Favorable Opportunity Structures for Populist Communication: Comparing Different Types of Politicians and Issues in Social Media,Television and the Press
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online April, 2019
Favorable Opportunity Structures for Populist Communication: Comparing Different Types of Politicians and Issues in Social Media,Television and the Press
The aim of this study is to explore favorable opportunity structures for populist communication of politicians in Western democracies. We analyze the content and style of 2,517 statements from 103 politicians from six countries (France, Italy, Germany, Switzerland, United Kingdom, and United States) who differ in their party affiliation (populist versus nonpopulist) and hierarchical position (backbencher vs. frontbencher). To learn more about their media strategies and chances of success, we investigate four communication channels (Facebook, Twitter, talk shows, and news media) that systematically differ in their degree of journalistic intervention and examine fourteen often-raised topics that differ in their suitability for populist mobilization. Our content analysis shows the highest probability of populist communication comes from (1) members of populist parties and (2) backbenchers who address (3) mobilizable issues in (4) social media or newspaper articles. We conclude by explaining why populists have become so successful in getting their messages into newspapers.
AalbergTorilEsserFrankReinemannCarstenStrömbäckJesperde VreeseClaes. 2017. Populist Political Communication in Europe. New York: Routledge.
2.
AbtsKoenRummensStefan. 2007. “Populism versus Democracy.” Political Studies55 (2): 405–24.
3.
AlbertazziDanieleMcDonnellDuncan. 2008. “Introduction: A New Spectre for Western Europe.” In Twenty-First Century Populism: The Spectre of Western European Democracy, ed. AlbertazziDanieleMcDonnellDuncan, 1–11. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
4.
BernhardLaurent. 2017. “Three Faces of Populism in Current Switzerland: Comparing the Populist Communication of the Swiss People’s Party, the Ticino League, and the Geneva Citizens’ Movement.” Swiss Political Science Review23 (4): 509–25.
5.
BobbaGiulianoMcDonnellDuncan. 2016. “Different Types of Right-Wing Populist Discourse in Government and Opposition: The Case of Italy.” South European Society and Politics21 (3): 281–99.
6.
BosLindaBrantsKees. 2014. “Populist Rhetoric in Politics and Media: A Longitudinal Study of the Netherlands.” European Journal of Communication29 (6): 703–19.
7.
BraccialeRobertaMartellaAntonio. 2017. “Define the Populist Political Communication Style: The Case of Italian Political Leaders on Twitter.” Information, Communication & Society20 (9): 1310–29.
8.
ChadwickAndrew. 2017. The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9.
CranmerMirjam. 2011. “Populist Communication and Publicity: An Empirical Study of Contextual Differences in Switzerland.” Swiss Political Science Review17 (3): 286–307.
10.
DavisAeron. 2009. “Journalist-Source Relations, Mediated Reflexivity and the Politics of Politics.” Journalism Studies10 (2): 204–19.
11.
EngesserSvenFawziNaylaLarssonAnders Olof. 2017. “Populist Online Communication: Introduction to the Special Issue.” Information, Communication & Society20 (9): 1279–92.
12.
ErnstNicoleBlassnigSinaEngesserSvenEsser.FrankMay2018. “Where Populists Prefer to Spread their Messages. An Analysis of Social Media and Talk Shows in Six Countries.” Conference Paper. International Communication Association (ICA), Prag, 1–31.
13.
ErnstNicoleEngesserSvenBüchelFlorinBlassnigSinaEsserFrank. 2017. “Extreme Parties and Populism: An Analysis of Facebook and Twitter Across Six Countries.” Information, Communication & Society20 (9): 1347–64.
14.
EsserFrank. 2008. “Dimensions of Political News Cultures: Sound Bite and Image Bite News in France, Germany, Great Britain, and the United States.” The International Journal of Press/Politics13 (4): 401–28.
15.
EsserFrankStępińskaAgnieszkaHopmannDavid Nicolas. 2017. “Populism and the Media: Cross-National Findings and Perspectives.” In Populist Political Communication in Europe, ed. AalbergTorilEsserFrankReinemannCarstenStrömbäckJesperVreeseClaes de, 365–380. New York: Routledge.
16.
FisherCarolineMarshallDavidMcCallumKerry. 2018. “Bypassing the Press Gallery: From Howard to Hanson.” Media International Australia167 (1): 57–70.
17.
HallerAndré. 2015. “How to Deal with the Black Sheep? An Evaluation of Journalists’ Reactions Towards Intentional Self-scandalization by Politicians.” Journal of Applied Journalism & Media Studies4 (3): 435–51.
18.
HallerAndréHoltKristoffer. 2018. “Paradoxical Populism: How PEGIDA Relates to Mainstream and Alternative Media.” Information, Communication & Society: 1–16.
19.
HallinDanielManciniPaolo. 2004. Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20.
HawkinsKirk A.2009. “Is Chávez Populist? Measuring Populist Discourse in Comparative Perspective.” Comparative Political Studies42 (8): 1040–67.
21.
JacobsKristofSpieringsNiels. 2018. “A Populist Paradise? Examining Populists’ Twitter Adoption and Use.” Information, Communication & Society95:1–16.
