Vote outcomes in elections are expected to be influenced by factors beyond simple economic and political considerations. For example, personality traits have been found to be associated with a voter’s political affiliation. Here, we explore the role of openness to experience in voting outcomes in U.S. elections. By using a panel dataset on consumer purchases, we examine the relationship between openness to experience, measured as the variety-seeking behavior in food and beverage purchase decisions, and election outcomes at both county and state levels. Results suggest that voting outcomes for liberal-leaning candidates are associated with greater purchase diversity patterns for food and alcoholic beverages. Our findings have implications for both the food retailing and food service industries that aim to better align their product offerings with their customers.
AbeJ. A. (2018). Personality and political preferences: The 2016 U.S. Presidential Election. Journal of Research in Personality, 77, 70–82.
2.
AnsolabehereS.SnyderJ. MJr (2002). The incumbency advantage in US elections: An analysis of state and federal offices, 1942–2000. Election Law Journal, 1(3), 315–338.
3.
ArcelusF.MeltzerA. H. (1975). The effect of aggregate economic variables on congressional elections. American Political Science Review, 69(4), 1232–1239.
4.
AveryJ. M.LesterD.YangB. (2015). State-level personality and presidential vote share in the 2008 and 2012 presidential elections. The Social Science Journal, 52(2), 112–122.
5.
BlaisA.St-VincentS. L. (2011). Personality traits, political attitudes and the propensity to vote. European Journal of Political Research, 50(3), 395–417.
6.
BlakelyJ. (2020). We built reality: How social science infiltrated culture, politics, and power. Oxford University Press.
7.
BlinderA. S.WatsonM. W. (2016). Presidents and the US economy: An econometric exploration. American Economic Review, 106(4), 1015–1045.
8.
BreuerM.DeHaanE. D. (2024). Using and interpreting fixed effects models. Journal of Accounting Research, 62(4), 1183–1226.
9.
BuddelmeyerH.JensenP. H.OguzogluU.WebsterE. (2008). Fixed effects bias in panel data estimators (No. 3487). Institute of Labor Economics.
10.
BurdenB. C.WichowskyA. (2014). Economic discontent as a mobilizer: Unemployment and voter turnout. The Journal of Politics, 76(4), 887–898.
11.
Bureau of Economic Analysis. (2023). Personal Income by state and by county. Bureau of Economic Analysis, U.S. Department of Commerce. https://www.bea.gov/data/income-saving
12.
ByrneD. (1997). An overview (and underview) of research and theory within the attraction paradigm. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 14(3), 417–431.
13.
CapraraG. V.ZimbardoP. G. (2004). Personalizing politics: A congruency model of political preference. American Psychologist, 59(7), 581.
14.
CarneyD. R.JostJ. T.GoslingS. D.PotterJ. (2008). The secret lives of liberals and conservatives: Personality profiles, interaction styles, and the things they leave behind. Political Psychology, 29(6), 807–840.
15.
DennyK.DoyleO. (2008). Political interest, cognitive ability and personality: Determinants of voter turnout in Britain. British Journal of Political Science, 38(2), 291–310.
16.
EdelmanM.MitofskyW. J. (1990, May). The effect of the interviewer’s race in political surveys with multiracial candidates. Annual Meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Lancaster, PA, United States.
17.
EisenbergD.KetchamJ. (2004). Economic voting in US presidential elections: Who blames whom for what?The BE Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 4(1), 1–25.
18.
FrançoisA.GergaudO. (2019). Is civic duty the solution to the paradox of voting?Public Choice, 1–27.
19.
GerberA. S.HuberG. A.DohertyD.DowlingC. M. (2011). The big five personality traits in the political arena. Annual Review of Political Science, 14, 265–287.
20.
GerberA. S.HuberG. A.DohertyD.DowlingC. M.HaS. E. (2010). Personality and political attitudes: Relationships across issue domains and political contexts. American Political Science Review, 104(01), 111–133.
21.
