The emergence of a national “Tea Party” movement in the United States stimulated much media commentary regarding the movement’s origins, goals, participants, and even temperament. Unlike political movements of the recent past, the Tea Party stands starkly to the right. This study examines nightly cable news coverage of this movement by using key frames associated with the “protest paradigm”—the tendency for media to marginalize movements by drawing attention away from core concerns raised by such movements. We ask whether the protest paradigm can be applied to a right-wing movement and whether such application varies by the ideological leaning of a given source. That is, do cable news channels use frames in ways consistent with their respective ideological hues? We draw on a representative sample of stories regarding the national movement from the most viewed nightly news programs on Fox News, MSNBC, and CNN, with the Associated Press as a reference point. Results show significant differences across sources in issue and marginalization frame use. Although utilization of marginalization frames is popular among ideological channels, traditional news sources are not immune from using these devices.
AnsolabehereStephenBehrRoyIyengarShanto. 1993. The Media Game: American Politics in the Television Age. New York: Macmillan.
3.
BaumMatthew A.GroelingTim. 2008. “New Media and the Polarization of American Political Discourse.” Political Communication25 (4): 345–65.
4.
BennettW. Lance.1990. “Toward a Theory of Press-State Relations.” Journal of Communication40 (2): 103–25.
5.
BennettW. Lance.2009. News: The Politics of Illusion. 8th Edition.New York: Pearson Longman.
6.
BoykoffJules.2007. “Limiting Dissent: The Mechanisms of State Repression in the United States.” Social Movement Studies6 (3): 281–310.
7.
BoykoffJulesLascheverEulalie2011. “The Tea Party Movement, Framing, and the US Media.” Social Movement Studies10 (4): 341–66.
8.
BoyleMichael P.ArmstrongCory L.2009. “Measuring Level of Deviance: Considering the Distinct Influence of Goals and Tactics on News Treatment of Abortion Protests.” Atlantic Journal of Communication17 (4): 166–83.
9.
BoyleMichael P.McCluskeyMichael R.DevanathanNarayanSteinSusan E.McLeodDouglas2004. “The Influence of Deviance Level and Protest Type on Coverage of Social Protest in Wisconsin from 1960 to 1999.” Mass Communication and Society7 (1): 43–60.
10.
BoyleMichael P.McCluskeyMichael R.McLeodDouglas M.SteinSusan E.2005. “Newspapers and Protest: An Examination of Protest Coverage from 1960 to 1999.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly82 (3): 638–53.
11.
BoyleMichael P.McLeodDouglas M.ArmstrongCory L.2012. “Adherence to the Protest Paradigm: The Influence of Protest Goals and Tactics on News Coverage in U.S. and International Newspapers.” The International Journal of Press/Politics17 (2): 127–44.
12.
ChanJoseph ManChi-ChuanLee1984. “Journalistic ‘Paradigms’ of Civil Protests: A Case Study of Hong Kong.” In The News Media in National and International Conflict, ed. ArnoAndrewDissanayakeWimal, 183–202. Boulder, CO: Westview.
13.
ChongDennisDruckmanJames D.2007. “A Theory of Framing and Opinion Formation in Competitive Elite Environments.” Journal of Communication57 (1): 99–118.
CoeKevinTewksburyDavidBondBradley J.DrogosKristin L.PorterRobert W.YahnAshleyZhangYuanyuan2008. “Hostile News: Partisan Use and Perceptions of Cable News Programming.” Journal of Communication58 (2): 201–19.
16.
CourserZachary2010. “The Tea Party at the Election.” The Forum8 (4): 1–18, Article 5. doi:10.2202/1540-8884.1410.
17.
DardisFrank E.2006. “Marginalization Devices in the U.S. Press Coverage of Iraq War Protest: A Content Analysis.” Mass Communication and Society9 (2): 117–35.
18.
DavisRichardOwenDiana1998. New Media and American Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
19.
Di CiccoDamon T.2010. “The Public Nuisance Paradigm: Changes in Mass Media Coverage of Political Protest since the 1960s.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly87 (1): 135–53.
20.
DonohueGeorge A.TichenorPhillip J.OlienClarice N.1995. “A Guard Dog Perspective on the Role of the Media.” Journal of Communication45 (2): 115–32.
21.
EntmanRobert M.1993. “Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm.” Journal of Communication43 (4): 51–58.
22.
FallowsJames1997. Breaking the News: How the Media Undermine American Democracy. New York: Vintage Books.
23.
FritschJane1995. “The Grass Roots, Just a Free Phone Call Away.” New York Times, June23, A1.
24.
GamsonWilliam A.GadiWolfsfeld1993. “Movements and Media As Interacting Systems.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science528 (1): 114–25.
25.
GinsbergBenjaminLowiTheodore J.WeirMargaret2011. We the People. Shorter 8th Edition.New York: W.W. Norton.
