Previous communication studies have noted the imGortance of descriGtive reGresentation for increasing elected officials' discussion of women's and minority issues. While increased attention to these issues is imGortant for the symbolic reGresentation of these Golitically marginalized grouGs, women's and minority issues often constitute a minor Gortion of reGresentatives' agendas. Strategically, female, Latino, and African American U.S. House members may Grovide greater symbolic reGresentation for women and minorities by including their interests and concerns in discussion of more general issues that commonly toG the Golitical agenda. Relying on a content analysis of 1R1 official congressional Web sites, the author examines the extent to which reGresentatives address the needs of their female and minority constituents in their general issue discussion. Results demonstrate that female, Latino, and African American House members more freOuently connect general issues to race, ethnicity, and gender comGared with their Anglo and male counterGarts. The imGlications of reGresentatives Giggybacking the interests of female and minority constituents on more Golitically salient issues are discussed.
Bedolla, Lisa Garcia, Katherine Tate, and Janelle Wong.2005 "Indelible Effects: The Impact of Women of Color in the U.S" In Women and Elective Office: Past, Present, and Future, ed. Sue Thomas and Clyde Wilcox.New York: Oxford University Press.
2.
Benoit, William L., and Pamela J. Benoit .2000. "The Virtual Campaign: Presidential Primary Websites in Campaign 2000" American Communication Journal3(3). http://www.acjournal.org/holdings/v013/Iss3/rogue4/benoit.html .
3.
Bullock, Charles S. III.1995. "The Impact of Changing the Racial Composition of Congressional Districts on Legislators Roll Call Behavior." American Politics Quarterly23(2):141-58.
4.
Bystrom, Dianne.2006. "Advertising, Web Sites, and Media Coverage: Gender and Communication Along the Campaign Trail." In Gender and Elections: Shaping the Future of American Politics, ed. Susan Carroll and Richard Fox.NewYork: Cambridge University Press.
5.
Bystrom, Dianne, and L.L. Kaid.2002. "Are Women Candidates Transforming Campaign Communication? A Comparison of Advertising Videostyles in the 1990s." In Women Transforming Congress, ed. C. S. Rosenthal.Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
6.
Canon, David T.1999a. "Electoral Systems and the Representation of Minority Interests in Legislatures." Legislative Studies Quarterly24(3):331-85.
7.
Canon, David T.1999b. Race, Redistricting, and Representation:The Unintended Consequences of the Black Majority Districts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8.
Carroll, Susan J.2001. The Impact of Women in Public Office. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
9.
Combs, Michael W., John R. Hibbing, and Susan Welch.1984. "Black Constitutional and Congressional Roll Call Votes." Western Political Quarterly37(3):424-34.
10.
Cooks Political Report.2006Competitive House Race Chart.Washington, D.C.: Cooks Political Report.
11.
DAlessio, Dave.1997. "Use of the World Wide Web in the 1996 U.S. Election" Electoral Studies16(4):489-500.
12.
DAlessio, Dave.2000. "Adoption of the World Wide Web by American Political Candidates, 1996-1998." Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media44(4):556-68.
13.
Darcy, R., Susan Welch, and Janet Clark.1987. Women, Elections, and Representation . Lincoln: University of Nebraska .
14.
Dodson, Debra L.2001. "Acting for Women: Is What Legislators Say, What They Do?" In The Impact of Women in Public Office, ed. Susan J. Carroll.Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
15.
Dodson, Debra L., Susan J. Carroll, Ruth B. Mandel, Katherine E. Kleeman, Ronnee Schreiber, and Debra Liebowitz .1995. Voices,Views,Votes:The Impact of Women in the 103rd Congress. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University, Center for the American Women and Politics.
16.
Dolan, Julie, and Jonathan S. Kropf .2004. "Credit Claiming from the US House: Gendered Communication Styles?" Harvard International Journal of Press Politics9(1):41-59.
17.
Dulio, David A., Donald L. Goff, and James A. Thurber .1999. "Untangled Web: Internet Use During the 1998 Election." PS: Political Science and Politics32(1):53-59.
18.
Farnsworth, Stephen J., and Diana Owen.2004. "Internet Use and the 2000 Presidential Election." Electoral Studies23(3):415-29.
19.
Foot, Kristin A., and Steven M. Schneider.2002. "Online Action in Campaign 2000: An Exploratory Analysis of the U.S. Political Web Sphere." Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media46(2):222-44.
20.
Fox, Richard Logan.1997. Gender Dynamic in Congressional Elections. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
21.
Fridkin, Kim, and Gina Woodall.2005. "Different Portraits, Different Leaders? Gender Differences in US Senators Presentation of Self" In Women and Elective Office: Past, Present, and Future, ed. Sue Thomas and Clyde Wilcox. 2nd Edition. NewYork : Oxford University Press.
22.
Gerrity, Jessica C., Tracy Osborn, and Jeanette Morehouse Mendez.2007. "Women and Representation: A Different View of the District?" Politics and Gender3(2):179-200.
23.
Gulati, Girish.2004. "Members of Congress and Presentation of Self on the World Wide Web." Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics9(1):22-40.
24.
Jones, Alex.2006. "The Internet and the Evolving Nature of Congressional Communication: An Interview with GirishJ. Gulati." Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics9(1):3-6.
25.
Jones-Correa, Michael.1998. Between Two Nations:The Political Predicament of Latinos in NewYork City. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
26.
Kahn, Kim Fridkin.1993. "Gender Differences in Campaign Messages: The Political Advertisements of Men and Women Candidates for U.S. Senate" Political Research Quarterly46(3):481-502.
27.
Kahn, Kim Fridkin.1996. The Political Consequences of Being aWomen: How Stereotypes Influence the Conduct and Consequences of Campaigns. New York: Columbia University Press.