GerberA. S.HuberG. A.DohertyD.DowlingC. M.PanagopoulosC. (2013). Big five personality traits and responses to persuasive appeals: Results from voter turnout experiments. Political Behavior, 35(4), 687–728.
22.
GerberA. S.HuberG. A.DohertyD.DowlingC. M.RasoC.HaS. E. (2011). Personality traits and participation in political processes. The Journal of Politics, 73(3), 692–706.
23.
GeysB.HeggedalT. R.SørensenR. J. (2022). Age and vote choice: Is there a conservative shift among older voters?Electoral Studies, 78, 102485.
24.
GollopF. M.MonahanJ. L. (1991). A generalized index of diversification: Trends in US manufacturing. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 73(2), 318–330.
25.
GoslingS. D.RentfrowP. J.SwannW. B. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(6), 504–528.
26.
GrahamJ.HaidtJ.NosekB. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 1029.
27.
GuidettiM.CarraroL.CavazzaN. (2022). Dining with liberals and conservatives: The social underpinnings of food neophobia. PLOS ONE, 17(1), e0262676.
28.
GustavsenG. W.RickertsenK. (2019). Personality traits and consumption of wine and beer. Journal of Wine Economics, 1–8.
29.
HeavenP. C.BucciS. (2001). Right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and personality: An analysis using the IPIP measure. European Journal of Personality, 15(1), 49–56.
30.
HermannM. G. (1999). Assessing leadership style: A trait analysis. Columbus: Social Science Automation.
31.
HolbrookT. M. (1991). Presidential elections in space and time. American Journal of Political Science, 91–109.
32.
HoyerW. D.RidgwayN. M. (1984). Variety seeking as an explanation for exploratory purchase behavior: A theoretical model. ACR North American Advances.
33.
JekanowskiM. D.BinkleyJ. K. (2000). Food purchase diversity across US markets. Agribusiness: An International Journal, 16(4), 417–433.
34.
JostJ. T.AmodioD. M. (2012). Political ideology as motivated social cognition: Behavioral and neuroscientific evidence. Motivation and Emotion, 36, 55–64.
35.
JostJ. T.GlaserJ.KruglanskiA. W.SullowayF. J. (2003). Political Conservatism as Motivated Social Cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 339–375.
36.
KimJ.ElliottE.WangD. M. (2003). A spatial analysis of county-level outcomes in US Presidential elections: 1988–2000. Electoral Studies, 22(4), 741–761.
37.
KnokeD.HoutM. (1974). Social and demographic factors in American political party affiliations, 1952-72. American Sociological Review, 700–713.
38.
Koschate-FischerN.HoyerW. D.Stokburger-SauerN. E.EnglingJ. (2018). Do life events always lead to change in purchase? The mediating role of change in consumer innovativeness, the variety seeking tendency, and price consciousness. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46, 516–536.
39.
KramerG. H. (1971). Short-term fluctuations in US voting behavior, 1896–1964. American Political Science Review, 65(1), 131–143.
40.
LaustsenL.BorA. (2017). The relative weight of character traits in political candidate evaluations: Warmth is more important than competence, leadership and integrity. Electoral Studies, 49, 96–107.
41.
Lewis-BeckM. S.RiceT. W. (1983). Localism in presidential elections: The home state advantage. American Journal of Political Science, 548–556.
42.
Lewis-BeckM. S.StegmaierM. (2000). Economic determinants of electoral outcomes. Annual Review of Political Science, 3(1), 183–219.
43.
Lewis-BeckM. S.StegmaierM. (2007). Economic models of voting. In The Oxford handbook of political behavior.
44.
Lewis-BeckM. S.StegmaierM. (2013). The VP-function revisited: A survey of the literature on vote and popularity functions after over 40 years. Public Choice, 157(3–4), 367–385.
45.
MarkusG. B. (1988). The impact of personal and national economic conditions on the presidential vote: A pooled cross-sectional analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 137–154.
46.
