Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Anatomic reconstruction of the lateral ligamentous ankle complex with an autograft is indicated as a surgical approach in chronic ankle instability management. This approach benefits ankles deficient in ligamentous support and those with greater occupational or sporting demands. Autograft choice varies in clinical practice and is driven by surgeon’s choice and patient-specific ankle demands. Current literature does not favor any particular autograft with respect to functional outcomes or postoperative complications. This review systematically compares common autografts through patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs) and radiographic assessments. A literature search was performed using Ovid MEDLINE and PubMed databases. Studies were screened against inclusion and exclusion criteria and selected studies were critically appraised using Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool 2018. Preoperative and postoperative values of PROMs and radiographic outcomes were extracted, and the percentage change indicated intervention effectiveness. One-way analysis of variance was used to ascertain any statistical significance between the autografts. A total of 20 studies were included comprising 734 patients and 738 ankles. Six different autografts (gracilis, extensor digitorum longus, bone-patellar tendon, semitendinosus, anterior half of peroneus longus, and anterior half of peroneus brevis), 3 PROMs (the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Score, visual analog scale, and Karlsson-Peterson scale), and 2 radiographic assessments (anterior talar translation and talar tilt) were analyzed. Peroneal tendons showed superior PROMs and radiographic assessments, though not statistically significant, with also the lowest complication rates. Autografts with a distal harvest sites, such as gracilis or bone-patellar tendon-bone, carry higher risks of harvest-related and nerve injuries compared with other autografts.

Levels of Evidence: Level 2

Keywords

anatomic reconstruction ankle surgery autograft chronic ankle instability lateral ankle ligaments

“A closer analysis of postoperative complications and autograft properties reveals potential factors that might favor a surgeon’s choice of a particular autograft over the other.”

Introduction

Lateral ankle sprains are the most common acute musculoskeletal injury, with its prevalence being especially high in physically active people.¹ The initial sprain carries a risk of reinjury among which 20% to 40% result in a chronic ankle instability (CAI). Chronic ankle instability encompasses continuous joint instability, recurrent sprains, limited range of motion, reduced neuromuscular control, and muscle weakness, overall leading to a cumulative decline in the ankle function² and underlying degenerative changes in the cartilage.³

The primary management of CAI includes nonoperative interventions ranging from strength and balance training programs to more comprehensive multicomponent rehabilitation plans.⁴ A surgical intervention is indicated after a failure in symptomatic improvement following 3 to 6 months of aforementioned nonoperative management. Surgical procedures for CAI can be divided into 3 distinct groups: anatomic repair, nonanatomic reconstruction, and anatomic reconstruction.⁵

Anatomic repair uses existing ligamentous tissue to regain the ankle stability. Broström procedure, with oftentimes Gould modification, has been considered a gold standard surgical repair approach.^1,6 However, ankles characterized by attenuated or deficient ligamentous tissue and concomitant local tissue scarring were shown to profit from an anatomic reconstruction using a free tendon graft to adequately restore the anatomy and thus ankle functionality.⁷

Anatomic reconstruction was also proven to benefit high demand ankles in either occupational or sporting activities.³ Reconstruction can be performed using an either autograft or allograft, with no clinical evidence of superiority of one over the other.⁸ The vast research on anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction highlighted the relevant advantages and disadvantages of graft choices which are applicable to ankle ligament reconstruction.⁹ Expected-value decision analysis of patients undergoing ACL reconstruction revealed aversion to allografts.⁶ Regardless of an absence of secondary incision at the harvesting site and thus prolonged theater time seen in case of autografts, allografts are associated with potential disease transmission, risk of immunogenicity, higher cost and varied availability.^9,10 Therefore, recent years had demonstrated an established use of autografts in lateral ankle ligamentous complex reconstruction.¹⁰

The choice of autograft varies greatly among surgeons whereby semitendinosus tendon, gracilis tendon, plantaris tendon, toe extensor tendon, and bone-patellar tendon are some of the most commonly employed.¹¹ Differing biomechanical properties of distinctive autografts as well as patient-specific ankle demands enable an opportunity for individualistic approach. However, the heterogeneity of autografts, variety of surgical techniques employed, and assortment of different outcome measurements make it challenging to ascertain the evidence on the graft choice. To date, no autograft has shown superiority to others with respect to functional outcomes or postoperative complications.

This review aims to systematically compare the use of common autografts through patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs) and radiographic assessments including anterior talar translation (ATT) and talar tilt (TT). Patient-reported outcome measurements considered in this study included Karlsson-Peterson scale, visual analog scale (VAS), and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS). Harvesting an autologous tendon comes at the expense of potentially changing the biomechanics of the affected site.¹⁰ In that regard, this review also aims to highlight any complications associated with a particular autograft choice and evaluate which autograft carries the least “cost” of harvesting.

