This paper clarifies whether and to what extent populist communication could drive different gender-oriented reactions. We adopted an original research design intending Facebook as a natural environment where investigating the interaction between social media users and populist and non-populist parties. Our case selection considers three countries falling into the pluralist polarized media system: France, Italy, and Spain. A human content analysis was carried out on a sample of 2,235 Facebook posts published during thirty days in 2016 by the four main parties/leaders in each country. An original algorithm allowed to identify the gender of users liking each message. We tested whether men tend more to provide likes to messages posted by populist parties, messages published by radical populists, messages containing populist contents, and different components of populist messages. Findings confirm the existence of a gender-oriented reaction to populism: Men tend to support populist actors and parties on Facebook more than women do, by providing likes to their content. Yet the difference in gender gap between radical and moderate parties is not significant. We also found that the antielite component of populist discourse obtains more likes by male Facebook users. This pattern is common for both populist and non-populist parties.
AalbergTorilEsserFrankReinemannCarstenStrömbäckJesperde VreeseClaes H.2017. Populist Political Communication in Europe. New York: Routledge.
2.
Abi-HassanSahar. 2017. “Populism and Gender.” In The Oxford Handbook of Populism, ed. Rovira KaltwasserCristóbalTaggartPaulOchoa EspejoPaulinaOstiguyPierre, 426–44. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3.
AlbertazziDanieleMcDonnellDuncan. 2015. Populists in Power. London: Routledge.
4.
AslanidisParis. 2016. “Is populism an ideology? A refutation and a new perspective.” Political Studies64 (1): 88–104.
5.
BetzHans-Georg. 2018. “The Radical Right and Populism.” In The Oxford Handbook of the Radical Right, ed. RydgrenJens, 86–104. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6.
BodeLeticia. 2017. “Closing the Gap: Gender Parity in Political Engagement on Social Media.” Information, Communication & Society20 (4): 587–603.
7.
BosLindavan der BrugWouterde VreeseClaes H.2011. “How the Media Shape Perceptions of Right-Wing Populist Leaders.” Political Communication28 (2): 182–206.
8.
ColleyAnnMaltbyJohn. 2008. “Impact of the Internet on Our Lives: Male and Female Personal Perspectives.” Computers in Human Behavior24 (5):2005–13.
9.
DahlgrenPeter. 2013. The Political Web: Media, Participation and Alternative Democracy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
10.
de VreeseClaes H.EsserFrankAalbergTorilReinemannCarstenStanyer.James2018. “Populism as an Expression of Political Communication Content and Style: A New Perspective.” Special issue introduction article. International Journal of Press/Politics23 (4):423–438. doi: 10.1177/1940161218790035.
11.
DimitrovaDaniela V.ShehataAdamStrömbäckJesperNordLars W.2014. “The Effects of Digital Media on Political Knowledge and Participation in Election Campaigns: Evidence from Panel Data.” Communication Research41 (1): 95–118.
12.
ElchardusMarkSpruytBram. 2016. “Populism, Persistent Republicanism and Declinism: An Empirical Analysis of Populism as a Thin Ideology.” Government & Opposition51 (1): 111–33.
13.
EngesserSvenFawziNaylaLarssonAnders O.2017. “Populist Online Communication: Introduction to the Special Issue.” Information, Communication & Society20 (9): 1279–92.
14.
FabbriniSergioLazarMarc. 2013. “Still a Difficult Democracy? Italy between Populist Challenges and Institutional Weakness.” Contemporary Italian Politics5 (2): 106–12.
15.
Gil de ZúñigaHMolyneuxLZhengP.2014. Social media, political expression, and political participation: Panel analysis of lagged and concurrent relationships. Journal of Communication64 (4): 612–634.
16.
HallinDaniel C.ManciniPaolo. 2004. Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17.
HameleersMichealBosLindade VreeseClaes H.2016. “‘They Did It’: The Effects of Emotionalized Blame Attribution in Populist Communication.” Communication Research44 (6): 870–900.
18.
HameleersMichaelBosLindade VreeseClaes H.2017. “Framing Blame: Toward a Better Understanding of the Effects of Populist Communication on Populist Party Preferences.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties. Published electronically November 26. doi:10.1080/17457289.2017.1407326.
19.
HameleersMichaelBosLindade VreeseClaes H.2018. “Selective Exposure to Populist Communication: How Attitudinal Congruence Drives the Effects of Populist Attributions of Blame.” Journal of Communication68 (1): 51–74.
20.
HargittaiEszterWalejkoGina. 2008. “The Participation Divide: Content Creation and Sharing in the Digital Age.” Information, Community & Society11 (2): 239–56.
21.
HarteveldEelcoIvarsflatenElisabeth. 2018. “Why Women Avoid the Radical Right: Internalized Norms and Party Reputations.” British Journal of Political Science48 (2):369–84. doi:10.1017/S0007123415000745.
22.
HarteveldEelcoVan Der BrugWouterDahlbergStefanKokkonenAndrej. 2015. “The Gender Gap in Populist Radical-Right Voting: Examining the Demand Side in Western and Eastern Europe.” Patterns of Prejudice49 (1–2): 103–34.
