As generative artificial intelligence (AI) reshapes news production, understanding what drives global audiences to accept AI-generated news is critical. Existing research largely adopts a competence-based perspective, neglecting the complex role of trust dimensions and macro-political contexts. This study examines how AI self-efficacy interacts with two distinct dimensions of trust (competence trust and ethical trust) to shape acceptance of AI-generated news, and how these relationships vary across political environments. Analyzing survey data from 24,000 respondents across twenty-four countries, we find that ethical trust is a substantially stronger predictor of acceptance than competence trust, while AI self-efficacy promotes acceptance only when ethical trust is high. Multilevel analysis incorporating national-level indicators (press freedom, regime type, and AI readiness) reveals that the relationship between ethical trust and acceptance is stronger in open, liberal democratic, and technologically ready societies. These findings suggest that the legitimacy of AI-generated news is more strongly associated with audiences’ ethical evaluations of AI systems than with perceived technical capability, and that this association is shaped by the normative expectations that different political contexts cultivate.
AfrooghS.AkbariA.MaloneE.KargarM.AlambeigiH.2024. “Trust in AI: Progress, Challenges, and Future Directions.” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications11: 1568.
2.
AraujoT.HelbergerN.KruikemeierS.de VreeseC. H.2020. “In AI We Trust? Perceptions About Automated Decision-Making By Artificial Intelligence.” Ai & Society35, no. 3: 611–23.
3.
AysolmazB.MüllerR.MeachamD.2023. “The Public Perceptions of Algorithmic Decision-Making Systems: Results From A Large-Scale Survey.” Telematics and Informatics79: 101954.
4.
BanduraA.1993. “Perceived Self-Efficacy in Cognitive Development and Functioning.” Educational Psychologist28, no. 2: 117–48.
5.
BanduraA.1997. Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. W H Freeman/Times Books/ Henry Holt & Co.
6.
BoonS. D.HolmesJ. G.1991. “The Dynamics Of Interpersonal Trust: Resolving Uncertainty In the Face of Risk.” In Cooperation and prosocial behavior (pp. 190–211), edited by HindeR. A.GroebelJ.Cambridge University Press.
7.
BrüggemannM.EngesserS.BüchelF.HumprechtE.CastroL.2014. “Hallin and Mancini Revisited: Four Empirical Types of Western Media Systems.” Journal of Communication64, no. 6: 1037–65.
ChoungH.DavidP.RossA.2023. “Trust In AI and Its Role In the Acceptance of AI Technologies.” International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction39, no. 9: 1727–39.
10.
CompeauD. R.HigginsC. A.1995. “Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of A Measure and Initial Test.” MIS Quarterly19, no. 2: 189–211.
11.
DiakopoulosN.2019. Automating the News: How Algorithms are Rewriting the Media. Harvard University Press.
GliksonE.WoolleyA. W.2020. “Human Trust In Artificial Intelligence: Review of Empirical Research.” Academy of management annals14, no. 2: 627–60.
14.
GondweG.2025. “Perceptions of AI-Driven News Among Contemporary Audiences: A Study of Trust, Engagement, and Impact.” AI & Society40, no. 7: 5637–48.
15.
GoyanesM.UtzS.Gil de ZúñigaH.2026. “Trust In AI News, AI Literacy, and the Mediating Role of Artificial Intelligence Attitudes: A Longitudinal Study Across Diverse Societies.” Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans7: 100279.
16.
GraefeA.HaimM.HaarmannB.BrosiusH. B.2018. “Readers’ Perception of Computer-Generated News: Credibility, Expertise, and Readability.” Journalism19, no. 5: 595–610.
17.
HallinD. C.ManciniP.2004. Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge University Press.
18.
HallinD. C.ManciniP. (Eds.). 2011. Comparing Media Systems Beyond the Western world. Cambridge University Press.
19.
HanitzschT.Van DalenA.SteindlN.2018. “Caught In the Nexus: A Comparative and Longitudinal Analysis of Public Trust In the Press.” The International Journal of Press/Politics23, no. 1: 3–23.
20.
HeimS.Chan-OlmstedS.2023. “Consumer Trust In Ai–Human News Collaborative Continuum: Preferences and Influencing Factors By News Production Phases.” Journalism and Media4, no. 3: 946–65.
21.
HenselerJ.RingleC. M.SarstedtM.2015. “A New Criterion For Assessing Discriminant Validity In Variance-Based Structural Equation Modeling.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science43, no. 1: 115–35.
22.
JangW.KwakD. H.BucyE.2024. “Knowledge of Automated Journalism Moderates Evaluations of Algorithmically Generated News.” New Media & Society26, no. 10: 5898–922.
23.
KarpaD.RochlitzM.2025. “Authoritarian Surveillance and Public Support For Digital Governance Solutions.” Comparative Political Studies58, no. 10: 2237–65.
24.
KelleyP. G.YangY.HeldrethC.MoessnerC.SedleyA.KrammA., et al. 2021. “Exciting, useful, worrying, futuristic: Public perception of artificial intelligence in 8 countries.” Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, Virtual Event, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3461702.3462605.
25.
KimJ.GirouxM.LeeJ. C.2021. “When Do You Trust AI? The Effect of Number Presentation Detail On Consumer Trust and Acceptance of AI Recommendations.” Psychology & Marketing38, no. 7: 1140–55.
26.
