In Romania, the political system, itself an amalgam of systems and still shifting in line with a continually evolving democracy, is only the vessel in which corruption is percolating and not the cause of it; culture is the cause. This is true of the very nature of how instrumentalization, clientelism, and political parallelism have evolved. Romanian clientelism and the political parallelism are often an expression of the powers of the manager-journalist or star journalists and not only of media owners and politicians. This may set the Romania mass media system apart from other systems.
ComanMihai. 2012. “The Paradox of Journalistic Elites in Post-Communist Romania: From Defenders of Freedom of Expression to Corrupted Moguls.” In Fighting Windmills. A Retrospective on over 20 Years of Media Transformation in Eastern Europe, ed. GrossPeterJakubowiczKarol. Lexington, MA: Lexington Press. Forthcoming.
9.
ComanMihai. 2009. “Press Freedom and Media Pluralism in Romania: Facts, Myths and Paradoxes.” In Press Freedom and Pluralism in Europe, ed. CzepekAndreaHellwigMelanieNowakEva, 177–96. Bristol, UK: Intellect Press.
10.
ComanMihaiGrossPeter. 2006. Media and Journalism in Romania. Berlin, Germany: Vistas Verlag.
11.
ComanMihaiRaduRalucaPreoteasaManuelaPaunMihaelaBadauHorea. 2011. “Romania: Twenty Years of Professionalization in Journalism—Still Counting.” In Mapping Media Accountability—In Europe and Beyond, ed. EberweinTobiasFenglerSusanneLaukEppLeppic-BorkTanja, 142–54. Koln, Germany: Herbert von Halem Verlag.
12.
CrawfordBeverlyLijphartArend. 1995. “Explaining Political and Economic Change in Post-Communist Eastern Europe: Old Legacies, New Institutions, Hegemonic Norms and International Pressures.” Comparative Political Studies28:171–199.
13.
DelaloyeGerard. 2007. “L’avis de l’expert. Suspension du president en Roumanie: le deuxieme putsch d’Ion Iliescu. Le Temps, Apr. 24 (Switzerland). http://www.letemps.ch/ (accessed April 25, 2007).
14.
DeweyJohn. 1930. Human Nature and Conduct. NY: Modern Library.
15.
DuvergerMaurice, ed. 1986a. Les régimes semi-présidentiels. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
16.
DuvergerMaurice. 1986b. “Le concept de régime semi-présidentiel.” In Les régimes semi-présidentiels, ed. DuvergerMaurice, 7–17Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
17.
EngesserSvenFranzettiAnnika. 2011. “Media Systems and Political Systems: Dimensions of Comparison.” International Communication Gazette73(4):273–301.
18.
Eurobarometer 69. 2008. Public opinion in the European Union. National Report: Executive Summary, Romania. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.
19.
FenglerSusanneEberweinTobiasLeppik-BorkTanja. 2011. “Mapping Media Accountability—in Europe and Beyond.” In Mapping Media Accountability—In Europe and Beyond, ed. EberweinTobiasFenglerSusanneLaukEppLeppic-BorkTanja, 7–22. Koln, Germany: Herbert von Halem Verlag.
20.
GaneaLianaPopaMaria-AdrianaUrsuleanVlad. 2011. Raportul FREEEX. Libertatea Presei in Romania 2010. Bucharest, Romania: Active Watch, Agentia de Monitorizare a Presei.
21.
GhineaCristianMungiu-PippidiAlina. 2010. Media Policies and Regulatory Practices in a Selected Set of European Countries, the EU and the Council of Europe: The Case of Romania. Mediadem, European Commission.
22.
GrossPeter. 1996. Mass Media in Revolution and National Development: The Romanian Laboratory. Ames: Iowa State University Press.
23.
GrossPeter. 2004. Mass Media and Democracy in Eastern Europe [in Romanian]. Iasi, Romania: Polirom, 2004.
24.
GrossPeter. 2008a. “Dances with Wolves. A Meditation on the Media and Political System in the European Union’s Romania.” In Finding the Right Place on the Map. Central and Eastern European Media Change in a Global Perspective, ed. JakubowiczKarolSukosdMiklos, 125–44. Bristol, UK: Intellect Books.
25.
GrossPeter. 2008b. “Back to the (Uncertain) Future. Politics, Business and the Media in Romania.” Global Media Journal (Polish Edition) 1(4):51–68.
26.
GrossPeter. 2008c. “Forward to the Past: The Intractable Problems of Romania’s Media System.” International Journal of Press/Politics13(2):141–52.
27.
Grzymala-BusseAnna. 2007. “Beyond Clientelism: Incumbent State Capture and State Formation.” Comparative Political Studies41(4/5):638–73.
28.
HallinDaniel C.ManciniPaulo. 2004. Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
29.
HumeEllen. 2011. Caught in the Middle: Central and Eastern European Journalism at a Crossroads. A Report to the Center for International Media Assistance. Washington, D.C.: Center for International Media Assistance.
30.
HuntingtonSamuel P. (1999) 2006. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.
31.
InglehartRonald. 2000. “Culture and Democracy.” In Culture Matters: How Values Shape Human Progress, ed. HarrisonLawrence E.HuntingtonSamuel P., 80–97. New York: Basic Books.
32.
