In this paper, we examine who drives attention to the European Union (EU) in member nations—the media or the parties—and how cross-national variations in these media-party interactions can be explained by focusing on issue salience in campaign communications, party polarization, and media system characteristics. To answer these questions, we rely on a quantitative content analysis of newspaper articles and party press releases in seven countries (Austria, France, Germany, Greece, the Netherlands, Portugal, and the United Kingdom) during the twelve weeks prior to the 2014 European Parliament (EP) election. Our results from a daily-level vector autoregression (VAR) analysis show that parties are the main driver. However, our findings also indicate that single approaches in comparative research, namely, issue salience, party polarization, and media characteristics, cannot fully explain cross-national variations, which stem from combinations of different determinants, such as low (high) EU issue salience interacting with high (low) party polarization.
AalbergTorilCurranJames. 2012. How Media Inform Democracy: A Comparative Approach. London: Routledge.
2.
Abdi-HerrleSasan. 2018. “Mediale Themensetzung in Zeiten von Web 2.0: Wer beeinflusst wen? Das Agenda-Setting-Verhältnis zwischen Twitter und Online-Leitmedien.” [“Media Topics in Times of Web 2.0: Who Influences Whom? The Agenda-Setting Relationship Between Twitter and Online Media”] Ph.D thesis, Universität Bern.
3.
AbrigoMichael R. M.LoveInessa. 2015. Estimation of Panel Vector Autoregression in Stata: A Package of Programs. Manoa: Department of Economics, University of Hawaii.
4.
AdamSilkeAntl-WittenbergEvaEugsterBeatriceLeidecker-SandmannMelanieMaierMichaelaSchmidtFranzisca. 2017. “Strategies of Pro-European Parties in the Face of a Eurosceptic Challenge.” European Union Politics18 (2): 260–82. doi: 10.1177/1465116516661248
5.
ArielYaronVeredElishar-MalkaDanaWeimann-SaksRuthAvidar. 2017. “Online Agenda-Setting Research. Challenges and Dilemmas.” The Agenda Setting Journal1(2):117-36. doi: 10.1075/asj.1.2.03ari
6.
BartelsLarry M.1996. “Politicians and the Press: Who Leads, Who Follows?” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, CA, August 29 - September 1, 1996.
7.
BeckettiSean. 2013. Introduction to Time Series Using Stata. College Station: Stata Press.
8.
BlumlerJay G.GurevitchMichael. 1995. The Crisis of Public Communication. London: Routledge.
9.
BobbaGiulianoSeddoneAntonella. 2017. “How Do Eurosceptic Parties and Economic Crisis Affect News Coverage of the European Union? Evidence from the 2014 European Elections in Italy.” European Politics and Society41 (4): 1–19. doi: 10.1080/23745118.2017.1368230
10.
BoomgaardenHajo G.De VreeseClaes H.SchuckAndreas R. T.AzroutRachidElenbaasMatthijsSpanjeJoost VanVliegenthartRens. 2013. “Across Time and Space: Explaining Variation in News Coverage of the European Union.” European Journal of Political Research52 (5): 608–29.
11.
BrandenburgHeinz. 2002. “Who Follows Whom? The Impact of Parties on Media Agenda Formation in the 1997 British General Election Campaign.” The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics7 (3): 34–54. doi: 10.1177/1081180X0200700303
12.
BrüggemannMichaelEngesserSvenBüchelFlorinHumprechtEddaCastroLaia. 2014. “Hallin and Mancini Revisited: Four Empirical Types of Western Media Systems.” Journal of Communication64 (6): 1037–65. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12127
13.
CanovaFabioCiccarelliMatteo. 2013. “Panel Vector Autoregressive Models: A Survey.” In VAR Models in Macroeconomics—New Developments and Applications: Essays in Honor of Christopher A. Sims, ed. FombyThomas B.SimsChristopher A. Advances in Econometrics, Vol. 32, 205–46. Bingley: Emerald.
14.