Methodology

Electronic Literature Search

This study was conducted in accordance with the guidelines pertaining the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines (Figure 1). Electronic databases Ovid and PubMed were searched on the July 4, 2024. The search was conducted using the following key words: “chronic ankle instability,” “reconstruction,” and “tendon graft.” Studies were limited to full-text articles and English language only. Supplementary search methods were employed including cross-reference search of relevant systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Figure 1.

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA).

Study Selection

All retrieved articles were independently assessed by 2 reviewers (LB and CFMG). After removing duplicates, titles and abstracts of the articles were reviewed for an appropriate study design and clinically relevant comparable outcomes. Inclusion and exclusion criteria listed below were applied to the remaining articles.

Inclusion criteria

Prospective or retrospective therapeutic studies concerning anatomic reconstruction of lateral ligamentous ankle complex with the autologous tendon graft, either open or arthroscopic.

Studies including participants with CAI diagnosis who underwent at least 3 to 6 months of failed conservative, nonsurgical treatment, and/or failed Broström-Gould procedures, of any age, gender, BMI score, or level of physical activity.

Studies using at least one of the PROMs and/or radiographical reported outcomes with a follow-up of at least 6 months.

Exclusion criteria

Therapeutic studies concerning anatomic repair, nonanatomic reconstruction or anatomic reconstruction with allografts.

Studies involving participants with concurrent rheumatoid arthritis, grade II or above ankle degenerative arthritis, deformities of foot and ankle, systemic diseases, and neuromuscular disorders.

Systematic reviews, cadaveric studies, animal studies, and ex vivo studies.

Critical Appraisal and Quality Assessment

All selected studies were critically appraised using Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) 2018.¹² Each study was independently appraised by the 2 authors (LB, CFMG). In the case of a disagreement, a third author provided input to reach a consensus.

Data Extraction, Synthesis, and Analysis

Preoperative and postoperative values of PROMs and/or radiographic outcomes were extracted and analyzed in the Microsoft Excel. Similarly, any postoperative complications reported in the studies were noted and collated in the Microsoft Excel. Postoperative values of PROMs and/or radiographic outcomes were taken at the final patient follow-up. Percentage change in preoperative and postoperative values was taken as the indicator of intervention effectiveness and served as a basis for further statistical analysis in IBM SPSS software v.29.0.2.0.¹³ One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was used to ascertain any statistical significance between the autografts and reveal any superiority in therapeutic effect of a particular autograft.

Results

Study Selection

Figure 1 exhibits the flow diagram of the detailed study selection process. The initial database search yielded 109 articles. After removing duplicates, screening for relevant outcomes and application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 12 studies were included in the review. In addition, studies identified through citation searching were subjected to the same scrutiny. Of those, 8 studies were included, achieving a total of 20 studies eligible for review. Reasons for exclusion of the remaining articles are listed in Figure 1.

Critical Appraisal and Quality Assessment

One study¹⁴ was a level II randomized control trial (RCT) without blinding, 5 studies^{6,10,11,15,16} were level III quantitative nonrandomized studies, and 13 studies^1,3,5,7,^17-25 were level IV quantitative descriptive case reports or series. Seventeen studies were valued as higher quality papers, whereby 10 of these were fully satisfactory and 4 had some concerns in 1 of the 5 evaluation criteria. Three studies were deemed of lower quality, meeting 60% of the evaluation criteria (Table 1). No studies included met any lower than 60% of evaluation criteria.

Table 1.

Quality Appraisal of Included Studies Using Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) 2018.

	Author(s)	2. Quantitative randomized controlled trials					3. Quantitative nonrandomized					4. Quantitative descriptive					Overall quality score
		2.1	2.2	2.3	2.4	2.5	3.1	3.2	3.3	3.4	3.5	4.1	4.2	4.3	4.4	4.5
Gracilis tendon graft	Coughlin et al¹⁸											Y	Y	Y	Y	Y	*****
	Cordier et al¹⁷											Y	Y	Y	Y	Y	*****
	Guillo et al³											Y	Y	Y	Y	Y	*****
	Ibrahim et al¹⁹											Y	Y	Y	Y	Y	*****
	Miyamoto et al¹¹						Y	Y	Y	CT	Y						****
	Lan et al²⁰											Y	Y	Y	Y	Y	*****
	Allegra et al²¹											Y	Y	Y	Y	Y	*****
	Lopes et al¹⁵						Y	Y	Y	N	Y						****
Extensor digitorum longus	Ahn et al⁷											Y	Y	Y	N	Y	****
Bone-patellar tendon	Chen et al²²											Y	Y	Y	N	Y	****
Bone-patellar tendon	Sugimoto et al²³											Y	Y	Y	Y	Y	*****
Semitendinosus	Feng et al¹⁴	Y	Y	Y	Y	CT											****
	Wei et al¹											Y	Y	Y	Y	Y	*****
	Xu et al⁶						Y	Y	Y	N	CT						***
	Li et al¹⁶						Y	Y	Y	N	Y						****
	Wang and Xu²⁴											Y	Y	Y	Y	Y	*****
Anterior half of peroneus longus	Kim et al²⁵											Y	Y	Y	CT	Y	****
	Park and Lee⁵											Y	Y	Y	Y	Y	*****
	Yang et al¹⁰						Y	Y	N	CT	Y						***
Anterior half of peroneus brevis	Yang et al¹⁰						Y	Y	N	CT	Y						***