28.
Kahn, Kim Fridkin.2003. "Assessing the Medias Impact on the Political Fortunes of Women." In Women and American Politics: New Questions, New Direction, ed. Susan J. Carroll.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
29.
Kahn, Kim Fridkin, and Edie N. Goldenberg .1991. "Women Candidates in the News: An Examination of Gender Differences in U.S. Senate Campaign Coverage " Public Opinion Quarterly55(2):180-99.
30.
Kerr, Brinck, and Will Miller.1997. "Latino Representation, Its Direct and Indirect." American Journal of Political Science41(3):1066-71.
31.
Klinenberg, Eric, and Andrew Perrin.2000. "Symbolic Politics in the Information Age: The 1996 Republican Presidential Campaigns in Cyberspace." Information, Communication and Society3(1):17-38.
32.
Lublin, David.1997. The Paradox of Representation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
33.
Mansbridge, Jane.1996. In Defense of "Descriptive" Representation. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University, Center for Urban Affairs and Policy Research.
34.
Mansbridge, Jane.1999. "Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent Yes.”Journal of Politics61(3):628-57.
35.
Margolis, Michael, David Resnick, and Chin-chang Tu .1997. "Campaigning on the Internet: Parties and Candidates on the World Wide Web in the 1996 Primary Season." Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics2(1):59-78.
36.
McIlwain, Charlton D., and Stephen Maynard Caliendo.2002. "How Do I Look? An Analysis of Television Advertisements for Black Candidates and Their Opponents, 1952-2000." Presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
37.
Niven, David, and Jeremy Zilber.2001. "Do Women and Men in Congress Cultivate Different Images? Evidence from Congressional Websites." Political Communication18(4):395-405.
38.
Orey, Bryon DAndra, Wendy Smooth, Kimberly S. Adams, and Kisha Harris-Clark . N.d. "Race and Gender Matter: Refining Models of Legislative Policy Making in State Legislatures" Journal of Women, Politics and Policy. Forthcoming
39.
Phillips, Anne.1995. The Politics of Presence. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
40.
Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel.1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley : SAGE Publications.
41.
Reingold, Beth.2000. Representing Women: Sex, Gender and Legislative Behavior in Arizona and California. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
42.
Sapiro, Virginia.1981. "Research Frontier Essay: When are Interests Interesting? The Problem of Political Representation of Women." American Political Science Review75(3):701-16.
43.
Sapiro, Virginia, and Katherine Cramer Walsh.2002. "Doing Gender in Congressional Campaign Advertisements" Presented at the annual meeting of the International Society for Political Psychology, Berlin, Germany.
44.
Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A., and William Mishler .2005. "An Integrated Model of Womens Representation." Journal of Politics67(2):407-28.
45.
Seelye, Katherine Q.2007. "Allies Urge Republicans To Join YouTube Debate." New York Times, Aug. 2.
46.
Simien, Evelyn.2007. "Doing Intersectionality Research: From Conceptual Issues to Practical Examples." Politics and Gender3(2):264-71.
47.
Sulkin, Tracy, Courtney M. Moriarty, and Veronica Hefner .2007. "Congressional Candidates Issue Agendas On- and Off-Line." Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics12(2):63-79.
48.
Swain, Carol M.1993. Black Faces, Black Interests: The Representation of African Americans in Congress. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
49.
Swears, Michele L.1998. "Are Women More Likely to vote for Womens Issues than Their Male Colleagues?" Legislative Studies Quarterly23(3):435-48.
50.
Tate, Katherine.2003. Black Faces in the Mirror: African Americans and Their Representatives in the US Congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
51.
Thomas, Sue.1994. How Women Legislate. New York: Oxford University Press.
52.
Thomas, Sue, and Susan Welch.2001. "The Impact of Women in State Legislatures: Numerical and Organizational Strength." In The Impact of Women in Public Office, ed. Susan J. Carroll.Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
53.
Tolleson-Rinehart, Sue.1991. "Do Women Leaders Make a Difference? Substance, Style and Perceptions." In Gender and Policymaking: Studies of Women in Office, ed. Debra L. Dodson.New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University, Center for the American Woman and Politics.
54.
Tolleson-Rinehart, Sue.2001. "Do Women Leaders Make a Difference? Substance, Style and Perceptions." In The Impact of Women in Public Office, ed. Susan J. Carroll.Bloomington : Indiana University Press.
55.
Welch, Susan.1984. "Are Women More Liberal Than Men in the U.S. Congress?" Legislative Studies Quarterly10(1):125-34.
56.
Welch, Susan, and John R. Hibbing .1984. "Hispanic Representation in the U.S. Congress." Social Science Quarterly65(2):328-35.
57.
Whitby, Kenney J.1998. The Color of Representation: Congressional Behavior and Black Constituents. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
58.
Williams, Alex.2007. "The Future President, on Your Friends List" New York Times. March 18. <http://www.nytimes.com> ;.
59.
Williams, Leonard.1998. "Gender, Political Advertising, and the Air Wars" In Women and Elective Office: Past, Present, and Future, ed. Sue Thomas and Clyde Wilcox.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
60.
Xenos, Michael A., and Kristin A. Foot .2005. "Politics As Usual, or Politics Unusual? Position Taking and Dialogue on Campaign Websites in the 2002 U.S. Elections." Journal of Communication55(1):169-85.
61.
Zilber, Jeremy, and David Niven.2000a. "Congress and the News Media: Stereotypes in the News Media Coverage of African Americans in Congress." Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics5(1):32-49.
62.
Zilber, Jeremy, and David Niven.2000b. Racialized Coverage of Congress: The News in Black and White. Westport, CT: Praeger.
