Background and Research Aims: The Democratic Republic of Congo is among the leading timber exporters in Africa. Over the past two decades, human-driven deforestation has brought forest elephants Loxodonta cyclotis into closer contact with humans, leading to increased human-elephant conflicts. Understanding the attitudes of communities that predominantly depend on livestock farming and agriculture for their livelihoods is essential for designing effective conservation interventions. This study aims to assess those factors influencing farmers’ attitudes towards the presence of forest elephants in the Western part of the Democratic Republic of Congo. Methods: We conducted interviews with a random sample of n = 45 farmers across five small villages in the Lukula territory. The effect of gender, age, education, and per capita income on the attitude towards the presence of forest elephants was analysed using a Bayesian ordinal regression mixed model to account for the small sample size. Farmers’ opinions regarding the most effective preventive measure/s to protect croplands were explored using Fisher’s exact test. Results: The results showed no significant effects of gender, age, or education in terms of attitudes towards the presence of forest elephants. In contrast, negative attitudes were significantly more prevalent among farmers with higher per capita incomes. Reforestation and beehive fences were most frequently quoted by farmers as effective methods of preventing human-elephant conflicts. Discussion: The perceived future losses due to elephant-related damages may drive more negative attitudes towards the presence of forest elephants. Notably, our study revealed that the species is still present in the Western transboundary area of the Democratic Republic of Congo, where, according to the farmers interviewed, it has never disappeared. Implications for Conservation: To enhance forest elephant conservation, it is essential to implement effective prevention measures, engage government authorities and local communities in conservation activities, and develop educational campaigns to foster human-elephant coexistence in shared landscapes.
AbdullahA.SayutiA.HasanuddinH., et al. (2019). People’s perceptions of elephant conservation and the human-elephant conflict in Aceh Jaya, Sumatra, Indonesia. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 65, 69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-019-1307-1
2.
AugugliaroC.ChristeP.JanchivlamdanC.BaymandayH.ZimmermannF. (2020). Patterns of human interaction with snow leopard and co-predators in the Mongolian western Altai: Current issues and perspectives. Global Ecology and Conservation, 24, e01378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e01378
3.
BanerjeeS.SharmaS. (2022). En-gendering human-wildlife interactions in Northeast India: towardscervation”, Journal of Political Ecology28(1), 1082–1100. doi: https://doi.org/10.2458/jpe.5217
4.
BattagliniL.BovolentaS.GusmeroliF.SalvadorS.SturaroE. (2014). Environmental Sustainability of Alpine Livestock Farms. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 13, 3155. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2014.3155
5.
BerziD.CerriJ.MustoC.ZanniM. L. (2021). Use of European funds and ex post evaluation of prevention measures against wolf attacks (Canis lupus italicus) in the Emilia-Romagna Region (Italy). Animals11, 1536. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11061536
6.
BorahB. Ch.BhattacharyaA.SarkarP.ChoudhuryP. (2022). People’s perception on human-elephant conflict in Rani-Garbhanga reserve forest of Assam, India. GeoJournal, 87, 4127–4141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-021-10491-6
7.
BourgoinC.CeccheriniG.GirardelloM.et al. (2024). Human degradation of tropical moist forests is greater than previously estimated. Nature631, 570–576. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07629-0
8.
BürknerP. (2021). Bayesian Item Response Modeling in R with brms and Stan. Journal of Statistical Software, 100(5), 1–54. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v100.i05
9.
CariveauD. P.WinfreeR. (2015). Causes of variation in wild bee responses to anthropogenic drivers. Current Opinion in Insect Science, 10, 104–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cois.2015.05.004
ChenYMarinoJChenYTaoQSullivanCDShiK, et al. (2016) Predicting Hotspots of Human-Elephant Conflict to Inform Mitigation Strategies in Xishuangbanna, Southwest China. PLoS ONE11(9): e0162035. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162035
12.
CITES (1973). Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora. Washington, D.C. https://cites.org/eng
13.
