Influence of Body Position on Shoulder and Trunk Muscle Activation During Resisted Isometric Shoulder External Rotation

Abstract

Background:

External rotation (ER) strengthening of the shoulder is an integral component of rehabilitative and preventative programs for overhead athletes. A variety of shoulder ER strengthening exercises are reported, including those intended to integrate the core musculature. The purpose of this study was to examine ER torque and electromyographic (EMG) activation of shoulder and trunk muscles while performing resisted isometric shoulder ER in 3 positions (standing, side lying, and side plank).

Hypothesis:

Significantly greater force and shoulder muscle activation would be generated while side lying given the inherent stability of the position, and greater trunk muscle activation would be generated in the less stable plank position.

Study Design:

Quasi-experimental repeated-measures study.

Level of Evidence:

Level 5.

Methods:

A convenience sample of 25 healthy overhead recreational athletes (9 men, 16 women) participated in this study. EMG electrodes were placed on the infraspinatus, posterior deltoid, middle trapezius, multifidi, internal obliques, and external obliques. EMG signals were normalized to a maximal isometric contraction. Participants performed resisted isometric ER in standing, side-lying, and side plank positions. Results were analyzed using a repeated-measures analysis of variance with post hoc Bonferroni corrections (α = 0.05).

Results:

There was no significant difference in ER torque between positions (α = 0.05). A significant difference in EMG activity of shoulder and trunk musculature between positions was found in 7 of the 8 muscles monitored. Significantly greater EMG activity in the infraspinatus, middle trapezius, and the nondominant external and internal obliques was found in the side plank position as compared with standing and side lying.

Conclusion:

While there was no difference in ER torque between the 3 exercise positions, EMG activity of the shoulder and trunk muscles was dependent on body position.

Clinical Relevance:

If a clinician is seeking to integrate trunk muscle activation while performing shoulder ER strengthening, the side plank position is preferred as compared with standing or side lying.

Keywords

electromyography shoulder strengthening

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andersen

Magnusson

Nielsen

Haleem

Poulsen

Aagaard

. Neuromuscular activation in conventional therapeutic exercises and heavy resistance exercises: implications for rehabilitation. Phys Ther. 2006;86:683-697.

Ayotte

Stetts

Keenan

Greenway

. Electromyographical analysis of selected lower extremity muscles during 5 unilateral weight-bearing exercises. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007;37:48-55.

Brumitt

Dale

. Integrating shoulder and core exercises when rehabilitating athletes performing overhead activities. N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 2009;4:132-138.

Carpenter

Blasier

Pellizzon

. The effects of muscle fatigue on shoulder joint position sense. Am J Sports Med. 1998;26:262-265.

Crisswell

, ed. Cram’s Introduction to Surface Electromyography. 2nd ed. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett; 2011.

De Mey

Danneels

Cagnie

Huyghe

Seyns

Cools

. Conscious correction of scapular orientation in overhead athletes performing selected shoulder rehabilitation exercises: the effect on trapezius muscle activation measured by surface electromyography. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2013;43:3-10.

Ekstrom

Donatelli

Carp

. Electromyographic analysis of core trunk, hip, and thigh muscles during 9 rehabilitation exercises. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007;37:754-762.

Escamilla

McTaggart

Fricklas

et al . An electromyographic analysis of commercial and common abdominal exercises: implications for rehabilitation and training. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006;36:45-57.

Hirashima

Kadota

Sakurai

Kudo

Ohtsuki

. Sequential muscle activity and its functional role in the upper extremity and trunk during overarm throwing. J Sports Sci. 2002;20:301-310.

10.

Hislop

Avers

Brown

. Daniels and Worthingham’s Muscle Testing: Techniques of Manual Examination and Performance Testing. 9th ed. St Louis, MO: Elsevier; 2014.

11.

Kibler

Press

Sciascia

. The role of core stability in athletic function. Sports Med. 2006;36:189-198.

12.

Olsen

2nd Fleisig

Dun

Loftice

Andrews

. Risk factors for shoulder and elbow injuries in adolescent baseball pitchers. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34:905-912.

13.

Reinold

Curtis

. Microinstability of the shoulder in the overhead athlete. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2013;8:601-616.

14.

Reinold

Wilk

Fleisig

et al . Electromyographic analysis of the rotator cuff and deltoid musculature during common shoulder external rotation exercises. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2004;34:385-394.

15.

Waite

Brookham

Dickerson

. On the suitability of using surface electrode placements to estimate muscle activity of the rotator cuff as recorded by intramuscular electrodes. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2010:20:903-911.

16.

Wilk

Yenchak

Arrigo

Andrews

. The Advanced Throwers Ten Exercise Program: a new exercise series for enhanced dynamic shoulder control in the overhead throwing athlete. Phys Sportsmed. 2011;39:90-97.