Background and Research Aims: Incorporating local community attitudes in wildlife conservation planning is crucial for effective conservation. However, there is limited data on conservation challenges and communities’ attitudes towards wildlife conservation in Ethiopia, even absent in Chimit Kola. This study aimed to explore major threats, community attitudes towards wildlife, and the role of wildlife conservation in Chimit Kola.
Methods: We explored the conservation challenges and community attitudes towards wildlife using a semi-structured questionnaire of 384 systematically selected respondents. Logistic regression was used to determine variables that influence community attitudes towards wildlife conservation.
Results: Respondents identified farmland expansion, charcoal production, and hunting as the main and most severe threats to wildlife conservation. However, most respondents had a positive attitude towards conservation. The age and educational status positively influenced respondents’ attitudes towards wildlife conservation. Respondents who completed at least grade 6 were 9 times more likely to support conservation than those who did not receive formal education. Nonetheless, older respondents (at least 46 years old) were 11 times more likely to support conservation than younger respondents (15 to 25 years old).
Conclusions: In general, communities living around Chimit Kola understand the role of wildlife and are willing to support conservation. However, some have a negative attitude towards wildlife conservation. The negative attitude is linked to low educational status, poor understanding of the role of wildlife in nature, and economic loss due to livestock predation/crop damage. Thus, awareness campaigns and community livelihood issues should be incorporated into conservation planning.
Implications for conservation: Our result also highlights the importance of education, experience, and benefits in positively influencing community attitudes towards wildlife conservation. Thus, conservation management should consider raising community awareness about the role of wildlife conservation and enhancing the community’s active participation in conservation management.
AbukariH.MwalyosiR. B. (2022). Local communities’ perceptions about the impact of protected areas on livelihoods and community development. Global Ecology Conservation, 22,e00909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e00909
2.
AjzenI. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50, 179–211.
3.
BajracharyaS. B.FurleyP. A.NewtonP. A. (2006). Impacts of community-based conservation on local communities in the Annapurna Conservation Area, Nepal. Biodiversity Conservation, 15, 2765–2786.
4.
BerhanuK.TeshomeE. (2018). Opportunities and Challenges for Wildlife Conservation: The Case of Alatish National Park, Northwest Ethiopia. African Journal Hospitality Tourism Leisure, 7, 1–12.
5.
BowyerR.T.BoyceM. S.GoheenJ. R.RachlowJ. L. (2019). Conservation of the world’s mammals: Status, protected areas, community efforts, and hunting. Journal of Mammalogy, 100, 923–941.
6.
BrookB.W.SodhiN. S.BradshawC. J. (2008). Synergies among extinction drivers under global change. Trends Ecology and Evolution, 23, 453–460.
7.
Browne-NuñezC.JonkerS. A. (2008). Attitudes Toward Wildlife and Conservation Across Africa: A Review of Survey Research, Human Dimensions of Wildlife: An International Journal, 13(1), 47-70.
8.
BryjaJ.MeheretuYŠumberaR.LaverenchenkoL. A. (2019). Annotated checklist, taxonomy and distribution of rodents in Ethiopia. Folia Zoologica, 68(3), 117–213.
9.
BulteE.RondeauD. (2007). Compensation for wildlife damages: Habitat conversion, species preservation and local welfare. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 54 (2007), 311–322.
10.
ChidumayoE. N.GumboD. J. (2013). The environmental impacts of charcoal production in tropical ecosystems of the world: A synthesis. Energy for Sustainable Development, 17, 86–94.
11.
CochranW. G. (1977). Sampling Techniques, 3rd ed.; John Wiley and Sons, Inc. Canada.
12.
DegfieT.AbebawA.MelkamuF. (2024). Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo church sacred forests as Sanctuaries for endangered species: Key roles, challenges and prospects, Sustainable Environment, 10(1), 1-16.
13.
EbuaV. B.AgwafoT. E.FonkwoS. N. (2011). Attitudes and perceptions as threats to wildlife conservation in the Bakossi area, South West Cameroon. International Journal of Biodiversity, 3, 631–636.
14.
FAO. (2020). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Global Forest Resources Assessment: Main Report; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy. https://doi.org/10.4060/ca9825en
15.
FashingP. J.NguyenN.SebsebeD.AbelG.AnagawA.AddisuM.NurmihN.O.KerbyiJ. F.StensethN. C. (2022). Ecology, evolution, and conservation of Ethiopia’s biodiversity. Proceeding of National Academic Science, 119, e2206635119.
16.
FeredeS.AgegnehuG.KehaliewA.AlemuT.YirgaC. (2020). Farming Systems Characterization and Analysis in East Gojjam Zone: Implications for Research and Development Intervention; Research Report No. 127; EIAR: Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
17.
HeS.JiaoW. (2023). Conservation-compatible livelihoods: An approach to rural development in protected areas of developing countries. Environmental Development, 45, (2023) 100797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2022.100797
18.