DargieG. C.LewisS. L.LawsonI. T., et al. (2017). Age, extent and carbon storage of the central Congo Basin peatland complex. Nature, 542, 86–90. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21048.
14.
de SilvaSherminRuppertKristieKnoxJillianDavisElizabeth O.WeerathungaU. SameeraGlikmanJenny A. (2023). Experiences and emotional responses of farming communities living with Asian Elephants in Southern Sri Lanka. Trees, Forests and People, 14, 100441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2023.100441
15.
DresselS.SandströmC.EricssonG. (2015). A meta-analysis of studies on attitudes toward bears and wolves across Europe 1976–2012. Conservation Biology, 29, 565–574. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12420
16.
EklundA.López-BaoJ. V.TouraniM.ChapronG.FrankJ. (2017). Limited evidence on the effectiveness of interventions to reduce livestock predation by large carnivores. Scientific Reports, 7, 2097. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-02323-w
FilacordaS.CominA.FranchiniM.FranginiL.PesaroS.PezzinE. N.PrandiA. (2022). Cortisol in hair: do habitat fragmentation and competition with golden jackal (Canis aureus) measurably affect the long-term physiological response in European wildcat (Felis silvestris)?Annales Zoologici Fennici, 59, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.5735/086.059.0101
19.
FisherR. A. (1922). On the interpretation of χ2 from contingency tables, and the calculation of P. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 85(1), 87–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2397-2335.1922.tb00768.x
20.
FoleyC. A.FaustL. J. (2010). Rapid population growth in an elephant Loxodonta africana population recovering from poaching in Tarangire National Park, Tanzania. Oryx, 44(2), 205–212. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605309990706
21.
FoleyC. A.FoleyL. S. (2022). The History, Status, and Conservation of the Elephant Population in the Tarangire Ecosystem. In: KiffnerC.BondM. L.LeeD. E. (Eds). Tarangire: Human-Wildlife Coexistence in a Fragmented Ecosystem. Springer, Cham, Switzerland. pp. 209–232.
FranchiniM.CorazzinM.BovolentaS.FilacordaS. (2021). The return of large carnivores and extensive farming systems: A review of stakeholders’ perception at an EU level. Animals, 11, 1735. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11061735
24.
FranchiniM.GuerisoliM. M., (2023). Interference competition driven by co-occurrence with tigers Panthera tigris may increase livestock predation by leopards Panthera pardus: a first step meta-analysis. Mammal Review, 53(4), 271–286. https://doi.org/10.1111/mam.12323
25.
FranchiniM.MazzaG.MoriE. (2022). First assessment of ectoparasite load in Apennine populations of Eurasian red squirrel: does habitat fragmentation affect parasite presence?Ecology, Ethology & Evolution, 34(5), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/03949370.2021.1967458
26.
FranchiniM.SartorP.ZulianiA.CorazzinM.PasutD.CozziG.BovolentaS. (2025a) Insights into large carnivore predations and extensive farming practices in the Italian Alps: current issues and future perspectives. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 24(1), 2600–2620. https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2025.2591442
27.
FranchiniM.ŠvajdaJ.UhrínM.ProkopP. (2025). People and bears: Evaluating public attitudes to foster human–carnivore coexistence in Slovakia. Hystrix, the Italian Journal of Mammalogy, 0. https://doi.org/10.4404/hystrix-00774-20
28.
FullerT. L.NarinsT. P.NackoneyJ., et al. (2018). Assessing the impact of China’s timber industry on Congo Basin land use change. Royal Geographical Society, 51(2), 340–349. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12469
GelmanA.CarlinJ. B.SternH. S.DunsonD. B.VehtariA.RubinD. B. (2025). Bayesian Data Analysis Third edition (with errors fixed as of 20 February 2025). CRC Press.
31.
GelmanA.HillJ. (2006). Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. Cambridge University Press.
32.
