There is limited information on the appropriate timing of return to sports after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. A composite test was developed to assess the athlete’s ability to return to sports after ACL reconstruction: the Knee Santy Athletic Return To Sport (K-STARTS) test.
Hypothesis:
The K-STARTS test meets validation criteria for an outcome score assessing readiness for return to sports after ACL reconstruction.
Study Design:
Diagnostic study.
Level of Evidence:
Level 3.
Methods:
A prospective comparative study identified 410 participants: 371 participants who had undergone ACL reconstruction and a control group of 39 healthy participants. The K-STARTS score is calculated as the sum of 7 tests (8 components), for a maximal value of 21 points. Construct validity, internal consistency, discriminant validity, and sensitivity to change were used to validate this new test.
Results:
The K-STARTS assessment showed a high completion rate (100%), high reproducibility (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.87; coefficient of variation, 7.8%), and high sensitivity to change. There was moderate correlation with the ACL Return to Sports after Injury scale (ACL-RSI) and hop tests. There were no ceiling or floor effects. There was a significant difference between K-STARTS scores assessed at 6 and 8 months postoperatively (11.2 ± 2.7 vs 17.1 ± 3.2; P < 0.001). The K-STARTS score in the control group was significantly higher than that in the ACL reconstruction group (17.3 ± 2.1 and 13.7 ± 3.8, respectively; P < 0.001).
Conclusion:
The K-STARTS test is an objective outcome measure for functional improvement after ACL reconstruction.
Clinical Relevance:
It is important for the clinician to determine when return to sports is optimal after ACL reconstruction to reduce the current high risk of reinjury.
AlmangoushAHerringtonL. Functional performance testing and patient reported outcomes following ACL reconstruction: a systematic scoping review. Int Sch Res Notices. 2014;2014:613034.
2.
ArdernCL. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction—not exactly a one-way ticket back to the preinjury level. Sports Health. 2015;7:224-230.
3.
ArdernCLGlasgowPSchneidersAet al. 2016 consensus statement on return to sport from the First World Congress in Sports Physical Therapy, Bern. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50:853-864.
4.
ArdernCLÖsterbergATagessonSGauffinHWebsterKEKvistJ. The impact of psychological readiness to return to sport and recreational activities after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Br J Sports Med. 2014;48:1613-1619.
5.
ArdernCLTaylorNFFellerJAWebsterKE. Fifty-five per cent return to competitive sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis including aspects of physical functioning and contextual factors. Br J Sports Med. 2014;48:1543-1552.
6.
ArdernCLTaylorNFFellerJAWebsterKE. Return-to-sport outcomes at 2 to 7 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40:41-48.
7.
Barber-WestinSDNoyesFR. Factors used to determine return to unrestricted sports activities after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2011;27:1697-1705.
8.
BollenSRScottBW. Rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament—a quiet epidemic?Injury. 1996;27:407-409.
9.
CzupponSRacetteBAKleinSEHarris-HayesM. Variables associated with return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2014;48:356-364.
10.
FrankCBJacksonDW. The science of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:1556-1576.
11.
GianottiSMMarshallSWHumePABuntL. Incidence of anterior cruciate ligament injury and other knee ligament injuries: a national population-based study. J Sci Med Sport. 2009;12:622-627.
12.
GoetschiusJSmithHCVacekPMet al. Application of a clinic-based algorithm as a tool to identify female athletes at risk for anterior cruciate ligament injury. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40:1978-1984.
13.
GrassiAVascellariACombiATomaelloLCanataGLZaffagniniS. Return to sport after ACL reconstruction: a survey between the Italian Society of Knee, Arthroscopy, Sport, Cartilage and Orthopaedic Technologies (SIGASCOT) members. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2016;26:509-516.
14.
GrindemHSnyder-MacklerLMoksnesHEngebretsenLRisbergMA. Simple decision rules can reduce reinjury risk by 84% after ACL reconstruction: the Delaware-Oslo ACL cohort study. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50:804-808.
15.
GustavssonANeeterCThomeéPet al. A test battery for evaluating hop performance in patients with an ACL injury and patients who have undergone ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006;14:778-788.
16.
HachanaYChaabèneHBen RajebGet al. Validity and reliability of new agility test among elite and subelite under 14-soccer players. PLoS One. 2014;9:e95773.
17.
HarrisJDAbramsGDBachBRet al. Return to sport after ACL reconstruction. Orthopedics. 2014;37:e103-e108.
18.
HartiganEHAxeMJSnyder-MacklerL. Time line for noncopers to pass return-to-sports criteria after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Sport Phys Ther. 2010;40:141-154.
19.
HerbstEHoserCHildebrandtCet al. Functional assessments for decision-making regarding return to sports following ACL reconstruction. Part II: clinical application of a new test battery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23:1283-1291.
20.
HerringtonLMyerGHorsleyI. Task based rehabilitation protocol for elite athletes following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a clinical commentary. Phys Ther Sport. 2013;14:188-198.
21.
HewettTEMyerGDFordKRet al. Biomechanical measures of neuromuscular control and valgus loading of the knee predict anterior cruciate ligament injury risk in female athletes: a prospective study. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33:492-501.
22.
HildebrandtCMüllerLZischBHuberRFinkCRaschnerC. Functional assessments for decision-making regarding return to sports following ACL reconstruction. Part I: development of a new test battery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23:1273-1281.
