Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture is a common knee injury among athletes and physically active adults. Despite surgical reconstruction and extensive rehabilitation, reinjuries are common and disability levels are high, even years after therapy and return to activity. Prolonged knee dysfunction may result in part from unresolved neuromuscular deficits of the surrounding joint musculature in response to injury. Indeed, “upstream” neurological adaptations occurring after injury may explain these persistent functional deficits. Despite evidence for injury consequences extending beyond the joint to the nervous system, the link between neurophysiological impairments and patient-reported measures of knee function remains unclear.
Hypothesis:
Patterns of brain activation for knee control are related to measures of patient-reported knee function in individuals after ACL reconstruction (ACL-R).
Study Design:
Cross-sectional study.
Level of Evidence:
Level 3.
Methods:
In this multicenter, cross-sectional study, participants with unilateral ACL-R (n = 25; 10 men, 15 women) underwent task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging testing. Participants performed repeated cycles of open-chain knee flexion/extension. Neural activation patterns during the movement task were quantified using blood oxygen level–dependent (BOLD) signals. Regions of interest were generated using the Juelich Histological Brain Atlas. Pearson product-moment correlations were used to determine the relationship between mean BOLD signal within each brain region and self-reported knee function level, as measured by the International Knee Documentation Committee index. Partial correlations were also calculated after controlling for time from surgery and sex.
Results:
Patient-reported knee function was positively and moderately correlated with the ipsilateral secondary somatosensory cortex (r = 0.57, P = 0.005) and the ipsilateral supplementary motor area (r = 0.51, P = 0.01).
Conclusion:
Increased ipsilateral secondary sensorimotor cortical activity is related to higher perceived knee function.
Clinical Relevance:
Central nervous system mechanisms for knee control are related to subjective levels of knee function after ACL-R. Increased neural activity may reflect central neuroplastic strategies to preserve knee functionality after traumatic injury.
BaoRWeiPLiK, et al. Within-limb somatotopic organization in human SI and parietal operculum for the leg: an fMRI study. Brain Res. 2012;1445:30-39.
2.
BenjaminiYHochbergY. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol. 1995;57:289-300.
3.
BeudelMZijlstraSMulderTZijdewindIde JongBM. Secondary sensory area SII is crucially involved in the preparation of familiar movements compared to movements never made before. Hum Brain Mapp. 2011;32:564-579.
4.
BlackburnJTDewigDRJohnstonCD. Time course of the effects of vibration on quadriceps function in individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2020;56:102508.
5.
BodkinSGoetschiusJHertelJHartJ. Relationships of muscle function and subjective knee function in patients after ACL reconstruction. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017;5:2325967117719041.
6.
BodkinSGNorteGEHartJM. Corticospinal excitability can discriminate quadriceps strength indicative of knee function after ACL-reconstruction. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2019;29:716-724.
7.
BretasRVTaokaMSuzukiHIrikiA. Secondary somatosensory cortex of primates: beyond body maps, toward conscious self-in-the-world maps. Exp Brain Res. 2020;238:259-272.
8.
CalvertMBlazebyJAltmanDG, et al. Reporting of patient-reported outcomes in randomized trials: the CONSORT PRO extension. JAMA. 2013;309:814-822.
9.
ChenRCohenLGHallettM. Role of the ipsilateral motor cortex in voluntary movement. Can J Neurol Sci. 1997;24:284-291.
10.
ChildsJDSpartoPJFitzgeraldGKBizziniMIrrgangJJ. Alterations in lower extremity movement and muscle activation patterns in individuals with knee osteoarthritis. Clin Biomech. 2004;19:44-49.
11.
ClarkBCMahatoNKNakazawaMLawTDThomasJS. The power of the mind: the cortex as a critical determinant of muscle strength/weakness. J Neurophysiol. 2014;112:3219-3226.
12.
