Injury to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is among the most common orthopaedic injuries, and reconstruction of a ruptured ACL is a common orthopaedic procedure. In general, surgical intervention is necessary to restore stability to the injured knee, and to prevent meniscal damage. Along with surgery, intense postoperative physical therapy is needed to restore function to the injured extremity. ACL reconstruction (ACLR) has been the standard of care in recent decades, and advances in surgical technology have reintroduced the prospect of augmented primary repair of the native ACL via a variety of methods.
Evidence Acquisition:
A search of PubMed database of articles and reviews available in English was performed through 2020. The search terms ACLR, anterior cruciate ligament repair, bridge enhanced acl repair, suture anchor repair, dynamic intraligamentary stabilization, internal bracing, suture ligament augmentation, and internal brace ligament augmentation were used.
Study Design:
Clinical review.
Level of Evidence:
Level 5.
Results:
No exact consensus exists on effective rehabilitation protocols after ACL repair techniques, as the variation in published protocols seem even greater than the variation in those for ACLR. For some techniques such as internal bracing and dynamic interligamentary stabilization, it is likely permissible for the patients to progress to full weightbearing and discontinue bracing sooner. However, caution should be applied with regard to earlier return to sport than after ACLR as to minimize risk for retear.
Conclusion:
More research is needed to address how physical therapies must adapt to these innovative repair techniques. Until that is accomplished, we recommend that physical therapists understand the differences among the various ACL surgery techniques discussed here and work with the surgeons to develop a rehabilitation protocol for their mutual patients.
AchtnichAHerbstEForkelP, et al. Acute proximal anterior cruciate ligament tears: outcomes after arthroscopic suture anchor repair versus anatomic single-bundle reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2016;32:2562-2569.
2.
AndersonMJBrowningWMUrbandCEKluczynskiMABissonLJ. A systematic summary of systematic reviews on the topic of the anterior cruciate ligament. Orthop J Sports Med. 2016;4:2325967116634074.
3.
AndersonSRYoussefzadehKALimpisvastiO. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with suture tape augmentation: a surgical technique. Arthrosc Tech. 2019;8:e1579-e1582.
4.
ArdernCLTaylorNFFellerJAWebsterKE. Fifty-five per cent return to competitive sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis including aspects of physical functioning and contextual factors. Br J Sports Med. 2014;48:1543-1552.
5.
AteschrangAAhmadSSStöckleUSchroeterSSchenkWAhrendMD. Recovery of ACL function after dynamic intraligamentary stabilization is resultant to restoration of ACL integrity and scar tissue formation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018;26:589-595.
6.
BachmaierSDiFeliceGSSonnery-CottetB, et al. Treatment of acute proximal anterior cruciate ligament tears—part 2: the role of internal bracing on gap formation and stabilization of repair techniques. Orthop J Sports Med. 2020;8:2325967119897423.
7.
BeynnonBDJohnsonRJFlemingBCStankewichCJRenströmPANicholsCE. The strain behavior of the anterior cruciate ligament during squatting and active flexion-extension. A comparison of an open and a closed kinetic chain exercise. Am J Sports Med. 1997;25:823-829.
8.
BieriKSScholzSMKohlSAghayevEStaubLP. Dynamic intraligamentary stabilization versus conventional ACL reconstruction: a matched study on return to work. Injury. 2017;48:1243-1248.
9.
BigoniMGaddiDGorlaM, et al. Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament repair for proximal anterior cruciate ligament tears in skeletally immature patients: surgical technique and preliminary results. Knee. 2017;24:40-48.
10.
BousquetBAO’BrienLSingletonSBeggsM. Post-operative criterion based rehabilitation of acl repairs: a clinical commentary. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2018;13:293-305.
11.
BrayRCLeonardCASaloPT. Correlation of healing capacity with vascular response in the anterior cruciate and medial collateral ligaments of the rabbit.J Orthop Res. 2003;21:1118-1123.
12.
BüchlerLRegliDEvangelopoulosDS, et al. Functional recovery following primary ACL repair with dynamic intraligamentary stabilization. Knee. 2016;23:549-553.
13.
CalvertNDSmithAAcklandTKusterMSEbertJ. Kneeling difficulty is common following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring autograft and correlates with outcome measures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020;140:913-921.
14.
CareyJLSheaKG. AAOS Clinical practice guideline: management of anterior cruciate ligament injuries: evidence-based guideline. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015;23:e6-e8.
15.
CavanaughJTPowersM. ACL rehabilitation progression: where are we now?Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2017;10:289-296.
16.
ChambatPGuierCSonnery-CottetBFayardJMThaunatM. The evolution of ACL reconstruction over the last fifty years. Int Orthop. 2013;37:181-186.