GemedaD. O.MelesS. K. (2018). Impacts of human-wildlife conflict in developing countries. Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management, 22(8), 1233–1238. https://doi.org/10.4314/jasem.v22i8.14
33.
GobushK. S.EdwardsC. T. T.MaiselsF.WittemyerG.BalfourD.TaylorR. D. (2021). Loxodonta cyclotis (errata version published in 2021). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2021: e.T181007989A204404464
34.
GrahamM. D.OchiengT. (2008). Uptake and performance of farm-based measures for reducing crop raiding by elephants Loxodonta africana among smallholder farms in Laikipia District, Kenya. Oryx, 42(01), 76–82. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605308000677
35.
GrossE. M.LahkarB. P.SubediN., et al. (2018). Seasonality, crop type and crop phenology influence crop damage by wildlife herbivores in Africa and Asia. Biodiversity and Conservation, 27, 2029–2050. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-018-1523-0
36.
GuerisoliM. M.Luengos VidalE.FranchiniM.CarusoN.CasanaveE. B.LucheriniM. (2017). Characterization of puma–livestock conflicts in rangelands of central Argentina. Royal Society Open Science, 4, 170852. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.170852
37.
HairJ. F. (2014)Multivariate Data Analysis. 7th ed.Harlow: Pearson New International Edition
38.
HubauW.LewisS. L.PhillipsO. L., et al. (2020). Asynchronous carbon sink saturation in African and Amazonian tropical forests. Nature, 579, 80–87. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2035-0
39.
IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature) (2021). Loxodonta cyclotis (errata version published in 2021). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 6.3. https://www.iucnredlist.org. Downloaded on 03 January 2025
40.
KanskyR.KiddM. (2024). Putting yourself in an animal’s shoes-empathy and intangible benefits drive tolerance towards wildlife in Namibian communal conservancies. Biological Conservation, 293, 110588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110588
41.
KanskyR.KiddM.KnightA. T. (2016). A wildlife tolerance model and case study for understanding human-wildlife conflicts. Biological Conservation, 20, 137–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.07.002
42.
KidaneE. E.KirosS.BerheA.GirmaZ. (2024). Human-wildlife conflict and community perceptions towards wildlife conservation in and around a biodiverse National Park, northern Ethiopia. Global Ecology and Conservation, 54, e03072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2024.e03072
43.
KingL. E.Douglas-HamiltonI.VollrathF. (2011). Beehive fences as effective deterrents for crop-raiding elephants: field trials in northern Kenya. African Journal of Ecology, 49, 431–439. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2028.2011.01275.x
44.
KingL. E.LalaF.NzumuH.MwambinguE.Douglas-HamiltonI. (2017). Beehive fences as a multidimensional conflict-mitigation tool for farmers coexisting with elephants. Conservation Biology, 31, 743–752. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12898
45.
KruschkeJ. K. (2014). Doing Bayesian data analysis: a tutorial with R, JAGS and Stan. 2nd ed.Elsevier, Amsterdam.
MalhiY.GardnerT. A.GoldsmithG. R.SilmanM.R.MilesR.ZelazowskiP. (2014). Tropical forests in the Anthropocene. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 39, 125–159. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-030713-155141
48.
MangiaficoS.S. (2024). rcompanion: Functions to Support Extension Education Program Evaluation. Rutgers Cooperative Extension, New Brunswick, New Jersey. version 2.4.35. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rcompanion/
49.
MayberryA. L.HovorkaA. J.EvansK. E. (2017). Well-being impacts of human-elephant conflict in Khumaga, Botswana exploring visible and hidden dimensions. Conservation and Society, 15, 280–291. https://doi.org/10.4103/cs.cs_16_132
50.
MoL.ZohnerC. M.ReichP. B.et al. (2023). Integrated global assessment of the natural forest carbon potential. Nature624, 92–101. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06723-z
51.