DaltonRussel J.BeckPaul A.HuckfeldtRobert. 1998. “Partisan Cues and the Media: Information Flows in the 1992 Presidential Election.” The American Political Science Review92 (1): 111–26.
15.
De VreeseClaes H.2003. Framing Europe: Television News and European Integration. Amsterdam: Aksant.
16.
De VreeseClaes H.LaufEdmundPeterJochen. 2007. “The Media and European Parliament Elections: Second-Rate Coverage of Second-Order Event?” In European Elections & Domestic Politics: Lessons from the Past and Scenarios for the Future, ed. BrugWouter Van derEijkCees Van der, 116–30. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press. doi: 10.2307/2585932
17.
EichhornWolfgang. 2005. Agenda-Setting-Prozesse: Eine theoretische Analyse individueller und gesellschaftlicher Themenstrukturierung. [Agenda-Setting Processes: A Theoretical Analysis of Individual and Societal Issue Structuring]. München: R. Fischer.
18.
European Commission. 2014. “Media Use in the European Union.” Report. Standard Eurobarometer, 82, European Commission, Brussels.
EzrowLawrence. 2007. “The Variance Matters: How Party Systems Represent the Preferences of Voters.” The Journal of Politics69 (1): 182–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00503.x
21.
FerraraFedericoWeishauptJ. Timo. 2004. “Get Your Act Together: Party Performance in European Parliament Elections.” European Union Politics5 (3): 283–306. doi: 10.1177/1465116504045154
22.
GaltungJohanRugeMari H.1965. “The Structure of Foreign News.” Journal of Peace Research2 (1): 64–90. doi: 10.1177/002234336500200104
23.
GrangerClive W. J.1969. “Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods.” Econometrica37 (3): 424–438. doi: 10.2307/1912791
24.
Green-PedersenChristoffer. 2007. “The Growing Importance of Issue Competition: The Changing Nature of Party Competition in Western Europe.” Political Studies55 (3): 607–28. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00686.x
25.
Green-PedersenChristoffer. 2011. “A Giant Fast Asleep? Party Incentives and the Politicisation of European Integration.” Political Studies60 (1): 115–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00895.x
26.
Green-PedersenChristofferStubagerRune. 2010. “The Political Conditionality of Mass Media Influence: When Do Parties Follow Mass Media Attention?” British Journal of Political Science40 (3): 663–77. doi: 10.1017/S0007123410000037
27.
HallinDaniel C.ManciniPaolo. 2004. Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Communication, Society and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
HarderRaymond A.SevenansJulieAelstPeter Van. 2017. “Intermedia Agenda Setting in the Social Media Age: How Traditional Players Dominate the News Agenda in Election Times.” The International Journal of Press/Politics22 (3): 275–93. doi: 10.1177/1940161217704969
30.
HaselmayerMartinWagnerMarkusMeyerThomas M.2017. “Partisan Bias in Message Selection: Media Gatekeeping of Party Press Releases.” Political Communication1 (2): 367–84. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2016.1265619
31.
HoogheLiesbetMarksGary. 2008. “A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus.” British Journal of Political Science39 (1): 1–23. doi: 10.1017/S0007123408000409
32.
HopmannDavid N.Elmelund-PræstekærChristianAlbækErikDe VreeseClaes H.2009. “The Public or Parties in The Media?” Javnost—The Public16 (3): 71–84. doi: 10.1080/13183222.2009.11009010
33.
HopmannDavid N.Elmelund-PræstekærChristianAlbækErikVliegenthartRensDe VreeseClaes H.2012. “Party Media Agenda-Setting: How Parties Influence Election News Coverage.” Party Politics18 (2): 173–91. doi: 10.1080/13183222.2009.11009010
34.
JacobiCarinaKönigslöwKatharina Kleinen-vonRuigrokNel. 2016. “Political News in Online and Print Newspapers.” Digital Journalism4 (6): 723–42. doi: 10.1080/21670811.2015.1087810
35.
