Through the use of experimental methods, this study examines the claim that strategic news engenders political cynicism. First, it builds upon previous theory by conceptualizing and measuring political cynicism at both issue-specific and global levels. Second, the contingency of framing effects is a contested but crucial area of the framing paradigm and deserves greater attention in strategic framing studies. The study therefore examines this in detail by testing a number of individual characteristics for their moderating effects. The author found that relative to issue-based coverage, strategic news frames increased issue-specific political cynicism, but this effect was only evident for those who were less politically engaged and knowledgeable. The effects of the strategy frame on more global measures of political cynicism were minimal. The findings are discussed in the light of ongoing debates about framing effects and the media’s role in democratic engagement.
Almond, G., and S. Verba.1963. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
2.
Ansolabehere, S., and S. Iyengar.1995. Going Negative: How Attack Ads Shrink and Polarize the Electorate. New York, NY: Free Press.
3.
Aronson, E., P. C.Ellsworth, J. M. Carlsmith, and M. Gonzales.1990. Methods of Research in Social Psychology . 2nd Edition. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
4.
Bartle, J.2002. "Why Labour Won-Again." In Britain at the Polls 2001, ed. A. King.New York, NY: Chatham House.
5.
Bennett, W.L.2004. "Branded Political Communication: Lifestyle Politics, Logo Campaigns, and the Rise of Global Citizenship." In Politics, Products, and Markets: Exploring Political Consumerism Past and Present, ed. M. Micheletti, A. Follesdal, and D. Stolle.New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
6.
Blumler, J.G.1997. "Origins of the Crisis of Communication for Citizenship ." Political Communication14:395-404.
7.
Brants, K., C. H. de Vreese, J. Möller, and P. van Praag.2009. "The Real Spiral of Cynicism? Symbiosis and Mistrust between Politicians and Journalists."International Journal of Press/ Politics15(1):25-40.
8.
Brown, S.R., and L.E. Melamed.1990. Experimental Design and Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
9.
Cappella, J.N., and K.H. Jamieson.1997. Spiral of Cynicism: The Press and the Public Good. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
10.
Chong, D., and J.N. Druckman.2007. "Framing Theory."Annual Review of Political Science10:103-26.
11.
Citrin, J.1974. "The Political Relevance of Trust in Government ." American Political Science Review68:973-88.
12.
Craig, S.C.1993. The Malevolent Leaders: Popular Discontent in America . Boulder, CO: Westview.
13.
Delli Carpini, M.X.2000. "Gen.com: Youth, Civic Engagement, and the New Information Environment." Political Communication17(4):341-49.
14.
de Vreese, C.H.2004. "The Effects of Strategic News on Political Cynicism, Issue Evaluation, and Policy Support: A Two- Wave Experiment."Mass Communication and Society7(2):191-214.
15.
de Vreese, C.H.2005a. Framing Europe: Television News and European Integration . Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Her Spinus.
16.
de Vreese, C.H.2005b. "The Spiral of Cynicism Reconsidered."European Journal of Communication20(3):283-301.
17.
de Vreese, C.H., and M. Elenbaas.2008. "Media in the Game of Politics: Effects of Strategic Metacoverage on Political Cynicism."Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics13(3):285-309.
18.
de Vreese, C.H., J. Peter, and H.A. Semetko.2001. "Framing Politics at the Launch of the Euro: A Cross-National Comparative Study of Frames in the News."Political Communication18:107-22.
19.
de Vreese, C.H., and H.A. Semetko.2002. "Cynical and Engaged: Strategic Campaign Coverage, Public Opinion and Mobilisation in a Referendum."Communication Research29(6):615-41.
20.
Druckman, J.N.2004. "Political Preference Formation: Competition, Deliberation, and the (Ir) relevance of Framing Effects." American Political Science Review98:671-86.
21.
Druckman, J.N., and K.R. Nelson.2003. "Framing and Deliberation: How Citizens’ Conversations Limit Elite Influence." American Journal of Political Science47:729-45.
22.
Electoral Commission and Hansard Society.2007. An Audit of Political Engagement 4. London, UK: Electoral Commission and Hansard Society.
23.
Elenbaas, M., and de Vreese, C.H.2008. The Effects of Strategic News on Political Cynicism and Vote Choice Among Young Voters in a Referendum. Journal of Communication, 58(3), 550-67.
24.
Entman, R.M.1989. Democracy without Citizens: Media and the Decay of American Politics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
25.
Erber, R., and R.R. Lau.1990. "Political Cynicism Revisited: An Information-Processing Reconciliation of Policy-Based and Incumbency-Based Interpretations of Changes in Trust in Government." American Journal of Political Science Review34:236-53.
26.
Fallows, J.1996. Breaking the News: How the Media Undermine American Democracy . New York, NY: Vintage .
27.
Fazio, R.H.1995. "Attitudes as Object-Evaluation Associations: Determinants, Consequences, and Correlates of Attitude Accessibility." In Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences, ed. R. E. Petty and J. A. Krosnick.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28.