NaimiB.HammN. A. S.GroenT. A.SkidmoreA. K.ToxopeusA. G. (2014). Where is positional uncertainty a problem for species distribution modelling?Ecography, 37(2), 191–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.00205.x
52.
NgamaS.KorteL.BindelleJ.VermeulenC.PoulsenJ. R. (2016). How bees deter elephants: beehive trials with forest elephants (Loxodonta africana cyclotis) in Gabon. PLoS ONE, 11(5), e0155690. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155690
PachoudC.Da ReR.RamanzinM.BovolentaS.GianelleD.SturaroE. (2020). Tourists and Local Stakeholders’ Perception of Ecosystem Services Provided by Summer Farms in the Eastern Italian Alps. Sustainability, 12, 1095. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12031095
55.
Provincial Biodiversity Action Plans (Annex to the National Action Plan) (1999). Ministry of Land Affairs, Environment, Nature Conservation, Fisheries and Forests. General Secretariat for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Fisheries, and Forests (in French)
RaycraftJ. (2024). Perceived Impacts of Wildlife on Agropastoral Food Production in Northern Tanzania. Ecology of Food and Nutrition, 63, 204–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/03670244.2024.2329978
58.
RaycraftJ.BellE. (2025). Socioeconomic predictors of pastoralist tolerance towards large carnivores in northern Tanzania. Journal for Nature Conservation, 88, 127035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2025.127035
59.
RaycraftJ.TannerG.OleE. M. (2024). Sharing landscapes with megaherbivores: Human-elephant interactions northeast of Tarangire National Park. Environmental Challenges, 17, 101005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2024.101005
60.
R Core Team (2023). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
61.
RippleW.J.NewsomeT.M.WolfC., et al. (2015) Collapse of the world’s largest herbivores. Science Advances, 1(4), e1400103. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.140010
62.
SalvadorS.CorazzinM.RomanzinA.BovolentaS. (2017). Greenhouse gas balance of mountain dairy farms as affected by grassland carbon sequestration. Journal of Environmental Management, 196, 644–650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.03.052
63.
ScalbertM.VermeulenC.BreuerT.DoucetJ-L. (2023). The challenging coexistence of forest elephants Loxodonta cyclotis and timber concessions in central Africa. Mammal Review, 53, 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/mam.12305
64.
ShafferL. J.KhadkaK. K.Van Den HoekJ.NaithaniK. J. (2019). Human-elephant conflict: A review of current management strategies and future directions. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 6, 235. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2018.00235
65.
SinghB. V. R.BatarA. K.AgarwalV.SenA.KulhariK. (2025). Forest fragmentation and human-wildlife conflict: assessing the impact of land use land cover change in Ranthambhore Tiger Reserve, India. Environmental Research Communications, 7(6), 061006. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ade229
66.
TegegneY. T.LindnerM.FobissieK.KanninenM. (2016). Evolution of drivers of deforestation and forest degradation in the Congo Basin forests: Exploring possible policy options to address forest loss. Land Use Policy, 51(51), 312–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.11.024
67.
van de WaterA.MattesonK. (2018). Human-elephant conflict in western Thailand: socio-economic drivers and potential mitigation strategies. PLoS ONE, 13(6), e0194736. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194736
68.
van EedenL. M.EklundA.MillerJ. R. B., et al. (2018). Carnivore conservation needs evidence-based livestock protection. PLoS Biology, 16(9), e2005577. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005577
69.
WalkerK. L. (2012). Labor costs and crop protection from wildlife predation: the case of elephants in Gabon. Agricultural Economics, 43(1), 61–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2011.00565.x
70.
WebberC. E.SereivathanaT.MaltbyM. P.LeeP. C. (2011). Elephant crop-raiding and human–elephant confict in Cambodia: crop selection and seasonal timings of raids. Oryx, 45, 243–251. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0030605310000335
WszelakiS. (2025). Variety and effectiveness of non-lethal crop protection methods against wildlife. Biodiversity and Conservation, 34, 3399–3452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-025-03124-8
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