*****

or 100% quality criteria met.

****

or 80% quality criteria met.

***

or 60% quality criteria met.

Data Extraction, Synthesis, and Analysis

Detailed information about selected studies was extracted and synthesized in Table 2. Overall, a total of 734 patients and 738 ankles were included in the review. Synthesis of included articles revealed 6 different autografts employed across the studies with gracilis being the most frequently used autograft. The distribution of different autografts among patients is shown in Table 3. Studies employed a variety of different PROMs, with most studies using several of them solely or accompanied with radiographic outcomes. To surmount the heterogeneity of the outcomes and enable comparison between the autografts, this review focused on the most frequently used PROMs across studies, AOFAS, VAS, and Karlsson-Peterson scale. The radiographic outcome measurements used in this review included ATT and TT. The distribution of PROMs and radiographic outcomes is demonstrated in Tables 4 and 5, respectively.

Table 2.

Characteristics of Included Studies.

Author(s)	Level of evidence	No. of patients (no. of ankles)	Age range (mean)	Gender (F/M)	Autograft	PROMs	Radiographic outcomes	Follow-up period, mo
Ahn et al⁷	IV	24	16-53 (35.7)	10/14	EDL	Karlsson-Peterson scale	ATTTT	24
Allegra et al²¹	IV	11	21-51 (33.3)	4/7	Gracilis	AOFAS	TT	24
Chen et al²²	IV	31	16-52 (33.1)	11/20	BPTB	VAS, Karlsson-Peterson scale, AHS, Tegner scale	ATTTT	24-82
Coughlin et al¹⁸	IV	28 (29)	16-59 (31)	17/11	Gracilis	AOFAS, VAS, post-op Karlsson-Peterson scale	ATTTT	12-52
Cordier et al¹⁷	IV	50	21-58 (38.1)	16/34	Gracilis	AOFAS, VAS, Karlsson-Peterson scale	-	24
Feng et al¹⁴	II	53	70.9^a	14/39	Semitendinosus	AOFAS, VAS, Karlsson-Peterson scale	ATT	24
Guillo et al³	IV	41	16-53 (35.6)	9/25	Gracilis	AOFAS, Karlsson-Peterson scale, AAS	-	24
Ibrahim et al¹⁹	IV	14	18-29 (25)	2/12	Gracilis	AOFAS, VAS, post-op Karlsson-Peterson scale, Olerud and Molander scale	ATTTT	33.5
Kim et al²⁵	IV	31	19-46 (24)	5/24	Anterior half of PL	Karlsson-Peterson scale	ATTTT	12
Lan et al²⁰	IV	15	21-48 (31.9)	1/14	Gracilis	AOFAS, VAS, Karlsson-Peterson scale	ATTTT	18
Li et al¹⁶	III	10	31.3^a	2/8	Semitendinosus	AOFAS, Karlsson-Peterson scale	-	16
Lopes et al¹⁵	III	171	35.2^a	60/111	Gracilis	AOFAS, Karlsson-Peterson scale	-	6
Miyamoto et al¹¹	III	33	18-43 (27.1)	10/23	Gracilis	Karlsson-Peterson scale	ATTTT	24
Park and Lee⁵	IV	30 (31)	17-54 (23.9)	7/23	Anterior half of PL	AOFAS, VAS, Karlsson-Peterson scale	ATTTT	12
Sugimoto et al²³	IV	13	21-56 (39.1)	6/7	BPTB	-	ATTTT	12
Wang and Xu²⁴	IV	25	17-62 (32.4)	11/14	Semitendinosus	AOFAS	ATTTT	12
Wei et al¹	IV	18	20-46 (27.8)	3/15	Semitendinosus	VAS, Karlsson-Peterson scale, Sefton articular stability scale	ATTTT	24
Xu et al⁶	III	32	32.4^a	13/19	Semitendinosus	AOFAS	ATTTT	12
Yang et al¹⁰	III	50	39.9^a	25/25	Anterior half of PL	AOFAS, VAS, Karlsson-Peterson scale	ATTTT	12
Yang et al¹⁰	III	50	35.6^a	24/26	Anterior half of PB	AOFAS, VAS, Karlsson-Peterson scale	ATTTT	12

