The introduction to this special issue considers the political potential of enactments of artful inquiry. The editors examine how taking up artful practices as a way of making knowledge, turning to artists as theorists and philosophers, presenting findings visually, poetically, or through other evocative means, reorients, and reimagines the epistemological, ontological, and axiological assumptions of social science research. In doing so, we argue that artful inquiry offers an avenue for practicing radical hope, interrupting, and troubling logics of modernity/coloniality/white supremacy in social science research.
CannellaG. S.PerezM. S.PasqueP. A. (Eds.), (2015). Critical qualitative inquiry: Foundations and futures. Left Coast Press.
5.
ChangfootN.RiceC.ChandlerE. (2024). Introduction to the special issue “Rethinking artful politics: Bodies of difference remaking body worlds”. Social Sciences, 13(6), 304. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13060304
6.
CooglerC. H. (2023). Not just surface: Embroidering beyond [Embroidery installation]. The University of Alabama.
deSouzaA. A. (2018). In How art can be thought: A handbook for change. Duke University Press Books.
11.
de OliveiraV. M. (2021). Hospicing modernity: Facing humanity’s wrongs and the implications for social activism. North Atlantic Books.
12.
FinleyS. (2014). An Introduction to critical arts-based research: Demonstrating methodologies and practices of a radical ethical aesthetic. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 14(6), 531–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708614548123
13.
FlintM. A. (2019). Methodological orientations: College student navigations of race and pace in higher education. [Doctoral Dissertation, University of Alabama]. Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
GuyotteK. W.Philosophies of artful inquiry as legible resistance. In SalvoJ.UlmerJ. (Eds.), Routledge encyclopedia of qualitative methods. Routledge. (in press-a).
18.
HartmanS. (2019). Wayward lives, beautiful experiments: Intimate histories of riotous Black girls, troublesome women, and queer radicals. WW Norton & Company.
19.
HonigB. (2013). A feminist theory of refusal. Harvard University Press.
20.
LatherP. (2004). This IS your father’s paradigm: Government intrusion and the case of qualitative research in education. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(1), 15–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800403256154
21.
LincolnY. S.CannellaG. S. (2004). Dangerous discourses: Methodological conservatism and governmental regimes of truth. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800403259717
22.
LovelessN. (2019). How to make art at the end of the world: A manifesto for research-creation. Duke University Press Books.
23.
ManningE. (2016). The minor gesture. Duke University Press.
Osei-KofiN. (2013). The emancipatory potential of arts-based research for social justice. Equity & Excellence in Education, 46(1), 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2013.750202
Plato. (1984). The gorgias. In The dialogues of Plato. (Vol 1). Yale. (R. E. Allen, Trans.) (Original work published c. 380 B.C.E.).
40.
Plato. (1992). The republic. Hackett Publishing Company. (G. M. A. Grube, Trans., C. D.C. Reeve, Reviser) (Original work published c. 380 B.C.E.).
41.
RichA. (2001). Arts of the possible: Essays and conversations. WW Norton & Company.
42.
Rogowska-StangretM.CielemęckaO. (2020). Vulnerable academic performances. Dialogue on matters of voice and silence in academia. Matter: Journal of New Materialist Research, 1(1), 23–51. https://doi.org/10.1344/jnmr.v1i1.30161
SousanisN. (2015). Unflattening. Harvard University Press.
47.
ToliverS. R. (2021). Recovering Black storytelling in qualitative research (1st ed.). Routledge.
48.
ToliverS. R.HadleyH. L. (2021). Ca(n)non fodder no more: Disrupting common arguments that support a canonical empire. Journal of Language and Literacy Education, 17(2), 1–28. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1342503.pdf