23.
IrrgangJJHoHHarnerCDFuFH. Use of the International Knee Documentation Committee guidelines to assess outcome following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1998;6:107-114.
24.
ItohHKurosakaMYoshiyaSIchihashiNMizunoK. Evaluation of functional deficits determined by four different hop tests in patients with anterior cruciate ligament deficiency. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1998;6:241-245.
25.
KamathGVMurphyTCreightonRAViradiaNTaftTNSpangJT. Anterior cruciate ligament injury, return to play, and reinjury in the elite collegiate athlete. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42:1638-1643.
26.
KyritsisPBahrRLandreauPMiladiRWitvrouwE. Likelihood of ACL graft rupture: not meeting six clinical discharge criteria before return to sport is associated with a four times greater risk of rupture. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50:946-951.
27.
LabouteESavalliLPuigPet al. Analysis of return to competition and repeat rupture for 298 anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with patellar or hamstring tendon autograft in sportspeople. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2010;53:598-614.
28.
LangfordJLWebsterKEFellerJA. A prospective longitudinal study to assess psychological changes following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Br J Sports Med. 2009;43:377-378.
29.
LeysTSalmonLWallerALinklaterJPinczewskiL. Clinical results and risk factors for reinjury 15 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40:595-605.
30.
LindMMenhertFPedersenAB. The first results from the Danish ACL reconstruction registry: epidemiologic and 2 year follow-up results from 5,818 knee ligament reconstructions. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009;17:117-124.
31.
LoevingerJ. The attenuation paradox in test theory. Psychol Bull. 1954;51:493-504.
32.
LysholmJGillquistJ.Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale. Am J Sports Med. 1982;10:150-154.
33.
MarxRGJonesECAllenAAet al. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of four knee outcome scales for athletic patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83-A:1459-1469.
34.
MascarenhasRTranovichMKarpieJCIrrgangJJFuFHHarnerCD. Patellar tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the high-demand patient: evaluation of autograft versus allograft reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2010;26(suppl 9):S58-S66.
35.
MihelicRJurdanaHJotanovicZMadjarevicTTudorA. Long-term results of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison with non-operative treatment with a follow-up of 17-20 years. Int Orthop. 2011;35:1093-1097.
36.
MokkinkLBTerweeCBPatrickDLet al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63:737-745.
37.
MorganMDSalmonLJWallerARoeJPPinczewskiLA. Fifteen-year survival of endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients aged 18 years and younger. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44:384-392.
38.
MunroAGHerringtonLC. Between-session reliability of four hop tests and the agility t-test. J Strength Cond Res. 2011;25:1470-1477.
39.
NagelliCVHewettTE. Should return to sport be delayed until 2 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? Biological and functional considerations. Sports Med. 2017;47:221-232.
40.
NawasrehZLogerstedtDCummerKAxeMJRisbergMASnyder-MacklerL. Do patients failing return-to-activity criteria at 6 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction continue demonstrating deficits at 2 years?Am J Sports Med. 2017;45:1037-1048.
41.
NoyesFRBarberSDMangineRE. Abnormal lower limb symmetry determined by function hop tests after anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Am J Sports Med. 1991;19:513-518.
42.
NwachukwuBUVoletiPBBerkanishPet al. Return to play and patient satisfaction after ACL reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99:720-725.
43.
O’DonoghueDH. An analysis of end results of surgical treatment of major injuries to the ligaments of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1955;37-A:1-13.
44.
PaternoMVSchmittLCFordKRet al. Biomechanical measures during landing and postural stability predict second anterior cruciate ligament injury after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and return to sport. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38:1968-1978.
45.
SalmonLRussellVMusgroveTPinczewskiLRefshaugeK. Incidence and risk factors for graft rupture and contralateral rupture after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2005;21:948-957.
46.
SchmittN. Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. Psychol Assess. 1996;8:350-353.
47.
ShelbourneKDGrayT. Results of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction based on meniscus and articular cartilage status at the time of surgery. Am J Sports Med. 2000;28:446-452.
48.
SpindlerKPWrightRW. Anterior cruciate ligament tear. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2135-2142.
49.
TerweeCBBotSDde BoerMRet al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:34-42.
50.
ThomeéRNeeterCGustavssonAet al. Variability in leg muscle power and hop performance after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20:1143-1151.
51.
TrippDAStanishWDReardonGCoadyCSullivanMJ. Comparing postoperative pain experiences of the adolescent and adult athlete after anterior cruciate ligament surgery. J Athl Train. 2003;38:154-157.
52.
WebsterKEFellerJALambrosC. Development and preliminary validation of a scale to measure the psychological impact of returning to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Phys Ther Sport. 2008;9:9-15.
53.
WebsterKEFellerJALeighWBRichmondAK. Younger patients are at increased risk for graft rupture and contralateral injury after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42:641-647.
54.
WigginsAJGrandhiRKSchneiderDKStanfieldDWebsterKEMyerGD. Risk of secondary injury in younger athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44:1861-1876.
55.
WrightRWMagnussenRADunnWRSpindlerKP. Ipsilateral graft and contralateral ACL rupture at five years or more following ACL reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93:1159-1165.
56.
ZazulakBTHewettTEReevesNPGoldbergBCholewickiJ. Deficits in neuromuscular control of the trunk predict knee injury risk. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35:1123-1130.