CollinsNJMisraDFelsonDTCrossleyKMRoosEM. Measures of knee function: International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Physical Function Short Form (KOOS-PS), Knee Outcome Survey Activities of Daily Living Scale (KOS-ADL), Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Activity Rating Scale (ARS), and Tegner Activity Score (TAS). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011;63(suppl 11):S208-S228.
13.
Corradi-Dell’AcquaCTomasinoBFinkGR. What is the position of an arm relative to the body? Neural correlates of body schema and body structural description. J Neurosci. 2009;29:4162-4171.
14.
CourtneyCRineRMKrollP. Central somatosensory changes and altered muscle synergies in subjects with anterior cruciate ligament deficiency. Gait Posture. 2005;22:69-74.
15.
CourtneyCARineRM. Central somatosensory changes associated with improved dynamic balance in subjects with anterior cruciate ligament deficiency. Gait Posture. 2006;24:190-195.
16.
CrissCROnateJAGroomsDR. Neural activity for hip-knee control in those with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a task-based functional connectivity analysis. Neurosci Lett. 2020;730:134985.
17.
CrossESSchmittPJGraftonST. Neural substrates of contextual interference during motor learning support a model of active preparation. J Cogn Neurosci. 2007;19:1854-1871.
18.
DhillonMSBaliKPrabhakarS. Differences among mechanoreceptors in healthy and injured anterior cruciate ligaments and their clinical importance. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2012;2:38-43.
19.
DiekfussJAGroomsDRNissenKS, et al. Alterations in knee sensorimotor brain functional connectivity contributes to ACL injury in male high-school football players: a prospective neuroimaging analysis. Braz J Phys Ther. 2020;24:415-423.
20.
DuthonVBBareaCAbrassartSFaselJHFritschyDMénétreyJ. Anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006;14:204-213.
21.
EklundANicholsTEKnutssonH. Cluster failure: why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113:7900-7905.
22.
FischerAGErhart-HledikJCAsayJLChuCRAndriacchiTP. Activating the somatosensory system enhances net quadriceps moment during gait. J Biomech. 2019;82:149-155.
23.
ForssNJousmäkiV. Sensorimotor integration in human primary and secondary somatosensory cortices. Brain Res. 1998;781:259-267.
24.
GokelerANeuhausDBenjaminseAGroomsDRBaumeisterJ. Principles of motor learning to support neuroplasticity after ACL injury: implications for optimizing performance and reducing risk of second ACL injury. Sports Med. 2019;49:853-865.
25.
GroomsDAppelbaumGOnateJ. Neuroplasticity following anterior cruciate ligament injury: a framework for visual-motor training approaches in rehabilitation. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2015;45:381-393.
26.
GroomsDRCrissCRSimonJEHaggertyALWohlTR. Neural correlates of knee extension and flexion force control: a kinetically-instrumented neuroimaging study. Front Hum Neurosci. 2021;14:622637.
27.
GroomsDRDiekfussJAEllisJD, et al. A novel approach to evaluate brain activation for lower extremity motor control. J Neuroimaging. 2019;29:580-588.
HigginsLDTaylorMKParkD, et al. Reliability and validity of the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Form. Joint Bone Spine. 2007;74:594-599.
30.
IrrgangJJAndersonAFBolandAL, et al. Development and validation of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form. Am J Sports Med. 2001;29:600-613.
31.
JaegerLMarchal-CrespoLWolfPRienerRKolliasSMichelsL. Test-retest reliability of fMRI experiments during robot-assisted active and passive stepping. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2015;12:102.
32.
JenkinsonMBannisterPBradyMSmithS. Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. Neuroimage. 2002;17:825-841.
33.
Johansen-BergHRushworthMFSBogdanovicMDKischkaUWimalaratnaSMatthewsPM. The role of ipsilateral premotor cortex in hand movement after stroke. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:14518-14523.
34.
JohanssonHSjölanderPSojkaP. A sensory role for the cruciate ligaments. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991;268:161-178.
35.