MayhewD. R. (2008). Incumbency advantage in US presidential elections: The historical record. Political Science Quarterly, 123(2), 201–228.
47.
McCraeR. R.JohnO. P. (1992). An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60(2), 175–215.
48.
McDonaldJ. D. (2008). Measuring personality constructs: The advantages and disadvantages of self-reports, informant reports and behavioural assessments. Enquire, 1(1), 1–19.
49.
MischelW.ShodaY. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102(2), 246.
50.
MIT Election Data and Science Lab. (2021). County Presidential Election Returns 2000-2020 (Harvard Dataverse, V12). https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/VOQCHQ.
51.
MondakJ. J.HalperinK. D. (2008). A framework for the study of personality and political behaviour. British Journal of Political Science, 38(2), 335–362.
52.
MonnatS. M.BrownD. L. (2017). More than a rural revolt: Landscapes of despair and the 2016 presidential election. Journal of Rural Studies, 55, 227–236.
53.
NannestadP.PaldamM. (1994). The VP-function: A survey of the literature on vote and popularity functions after 25 years. Public Choice, 79(3–4), 213–245.
54.
OlsenS. O.TudoranA. A.HonkanenP.VerplankenB. (2016). Differences and similarities between impulse buying and variety seeking: A personality-based perspective. Psychology & Marketing, 33(1), 36–47.
55.
OzerD. J.Benet-MartinezV. (2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 401–421.
56.
ParkT.ReevesA. (2020). Local unemployment and voting for president: Uncovering causal mechanisms. Political Behavior, 42(2), 443–463.
57.
PaulhusD. L.VazireS. (2007). The self-report method. In Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 224–239).
58.
PayneJ. G. (2010). The Bradley effect: Mediated reality of race and politics in the 2008 US presidential election. American Behavioral Scientist, 54(4), 417–435.
RentfrowP. J.JostJ. T.GoslingS. D.PotterJ. (2009). Statewide differences in personality predict voting patterns in 1996-2004 US presidential elections. In JostJ. T.KayA.C.ThorisdottirH. (Eds.), Social and psychological bases of ideology and system justification. Oxford University Press.
61.
SchoenH.SchumannS. (2007). Personality traits, partisan attitudes, and voting behavior. Evidence from Germany. Political Psychology, 28(4), 471–498.
62.
SmithJ. K. (1982). An analysis of state regulations governing liquor store licensees. The Journal of Law and Economics, 25(2), 301–319.
63.
TangE. P. Y.ChinI. O. K. (2007). Analysing variety seeking behavior using panel data. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 19(4), 7–31.
64.
ThieleS.WeissC. (2003). Consumer demand for food diversity: Evidence for Germany. Food Policy, 28(2), 99–115.
65.
TrijpH. C. V.HoyerW. D.InmanJ. J. (1996). Why switch? product category–level explanations for true variety-seeking behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 33(3), 281–292.
66.
U.S.Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2023). Local area unemployment statistics. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor. https://www.bls.gov/lau/data.htm(on August,2023).
Van HielA.KossowskaM.MervieldeI. (2000). The relationship between openness to experience and political ideology. Personality and Individual Differences, 28(4), 741–751.
71.
VerhulstB.EavesL. J.HatemiP. K. (2012). Correlation not causation: The relationship between personality traits and political ideologies. American Journal of Political Science, 56(1), 34–51.
72.
WangC. H. (2016). Personality traits, political attitudes and vote choice: Evidence from the United States. Electoral Studies, 44, 26–34.
73.
WortmannH. R.GischU. A.WarschburgerP. (2021). Psychometric evaluation of the German version of the Variety Seeking Tendency Scale (VARSEEK). Food Quality and Preference, 94, 104319.
74.
WrightJ. R. (2012). Unemployment and the democratic electoral advantage. American Political Science Review, 106(4), 685–702.
75.
ZhangY. (2022). Variety-seeking behavior in consumption: A literature review and future research directions. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 874444.
