The following texts, by three critical session leaders, provide perhaps a conclusion to the special issue articles, but more importantly, may serve as “feedback loops” for becomings-with future present critical qualitative inquiries, for more just becomings that we have not thought. We become-with a new scholar who shares the important issues of her life as a beginning researcher, and we become-with two more senior researchers who share their critical experiences along with possibilities for reconceptualizing critical work as ethical ontologies.
BacchiC. (2012). Why study problematizations? Making politics visible. Open Journal of Political Science, 2(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojps.2012.21001
3.
BuchananI. (2020). Assemblage theory and method. Bloomsbury.
4.
ButlerJ. (2021). The force of non-violence. Verso Press.
5.
FoucaultM. (1988). Power, moral values, and the intellectual: Interview with michael bess. History of the present.
6.
FoucaultM. (2000). For an ethic of discomfort. In FaubionJ. (Ed.), Power. New Press.
7.
GuyotteK. W.KuntzA. M. (2018). Becoming openly faithful: Qualitative pedagogyand paradigmatic slippage. International Review of Qualitative Research, 11(3), 256–270. https://doi.org/10.1525/irqr.2018.11.3.256
KincheloeJ. L.McLarenP. I. (1994). Rethinking critical theory and qualitative research. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 138–157). Sage.
10.
St PierreE. A. (2015). Practices for the “new” in the new empiricisms, the new materialisms, and post qualitaitve inquiry. In DenzinN.GiardinaM. (Eds.), Qualtiative inquiry and the politics of research (pp. 75–95). Left Coast Press.
