This study investigates challenges faced by investigative journalists in Latin America, one of the most dangerous places in the world for reporters. Guided by the hierarchy of influences model, we analyzed answers from 1,543 journalists, journalism educators, and journalism students in the region. We identified both single and multilevel constraints impeding investigative reporting in Latin America. Single-level influences are those that are better analyzed by focusing on one level of the hierarchical model. These included individual (lack of training), routine (relationships with sources), organizational (media ownership), and institutional influences (censorship). However, results also suggest there are certain types of influences that are better suited for analysis combining all levels. Despite two decades of media liberalization, crime and corruption, state violence against the press, and the lack of a free-speech culture cut across all layers, posing severe constraints to investigative reporting in Latin America.
AbdenourJesse. 2017. Inspecting the Investigators: An Analysis of Television Investigative Journalism and Factors Leading to Its Production.”Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. First Published September 28, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699017733438
AndersonDavidBenjaminsonPeter. 1976. Investigative Reporting. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
4.
Austin Forum on Journalism in the Americas. 2010. “Coverage of Drug Trafficking and Organized Crime in Latin America and the Caribbean.” Knight Center for Journalism in the Americas.” https://knightcenter.utexas.edu/austinforum2011_en.pdf.
5.
AzevedoFernando A.2006. “Mídia e democracia no Brasil: relações entre o sistema de mídia e o sistema político.” [“Media and democracy in Brazil: relationships between the media system and the political system.”] Opinião Pública121:88–113.
6.
BennettW. Lance. 1990. “Toward a Theory of Press-State Relations in the United States.” Journal of Communication402:103–27.
7.
BennettW. Lance. 2011. News: The Politics of Illusion. 9th Edition.New York: Longman.
8.
BennettW. LanceLawrenceRegina G.LivingstonSteven. 2007. When the Press Fails: Political Power and the News Media from Iraq to Katrina. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.
EttemaJames S.GlasserTheodore L.1998. Custodians of Conscience: Investigative Journalism and Public Virtue. New York: Columbia University Press.
14.
FoxElizabethWaisbordSilvio. 2002. Latin Politics, Global Media. Austin: Texas University Press.
15.
GalperínHernán. 2002. “Transforming Television in Argentina: Market Development and Policy Reform in the 1990s.” In Latin Politics, Global Media, ed. FoxElizabethWaisbordSilvio, 22–37. Austin: University of Texas Press.
16.
GansHerbert J.1979. Deciding What’s News: A Study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek, and Time. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
17.
GansHerbert J.2004. Deciding What’s News. New York: Random House.
18.
García-CancliniNéstor. 2005. Hybrid Cultures: Strategies for Entering and Leaving Modernity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
19.
GitlinTodd. 1978. “Media Sociology: The Dominant Paradigm.” Theory and Society62:205–53.
20.
GitlinTodd. 1980. The Whole World Is Watching: Mass Media in the Making & Unmaking of the New Left. Berkeley: University of California Press.
21.
GuerreroManuel A.Márquez-RamírezMireya, eds. 2014. Media Systems and Communication Policies in Latin America. London: Springer.
22.
HughesSallieLawsonChappell. 2005. “The Barriers to Media Opening in Latin America.” Political Communication221:9–25.
23.
IyengarShanto. 1991. Is Anyone Responsible? How Television Frames Political Issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Marques de MeloJose. 1994. A Opinião no Jornalismo Brasileiro [Opinion in Brazilian Journalism]. Petrópolis: Vozes.
29.
Marques de MeloJose. 1998. Teoria da comunicação: paradigmas latino-americanos [Communication Theory: Latin-American paradigms]. Petrópolis: Vozes.
30.
Marques de MeloJose. 2006. Teoria do Jornalismo: identidades brasileiras [Theory of Journalism: Brazilian identities]. São Paulo: Paulus.
31.
MatosCarolina. 2008. Journalism and Political Democracy in Brazil. Lanham: Lexington Books.
32.
MattosSérgio. 2002. A Historia da Televisão Brasileira [The History of Brazilian Television]. Petrópolis: Voze.
33.
MelladoClaudia. 2012. “The Chilean Journalist.” In WeaverDavid H.WillnatLars (eds), The Global Journalist in the 21st Century (pp. 382-399). New York, NY: Routledge.
34.
RellyJeannine E.González de BustamanteCeleste. 2014. “Silencing Mexico: A Study of Influences on Journalists in the Northern States.” The International Journal of Press/Politics191:108–31.
ReyGermán. 2005. El cuerpo del delito [Corpus Delicti]. Bogotá: Centro de Competencia en Comunicación para América Latina.
38.
SaxLinda J.GilmartinShannon K.BryantAlyssa N.2003. “Assessing Response Rates and Nonresponse Bias in Web and Paper Surveys.” Research in Higher Education44:409–32.
39.
ShoemakerPamela J.Mayfield.Elizabeth K.1987. “Building a Theory of News Content: A Synthesis of Current Approaches.” Journalism Monographs103. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED284240
40.
ShoemakerPamela J.ReeseStephen D.1996. Mediating the Message. White Plains: Longman.
41.
ShoemakerPamela J.ReeseStephen D.2014. Mediating the Message: A Media Sociology Perspective. New York: Routledge.
42.
SinclairJohnStraubhaarJoseph D.2013. Latin American Television Industries. London: BFI/Palgrave Macmillan.
43.
StraubhaarJoseph D.1989. “Television and Video in the Transition from Military to Civilian Rule in Brazil.” Latin American Research Review241:140–54.
44.
StraubhaarJoseph D.2007. World Television: From Global to Local. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
TuchmanGaye. 1978. Making News. New York: Free Press.
47.
UllmannJohnHoneymanStephen. 1983. The Reporter’s Handbook: An Investigator’s Guide to Documents and Techniques. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
48.
WaisbordSilvio. 2000. Watchdog Journalism in South America. New York: Columbia University Press.
49.
WaisbordSilvio. 2002. “Antipress Violence and the Crisis of the State.” The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics73:90–109.
50.
WaisbordSilvio. 2014. “United and Fragmented: Communication and Media Studies in Latin America.” Journal of Latin American Communication Research41:55–77.
51.
WeaverDavid H.2015. “Studying Journalists and Journalism across Four Decades: A Sociology of Occupations Approach.” Mass Communication & Society18 (1): 4–16.
52.
ZelizerBarbie. 2004. Taking Journalism Seriously: News and the Academy. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