AAS, the Ankle Arthritis Score; AOFAS, the American Orthopaedic Foot And Ankle Society Score; ATT, Anterior Talar Translation; BPTB, bone-patellar tendon-bone; EDL, extensor digitorum longus; PL, peroneus longus; TT, talar tilt; VAS, visual analog scale.

No age range reported.

Table 3.

Distribution of Autograft Types Across Included Studies.

Autograft	No. of studies	No. of patients	No. of ankles	Mean age of patients	Gender ratio (F/M)
Gracilis	8	368	370	33.9 ± 4.48	122/236
Extensor digitorum longus	1	24	24	35.7 (*no SD given)	10/14
Bone-patellar tendon	2	44	44	34.9 ± 2.77	17/27
Semitendinosus	5	138	138	46.5 ± 19.4	43/95
Anterior half of peroneus longus	3	110	112	31.1 ± 7.96	37/72
Anterior half of peroneus brevis	1	50	50	35.6 ± 11.8	24/26

Table 4.

Distribution of Outcome Measurements Across Included Studies.

Autograft	AOFAS	VAS	Karlsson-Peterson score
Autograft	AOFAS	VAS	Pre-op and post-op	Post-op only
Gracilis	7	4	4	2^a
Extensor digitorum longus	—	—	1	—
Bone-patellar	—	1	1	—
Semitendinosus	4	2	3	—
Anterior half of peroneus longus	2	2	3	—
Anterior half of peroneus brevis	1	1	1	—

For the purposes of consistency and comparative analysis, these studies were excluded from a further analysis due to lack of preoperative Karlsson score.

Table 5.

Distribution of Radiographic Measurements Across Included Studies.

Autograft	Anterior talar translation	Talar tilt
Gracilis	4	5
Extensor digitorum longus	1	1
Bone-patellar	2	2
Semitendinosus	4	3
Anterior half of peroneus longus	3	3
Anterior half of peroneus brevis	1	1

Percentage change in the aforementioned outcomes between the autografts allowed for the quantification of the effectiveness of the intervention with a given autograft and enabled a more robust statistical analysis (Table 6). One-way ANOVA test was performed for each individual PROM as well as radiographic assessment tool. Due to the restriction of the 1-way ANOVA test, autograft subgroups containing less than 2 cumulative mean values in any of the outcome measurements, were excluded from the analysis. In that respect, 1-way ANOVA for AOFAS excluded extensor digitorum longus (EDL), analysis of VAS excluded anterior half of peroneus brevis (PB) and bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB), and analysis of Karlsson-Peterson score excluded EDL, anterior half of PB and BPTB. In the instance of radiographic assessments, 1-way ANOVA tests excluded EDL and anterior half of PB. Nevertheless, the data presented below account for all values from the included studies (Table 6). According to PROMs, AOFAS revealed anterior half of peroneus longus (PL) to have the most positive outcomes with reported change of 59%. Studies utilizing VAS reporting found that semitendinosus and anterior half of PB stood out as most effective interventions with an 83% change. Last, interventions reported by Karlsson-Peterson scale showed EDL to be most effective autograft with a 92% change. However, 1-way ANOVA analysis of PROMs revealed no significant difference between autograft groups (P > .05), and thus, no autograft exhibits clinical superiority with respect to patient outcomes. Radiographic outcome measurements revealed anterior half of PB to be the most effective intervention, with 80% and 82% change measured in ATT and TT, respectively. Nevertheless, 1-way ANOVA test performed for radiographic assessments also revealed no significant difference among the autografts of interest (P > .05).

Table 6.

Patient-Reported Outcome Measurements Divided Into Autograft Subgroups.

