The communication mediation model asserts that the effects of news use on political participation are mostly indirect, mediated through discussion. Recent research has shown that this mediation process is stronger in countries where freedom of the press and expression are also greater. Relying on data collected during election cycles in seventeen countries between 2013 and 2018, we examine how additional country-level factors, including political freedom and digital infrastructure, moderate the indirect relationship between news use and political participation via political talk. Results provide evidence that these factors condition both outcomes, but in different ways. For protest, two of three country-level indices moderate individual-level variation in the pathway between political talk and protest. For voting, two of three country-level indices moderate aggregate-level variation in the pathway between news use and political talk. Results are discussed in light of their implications for the communication mediation model and comparative political communication research.
BarnidgeMatthewHuberBrigittede ZúñigaGilHomeroLiuJamesH. 2018. “Social Media as a Sphere for ‘Risky’ Political Expression: A Twenty-Country Multilevel Comparative Analysis.” The International Journal of Press/Politics23 (2): 161–82.10.1177/1940161218773838
2.
BarnidgeMatthewRojasHernandoBeckPaul A.Schmitt-BeckRüdiger. 2019. “Comparative Corrective Action: Perceived Media Bias and Political Action in 17 Countries.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research. Advance online publication.
3.
BellDorothy M.McKayColinPhillipsKathryn J. 2001. “Overcoming the Barriers to Voting Experienced by People with Learning Disabilities.” British Journal of Learning Disabilities29 (4): 122–7.10.1046/j.1468-3156.2001.00127.x
4.
BenhabibSeyla. 1996. “Toward A Deliberative Model of Democratic Legitimacy. In Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, ed. BenhabibSeyla, 67–94. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
5.
ChoiJihyang. 2016. “Differential Use, Differential Effects: Investigating the Roles of Different Modes of News Use in Promoting Political Participation.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication21 (6): 436–50.10.1111/jcc4.12176
6.
ClarkTerry N.1969. “Introduction.” In Gabriel Tarde on Communication and Social Influence, ed. ClarkTerry N., 1–72. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7.
ConversePhilip E.CampbellAngusMillerWarren E.StokesDonald E. 1961. “Stability and Change in 1960: A Reinstating Election.” The American Political Science Review55 (2): 269–80.10.2307/1952237
8.
CoppedgeMichaelGerringJohnLindbergStaffan I.SkaaningSvend-ErikTeorellJanAltmanDavid. 2016. “V-Dem Codebook v6.” Retrieved from www.v-dem.org.
9.
DahlRonald A.1989. Democracy and its Critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
10.
DiMaggioPaulHargitaiEszterNeumanW. RussellRobinsonJohn P. 2001. “Social Implications of the Internet.” Annual Review of Sociology27: 307–36.10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.307
11.
EdgerlyStephanieVragaEmily K.BodeLeticiaThorsonKjerstinThorsonEsther. 2018. “New Media, New Relationship to Participation? A Closer Look at Youth News Repertoires and Political Participation.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly95 (1): 192–212.10.1177/1077699017706928
12.
EvelandWilliam P.Jr.ShahDhavan V.KwakNojin. 2003. “Assessing Causality in the Cognitive Mediation Model: A Panel Study of Motivations, Information Processing, and Learning During Campaign 2000.” Communication Research30: 359–86.10.1177/0093650203253369
13.
EvelandWilliam P.SongHyunjinBeckPaul A. 2015. “Cultural Variations in the Relationships Among Network Political Agreement, Political Discussion Frequency, and Voter Turnout.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research27: 461–80.
14.
FunderDavid C.OzerDaniel J. 2019. “Evaluating Effect Size in Psychological Research: Sense and Nonsense.” Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science2: 156–68.10.1177/2515245919847202
15.
Gil de ZúñigaHomeroDiehlTrevorHuberBriggiteLiuJames H. 2019a. “The Citizen Communication Mediation Model Across Countries: A Multilevel Mediation Model of News Use and Discussion on Political Participation.” Journal of Communication69 (2): 144–67.10.1093/joc/jqz002
16.
Gil de ZúñigaHomeroGarciáVictorMcGregorShannon. 2015. “What is Second Screening? Exploring Motivations of Second Screen Use and its Effects on Online Political Participation.” Journal of Communication65 (5): 793–815.10.1111/jcom.12174
17.
HayesAndrew F.2013. Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York: Guilford.
18.
HayesAndrew F.RockwoodNicholas J. 2020. “Conditional Process Analysis: Concepts, Computation, and Advances in the Modeling of the Contingencies of Mechanisms.” American Behavioral Scientist64 (1): 19–54.10.1177/0002764219859633
19.