KandelERSchwartzJHJessellTMSiegelbaumSAHudspethAJ, eds. Principles of Neural Science. 5th Edition.McGraw-Hill Education; 2012.
36.
KapreliEAthanasopoulosSGliatisJ, et al. Anterior cruciate ligament deficiency causes brain plasticity: a functional MRI study. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37:2419-2426.
37.
KapreliEAthanasopoulosSPapathanasiouM, et al. Lateralization of brain activity during lower limb joints movement. An fMRI study. Neuroimage. 2006;32:1709-1721.
38.
LampGGoodinPPalmerSLowEBarutchuACareyLM. Activation of bilateral secondary somatosensory cortex with right hand touch stimulation: a meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies. Front Neurol. 2019;9:1129.
39.
LepleyASGribblePAThomasACTevaldMASohnDHPietrosimoneBG. Quadriceps neural alterations in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed patients: a 6-month longitudinal investigation. Scand J Med Sci Sport. 2015;25:828-839.
40.
LepleyASGroomsDRBurlandJPDaviSMKinsella-ShawJMLepleyLK. Quadriceps muscle function following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: systemic differences in neural and morphological characteristics. Exp Brain Res. 2019;237:1267-1278.
41.
LepleyLK. Deficits in quadriceps strength and patient-oriented outcomes at return to activity after ACL reconstruction: a review of the current literature. Sports Health. 2015;7:231-238.
42.
LuY-CLiuH-QHuaX-Y, et al. Supplementary motor area deactivation impacts the recovery of hand function from severe peripheral nerve injury. Neural Regen Res. 2016;11:670-675.
43.
Luc-HarkeyBAHarkeyMSPamukoffDN, et al. Greater intracortical inhibition associates with lower quadriceps voluntary activation in individuals with ACL reconstruction. Exp Brain Res. 2017;235:1129-1137.
44.
LuftARSmithGVForresterL, et al. Comparing brain activation associated with isolated upper and lower limb movement across corresponding joints. Hum Brain Mapp. 2002;17:131-140.
45.
MaedaFPascual-LeoneA. Transcranial magnetic stimulation: studying motor neurophysiology of psychiatric disorders. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2003;168:359-376.
46.
MagnussenRAVerlageMFlaniganDCKaedingCCSpindlerKP. Patient-reported outcomes and their predictors at minimum 10 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Orthop J Sports Med. 2015;3:2325967115573706.
47.
MakhniECPadakiASPetridisPD, et al. High variability in outcome reporting patterns in high-impact ACL literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97:1529-1542.
48.
MallNAChalmersPNMoricM, et al. Incidence and trends of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the United States. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42:2363-2370.
49.
MazzolaLFaillenotIBarralFGMauguièreFPeyronR. Spatial segregation of somato-sensory and pain activations in the human operculo-insular cortex. Neuroimage. 2012;60:409-418.
50.
MullerBYabroudiMALynchA, et al. Defining thresholds for the patient acceptable symptom state for the IKDC Subjective Knee Form and KOOS for patients who underwent ACL reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44:2820-2826.
NachevPKennardCHusainM. Functional role of the supplementary and pre-supplementary motor areas. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008;9:856-869.
53.
NewtonJMDongYHidlerJ, et al. Reliable assessment of lower limb motor representations with fMRI: use of a novel MR compatible device for real-time monitoring of ankle, knee and hip torques. Neuroimage. 2008;43:136-146.
54.
OchiMIwasaJUchioYAdachiNKawasakiK. Induction of somatosensory evoked potentials by mechanical stimulation in reconstructed anterior cruciate ligaments. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84:761-766.
55.
OchiMIwasaJUchioYAdachiNSumenY. The regeneration of sensory neurones in the reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999;81:902-906.
56.
PietrosimoneBGLepleyASEricksenHMGribblePALevineJ. Quadriceps strength and corticospinal excitability as predictors of disability after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Sport Rehabil. 2013;22:1-6.
57.