26.
GitlinTodd1981. The Whole World Is Watching: Mass Media in the Making and Unmaking of the New Left. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
27.
GreenJohn C.GuthJames L.KillKevin1993. “Faith and Election: The Christian Right in Congressional Campaigns, 1978–1988.” Journal of Politics55 (1): 80–91.
28.
HarrisFrederickGillionDaniel2010. “Expanding the Possibilities—Reconceptualizing Political Participation As a Toolbox.” In Oxford Handbook of American Elections and Behavior, ed. LeighleyJan, 144–161. New York: Oxford University Press.
29.
HolbertR. LanceHmielowskiJay D.WeeksBrian E.2012. “Clarifying Relationships between Ideology and Ideologically Oriented Cable TV News Use: A Case of Suppression.” Communication Research39 (2): 194–216. doi:10.1177/0093650211405650.
30.
IyengarShanto1991. Is Anyone Responsible? How Television Frames Political Issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31.
IyengarShanto2011. Media Politics: A Citizen’s Guide. 2nd Edition.New York: W.W. Norton.
32.
IyengarShantoHahnKyu S.2009. “Red Media, Blue Media: Evidence of Ideological Selectivity in Media Use.” Journal of Communication59 (1): 19–39.
33.
JamiesonKathleen HallCappellaJoseph N.2008. Echo Chamber: Rush Limbaugh and the Conservative Media Establishment. New York: Oxford University Press.
34.
JhaSonora2007. “Exploring Internet Influence on the Coverage of Social Protest: Content Analysis Comparing Protest Coverage in 1967 and 1999.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly84 (1): 40–57.
35.
KarpowitzChristopher F.MonsonJ. QuinPattersonKelly D.PopeJeremy C.2011. “Tea Time in America: The Impact of the Tea Party Movement on the 2010 Midterm Elections.” PS: Political Science & Politics44 (2): 303–309.
36.
KrippendorffKlaus1980. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
37.
LipskyMichael1968. “Protest As a Political Resource.” American Political Science Review62 (4): 1144–58.
38.
McCombsMaxwell E.ShawDonald L.1972. “The Agenda-Setting Function of the Mass Media.” Public Opinion Quarterly36 (Summer): 176–87.
39.
McLeodDouglas M.DetenberBenjamin H.1999. “Framing Effects of Television News Coverage of Social Protest.” Journal of Communication49 (3): 3–23.
40.
McLeodDouglas M.HertogJames K.1992. “The Manufacture of ‘Public Opinion’ by Reporters: Informal Cues for Public Perceptions of Protest Groups.” Discourse and Society3 (3): 259–75.
41.
NelsonThomas E.OxleyZoe M.1999. “Framing Effects on Belief Importance and Opinion.” Journal of Politics61 (4): 1040–67.
42.
Parry-GilesShawn J.2001. “Political Authenticity, Television News, and Hillary Rodham Clinton.” In Politics, Discourse, and American Society: New Agendas, ed. HartRoderick P.SparrowBartholomew H., 211–227. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
43.
PattersonThomas E.1994. Out of Order. New York: Vintage Books.
44.
PattersonThomas E.2003. The Vanishing Voter: Public Involvement in an Age of Uncertainty. New York: Vintage Books.
45.
PerrinAndrew J.TepperSteven J.CarenNealMorrisSally2011. “Cultures of the Tea Party.” Contexts10 (2): 74–75.
46.
ScheufeleDietram A.1999. “Framing As a Theory of Media Effects.” Journal of Communication49 (1): 103–22.
47.
SchudsonMichael1995. The Power of News. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
48.
SchudsonMichael2001. “The Objectivity Norm in American Journalism.” Journalism2 (2): 149–70.
49.
SkocpolThedaWilliamsonVanessa2012. The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican Conservatism. New York: Oxford University Press.
50.
SmithJackieMcCarthyJohn D.McPhailClarkAugustynBoguslaw2001. “From Protest to Agenda Building: Description Bias in Media Coverage of Protest Events in Washington, DC.” Social Forces79 (4): 1397–423.
51.
StroudNatalie J.2008. “Media Use and Political Predispositions: Revisiting the Concept of Selective Exposure.” Political Behavior30 (3): 341–66.
52.
StroudNatalie J.2011. Niche News: The Politics of News Choice. New York: Oxford University Press.
53.
StroudNatalie J.Vanessa de MacedoHiggins2008. “Content Analysis.” In Research Methods in Communication, ed. ZhouShuhuaSloanW. M. David, 123–143. Northport, AL: Vision Press.
54.
WilliamsonVanessaSkocpolThedaCogginJohn2011. “The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican Conservatism.” Perspectives on Politics9 (1): 25–43.
55.
ZallerJohn R.1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press
