Abstract
Background. The optimal surgical approach for mild-to-moderate insertional Achilles tendinopathy (IAT) with Haglund deformity remains controversial. This study compares the clinical and radiological outcomes of Zadek Calcaneal Closing Wedge Osteotomy (ZCCWO) and Calcaneal Exostectomy with Tendon Repair (CE-TR). Material and methods. This retrospective study included 30 patients (15 ZCCWO, 15 CE-TR) with mild-to-moderate IAT associated with calcaneal exostosis. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Score and Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). Radiological evaluations included the Fowler–Phillip (FP), Calcaneal Pitch (CP), and Chaveaux-Liet (CL) angles. The mean follow-up was 39 ± 8.8 months (ZCCWO) and 31.4 ± 5 months (CE-TR). Results. Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in AOFAS and NPRS scores (P < .00001) with no statistically significant differences between them (AOFAS: P = .6, NPRS: P = .65). The postoperative decline in FP angle was comparable (ZCCWO: 10.1°±3.9°, CE-TR: 9.7°±4.4°; P > .05). Non-union occurred in 1 ZCCWO case (6.6%), while superficial wound infections were more common in the CE-TR group (13.3% vs 6.6%). Conclusion. The ZCCWO and CE-TR provide equivalent functional and radiological outcomes for mild-to-moderate IAT associated with Haglund deformity. Both procedures are effective and safe, with complication profiles that warrant consideration in surgical planning.
Level of evidence:
level III
Clinical trial registration:
Not applicable.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