PietrosimoneBGMcLeodMMLepleyAS. A theoretical framework for understanding neuromuscular response to lower extremity joint injury. Sports Health. 2012;4:31-35.
58.
PoortvlietPCTuckerKJFinniganSScottDSowmanPHodgesPW. Cortical activity differs between position- and force-control knee extension tasks. Exp Brain Res. 2015;233:3447-3457.
59.
PruimRHRMennesMBuitelaarJKBeckmannCF. Evaluation of ICA-AROMA and alternative strategies for motion artifact removal in resting state fMRI. Neuroimage. 2015;112:278-287.
60.
PruimRHRMennesMvan RooijDLleraABuitelaarJKBeckmannCF. ICA-AROMA: a robust ICA-based strategy for removing motion artifacts from fMRI data. Neuroimage. 2015;112:267-277.
RomoRSchultzW. Role of primate basal ganglia and frontal cortex in the internal generation of movements. Exp Brain Res. 1992;91:396-407.
63.
ShanahanCJHodgesPWWrigleyTVBennellKLFarrellMJ. Organisation of the motor cortex differs between people with and without knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2015;17:164.
64.
SjölanderPJohanssonHDjupsjöbackaM. Spinal and supraspinal effects of activity in ligament afferents. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2002;12:167-176.
65.
SmithSM. Fast robust automated brain extraction. Hum Brain Mapp. 2002;17:143-155.
66.
SmithSMJenkinsonMWoolrichMW, et al. Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage. 2004;23(suppl 1):S208-S219.
67.
Sonnery-CottetBSaithnaAQuelardB, et al. Arthrogenic muscle inhibition after ACL reconstruction: a scoping review of the efficacy of interventions. Br J Sports Med. 2019;53:289-298.
68.
SpindlerKPHustonLJChaginKM, et al. Ten-year outcomes and risk factors after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a MOON longitudinal prospective cohort study. Am J Sports Med. 2018;46:815-825.
69.
TamèLBraunCLingnauA, et al. The contribution of primary and secondary somatosensory cortices to the representation of body parts and body sides: an fMRI adaptation study. J Cogn Neurosci. 2012;24:2306-2320.
70.
TanjiJ. The supplementary motor area in the cerebral cortex. Neurosci Res. 1994;19:251-268.
71.
TegnerYLysholmJ. Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985;198:43-49.
72.
TergauFWanschuraVCaneloM, et al. Complete suppression of voluntary motor drive during the silent period after transcranial magnetic stimulation. Exp Brain Res. 1999;124:447-454.
73.
TomaKHondaMHanakawaT, et al. Activities of the primary and supplementary motor areas increase in preparation and execution of voluntary muscle relaxation: an event-related fMRI study. J Neurosci. 1999;19:3527-3534.
74.
van MelickNMeddelerBMHoogeboomTJNijhuis-vanderSandenMWGvan CingelREH. How to determine leg dominance: the agreement between self-reported and observed performance in healthy adults. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0189876.
75.
WardNS. Mechanisms underlying recovery of motor function after stroke. Postgrad Med J. 2005;81:510-514.
76.
WebsterKEFellerJA. Younger patients and men achieve higher outcome scores than older patients and women after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017;475:2472-2480.
77.
WoolrichMWBehrensTEJBeckmannCFJenkinsonMSmithSM. Multilevel linear modelling for FMRI group analysis using Bayesian inference. Neuroimage. 2004;21:1732-1747.
78.
WoolrichMWBehrensTEJSmithSM. Constrained linear basis sets for HRF modelling using variational Bayes. Neuroimage. 2004;21:1748-1761.
79.
WoolrichMWRipleyBDBradyMSmithSM. Temporal autocorrelation in univariate linear modeling of FMRI data. Neuroimage. 2001;14:1370-1386.
80.
ZarzyckiRMortonSMCharalambousCCMarmonASnyder-MacklerL. Corticospinal and intracortical excitability differ between athletes early after ACLR and matched controls. J Orthop Res. 2018;36:2941-2948.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