JalaliCarlosSilvaTiago. 2011. “Everyone Ignores Europe? Party Campaigns and Media Coverage in the 2009 European Parliament Elections.” In Political Communication in European Parliamentary Elections, ed. MaierMichaelaStrömbäckJesperKaidLynda L., 111–28. Farnham: Ashgate.
36.
KlingerUlrikeRussmannUta. 2017. “‘Beer Is More Efficient than Social Media’—Political Parties and Strategic Communication in Austrian and Swiss National Elections.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics14 (4): 299–313. doi: 10.1080/19331681.2017.1369919
37.
KritzingerSylviaMüllerWolfgang C.SchönbachKlaus. 2014. Die Nationalratswahl 2013: Wie Parteien, Medien und Wählerschaft zusammenwirken. [The 2013 Elections to the National Parliament: How Political Parties, the Media and the Electorate Work Together]. Wien: Böhlau.
38.
LeeByung GuKimJinhaScheufeleDietram A.2016. “Agenda Setting in the Internet Age: The Reciprocity between Online Searches and Issue Salience.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research28 (3): 440–55. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/edv026
39.
LeeHan S.2014. “Analyzing the Multidirectional Relationships between the President, News Media, and the Public: Who Affects Whom?” Political Communication31 (2): 259–81. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2013.815295
40.
LillekerDarren G.TenscherJensŠtětkaVáclav. 2015. “Towards Hypermedia Campaigning? Perceptions of New Media’s Importance for Campaigning by Party Strategists in Comparative Perspective.” Information, Communication & Society18 (7): 747–65. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2014.993679
41.
LütkepohlHelmut. 2005. New Introduction to Multiple Time Series Analysis: With 49 Figures and 36 Tables. Berlin: Springer.
42.
LütkepohlHelmut. 2009. “Econometric Analysis with Vector Autoregressive Models.” In Handbook of Computational Econometrics, ed. BelsleyDavid A., 281–320. Chichester: Wiley.
43.
MachillMarcelBeilerMarkusFischerCorinna. 2006. “Europe-Topics in Europe’s Media.” European Journal of Communication21 (1): 57–88. doi: 10.1177/0267323106060989
44.
MaierMichaelaAdamSilkeDe VreeseClaes H.Leidecker-SandmannMelanieEugsterBeatriceSchmidtFranziscaAntl-WittenbergEva. 2016. “Politicization of EU Integration. Codebook for a Content Analysis of Media and Party Communication.” http://www.ikmb.unibe.ch/codebuch_eu2014 (accessed May 7, 2018).
45.
MaierMichaelaPatrickBacherleSilkeAdamMelanieLeidecker-Sandmann. 2017. “The Interplay between Parties and Media in Putting EU-Issues on the Agenda: A Temporal Pattern Analysis of the 2014 European Parliamentary Election Campaigns in Austria, Germany, and the United Kingdom.” Party Politics. Article first published online: April20, 2017. doi:10.1177/1354068817700532
46.
MaierMichaelaStengelKarinMarschallJoachim. 2010. Nachrichtenwerttheorie. [News Value Theory]. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
47.
MeijersMauritsChristianRauh. 2016. “Has Eurosceptic Mobilization Become More Contagious? Comparing the 2009 and 2014 EP Election Campaigns in the Netherlands and France.” Politics and Governance4 (1): 83-103. doi:10.17645/pag.v4i1.455
48.
NeumanRussell W.GuggenheimLaurenJangMo S.BaeSoo Young. 2014. “The Dynamics of Public Attention: Agenda-Setting Theory Meets Big Data.” Journal of Communication64 (2): 193–214. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12088
49.
NorrisPippa. 2009. “Comparative Political Communications: Common Frameworks or Babelian Confusion?” Government and Opposition44 (3): 321–40. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-7053.2009.01290.x
50.
PhillipsAngela. 2015. Journalism in Context: Practice and Theory for the Digital Age. London: Routledge.
51.
ReifKarlheinzSchmitt. 1980. Nine Second-Order National Elections. A Conceptual Framework for the Analysis of European Election Results. European Journal of Political Research8 (1): 3-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.1980.tb00737.x
52.