Autograft	AOFAS			VAS			Karlsson-Peterson score
Autograft	Pre-op (± SD)^a	Post-op (± SD)^b	% change	Pre-op (± SD)^a	Post-op (± SD)^b	% change	Pre-op (± SD)^a	Post-op (± SD)^b	% change
Gracilis	62.2 ± 7.59	91.1 ± 3.91	49	4.53 ± 2.45	1.46 ± 1.88	65	58.2 ± 7.65	88.0 ± 3.62	53
Extensor digitorum longus	—	—	—	—	—	—	48.0 ± 4.2	92.2 ± 3.8	92
Bone-patellar	—	—	—	5.9 ± 1.6	1.4 ± 1.0	76	55.2 ± 11.0	91.2 ± 6.9	65
Semitendinosus	60.7 ± 7.2	92.1 ± 3.1	53	6.36 ± 1.61	1.05 ± 0.22	83	58.4 ± 3.55	89.4 ± 2.63	54
Anterior half of peroneus longus	56.9 ± 0.24	90.4 ± 1.14	59	6.65 ± 0.19	1.48 ± 0.10	78	61.5 ± 3.46	88.9 ± 3.59	45
Anterior half of peroneus brevis	57.9 ± 6.4	90.7 ± 6.2	57	6.4 ± 1.0	1.1 ± 0.9	83	58.4 ± 6.9	86.4 ± 6.0	48

Cumulative mean value of preoperative PROMs.

Cumulative mean value of postoperative PROMs.

Complications Associated With Autografts

In the studies utilizing gracilis autograft, 84 out of 368 patients reported postoperative complications. In 4 cases, surgical revision was performed either due to autograft rupture or other unrevealed reasons. There were 17 cases of suspected injury to the superficial peroneal nerve due to patient-reported neuralgia and 5 cases of injury to the sural nerve. Postoperatively, 4 patients complained about peri-incisional numbness, pain or itchiness at the harvest site, 13 patients reported mild swelling, and 7 patients reported morning stiffness. In addition, there were 8 incidences of hardware-related issues, 14 cases of postoperative lateral ankle sprain, and 9 reports of regional chronic pain. In the cohort of 24 which underwent anatomic reconstruction using EDL autograft, 2 patients reported weakness in the dorsiflexion of the fourth toe and 1 case of mild cock-up deformity in the fifth toe. Among the 44 patients who received BPTB, 4 reported harvest-related problems. Two complained about sensory disturbance at the harvest site and the remaining 2 sustained an infrapatellar nerve injury during the harvest. There were also 2 separate incidences of a local infection. In the studies concerning semitendinosus autograft, of the 138 patients, there are reports of 1 postoperative residual instability and 1 recurrent ankle sprain. Of 110 ankles who received an intervention with anterior half of PL autograft, there were 6 cases of irritability over screw insertion site and 7 cases of ankle sprains following the procedure. There were no reported complications in the study concerning anterior half of PB.

Discussion

This review aimed to compare the effectiveness of different tendon autografts in an anatomic reconstruction of lateral ankle ligamentous complex and thus ascertain superiority of any autograft option. An ideal autograft should have adequate tensile strength to support ankle’s structure and function, easily accessible as well as safe to harvest without compromising the functionality of the donor site.^5,26

Considering both PROMs and radiographic measurements, peroneal tendons have shown to be the most effective autografts. However, both outcome measurements suggested that there is no statistical difference between any autograft options. A closer analysis of postoperative complications and autograft properties reveals potential factors that might favor a surgeon’s choice of a particular autograft over the other. A successful anatomic reconstruction would come at the minimal compromise of the ankle’s pre-existing functionality and autograft donor site complications. Autograft harvest carries a risk of mechanical and functional damage to the anatomical site that given tendon supports. Peroneus brevis tendon has associated concerns with regards to tendon weakening and decreased power of eversion.⁷ Nonetheless, there were no reported complications concerning PB tendon in this review. It is accepted that PB is a more effective evertor than PL, thus deeming the latter as a more suitable autograft choice.²⁵ However, of 110 ankles who received an intervention with anterior half of PL autograft, there were 7 cases of ankle sprains following the procedure. Autografts with a more distal harvest site can achieve ankle stability without affecting the peroneal tendons and subtalar movement.¹⁸ Regarding its biomechanical properties, PL was shown to be comparable with semitendinosus and superior to other autografts in its strength to withstand load to failure in cadaveric studies.⁵

Another aspect of the harvesting process to consider is the autograft accessibility. Harvesting gracilis tendon requires repositioning of the patient to a supine position. This not only prolongs the theater time but also necessitates broader knowledge of the local knee anatomy from a foot and ankle surgeon or potentially involvement of a second specialist.²⁵ In the case of gracilis, there is a secondary surgical site that introduces the risk of further complications. Within population included in this review, gracilis autograft exhibited seemingly higher rate of harvest-related and nerve injury-related complications when compared with other autograft options. These included suspected injury to the superficial peroneal nerve, injury to the sural nerve, peri-incisional numbness, and pain or itchiness at the harvest site. However, biomechanical properties and great tensile strength still consider gracilis as an adequate autograft choice.¹¹