HendelJohn. 2021. “Democrats Question TV Carriers’ Decisions to Host Fox, OAN and Newsmax, Citing ‘Misinformation’.” Retrieved frompolitico.com.
20.
HenfridssonOlaBygstadBendik. 2013. “The Generative Mechanisms of Digital Infrastructure Evolution.” MIS Quarterly37 (3): 907–31.10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.3.11
21.
HoffmanDonna L.NovakThomas P. 1998. “Bridging the Racial Divide on the Internet.” Science (New York, N.Y.)280: 390–1.10.1126/science.280.5362.390
22.
HoffmanLindsay H.YoungDannagal G. 2011. “Satire, Punch Lines, and the Nightly News: Untangling Media Effects on Political Participation.” Communication Research Reports28 (2): 159–68.10.1080/08824096.2011.565278
23.
KatzJames E.RiceRonald E.AspdenPhilip. 2001. “The Internet: 1995–2000. Access, Civic Involvement and Social Interaction.” American Behavioral Scientist45 (3): 405–19.
24.
KimYonghwanChenHsuan-TingWangYuan. 2016. “Living in the Smartphone Age: Examining the Conditional Indirect Effects of Mobile Phone Use on Political Participation.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media60 (4): 694–713.10.1080/08838151.2016.1203318
25.
Kligler-VilenchikNetaShresthovaSangita. 2012. “Learning Through Practice: Participatory Civic Cultures.” A Report for the Media, Activism and Participatory Politics Project, Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism.
26.
LazarsfeldPaul F.BerelsonBernardGaudetHazel. 1944. The People’s Choice: How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign. New York: Columbia University Press.
27.
LeeNam-Jin. 2017. “Communication Mediation Model.” In The International Encyclopedia of Media Effects, ed. RösslerPatrickHoffnerCynthia A.Liesbet van ZoonenA., 1–9. Chichester, UK: Wiley Blackwell.
28.
LeesonPeter T. 2008. “Media Freedom, Political Knowledge, and Participation.” Journal of Economic Perspectives22 (2): 155–69.10.1257/jep.22.2.155
29.
LeesonPeter T.CoyneChristopher J.. 2005. “Manipulating the Media.” Institutions and Economic Development1 (2): 67–92
30.
LeighleyJan E. 1995. “Attitudes, Opportunities and Incentives: A Field Essay on Political Participation.” Political Research Quarterly48 (1): 181–209.10.1177/106591299504800111
31.
LemertJames B.1992. “Effective Public Opinion.” In Public Opinion, the Press, and Public Policy, ed. David KennamerJ., 41–62. West Port, CT: Praeger Publishers.
32.
LührmannAnnaMaerzSeraphine F.GrahnSandraAlizadaNazifaGastaldiLisaHellmeierSebastianHindleGarryLindbergSteffan I. 2020. “Autocratization Surges—Resistance Grows: Democracy Report 2020.” Report for the Varieties of Democracy Institute (V-Dem). Retrieved fromv-dem.net.
33.
MaasCora J. M.HoxJoop J. 2005. “Sufficient Sample Sizes for Multilevel Modeling.” Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences1 (3): 86–92.10.1027/1614-2241.1.3.86
34.
McGregorShannon C.MourãoRachel R. 2017. “Second Screening Donald Trump: Conditional Indirect Effects on Political Participation.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media61 (2): 264–90.10.1080/08838151.2017.1309418
35.
McLeodJack M.KosickiGerald M.McLeod.Douglas M.1994. “The Expanding Boundaries of Political Communication Effects.” In Media Effects, Advances in Theory and Research, ed. Jennings BryantDolf Zillman, 123–162. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
36.
McLeodJack M.ScheufeleDietram A.MoyPatricia. 1999. “Community, Communication, and Participation: The Role of Mass Media and Interpersonal Discussion in Local Political Participation.” Political Communication16 (3): 315–36.10.1080/105846099198659
37.
McLeodJack M.ZubricJessicaKeumHeejoDeshpandeSameerChoJaehoSteinSusanHeatherMark. 2001. “Reflecting and Connecting: Testing a Communication Mediation Model of Civic Participation.” Paper presented at the annual conference of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Washington, D.C.
38.
MeirickPatrick C.WackmanDaniel B. 2004. “Kids Voting and Political Knowledge: Narrowing Gaps, Informing Votes.” Social Science Quarterly85 (5): 1161–77.10.1111/j.0038-4941.2004.00269.x
39.
MilbrathLester W.1981. “Political Participation.” In The Handbook of Political Behavior, ed. LongSamuel L., 197–230. Boston: Springer.