HoffmannM.BelantJ. L.ChansonL. S.CoxN. A.LamoreuxJ.RodriguesA. S.SchipperA.StuartS. N. (2011). The changing fates of the world’s mammals. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 366, 2598–2610.
19.
IbouroiM. T.DhurhamS. O. A.BesnardA.LescureuxN. (2014). Understanding Drivers of Unsustainable Natural Resource Use in the Comoro Islands. Tropical Conservation Science, 25, 1–21.
20.
JyrwaJ. D.JoshiD. B.GhoshA.MayiY.NipaM.AngaN.PaliM.ThakurM.ChandraK.SharmaL. K. (2020). Dimensions of changing perception towards wildlife conservation in East Siang district of Arunachal Pradesh, Eastern Himalayas. Global Ecology Conservation, 24, e01265.
21.
KanskyR.KnightA. T. (2014). Key factors driving attitudes towards large mammals in conflict with humans. Biological Conservation, 179,93–105.
22.
KaranthK. K.NepalS. K. (2011). Local Residents Perception of Benefits and Losses from Protected Areas in India and Nepal. Environmental Management, 49 (2), 372–386.
23.
KatsweraJ.MutekangaN. M.TwesigyeC. K. (2022). Community Perceptions and Attitudes towards Conservation of Wildlife in Uganda. Journal of Wildlife and Biodiversity, 6, 42–65.
24.
KeltD. A.MeserveP. L. (2014). Status and challenges for conservation of small mammal assemblages in South America. Biology Review, 89, 705-722.
25.
KrosnickJ. A.JuddC. M.WittenbrinkB. (2005). The measurements of attitudes. In: The handbooks of attitudes, pp. 21-69, (AlbarracinD.JohnsonB.T.ZannaM. Eds.), New Jersy, USA.
26.
LavrenchenkoL. A.AfeworkB. (2017). Diversity and conservation of Ethiopian mammals: What have we learned in 30 years?Ethiopian Journal of Biological Society, 16 (1), 1–20.
27.
LeslieS.BrooksA.JayasingheN.KoopmansF. (2019). Human-Wildlife Conflict mitigation: Lessons learned from global compensation and insurance schemes. Annex Report. HWC SAFE Series. WWF Tigers Alive.
28.
MamoM.GureA.KebedeF.AbieK. (2018). Challenges, Attitude and Perception of Local Communities Towards Conservation of Alledeghi Wildlife Reserve, Eastern Ethiopia. Journal Natural Science Research, 8, 28–35.
29.
MartynovA. A.ZemlemerovaE. D.KostinD. S.KomarovaV. A.GromovA. R.MeseleY.AdaneT.AlexandrovD.Y.AfeworkB.BryjaJ.LavrenchenkoL. A. (2023). Uncovering the diversity of rodents and shrews in the Chebera-Churchura National Park, Ethiopia. Mammalia, 87(5), 451–463.
30.
MegazeA.BalakrishnanM.BelayG. (2017). Human-wildlife conflict and attitude of local people towards conservation of wildlife in Chebera Churchura National Park, Ethiopia. African Zoology, 52 (1), 1–8.
31.
MekonenS. (2020). Coexistence between humans and wildlife: the nature, causes and mitigations of human-wildlife conflict around Bale Mountains National Park, Southeast Ethiopia. BMC Ecology, 20 (51), 1-9.
32.
MeloR. S.SilvaO. C.SoutoA.AlvesR. N.SchielN. (2014). The role of mammals in local communities living in conservation areas in the Northeast of Brazil: An ethnozoological approach. Tropical Conservation Science, 7, 423–439.
33.
MengistW. (2020). Challenges of Protected Area Management and Conservation Strategies in Ethiopia: A Review Paper. Advances in Environmental Studies, 4(1), 277.
34.
MengistuW.AfeworkB.MeseleY. (2023). Diversity of small mammal ectoparasite species and factors that affect their abundance in Chimit Kola, northwestern Ethiopia. Global Ecology Conservation, 41, e02370.
35.
MengistuW.MeseleY. (2021). Species Composition, Diversity, and Habitat Association of Medium- and Large-Sized Mammals in Chimit-Kola, Abay Gorge, Ethiopia. International Journal of Zoology, 3, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9960764
36.
MgonjaJ. T.UswegeD. N. (2022). Assessment of Factors Moderating Community Attitudes Towards Wildlife Tourism and Conservation: A Case of Ikona and Makao Wildlife Management Areas. Tanzania Journal of Forestry and Nature Conservation, 91(2), 214-233.
37.
MirZ. R.NoorA.HabibB.VeeraswamiG. G. (2015). Attitudes of Local People Toward Wildlife Conservation: A Case Study from the Kashmir Valley. Mountain Research and Development, 35(4), 392–400.
38.
MogessieE. (2024). Traditional Indigenous governance has helped a once-unwanted protected area thrive. The law of the land. https://iucn.org/story/202406/law-land; Accessed on November 10, 2024.
39.