17.
CookCNguyenLHegedusE, et al. Continental variations in preoperative and postoperative management of patients with anterior cruciate ligament repair. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2008;44:253-261.
18.
CsapoRPointnerHHoserCGföllerPRaschnerCFinkC. Physical fitness after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: influence of graft, age, and sex. Sports (Basel). 2020;8:30.
DekkerTJGodinJADaleKMGarrettWETaylorDCRibohJC. Return to sport after pediatric anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and its effect on subsequent anterior cruciate ligament injury. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99:897-904.
21.
DiFeliceGSvan der ListJP. Arthroscopic primary repair of proximal anterior cruciate ligament tears. Arthrosc Tech. 2016;5:e1057-e1061.
22.
DiFeliceGSvan der ListJP. Clinical outcomes of arthroscopic primary repair of proximal anterior cruciate ligament tears are maintained at mid-term follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2018;34:1085-1093.
23.
DiFeliceGSVillegasCTaylorS. Anterior cruciate ligament preservation: early results of a novel arthroscopic technique for suture anchor primary anterior cruciate ligament repair. Arthroscopy. 2015;31:2162-2171.
24.
EggliSKohlhofHZumsteinM, et al. Dynamic intraligamentary stabilization: novel technique for preserving the ruptured ACL. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23:1215-1221.
25.
EnglanderZABaldwinEL3rdSmithWARGarrettWESpritzerCEDeFrateLE. In vivo anterior cruciate ligament deformation during a single-legged jump measured by magnetic resonance imaging and high-speed biplanar radiography. Am J Sports Med. 2019;47:3166-3172.
26.
EscamillaRFMacleodTDWilkKEPaulosLAndrewsJR. Anterior cruciate ligament strain and tensile forces for weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing exercises: a guide to exercise selection. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012;42:208-220.
27.
FeaginJACurlWW. Isolated tear of the anterior cruciate ligament: 5-year follow-up study. Am J Sports Med. 1976;4:95-100.
28.
FlaggKYKaravatasSGThompsonSJrBennettC. Current criteria for return to play after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an evidence-based literature review. Ann Transl Med. 2019;7(suppl 7):S252.
29.
FlemingBCSpindlerKPPalmerMPMagarianEMMurrayMM. Collagen-platelet composites improve the biomechanical properties of healing anterior cruciate ligament grafts in a porcine model. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37:1554-1563.
FältströmAKvistJGauffinHHägglundM. Female soccer players with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction have a higher risk of new knee injuries and quit soccer to a higher degree than knee-healthy controls. Am J Sports Med. 2019;47:31-40.
32.
GagliardiAGCarryPMParikhHBTraverJLHowellDRAlbrightJC. ACL repair with suture ligament augmentation is associated with a high failure rate among adolescent patients. Am J Sports Med. 2019;47:560-566.
33.
GenelinFTrostAPrimavesiCKnollP. Late results following proximal reinsertion of isolated ruptured ACL ligaments. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1993;1:17-19.
34.
GipsmanAMTrasoliniNHatchGFR. Primary anterior cruciate ligament single-bundle repair with augmentation for a partial anterior cruciate ligament tear. Arthrosc Tech. 2018;7:e367-e372.
35.
GrantJAMohtadiNG. Two- to 4-year follow-up to a comparison of home versus physical therapy-supervised rehabilitation programs after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38:1389-1394.
36.
HeijneAFlemingBCRenstromPAPeuraGDBeynnonBDWernerS. Strain on the anterior cruciate ligament during closed kinetic chain exercises. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36:935-941.
37.
HenlePRöderCPerlerGHeitkemperSEggliS. Dynamic intraligamentary stabilization (dis) for treatment of acute anterior cruciate ligament ruptures: case series experience of the first three years. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015;16:27.
38.
HeusdensCHWHopperGPDosscheLRoelantEMackayGM. Anterior cruciate ligament repair with independent suture tape reinforcement: a case series with 2-year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019;27:60-67.
39.
HewettTEMyerGDFordKR, et al. Biomechanical measures of neuromuscular control and valgus loading of the knee predict anterior cruciate ligament injury risk in female athletes: a prospective study. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33:492-501.
40.
HoffmannCFriederichsJvon RüdenCSchallerCBührenVMoessmerC. Primary single suture anchor re-fixation of anterior cruciate ligament proximal avulsion tears leads to good functional mid-term results: a preliminary study in 12 patients. J Orthop Surg Res. 2017;12:171.
41.