40.
PowersMatthewVera-ZambranoSandra. 2018. “The Universal and the Contextual of Media Systems: Research Design, Epistemology, and the Production of Comparative Knowledge.” The International Journal of Press/Politics23 (2): 143–60.10.1177/1940161218771899
41.
PutnamRobert D. 1995. “Tuning In, Tuning Out: The Strange Disappearance of Social Capital in America.” PS: Political Science & Politics28 (4): 664–83.
42.
RepucciSarah. 2020. “Freedom in the World 2020: A Leaderless Struggle for Democracy.” A report for Freedom House. Retrieved fromfreedomhouse.org.
43.
RojasHernando. 2008. “Strategy Versus Understanding: How Orientations Towards Political Conversation Influence Political Engagement.” Communication Research35: 452–80.10.1177/0093650208315977
44.
RojasHernandoPuig-i-AbrilEulalia. 2009. “Mobilizers Mobilized: Information, Expression, Mobilization and Participation in the Digital Age.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication14 (4): 902–27.10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01475.x
45.
SabucedoJose ManuelArceConstantino. 1991. “Types of Political Participation: A Multidimensional Analysis.” European Journal of Political Research20 (1): 93–102.10.1111/j.1475-6765.1991.tb00257.x
46.
SaundersClare. 2014. “Anti-Politics in Action? Measurement Dilemmas in the Study of Unconventional Political Participation.” Political Research Quarterly67 (3): 574–88.10.1177/1065912914530513
47.
ScherbaumCharles A.FerreterJennifer M. 2009. “Estimating Statistical Power and Required Sample Sizes for Organizational Research Using Multilevel Modeling.” Organizational Research Methods12 (2): 347–67.10.1177/1094428107308906
48.
SchlozmanKay LehmanVerbaSidneyBradyHenry E.2012. The Unheavenly Chorus: Unequal Political Voice and the Broken Promise of American Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
49.
SchoonveldeMartijn. 2014. “Media Freedom and the Institutional Underpinnings of Political Knowledge.” Political Science Research and Methods2 (2): 163–78.10.1017/psrm.2013.18
50.
ShahDhavan V. 2016. “Conversation is the Soul of Democracy: Expression Effects, Communication Mediation, and Digital Media.” Communication and the Public1 (1): 12–8.10.1177/2057047316628310
51.
ShahDhavan V.ChoJaehoEvelandWilliam P.Jr.KwakNojin. 2005. “Information and Expression in a Digital Age: Modeling Internet Effects on Civic Participation.” Communication Research32 (5): 531–65.10.1177/0093650205279209
52.
ShahDhavan V.ChoJaehoNahSeungahnGotliebMelissa R.HwangHyunseoLeeNam-Jin., SchollRoseann M.McLeodDouglas M. 2007. “Campaign Ads, Online Messaging, and Participation: Extending the Communication Mediation Model.” Journal of Communication57 (4): 676–703.10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00363.x
53.
ShahDhavan V.McLeodDouglas M.RojasHernandoChoJaehoWagnerMichael W.FriedlandLewis A. 2017. “Revising the Communication Mediation Model for A New Political Communication Ecology.” Human Communication Research43: 491–504.10.1111/hcre.12115
54.
ShehataAdamStrömbäckJesper. 2011. “A Matter of Context: A Comparative Study of Media Environments and News Consumption Gaps in Europe.” Political Communication28 (1): 110–34.10.1080/10584609.2010.543006
55.
SotirovicMiraMcLeodJack M. 2001. “Values, Communication Behavior, and Political Participation.” Political Communication18 (3): 273–300.10.1080/10584600152400347
56.
ThorsonEmily. 2014. “Beyond Opinion Leaders: How Attempts to Persuade Foster Political Awareness and Campaign Learning.” Communication Research41 (3): 353–74.10.1177/0093650212443824
57.
TorcalMarianoMonteroJose Ramon. 2006. Political Disaffection in Contemporary Democracies: Social Capital, Institutions and Politics. New York: Routledge.
58.
ZasloveAndrejGeurkinkBramJacobsKristofAkkermanAgnes. 2021. “Power to the People? Populism, Democracy, and Political Participation: A Citizen’s Perspective.” West European Politics44 (4): 727–51.10.1080/01402382.2020.1776490
59.
ZhangWeiyu. 2012. “The Effects of Political News Use, Political Discussion and Authoritarian Orientation on Political Participation: Evidences From Singapore and Taiwan.” Asian Journal of Communication22 (5): 474–92.10.1080/01292986.2012.701313
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