MogomotsiP. K.MogomotsiG. E. J.DipogisoK.Phonchi-TshekisoN. D.StoneL. S.BadimoD. (2020). An Analysis of Communities’ Attitudes Toward Wildlife and Implications for Wildlife Sustainability. Tropical Conservation Science, 13, 1–9.
Moreno-RubianoM.Gómez-SánchezJ.Robledo-BuitragoD.Luque-VillaD.Urbina-CardonaN.Granda-RodriguezH. (2023). Perception and attitudes of local communities towards vertebrate fauna in the Andes of Colombia: Effects of gender and the urban/rural setting. Ethnobiology and Conservation, 12, 1-20.
42.
MorrisG.HostetlerJ. A.ConnerL. K.OliM. K. (2011). Effects of prescribed fire, supplemental feeding, and mammalian predator exclusion on hispid cotton rat populations. Oecologia, 167, 1005–1016.
43.
MubalamaL. K.IgunziF. L.BuhendwaG. M. (2020). Local community perceptions towards biodiversity conservation within protected areas: Implications for policy-making and management in Itombwe Nature Reserve, Eastern DR Congo. Journal of Environmental Science, Toxicology and Food Technology, 14 (4), 26-48.
44.
NanthaH. S.TisdellC. (2014). The opportunity cost of engaging in reduced-impact logging to conserve the orangutan: a case study of the management of Deramakot Forest Reserve, Sabah, Malaysia. In Working Papers on Economics, Ecology and The Environment (194). The University of Queensland. https://doi.org/10.14264/uql.2018.598
45.
NasR.FaJ. E. (2015). The role of bushmeat in food security and nutrition. XIV World and Forestry Congress, Durban, South Africa, 7-11.
46.
NtuliH.JagersC.MuchapondE.LinellA.SjöstedtM. (2018). Factors influencing people's perceptions towards conservation of transboundary wildlife resources. The case of the Great-Limpopo Trans-frontier Conservation Area, Discussion Paper 19-12.
47.
OchiengC. N.ThenyaT.ShahP.OdweJ. (2021). Awareness of traditional knowledge and attitudes towards wildlife conservation among Maasai communities: The case of Enkusero Sampu Conservancy, Kajiado County in Kenya. African Journal of Ecology, 59, 1–12.
48.
PrinceM.DaviesM. (2001). “Moderator teams: an extension to focus group methodology”, Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 4(4), 207 – 216.
49.
RavenelleJ.NyhusP. (2017). Global Patterns and Trends in human-wildlife Conflict Compensation. Conservation Biology, 31(6), 1247–1256.
50.
SamuelO.TekalignW.MegazeA. (2022). Promoting harmony between local people and wild animals around the Humbo Community Managed Forest area, in Ethiopia. African Journal Ecology, 60, 1–6.
51.
ShankoG.TonaB. (2022). Human-Terrestrial Wildlife Conflict in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review. Scientific World Journal, 1-8.
52.
ShenJ.SaijoT. (2008). Reexamining the relations between socio-demographic characteristics and individual environmental concern: Evidence from Shanghai data. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28 (1), 42–50.
53.
TassieK.MisganawB.AddisuS.TesfayeE. (2021). Socioeconomic and Environmental Impacts of Charcoal Production Activities of Rural Households in Mecha District, Ethiopia. Advances in Agriculture, 1-16.
54.
TeferaZ.Leader-WilliamsN. (2005). Indigenous Common Property Resource Management in the Central Highlands of Ethiopia. Human Ecology, 33(4), 539–563.
55.
TekalignW.BekeleB. (2026). Anthropogenic Influences on the Wildlife Conservation Efforts in Maze National Park, Southern Ethiopia. Australian Journal of Business Science Design & Literature, 9(2), 1–10.
56.
TemesgenF.WorkinehB. (2018). Biodiversity Status and Conservation Challenges of Protected Areas of Ethiopia: Awash and Nechsar National Parks in Focus. Journal of Natural Science Research, 8, 46–61.
57.
TessemaM.LilieholmR. J.TeferaZ.Leader-WilliamsN. (2010). Community Attitudes Toward Wildlife and Protected Areas in Ethiopia. Society & Natural Resources, 94, 1–41.
58.
TilmanD.ClarkM.WilliamsD. R.KimmelK.PolaskyS.PackerC. (2017). Future threats to biodiversity and pathways to their prevention. Nature, 546, 73–80.
59.
TomassZ.ShibruS.YonasM.LeirsH. (2020). Farmers’ perspectives of rodent damage and management rodents in smallholder maize cropping systems of Southern Ethiopia. Crop Protection, 136, 105232.
60.
TomićevićJ.ShannonM. A.MilovanovićM. (2010). Socio-economic impacts on the attitudes towards conservation of natural resources: A case study from Serbia. Forest Policy and Economics, 12(3), 157–162.
61.
UpadhyayS. (2013). Challenges of Compensation Schemes for Human-Wildlife Conflict Mitigation: Department of Ecology and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences. Term Paper NATF350, 2013.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