RobertsMarilynMcCombsMaxwell E.1994. “Agenda Setting and Political Advertising: Origins of the News Agenda.” Political Communication11 (3): 249–62. doi: 10.1080/10584609.1994.9963030
53.
SchuckAndreas R. T.De VreeseClaes H.2011. “Finding Europe: Mapping and Explaining Antecedents of ‘Europeanness’ in News about the 2009 European Parliamentary Elections.” Studies in Communication | Media2011 (2): 265–94. doi: 10.5771/2192-4007-2011-2-265
54.
SchuckAndreas R. T.XezonakisGeorgiosElenbaasMatthijsBanducciSusan A.De VreeseClaes H.2011. “Party Contestation and Europe on the News Agenda: The 2009 European Parliamentary Elections.” Electoral Studies30 (1): 41–52. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2010.09.021
55.
SchulzeHeidi. 2016. “The Spitzenkandidaten in the European Parliament Election Campaign Coverage 2014 in Germany, France, and the United Kingdom.” Politics and Governance4 (1): 23-26. doi:10.17645/pag.v4i1.457
56.
SerazioMichael. 2014. “The New Media Designs of Political Consultants: Campaign Production in a Fragmented Era.” Journal of Communication64 (4): 743–63. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12078/full
57.
ShawDonald L.McCombsMaxwell E.1977. The Emergence of American Political Issues: The Agenda-Setting Function of the Press. St. Paul: West Publications.
58.
ShoemakerPamela J.VosTim P.ReeseStephen D.2009. “Journalists as Gatekeepers.” In The Handbook of Journalism Studies, ed. Wahl-JorgensenKarinHanitzschThomas. International Communication Association Handbook Series, 73–82. New York: Routledge.
59.
SorokaStuart N.2002a. Agenda-Setting Dynamics in Canada. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
60.
SorokaStuart N.2002b. “Issue Attributes and Agenda-Setting by Media, the Public, and Policymakers in Canada.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research14 (3): 264–85. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/14.3.264.
61.
SorokaStuart N.2003. “Media, Public Opinion, and Foreign Policy.” The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics8 (1): 27–48. doi: 10.1177/1081180X02238783.
62.
ThesenGunnar. 2013. “When Good News Is Scarce and Bad News Is Good: Government Responsibilities and Opposition Possibilities in Political Agenda-Setting.” European Journal of Political Research52 (3): 364–89. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2012.02075.x.
63.
van AelstPeterWalgraveStefaan. 2011. “Minimal or Massive? The Political Agenda-Setting Power of the Mass Media According to Different Methods.” The International Journal of Press/Politics16 (3): 295–313. doi: 10.1177/1940161211406727
64.
van der BrugWouterGattermannKatjanaDe VreeseClaes H.2016. “Introduction: How Different Were the European Elections of 2014?” Politics and Governance4 (1): 1-8. doi: 10.17645/pag.v4i1.591
65.
van der PasDaphne J.VliegenthartRens. 2015. “Do Media Respond to Party Conflict? Debates on European Integration in British, Dutch and German Party Manifestos and Newspapers, 1987–2006.” Political Studies64 (2): 260–78. doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.12187
66.
VliegenthartRensMontesMena N.2014. “How Political and Media System Characteristics Moderate Interactions between Newspapers and Parliaments: Economic Crisis Attention in Spain and the Netherlands.” The International Journal of Press/Politics19 (3): 318–39. doi: 10.1177/1940161214531335
67.
WalgraveStefaanAelstPeter Van. 2006. “The Contingency of the Mass Media’s Political Agenda Setting Power: Toward a Preliminary Theory.” Journal of Communication56 (1): 88–109. doi: j.1460-2466.2006.00005.x
68.
WalgraveStefaanPeterVan Aelst. 2016. “Political Agenda Setting and the Mass Media.” In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics, ed. ThompsonWilliam R., 1-26. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ACREFORE/9780190228637.013.46
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
