This article is reaction of article Adams (2017) and call of establishing criteria. Author wants to say, that is not good call. Such call can bring poison fruits. Author say that we don’t need any criteria to do autoethongraphy, we just need safe space to meet and speak together.
AdamsT. E. (2017). Autoethnographic responsibilities. International Review of Qualitative Research, 10(1), 62–66.doi:10.1525/irqr.2017.10.1.62
2.
BallS. J. (2012). Performativity, commodification and commitment: An I-Spy guide to the neoliberal university. British Journal of Educational Studies, 60(1), 17–28.doi:10.1080/00071005.2011.650940
EllisC. (2000). Creating criteria: An ethnographic short story. Qualitative Inquiry, 6(2), 273–277.doi:10.1177/107780040000600210
9.
FosterE. (2017). Academic labor in the age of anxiety: Autoethnography matters. Cultural Studies Critical Methodologies, 17(4), 320–326.doi:10.1177/1532708617706124
GaleK.WyattJ. (2017). Working at the wonder: Collaborative writing as method of inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(5), 355–364.doi:10.1177/1077800416659086
12.
GołębniakD. (2014). O “upedagogicznianiu” szkoły poprzez akademicki dyskurs edukacyjny: Ku autoetnografii [On“pedagogisation” of school through academic discourse on education: Toward autoethnography]. Forum Oświatowe, 2(52), 147–169.
13.
HoltN. L. (2003). Representation, legitimation, and autoethnography: An autoethnographic writing story. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2(1), 18–28.doi:10.1177/160940690300200102
14.
LatherP. (2007). Getting lost: Feminist efforts towards a double(d) science. State University of New York.
15.
LewisT. E. (2017). Bayond mensure: Studying the educational logic of Patti Lather’s getting lost. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(4), 300–308.
16.
OzgaJ. (2008). Governing knowledge: Research steering and research quality. European Educational Research Journal, 7(3), 261–272.doi:10.2304/eerj.2008.7.3.261
17.
PeliasR. J. (2005). Performative writing as scholarship: An apology, an argument, an anecdote. Cultural Studies Critical Methodologies, 5(4), 415–424.doi:10.1177/1532708605279694
18.
PeliasR. J. (2017). Still here, writing, trying to be a part of the conversation. Cultural Studies Critical Methodologies, 17(4), 364–365.doi:10.1177/1532708617706130
19.
PitardJ. (2017). A journey to the centre of self: Positioning the researcher in autoethnography. Forum Qualitative Socialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 18(3), Art 10.
20.
PoulosC. N. (2017). Under pressure. Cultural Studies Critical Methodologies, 17(4), 308–315.doi:10.1177/1532708617706122
SparkesA. C. (2000). Autoethnography and narratives of self: Reflections on criteria in action. Sociology of Sport Journal, 17(1), 21–43.doi:10.1123/ssj.17.1.21
23.
SpeedyJ. (2005). Writing as inquiry: Some ideas, practices, opportunities and constraints. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 5(1), 63–64.doi:10.1080/14733140512331343930
24.
SpeedyJ. (2012). Collaborative writing and ethical know-how. Moment within the space around scholarship, the academy and the social research imaginary. International Review of Qualitative Research, 5(4), 349–356.
25.
SzwabowskiO.WężniejewskaP. (2017). An (CO) autoethnography story about going against the neoliberal didactic machine. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 15(3), 105–144.
