Abstract
Much of the lasting spiritual fruit of early Christian monasticism was born in the desert, but use of the desert tradition for spiritual formation should be conscious of its potential theological liabilities. Hence, this paper explores gendered dimensions of early ascetic literature, particularly the Desert Fathers and Mothers’ divergent approaches to sexual temptation. The Fathers exhibit an avoidant posture toward women, projecting their sexual temptations onto female bodies and visualizing demonic activity in female form. This projection reflects broader cultural associations of women with lust and carnality, which reinforces misogyny and validates violence. In contrast, the Desert Mothers internalize responsibility for sexual temptation, emphasizing personal accountability and spiritual disciplines such as discernment, prayer, and embodied relationality rather than violent abjection. Attention to this gendered divergence thus has the potential to not only interrupt unintentional perpetuation of misogynist theology, but to resource modern ascetic practice for both genders.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