HoogeslagRAGBrouwerRWBoerBCde VriesAJHuis In ‘t VeldR. Acute anterior cruciate ligament rupture: repair or reconstruction? Two-year results of a randomized controlled clinical trial. Am J Sports Med. 2019;47:567-577.
42.
JonkergouwAvan der ListJPDiFeliceGS. Arthroscopic primary repair of proximal anterior cruciate ligament tears: outcomes of the first 56 consecutive patients and the role of additional internal bracing. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019;27:21-28.
43.
JoshiSMMastrangeloANMagarianEMFlemingBCMurrayMM. Collagen-platelet composite enhances biomechanical and histologic healing of the porcine anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37:2401-2410.
44.
KandhariVVieiraTDOuanezarH, et al. Clinical outcomes of arthroscopic primary anterior cruciate ligament repair: a systematic review from the Scientific Anterior Cruciate Ligament Network International Study Group. Arthroscopy. 2020;36:594-612.
45.
KaplanNWickiewiczTLWarrenRF. Primary surgical treatment of anterior cruciate ligament ruptures. A long-term follow-up study. Am J Sports Med. 1990;18:354-358.
46.
KohlSEvangelopoulosDSAhmadSS, et al. A novel technique, dynamic intraligamentary stabilization creates optimal conditions for primary ACL healing: a preliminary biomechanical study. Knee. 2014;21:477-480.
47.
KohlSEvangelopoulosDSKohlhofH, et al. Anterior crucial ligament rupture: self-healing through dynamic intraligamentary stabilization technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21:599-605.
48.
KohlSEvangelopoulosDSSchärMOBieriKMüllerTAhmadSS. Dynamic intraligamentary stabilisation: initial experience with treatment of acute ACL ruptures. Bone Joint J. 2016;98-B:793-798.
49.
LeongNLKatorJLClemensTLJamesAEnamoto-IwamotoMJiangJ. Tendon and ligament healing and current approaches to tendon and ligament regeneration. J Orthop Res. 2020;38:7-12.
50.
LiQLiKZhanLHanQWuMZhangN. A hybrid repair technique combining single-bundle reconstruction and primary repair with internal brace augmentation for anterior cruciate ligament injury. Arthrosc Tech. 2020;9:e917-e923.
51.
Luque-SeronJAMedina-PorqueresI. Anterior cruciate ligament strain in vivo: a systematic review. Sports Health. 2016;8:451-455.
52.
MacKayGAnthonyICJenkinsPJBlythM. Anterior cruciate ligament repair revisited. preliminary results of primary repair with internal brace ligament augmentation: a case series. Orthop Muscul Syst. 2015;4:2.
MalahiasMAChytasDNakamuraKRaoulisVYokotaMNikolaouVS. A narrative review of four different new techniques in primary anterior cruciate ligament repair: “back to the future” or another trend?Sports Med Open. 2018;4:37.
55.
ManiarNSchacheAGPizzolatoCOparDA. Muscle contributions to tibiofemoral shear forces and valgus and rotational joint moments during single leg drop landing. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2020;30:1664-1674.
56.
MasseyPParkerDMcClaryKRobinsonJBartonRSSolitroGF. Biomechanical comparison of anterior cruciate ligament repair with internal brace augmentation versus anterior cruciate ligament repair without augmentation. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2020;77:105065.
57.
MeierbachtolAObermeierMYungtumW, et al. Injury-related fears during the return-to-sport phase of ACL reconstruction rehabilitation. Orthop J Sports Med. 2020;8:2325967120909385.
58.
MihelicRJurdanaHJotanovicZMadjarevicTTudorA. Long-term results of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison with non-operative treatment with a follow-up of 17-20 years. Int Orthop. 2011;35:1093-1097.
59.
MurrayMMFlemingBC. Biology of anterior cruciate ligament injury and repair: Kappa Delta Ann Doner Vaughn Award paper 2013. J Orthop Res. 2013;31:1501-1506.
60.
MurrayMMFlemingBCBadgerGJ, et al. Bridge-enhanced anterior cruciate ligament repair is not inferior to autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at 2 years: results of a prospective randomized clinical trial. Am J Sports Med. 2020;48:1305-1315.
61.
MurrayMMFlutieBMKalishLA, et al. The bridge-enhanced anterior cruciate ligament repair (BEAR) procedure: an early feasibility cohort study. Orthop J Sports Med. 2016;4:2325967116672176.
62.
MurrayMMKalishLAFlemingBC, et al. Bridge-enhanced anterior cruciate ligament repair: two-year results of a first-in-human study. Orthop J Sports Med. 2019;7:2325967118824356.
63.
MurrayMMMartinSDMartinTLSpectorM. Histological changes in the human anterior cruciate ligament after rupture. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82:1387-1397.