A secondary surgical site and associated complications are also encountered with BPTB autograft. Bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft also casts doubt on its compatibility as an intervention, as its fibers resist the force perpendicular to the floor whereby autograft reconstructing the lateral ankle ligamentous complex requires a force axis oblique to the floor.²²

In addition to adequate biomechanical properties,²⁶ optimal autograft also potentially necessitates modification of the surgical technique to surmount the hindrances of a harvested tendon and make it suitable for a reconstruction. Extensor digitorum longus was found to be advantageous due to its great cross-sectional area and stiffness, but proved to be inadequate in dimensions, requiring the doubling or tripling the graft to provide sufficient material for ankle stabilization.⁷ Also, the ease of access and harvest relies on the surrounding tissue. Extensor digitorum longus autograft harvest can frequently pose difficulty due to its adherence to the local surrounding tissue, also possibly accounting for postoperative complications.⁷ In this study, 2 patients reported weakness in the dorsiflexion of the fourth toe and 1 case of mild cock-up deformity in the fifth toe.

Semitendinosus reportedly provides sufficient material in diameter and length for entire lateral ligamentous complex reconstruction.⁶ Also, it is associated with the low incidence of complications. In this review, of the 138 patients, there are reports of 1 postoperative residual instability and 1 recurrent ankle sprain.

One of the limitations of this review was the identification of 8 additional studies that were initially missed during the database search and were later included by cross-reference of other reviews. This occurred despite conducting a comprehensive search across 2 databases. The omission of these studies may be attributed to the inherent variability in indexing terms in databases, potential limitations in keyword selection, and differences in how relevant studies were categorized in the literature. While the studies included in this review were all deemed of satisfactory quality for an inclusion eligibility, it is important to note that most studies were level IV evidence with nonrandomized treatment assignment, nonblinding of the examiners, and oftentimes paucity of homogeneity and consistency in the relatively small study population. In addition, overarching short follow-up period does not enable discussion on long-term efficacy and later occurring complications associated with different autograft interventions. Further studies tackling the mutual issue of patient adherence to a long-term follow-up would consolidate the indication of this procedure. Due to limited number of included studies reporting on return to daily or sporting activities, the comparison of this variable was left out of this review. Nevertheless, promoting inclusion of such factors into the future studies would further inform the decision behind the optimal graft, especially when coupled with clearly defined physical activity level of the population studied. Across studies, there is intravariability in population characteristics with regards to the mechanism of injury that led to the diagnosis of CAI. While this reduces the risk of population bias, further studies of these interventions in more focused cohorts such as athletes could provide more meaningful insights into the utility of specific autografts (Table 7).

Table 7.

Radiographic Assessment Outcomes Divided Into Autograft Subgroups.

Autograft	Anterior talar translation			Talar tilt
Autograft	Pre-op (± SD)	Post-op (± SD)	% change	Pre-op (± SD)	Post-op (± SD)	% change
Gracilis	10.0 ± 1.73	4.41 ± 0.51	55	10.8 ± 3.88	4.23 ± 1.76	62
Extensor digitorum longus	6.7 ± 1.2	3.4 ± 0.6	49	12.3 ± 1.1	4.3 ± 0.8	65
Bone-patellar	7.97 ± 0.74	2.98 ± 1.85	64	17.4 ± 0.65	4.13 ± 0.51	76
Semitendinosus	10.2 ± 2.04	3.71 ± 0.81	64	17.1 ± 4.61	3.89 ± 0.16	76
Anterior half of peroneus longus	11.5 ± 3.21	4.22 ± 1.41	58	14.7 ± 0.91	3.44 ± 0.79	77
Anterior half of peroneus brevis	15.0 ± 2.5	3.0 ± 0.7	80	12.8 ± 2.9	2.3 ± 1.9	82

The heterogeneity of PROMs used across studies made the initially proposed comparative analysis of autografts such as EDL and anterior half of PB unfeasible. Further studies concerning these autografts would inevitably provide a greater insight into the optimal choice of autograft. The subjectivity of PROMs potentially affects the reliability of the presented results which was attempted to be mitigated by contrasting those outcomes with more objective, radiographic assessment tools including ATT and TT.

Statistical analysis relied on the percentage change from preoperative to postoperative value as measured by distinct outcome measurements. Postoperative values were taken at the final follow-up which varied across studies and could be a confounding factor in determining the effectiveness of the intervention with a particular autograft. Furthermore, postoperative care undoubtedly has a significant impact on the resulting outcome of the intervention. Studies included in this review revealed different postoperative care either through formal rehabilitation program or patient care instructions. While patient’s characteristics and needs are predominant guides in individual postoperative journey, to what extent could those impact the outcome measurements at the follow-up is difficult to ascertain. Even though randomization and blinding in a surgical setting raise another set of ethical concerns, this review highlights the need for RCTs involving different autografts to mitigate the extent of confounding factors and provide a greater reliability in drawing conclusions about the autograft choice for an anatomic reconstruction of lateral ligamentous complex of the ankle.