22.
JagersJan.WalgraveStefaan. 2007. “Populism as Political Communication Style: An Empirical Study of Political Parties’ Discourse in Belgium.” European Journal of Political Research46 (3): 319–45.
23.
KaltwasserCristóbal RoviraTaggartPaul. 2016. “Dealing with Populists in Government: A Framework for Analysis.” Democratization23 (2): 201–20.
24.
KoopmansRuudOlzakSusan. 2004. “Discursive Opportunities and the Evolution of Right-Wing Violence in Germany.” American Journal of Sociology110 (1): 198–230.
25.
KrämerBenjamin. 2017. “Populist Online Practices: The Function of the Internet in Right-Wing Populism.” Information, Communication & Society20 (9): 1293–1309.
26.
KriesiHanspeter. 2018. “Revisiting the Populist Challenge.” Politologický Casopis—Czech Journal of Political Science25 (1): 5–27.
27.
MazzoleniGianpietro. 2008. “Populism and the Media.” In Twenty-First Century Populism: The Spectre of Western European Democracy, ed. AlbertazziDanieleMcDonnellDuncan, 49–64. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
28.
MoffittBenjamin. 2016. The Global Rise of Populism: Performance, Political Style, and Representation. Standford: Standford University Press.
29.
MuddeCas. 2007. Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30.
NewmanNicFletcherRichardKalogeropoulosAntonisLevyDavidNielsenRasmus Kleis. 2017. “Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2017.” Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
31.
PaletzDavid L.2002. The Media in American Politics: Contents and Consequences. New York: Longman.
32.
PoierKlausSaywald-WedlSandraUngerHedwig. 2017. Die Themen der “Populisten”: Mit einer Medienanalyse von Wahlkämpfen in Österreich [The issues of “the populist”: With a media analysis of election campaigns in Austria]. Deutschland: Nomos.
33.
RogstadIngrid. 2016. “Is Twitter Just Rehashing? Intermedia Agenda Setting between Twitter and Mainstream Media.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics13 (2): 142–58.
34.
RooduijnMatthijsAkkermanTjitske. 2017. “Flank Attacks: Populism and Left-Right Radicalism in Western Europe.” Party Politics23 (3): 93–204.
35.
RooduijnMatthijsLangeSarah L deBrugWouter van der. 2014. “A Populist Zeitgeist? Programmatic Contagion by Populist Parties in Western Europe.” Party Politics20 (4): 563–75.
36.
SchmidtFranzisca. 2017. “Drivers of Populism: A Four-Country Comparison of Party Communication in the Run-up to the 2014 European Parliament Elections.” Political Studies66 (2): 459–79.
37.
SmithJason Matthew. 2010. “Does Crime Pay? Issue Ownership, Political Opportunity, and the Populist Right in Western Europe.” Comparative Political Studies43 (11): 1471–98.
38.
SorensenLone. 2017. “Populism in Communications Perspective: Concepts, Issues, Evidence.” In Political Populism: A Handbook, ed. HeinischReinhardHoltz-BachaChristinaMazzoleniOscar, 137–151. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
39.
SpieringsNielsJacobsKristofLinders.Nik2018. “Keeping an Eye on the People: Who Has Access to MPs on Twitter?” Social Science Computer Review1–18.
40.
StewartJared Alan. 2018. “In Through the Out Door: Examining the Use of Outsider Appeals in Presidential Debates.” Presidential Studies Quarterly48 (1): 93–109.
41.
TaggartPaul. 2017. “Populism in Western Europe.” In The Oxford Handbook of Populism, ed. KaltwasserCristóbal R.TaggartPaulEspejoPaulina O.OstiguyPierre, 248–266. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42.
UmbrichtAndreaEsserFrank. 2016. “The Push to Popularize Politics.” Journalism Studies17 (1): 100–21.
43.
Van AelstPeterWalgraveStefaan. 2016. “Information and Arena: The Dual Function of the News Media for Political Elites.” Journal of Communication66 (3): 496–518.
44.
Van KesselStijn. 2015. Populist Parties in Europe. Agents of Discontent?Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
45.
VreeseClaesEsserAalbergReinemannStanyer. 2018 “Populism as an Expression of Political Communication Content and Style: A New Perspective.” The International Journal of Press/Politics23(4): 423–38.
46.
WettsteinMartinEsserFrankSchulzAnneWirzDominiqueWirthWerner. 2018. “News Media as Gatekeepers, Critics and Initiators of Populist Communication: How Journalists in Ten Countries Deal with the Populist Challenge.” The International Journal of Press/Politics23 (4): 476–95.
47.
WeylandKurt. 2001. “Clarifying a Contested Concept—Populism in the Study of Latin American Politics.” Comparative Politics34 (1): 1–22.
48.
WirthEsserWettsteinEngesserWirzSchulzErnst., et al. 2016. “The Appeal of Populist Ideas, Strategies and Styles: A Theoretical Model and Research Design for Analyzing Populist Political Communication.” Zurich: NCCR Democracy, Working Paper No. 88. Retrieved from http://www.nccr-democracy.uzh.ch/publications/workingpaper/wp88
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
