Research shows that news coverage of protest groups that challenge the status quo treats them relatively critically. To develop a more precise understanding of such coverage, this study content analyzes an international set of newspapers (N = 220) to explore the relationships between a protest group’s goals and tactics on resulting news coverage. The findings indicate that a group’s tactics—more than its goals—play a substantial role in affecting coverage. Furthermore, the findings also show that the protest issue and location indirectly affect coverage through their relationship to a group’s tactics. Implications for journalists and protesters alike are discussed.
ArmstrongCory L.2006. Revisiting structural pluralism: A two-dimensional concept of community power. Mass Communication & Society9: 287-300.
2.
Avraham Eli. 2003. Behind media marginality: Coverage of social groups and places in the Israeli press. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
3.
BoykoffJules. 2006. Framing dissent: Mass-media coverage of the global justice movement. New Political Science28: 201-28.
4.
BoyleMichael P.ArmstrongCory L.2009. Measuring level of deviance: Considering the distinct influence of goals and tactics on news treatment of abortion protests. Atlantic Journal of Communication17:166-83.
5.
BoyleMichael P.McCluskeyMichael R.DevanathanNarayanSteinSusanMcLeodDouglas M.2004. The influence of level of deviance and protest type on coverage of social protest in Wisconsin from 1960 to 1999. Mass Communication & Society7:43-60.
6.
BrownRichard M.1979. The gatekeeper reassessed: A return to Lewin. Journalism Quarterly59:595-601, 679.
7.
ChanJoseph M.LeeChi-Chuan. 1984. The journalistic paradigm on civil protests: A case study of Hong Kong. In The news media in national and international conflict, edited by ArnoA.DissanayakeW., 183-202. Boulder, CO: Westview.
8.
DemersDaveViswanathK.1999. Mass media, social control and social change: A macrosocial perspective. Ames: Iowa State University Press.
EntmanRobert M.1993. Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication43:51-58.
11.
GamsonWilliam A.1990. The strategy of social protest. 2nd ed.Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
12.
GamsonWilliam A.ModiglianiAndre. 1989. Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology95:1-37.
13.
GansHerbert. 1979. Deciding what’s news. New York: Pantheon Books.
14.
GitlinTodd. 1980. The whole world is watching: Mass media and the making and unmaking of the new left. Berkeley: University of California Press.
15.
GurevitchMichaelBlumlerJay G.1980. Political communication systems and democratic values. In Democracy and the mass media, edited by LichtenbergJ., 269-87. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16.
HermanEdward S.ChomskyNoam. 1988. Manufacturing consent: The political economy of the mass media. New York: Pantheon Books.
17.
HertogJames K.McLeodDouglas M.1995. Anarchists wreak havoc in downtown Minneapolis: A multi-level study of media coverage of radical protester. Journalism and Mass Communication Monographs151:1-48.
18.
HugSimonWislerDominique. 1998. Correcting for selection bias in social movement research. Mobilization3:141-61.
19.
KaramjitKaurYongNicholas. 2008. Tourists trapped: Group bound for airport is blocked by protesters wielding weapons. The Straits Times. Lexis-Nexis database (accessed October 19, 2009).
McCluskeyMichaelSteinSusan E.BoyleMichael P.McLeodDouglas M.2009. Community structure and social protest: Influence on newspaper coverage. Mass Communication & Society12:353-71.
22.
McLeodDouglas M.1995. Communicating deviance: The effects of television news coverage of social protest. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media39:4-19.
23.
McLeodDouglas M.1999. The protest paradigm and news coverage of the “Right to Party” movement. In It’s show time!: Media, politics, and popular culture, edited by SchultzD. A., 29-50. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
24.
McLeodDouglas M.2007. News coverage and social protest: How the media’s protest paradigm exacerbates social conflict. Journal of Dispute Resolution2007:185-94.
25.
McLeodDouglas M.DetenberBen H.1999. Framing effects of television news coverage of social protest. Journal of Communication49:3-23.
26.
McLeodDouglas M.HertogJames K.1992. The manufacture of public opinion by reporters: Informal cues for public perceptions of protest groups. Discourse and Society3:259-75.
27.
McLeodDouglas M.HertogJames K.1999. Social control and the mass media’s role in the regulation of protest groups: The Communicative Acts perspective. In Mass media, social control and social change, edited by DemersD.ViswanathK., 305-30. Ames: Iowa State University Press.
28.
MydansSethFullerThomas. 2009. Protesters in Thailand challenge premier. The New York Times. Lexis-Nexis database (accessed October 19, 2009).
29.
OliverPamela E.ManeyGregory M.2000. Political processes and local newspaper coverage of protest events: From selection bias to triadic interactions. American Journal of Sociology106:463-505.
30.
OsmanSalim. 2008. Jakarta under pressure not to ban sect: Protesters rally in support of Ahmadiyah and call for religious freedom. The Straits Times. Lexis-Nexis database (accessed October 19, 2009).
31.
ReeseStephen D.2001. Prologue-framing public life: A bridging model for media research. In Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world, edited by ReeseS. D.GandyO. H.GrantA. E., 7-31. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
32.
ShaverKatherine. 2008. Highway a health risk, protesters say: Students, parents of school next to proposed road ask governor to halt construction. The Washington Post. Lexis-Nexis database (accessed October 19, 2009).
33.
ShoemakerPamela J.1984. Media treatment of deviant political groups. Journalism Quarterly61:66-75, 82.
34.
ShoemakerPamela J.ReeseStephen D.1996. Mediating the message: Theories of influences on mass media content. 2nd ed.New York: Longman.
35.
WittebolsJames H.1996. News from the noninstitutional world: U.S. and Canadian television news coverage of social protest. Political Communication13:345-61.
36.
WolfsfeldGadiAvrahamEliAburaiyaIssam. 2000. When prophesy always fails: Israeli press coverage of the Arab minority’s Land Day protests. Political Communication17:115-31.