Conclusion

This is to our knowledge the first review that focuses solely on autograft types in lateral ankle ligament reconstruction. Peroneal tendons have stood out as clinically superior autografts according to PROMs and radiographic measurements, though not statistically significant. These have also had the lowest incidence of complications among autografts. Caution should be exercised when using autografts with a more distal harvest site, such as gracilis or BTPB due to a higher rate of harvest-related and nerve injury–related complications. The choice of autograft should come at the minimal compromise of the ankle’s pre-existing functionality and autograft donor site complications, with consideration also given to autograft’s biomechanical properties, accessibility, and patient’s choice.

Footnotes

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Ethical Approval

Ethical approval was not sought or required for this study, as it constitutes a systematic review of previously published data and did not involve the collection or analysis of new, identifiable patient information.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was not applicable to this study, as no new data were collected from human participants. The research involved secondary analysis of previously published studies, all of which are assumed to have obtained appropriate ethical approval and informed consent at the time of their original conduct.

Trial Registration

N/A.

ORCID iD

Lorena Brasnic

References

Wei

Fan

Han

, et al. Using arthroscopy combined with fluoroscopic technique for accurate location of the bone tunnel entrance in chronic ankle instability treatment. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021;22(1):289. doi:10.1186/s12891-021-04165-0

Hall

Docherty

Simon

Kingma

Klossner

JC.

Strength-training protocols to improve deficits in participants with chronic ankle instability: a randomized controlled trial. J Athl Train. 2015;50(1):36-44. doi:10.4085/1062-6050-49.3.71

Guillo

Odagiri

van Rooij

Bauer

Hardy

All-inside endoscopic anatomic reconstruction leads to satisfactory functional outcomes in patients with chronic ankle instability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020;29(4):1318-1324. doi:10.1007/s00167-020-06130-1

Hall

Chomistek

Kingma

Docherty

CL.

Balance- and strength-training protocols to improve chronic ankle instability deficits, part II: assessing patient-reported outcome measures. J Athl Train. 2018;53(6):578-583. doi:10.4085/1062-6050-387-16

Park

Lee

WC.

Donor site morbidity after lateral ankle ligament reconstruction using the anterior half of the peroneus longus tendon autograft. Am J Sports Med. 2016;45(4):922-928. doi:10.1177/0363546516675167

Liu

Zhu

Wang

Minimally invasive reconstruction of the lateral ankle ligaments using semitendinosus autograft or tendon allograft. Foot Ankle Int. 2014;35(10):1015-1021. doi:10.1177/1071100714540145

Ahn

Choy

Kim

HY.

Reconstruction of the lateral ankle ligament with a long extensor tendon graft of the fourth toe. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(3):637-644. doi:10.1177/0363546510388882

Spennacchio

Seil

Mouton

Scheidt

Cucchi

Anatomic reconstruction of lateral ankle ligaments: is there an optimal graft option?

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022;30(12):4214-4224. doi:10.1007/s00167-022-07071-7

Carey

Dunn

Dahm

Zeger

Spindler

KP.

A systematic review of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autograft compared with allograft. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(9):2242-2250. doi:10.2106/JBJS.I.00610

10.

Yang

Liu

Cui

, et al. Comparison of the effects of reconstruction of the lateral ankle ligaments using peroneus longus and peroneus brevis tendon graft. Medicine. 2020;99(46):e22912. doi:10.1097/md.0000000000022912

11.

Miyamoto

Takao

Yamada

Matsushita

Accelerated versus traditional rehabilitation after anterior talofibular ligament reconstruction for chronic lateral instability of the ankle in athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(6):1441-1447. doi:10.1177/0363546514527418

12.

Hong Q. Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) 2018. Published 2020. Accessed October 30, 2023. http://mixedmethodsappraisaltoolpublic.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/140056890/Reporting%20the%20results%20of%20the%20MMAT.pdf

13.

Karnosky

Cabe

Drakos

Reconstruction of chronic ankle instability with hamstring autograft. Tech Foot Ankle Surg. 2018;17(1):19-26.

14.

Feng

Maffulli

Oliva

Wang

Sun

QQ.

Arthroscopic remnant-preserving anterior talofibular ligament reconstruction does not improve mid-term function in chronic ankle instability. Injury. 2020;51(8):1899-1904. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2020.05.011

15.

Lopes

Andrieu

Cordier

, et al. Arthroscopic treatment of chronic ankle instability: prospective study of outcomes in 286 patients. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018;104(8S):S199-S205.