Institutul Roman Pentru Evaluare si Strategie. 2011. Atitudini si obiceiuri de consum media. Perceptii privind CNA. Raport de cercetare. http://www.ires.com.ro/despre-noi.
33.
JiglauGeorgeGherghinaSergiu. 2011. “The Ideological Institutionalization of the Romanian Party System.” Romanian Journal of Political Science11(1). http://www.sar.org.ro/polsci/?p=605 (accessed November 1, 2011).
34.
JowettKenneth. 1992. New World Disorder: The Leninist Extinction. Berkely: University of California Press.
35.
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven. 2009. “Independent Study on Indicators for Media Pluralism in the Member States—Towards a Risk-based Approach.” Final Report—Annex III. Country Reports. Romania. Prepared for the European Commission.
36.
LazescuAlexandru. 2007. “In transeele fronturilor pro si anti-Basescu.” Revista 2215(885). www.revista22.ro (accessed October 20, 2007).
37.
LichtAmir N.GoldschmidtChananSchwartzShalom H.2007. “Culture Rules: The Foundations of the Rule of Law and Other Norms of Governance.” Journal of Comparative Economics35:659–88.
38.
LijphartArend. 1984. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Twenty-One Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.
39.
LijphartArend. 1999. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.
40.
LinzJuan J.1997. “Introduction: Some Thoughts on Presidentialism in Postcommunist Europe.” In Post-Communist Presidents, ed. TarasRaymond, 1–14. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41.
LinzJuan J.StepanAlfred1996. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation. Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
42.
MainwaringScottShugartMatthew. July1997. “Juan Linz, Presidentialism and Democracy: A Critical Appraisal.” Comparative Politics29(4):449–71.
MarinoAdrian. 1996. Politica si cultura. Pentru o noua cultura romana. Iasi, Romania: Polirom.
45.
“Miscari in jos in audienta presei scrise. Majoritatea ziarelor au inregistrat scaderi ale numarului de cititori la ultimele masuratori.” Evenimentul Zilei.
46.
Mungiu-PippidiAlina. 2008. “How Media and Politics Shape Each Other in the New Europe.” In Finding the Right Place on the Map. Central and Eastern European Media Change in a Global Perspective, ed. JakubowiczK.SukosdM., 87–100. Bristol, UK: Intellect Press.
47.
Mungiu-PippidiAlina. 2010. “A Case Study in Political Clientelism. Romania’s Policy-Making Mayhem.” Unpublished Paper. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1686617.
PatapieviciHoria-Traian. 1996. Politice. Bucharest, Romania: Humanitas. “Peste zece posturi noi pe piata tv din Romania,” on HotNews.ro. www.HotNews.ro (accessed November 19, 2007).
50.
PopLiliana. 2006. Democratising capitalism? The political economy of post-communist transformations in Romania, 1989-2001. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
PreoteasaManuela. 2004. “Romania.” In Media Ownership and Its Impact on Media Independence and Pluralism, ed. PetkovicBrankica, 403–424. Slovenia: Peace Institute, Institute for Contemporary Social and Political Studies.
53.
PreoteasaManuela. 2008. “Romania.” In Television across Europe: More Channels, Less Independence. Follow up Reports, ed. DragomirMariusThompsonMarch, 365–412. Budapest, Hungary: Open Society Institute.
54.
ProtsykOlehMatichescuMarius Lupsa. 2011. “Clientelism and Political Recruitment in Democratic Transition: Evidence from Romania.” Comparative Politics42(2):207–24.
55.
SartoriGiovanni. 2003. “Alcuni Chiaramenti sul Semipresidenzialismo.” Political Study—Romanian Political Science Review, 3(3):617–20.
56.
SartoriGiovanni. 2004. Ingegneria costituzionale comparata. Strutture, incentivi ed esiti. Bologna, Italy: Il Mulino.
57.
SchudsonMichael. 2002. “The News Media as Political Institutions.” Annual Review of Political Science5: 249–69.
58.
SparksColin (with AnnaReading). 1998. Communism, Capitalism and the Mass Media. London: Sage.
59.
SplichalSlavko. 1995. Media beyond Socialism. Boulder, CO: Westview.
60.
StanLavinia. 2003. “Democratic Delusions. Ten Myths Accepted by the Romanian Democratic Opposition.” Problems of Post-Communism50(6):51–60.
61.
StarkDavidBrusztLaszlo. 1998. Postsocialist Pathways. Transforming Politics and Property in East Central Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
62.
StegherrMarcLiesemKerstin. 2010. Die Medien in Osteuropa. Mediensysteme im Transformationsprozess. Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag fur Sozialwissenschaften.
63.
TapalagaDan. 2010. Bulversarea Valorilor. Scrieri dintr-un timp buimac. Bucharest, Romania: Humanitas.
64.
TismaneanuVladimir. 2010. “The First Post-Communist Decade.” Romanian Journal of Society and Politics. http://rjsp.eu/99.html.
65.
WeberEugen. 1965. “Romania.” In The European Right. A Historical Profile, ed. RoggerHansWeberEugen, 501–74. Berkeley: University of California Press.
WydraHarald. 2007. Communism and the Emergence of Democracy. Cambridge University Press.
68.
YoungPatricia T.2009. “Political Parties and Democratic Governance in Romania.” Presented at the American Political Science Association Meeting, Toronto, Canada.