23.
HilleSanneBakkerPiet. 2013. “I like News. Searching for the ‘Holy Grail’ of Social Media: The Use of Facebook by Dutch News Media and Their Audiences.” European Journal of Communication28 (6): 663–80.
24.
ImmerzeelTimCofféHildevan der LippeTanja. 2015. “Explaining the Gender Gap in Radical Right Voting: A Cross-National Investigation in 12 Western European Countries.” Comparative European Politics13 (2): 263–86.
25.
InglehartRonald F.NorrisPippa. 2016. “Trump, Brexit, and the Rise of Populism: Economic Have-Nots and Cultural Backlash.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, September 2.
JagersJanWalgraveStefaan. 2007. “Populism as Political Communication Style: An Empirical Study of Political Parties’ Discourse in Belgium.” European Journal of Political Research46 (3): 319–45.
KrämerBenjamin. 2017. “Populist Online Practices: The Function of the Internet in Right-Wing Populism.” Information, Communication & Society20:1293–309. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2017.1328520.
30.
LachapelleGuyMaarekPhilippe, eds. 2015. Political Parties in the Digital Age: The Impact of New Technologies in Politics. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
LutzChristophPieter HoffmannChristianMeckelMiriam. 2014. “Beyond Just Politics: A Systematic Literature Review of Online Participation.” First Monday19 (7): 1–36.
33.
MairP.2006. Party system change. In Handbook of party politics, ed. KatzRSCrottyWJ, 63–73. London: Sage.
34.
MoffittBenjamin. 2016. The Global Rise of Populism: Performance, Political Style, and Representation. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
35.
MuddeCas. 2007. Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36.
MuddeCas. 2014. “Fighting the system? Populist Radical Right Parties and Party System Change.” Party Politics20 (2): 217–22.
37.
MuscanellNicole L.GuadagnoRosanna E.2012. “Make New Friends or Keep the Old: Gender and Personality Differences in Social Networking Use.” Computers in Human Behavior28 (1): 107–12.
38.
NabiRobin L.2003. “Exploring the Framing Effects of Emotion: Do Discrete Emotions Differentially Influence Information Accessibility, Information Seeking, and Policy Preference?” Communication Research30 (2): 224–47.
39.
NorrisPippa. 2005. Radical Right: Voters and Parties in the Electoral Market. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40.
OnoHiroshiZavodnyMadeline. 2003. “Gender and the Internet.” Social Science Quarterly84 (1): 111–21.
41.
PolkJonathanRovnyJanBakkerRyan. et al. 2017 (January-March). “Explaining the salience of anti-elitism and reducing political corruption for political parties in Europe with the 2014 Chapel Hill Expert Survey data,” Research & Politics: 1–9.
42.
RamiroLuisGomezRaul. 2017. “Radical-Left Populism during the Great Recession: Podemos and Its Competition with the Established Radical Left.” Political Studies65 (1): 108–26.
43.
RooduijnMatthijsde LangeSarah L.van der BrugWouter. 2014. “A Populist Zeitgeist? Programmatic Contagion by Populist Parties in Western Europe.” Party Politics20 (4): 563–75.
44.
SandersKaren B.BerganzaRosade MiguelRoberto. 2017. “Populism from the Far Right to the Emergence of Podemos.” In Populist Political Communication in Europe, ed. AalbergTorilEsserFrankReinemannCarstenStrombakJesperde VreeseClaes H., 249–60. New York: Routledge.
45.
SchmuckDesiréeMatthesJörg. 2017. “Effects of Economic and Symbolic Threat Appeals in Right-Wing Populist Advertising on Anti-immigrant Attitudes: The Impact of Textual and Visual Appeals.” Political Communication34 (4): 607–26.
46.
SnijdersTomBoskerRoel. 1999. Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Applied Multilevel Analysis. London: Sage.
47.
SolaJorgeRenduelesCesar. 2018. Podemos, the upheaval of Spanish politics and the challenge of populism. Journal of Contemporary European Studies26 (1): 99–116.
48.
SpieringsNielsZasloveAndrej. 2015. “Gendering the Vote for Populist Radical-Right Parties.” Patterns of Prejudice49 (1–2): 135–62.
49.
SpieringsNielsZasloveAndrej. 2017. “Gender, Populist Attitudes, and Voting: Explaining the Gender Gap in Voting for Populist Radical Right and Populist Radical Left Parties.” West European Politics40 (4): 821–47.
50.
TaggartPaul. 2000. Populism. Buckingham: Open University Press.
51.
Vesnic-AlujevicLucia. 2012. “Political Participation and Web 2.0 in Europe: A Case Study of Facebook.” Public Relations Review38 (3): 466–70.
52.
VochocováLenkaŠtětkaVáclavMazákJaromír. 2016. “Good Girls Don’t Comment on Politics? Gendered Character of Online Political Participation in the Czech Republic.” Information, Communication & Society19 (10): 1321–39.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