Ford, T.E., and A.W. Kruglanski .1995. "Effects of Epistemic Motivations on the Use of Accessible Constructs in Social Judgment." Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin21(9):950-62.
29.
Gavin, N.T.2007. Press and Television in British Politics. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
30.
Iyengar, S.1991. Is Anyone Responsible? How Television Frames Political Issues. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
31.
Jamieson, K.H.1992. Dirty Politics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
32.
Just, M., A. Crigler, and T. Buhr.1999. "Voice, Substance and Cynicism in Presidential Campaign Media."Political Communication16(1):15-24.
33.
Kerbel, M.R., S. Apee, and M.H. Ross.2000. "PBS Ain’t So Different: Public Broadcasting, Election Frames, and Democratic Empowerment."Harvard International Journal of Press/ Politics5(8):8-32.
34.
Kinder, D. R., and T. Palfrey, eds. 1993. Experimental Foundations of Political Science. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
35.
Kleinnijenhuis, J., A.M.J. van Hoof, and D. Oegema.2006. "Negative News and the Sleeper Effect of Distrust."Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics11(2):86-104.
36.
Kuhn, R.2003. "The Media and Politics." In Developments in British Politics 7, ed. P. Dunleavy, A. Gamble, R. Heffernan, and G. Peele.Hampshire , UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
37.
Lawrence, R.2000. "Game Framing the Issues: Tracking the Strategy Frame in Public Policy News." Political Communication17:93-114.
38.
Lewis, J., A. Williams, and B. Franklin.2008. "Four Rumours and an Explanation." Journalism Practice2(1):27-45.
39.
Luskin, R.C.1987. Measuring Political Sophistication. American Journal of Political Science, 31: 856-99.
40.
McGuire, W.J.1968. "Personality and Susceptibility to Social Influence." In Handbook of Personality Theory and Research, ed. E. F. Borgatta and W. W. Lambert.New York, NY: Rand-McNally .
41.
McLeod, D.M., and B.H. Detenber.1999. "Framing Effects of Television News Coverage of Social Protest." Journal of Communication49(3):3-23.
42.
McManus, M.1994. Market Driven Journalism: Let the Citizen Beware?Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
43.
McNair, B.2006. Cultural Chaos: Journalism, News and Power in a Globalised World. London, UK: Routledge .
44.
Miller, A.H.1974. "Political Issues and Trust in Government: 1964-1970."American Political Science Review68:951-72.
45.
Morris, J., and R.A. Clawson.2005. "Media Coverage of Congress in the 1990s: Scandals, Personalities, and the Prevalence of Policy and Process."Political Communication22(3):297-313.
46.
Nelson, T.E., Z.M. Oxley, and R.A. Clawson.1997. "Toward a Psychology of Framing Effects ." Political Behavior19:221-46.
47.
Norris, P.2000. A Virtuous Circle: Political Communication in Post-industrial Democracies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
48.
Patterson, T.E.1993. Out of Order. New York, NY: Knopf.
49.
Pattie, C., P. Seyd, and P. Whiteley.2004. Citizenship in Britain: Values, Participation and Democracy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
50.
Petty, R.T., and J.E. Cacioppo.1986. Communication and Persuasion. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
51.
Pinkleton, B.E., and E.W. Austin.2002. "Exploring Relationships among Media Use Frequency, Perceived Media Importance, and Media Satisfaction in Political Disaffection and Efficacy." Mass Communication and Society5:113-40.
52.
Price, V., and D. Tewksbury.1997. "News Values and Public Opinion. A Theoretical Account of Media Priming and Framing." In Progress in Communication Science, ed. G. Barnett and F. J. Boster.Greenwich, CT: Abiex.
53.
Rhee, J.W.1997. "Strategy and Issue Frames in Election Campaign Coverage: A Social Cognitive Account of Framing Effects." Journal of Communication47(3):26-48.
54.
Rosenstone, S.J., and J.M. Hansen.1993. Mobilization, Participation and Democracy in America. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
55.
Sanders, D., and P. Norris.1998. "Does Negative News Matter? The Effects of Television News on Party Images in the 1997 British General Election." In British Elections and Parties Review 8: The 1997 General Election , ed. D. Denver, J. Fisher, P. Cowley, and C. Pattie.London, UK: Frank Cass.
56.
Skorkjaer Binderkrantz, A., and C. Green-Pedersen .2009. "Policy or Processes in Focus?"Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics14:166-85.
57.
Valentino, N.A., M.N. Beckmann, and T.A. Buhr.2001. "A Spiral of Cynicism for Some: The Contingent Effects of Campaign News Frames on Participation and Confidence in Government." Political Communication18:347-67.
58.
Valenzuela, S.2009. "Variations in Media Priming: The Moderating Role of Knowledge, Interest, News Attention and Discussion."Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly86(4):756-74.
59.
Weatherford, S.M.1987. "How Does Government Performance Influence Political Support ?" Political Behavior9:5-28.
60.
Zaller, J.1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press .
61.
Zaller, J.2002. "The Statistical Power of Election Studies to Detect Media Exposure Effects in Political Campaigns." Electoral Studies21:297-330.