64.
MyerGDFordKRKhouryJSuccopPHewettTE. Development and validation of a clinic-based prediction tool to identify female athletes at high risk for anterior cruciate ligament injury. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38:2025-2033.
65.
NagelliCVHewettTE. Should return to sport be delayed until 2 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? Biological and functional considerations. Sports Med. 2017;47:221-232.
66.
NguyenDTDellbrüggeSTakPPWooSLBlankevoortLvan DijkNC. Histological characteristics of ligament healing after bio-enhanced repair of the transected goat ACL. J Exp Orthop. 2015;2:4.
67.
NguyenDTRamwadhdoebeTHvan der HartCPBlankevoortLTakPPvan DijkCN. Intrinsic healing response of the human anterior cruciate ligament: an histological study of reattached ACL remnants. J Orthop Res. 2014;32:296-301.
68.
PapaliaRTorreGPapaliaGCampiSMaffulliNDenaroV. Arthroscopic primary repair of the anterior cruciate ligament in adults: a systematic review.Br Med Bull. 2019;131:29-42.
69.
PerrimanALeahyESemciwAI. The effect of open- versus closed-kinetic-chain exercises on anterior tibial laxity, strength, and function following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2018;48:552-566.
RambaudAJMArdernCLThoreuxPRegnauxJPEdouardP. Criteria for return to running after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a scoping review.Br J Sports Med. 2018;52:1437-1444.
72.
RichmondJC. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2018;26:165-167.
73.
RisbergMAHolmIMyklebustGEngebretsenL. Neuromuscular training versus strength training during first 6 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized clinical trial. Phys Ther. 2007;87:737-750.
74.
Rodriguez-MerchanEC. Primary repair of the anterior cruciate ligament: a review of recent literature (2016-2017). Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2019;7:297-300.
75.
SandersTLMaradit KremersHBryanAJ, et al. Incidence of anterior cruciate ligament tears and reconstruction: a 21-year population-based study. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44:1502-1507.
76.
SandersTLPareekAKremersHM, et al. Long-term follow-up of isolated ACL tears treated without ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25:493-500.
77.
ShaerfDAPastidesPSSarrafKMWillis-OwenCA. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction best practice: a review of graft choice. World J Orthop. 2014;5:23-29.
78.
ShermanMFLieberLBonamoJRPodestaLReiterI. The long-term followup of primary anterior cruciate ligament repair. Defining a rationale for augmentation. Am J Sports Med. 1991;19:243-255.
TaylorSAKhairMMRobertsTRDiFeliceGS. Primary repair of the anterior cruciate ligament: a systematic review. Arthroscopy. 2015;31:2233-2247.
81.
TylerTFMcHughMPGleimGWNicholasSJ. The effect of immediate weightbearing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;357:141-148.
82.
van der ListJPDiFeliceGS. Arthroscopic primary anterior cruciate ligament repair with suture augmentation. Arthrosc Tech. 2017;6:e1529-e1534.
83.
van der ListJPDiFeliceGS. Range of motion and complications following primary repair versus reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Knee. 2017;24:798-807.
84.
van EckCFLimpisvastiOElAttracheNS. Is there a role for internal bracing and repair of the anterior cruciate ligament? A systematic literature review. Am J Sports Med. 2018;46:2291-2298.
85.
van GrinsvenSvan CingelREHollaCJvan LoonCJ. Evidence-based rehabilitation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18:1128-1144.
86.
van MelickNvan CingelREBrooijmansF, et al. Evidence-based clinical practice update: practice guidelines for anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation based on a systematic review and multidisciplinary consensus. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50:1506-1515.
87.
VermeijdenHDvan der ListJPDiFeliceGS. Arthroscopic primary repair of the anterior cruciate ligament with single-bundle graft augmentation. Arthrosc Tech. 2020;9:e367-e373.
88.
VermeijdenHDvan der ListJPO’BrienRDiFeliceGS. Patients forget about their operated knee more following arthroscopic primary repair of the anterior cruciate ligament than following reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2020;36:797-804.
89.
VermeijdenHDYangXAvan der ListJPDiFeliceGS. Large variation in indications, preferred surgical technique and rehabilitation protocol for primary anterior cruciate ligament repair: a survey among ESSKA members. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020;28:3613-3621.
90.
WidnerMDunleavyMLynchS. Outcomes following ACL reconstruction based on graft type: are all grafts equivalent?Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2019;12:460-465.
XieXXiaoZLiQ, et al. Increased incidence of osteoarthritis of knee joint after ACL reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts than hamstring autografts: a meta-analysis of 1,443 patients at a minimum of 5 years. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015;25:149-159.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
