This study examined the effects of customer race (i.e., Caucasian, African American, Hispanic, and Asian), gender (i.e., female and male), and attire (i.e., business and casual) on servers’ tip expectations and service intentions. The results indicate that customers in business attire are perceived as better tippers and targeted for better treatment than customers in casual attire. However, this main effect of attire was qualified by significant interactions with race and gender. The positive effects of business (vs. casual) attire were greater for African Americans than for Caucasians and for males than for females. The implications of these findings for the training and monitoring of restaurant servers are discussed.
AinscoughT. L.MotleyC. M. (2000). Will you help me please? The effects of race, gender and manner of dress on retail service. Marketing Letters, 11, 129-136.
2.
AyresI.VarsF. E.ZakariyaN. (2005). To insure prejudice: Racial disparities in taxicab tipping. Yale Law Journal, 114, 1613-1674.
3.
BarghJ. A. (1992). Does subliminality matter to social psychology? Awareness of the stimulus versus awareness of its influence. In BornsteinR. F.PittmanT. S. (Eds.), Perception without awareness: Cognitive, clinical, and social perspectives (pp. 236-255). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
4.
BrewsterZ. W. (2012). Racially discriminatory service in full-service restaurants: The problem, cause, and potential solutions. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 53, 274-285.
5.
BrewsterZ. W. (2013). The effects of restaurant servers’ perceptions of customers’ tipping behaviors on service discrimination. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 32, 228-236.
6.
DombrowskiP. J.NamasivayamK.BartlettB. (2006). Antecedents of tips and servers’ ability to predict tips in a restaurant setting. Journal of Foodservice Business Research, 9(1), 3-19.
7.
FeaginJ. R. (1991). The continuing significance of race: Antiblack discrimination in public places. American Sociological Review, 56, 101-116.
8.
FiskeS. T.CuddyA. J.GlickP.XuJ. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902.
9.
HorganT. G.MastM. S.HallJ. A.CarterJ. D. (2004). Gender differences in memory for the appearance of others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 185-196.
10.
LynnM.BrewsterZ. W. (2015). Racial and ethnic differences in tipping the role of perceived descriptive and injunctive tipping norms. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 56, 68-79.
11.
LynnM.PughC.WilliamsJ. (2012). Black-white differences in tipping: The moderating effects of socioeconomic status. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 53, 286-294.
12.
LynnM.Thomas-HaysbertC. (2003). Ethnic differences in tipping: Evidence, explanations and implications. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 1747-1772.
13.
MastM. S.HallJ. A. (2004). Who is the boss and who is not? Accuracy of judging status. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 28, 145-165.
14.
McCallM.LynnA. (2009). Restaurant servers’ perceptions of customer tipping intentions. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 28, 594-596.
15.
MolloyJ. T. (1988). New dress for success. New York, NY: Warner Books.
16.
RidgewayC. L.Kricheli-KatzT. (2013). Intersecting cultural beliefs in social relations gender, race, and class binds and freedoms. Gender & Society, 27, 294-318.
17.
SargentM. J. (2004). On the predictive utility of the Implicit Association Test: Current research and future directions. In WilliamsJ.LeeW.HaughtvedtC. (Eds.), Diversity in advertising: Broadening the scope of research directions (pp. 43-58). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18.
SebastianR. J.BristowD. (2008). Formal or informal? The impact of style of dress and forms of address on business students’ perceptions of professors. Journal of Education for Business, 83, 196-201.
Vilnai-YavetzI.GilboaS. (2014). The cost (and the value) of customer attire: Linking high-and low-end dress styles to service quality and prices offered by service employees. Service Business, 8, 355-373.