LeuppertR.WeinmannC.EidenJ.2025. “AI-Reporters As the Future of Journalism? Investigating Recipients' Credibility Evaluations of AI-Authored News.” Journalism. Published ahead of print September 25. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849251382484.
27.
LewisS. C.BroussardM.DiakopoulosN.GuzmanA. L.AbebeR.DupagneM., et al. 2019. “Artificial Intelligence and Journalism.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly96, no. 3: 673–95.
28.
LiM.BitterlyT. B.2024. “How Perceived Lack of Benevolence Harms Trust of Artificial Intelligence Management.” Journal of Applied Psychology109, no. 11: 1794–816.
29.
LoggJ. M.MinsonJ. A.MooreD. A.2019. “Algorithm Appreciation: People Prefer Algorithmic To Human Judgment.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes151: 90–103.
30.
LongD.MagerkoB.2020. “What is AI Literacy? Competencies and Design Considerations.” Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Honolulu, HI, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376727.
31.
MaasC. J. M.HoxJ. J.2005. “Sufficient Sample Sizes For Multilevel Modeling.” Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences1, no. 3: 86–92.
32.
MalleB. F.2022. “Beyond Fairness and Explanation: Foundations of Trustworthiness of Artificial Agents.” Proceedings of the 2022 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, Oxford, United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1145/3514094.3539570
33.
MayerR. C.DavisJ. H.SchoormanF. D.1995. “An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust.” The Academy of Management Review20, no. 3: 709–34.
34.
MorosoliS.ResendezV.NaudtsL.HelbergerN.de VreeseC.2024. “I Resist. A Study of Individual Attitudes Towards Generative AI In Journalism and Acts of Resistance, Risk Perceptions, Trust and Credibility. Digital Journalism. Published ahead of print Jan 2025. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2024.2435579
35.
NanzA.BinderA.MatthesJ.2025. “AI In the Newsroom: Does the Public Trust Automated Journalism and Will They Pay For It?” Journalism Studies26, no. 14: 1745–64.
36.
NewmanN.ArguedasA. R.RobertsonC. T.NielsenR. K.FletcherR.2025. Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2025. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://doi.org/10.60625/risj-8qqf-jt36
37.
NgD. T. K.LeungJ. K. L.ChuS. K. W.QiaoM. S.2021. “Conceptualizing AI Literacy: An Exploratory Review.” Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence2: 100041.
38.
NorrisP.2011. Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited. Cambridge University Press.
39.
NzobonimpaS.SavardJ.-F.2023. “Ready But Irresponsible? Analysis of the Government Artificial Intelligence Readiness Index.” Policy & Internet15, no. 3: 397–414.
40.
SchiavoG.BusinaroS.ZancanaroM.2024. “Comprehension, Apprehension, and Acceptance: Understanding the Influence of Literacy and Anxiety On Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence.” Technology in Society77: 102537.
41.
ShinD.2021. “The Effects of Explainability and Causability On Perception, Trust, and Acceptance: Implications For Explainable AI.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies146: 102551.
42.
ShinD.KeeK. F.ShinE. Y.2022. “Algorithm Awareness: Why User Awareness Is Critical For Personal Privacy In the Adoption of Algorithmic Platforms?International Journal of Information Management65: 102494.
43.
SiitonenM.LaajalahtiA.VenäläinenP.2024. “Mapping Automation In Journalism Studies 2010-2019: A Literature Review.” Journalism Studies25, no. 3: 299–318.
44.
SnijdersT. A. B.BoskerR. J.2012. Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling (2nd ed.). Sage Publishers.
45.
StockmannD.2012. Media Commercialization and Authoritarian Rule in China. Cambridge University Press.
46.
ToffB.SimonF. M.2025. “‘Or They Could Just Not Use It?’: The Dilemma of AI Disclosure For Audience Trust in News. International Journal of Press-Politics30, no. 4: 881–903.
47.
VenkateshV.MorrisM. G.DavisG. B.DavisF. D.2003. “User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View.” MIS Quarterly27, no. 3: 425–78.
48.
VoltmerK.2013. The Media in Transitional Democracies. Polity Press.
49.
WangB.RauP.-L. P.YuanT.2023. “Measuring User Competence In Using Artificial Intelligence: Validity and Reliability of Artificial Intelligence Literacy Scale.” Behaviour & Information Technology42, no. 9: 1324–37.
50.
WangY.-Y.ChuangY.-W.2024. “Artificial Intelligence Self-Efficacy: Scale Development and Validation.” Education and Information Technologies29, no. 4: 4785–808.
51.
WölkerA.PowellT. E.2021. “Algorithms In the Newsroom? News Readers’ Perceived Credibility and Selection of Automated Journalism.” Journalism22, no. 1: 86–103.
52.
Yeste-PiquerE.Suau-MartínezJ.Sintes-OlivellaM.Xicoy-ComasE.2025. “What If I Prefer Robot Journalists? Trust and Objectivity in the AI News Ecosystem.” Journalism and Media 6, no. 2: 13.
53.
ZhangB.DafoeA.2019. Artificial Intelligence: American Attitudes and Trends. http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3312874
54.
ZhangK.XieY. C.HanW. J.ZhangD. D.QuanY.2025. “Algorithm To Emotion: A Three-Stage Model of User Acceptance For AI-Generated News Platforms.” Telematics and Informatics101: 102312.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