16.

Tao

, et al. Clinical and magnetic resonance imaging assessment of anatomical lateral ankle ligament reconstruction: comparison of tendon allograft and autograft. Int Orthop. 2018;42(3):551-557. doi:10.1007/s00264-018-3802-5

17.

Cordier

Ovigue

Dalmau-Pastor

Michels

Endoscopic anatomic ligament reconstruction is a reliable option to treat chronic lateral ankle instability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019;28(1):86-92. doi:10.1007/s00167-019-05793-9

18.

Coughlin

Schenck

Jr Grebing

Treme

Comprehensive reconstruction of the lateral ankle for chronic instability using a free gracilis graft. Foot Ankle Int. 2004;25(4):231-241. doi:10.1177/107110070402500407

19.

Ibrahim

Hamido

Misfer

, et al. Anatomical reconstruction of the lateral ligaments using gracilis tendon in chronic ankle instability; a new technique. Foot Ankle Surg. 2011;17(4):239-246. doi:10.1016/j.fas.2010.07.006

20.

Lan

Zeng

Yuan

, et al. All-inside arthroscopic anterior talofibular ligament anatomic reconstruction with a gracilis tendon autograft for chronic ankle instability in high-demand patients. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2020;59(2):222-230.

21.

Allegra

Boustany

Cerza

Spiezia

Maffulli

Arthroscopic anterior talofibular ligament reconstructin in chronic ankle instability. Injury. 2020;51(suppl 3):S56-S62. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2020.03.054

22.

Chen

, et al. Anatomic reconstruction of anterior talofibular ligament with tibial tuberosity–patellar tendon autograft for chronic lateral ankle instability. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2018;26(2):2309499018780874. doi:10.1177/2309499018780874

23.

Sugimoto

Takakura

Kumai

Iwai

Tanaka

Reconstruction of the lateral ankle ligaments with bone-patellar tendon graft in patients with chronic ankle instability. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30(3):340-346. doi:10.1177/03635465020300030701

24.

Wang

XY.

Minimally invasive reconstruction of lateral ligaments of the ankle using semitendinosus autograft. Foot Ankle Int. 2013;34(5):711-715. doi:10.1177/1071100713478916

25.

Kim

Jeon

Dong

, et al. Lateral ankle ligament reconstruction using the anterior half of the peroneus longus tendon. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23(6):1877-1885. doi:10.1007/s00167-014-3072-8

26.

Bohnsack

Sürie

Kirsch

Wülker

Biomechanical properties of commonly used autogenous transplants in the surgical treatment of chronic lateral ankle instability. Foot Ankle Int. 2002;23(7):661-664. doi:10.1177/107110070202300714

27.

Glazebrook

Stone

Pasache Lozano

del

Morash

Takao

Open ankle reconstruction of lateral ligaments (O-Anti-RoLL). Tech Foot Ankle Surg. 2022;21(2):111-121. doi:10.1097/BTF.0000000000000347

28.

Kennedy

Smyth

Fansa

Murawski

CD.

Anatomic lateral ligament reconstruction in the ankle. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(10):2309-2317. doi:10.1177/0363546512455397

29.

Schuurman

Willems

WJ.

Lateral ankle reconstruction using a patellar tendon graft: a case report. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2009;48(3):353-357. doi:10.1053/j.jfas.2009.02.002

30.

Lopes

Andrieu

Molinier

Colin

Morin

PT4: new arthroscopic technique for isolated reconstruction of the anterior talofibular ligament using a quadrupled plantaris tendon. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021;107(6):102995. doi:10.1016/j.otsr.2021.102995

31.

Grass

Rammelt

Biewener

Zwipp

Peroneus longus ligamentoplasty for chronic instability of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. Foot Ankle Int. 2003;24(5):392-397. doi:10.1177/107110070302400503

32.

Budny

Schuberth

JM.

Autologous split peroneus longus lateral ankle stabilization. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012;51(5):588-592.

33.

Maffulli

Del Buono

Maffulli

, et al. Isolated anterior talofibular ligament Brostrom repair for chronic lateral ankle instability: 9-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(4):858-864.

34.

Colville

MR.

Surgical treatment of the unstable ankle. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1998;6(6):368-377.

35.

Knupp

Horn Lang

Zwicky

Lötscher

Hintermann

Chronic ankle instability (medial and lateral). Clin Sports Med. 2015;34(4):679-688. doi:10.1016/j.csm.2015.06.004

36.

Letts

Davidson

Mukhtar

Surgical management of chronic lateral ankle instability in adolescents. J Pediatr Orthop. 2003;23(3):392-377. Accessed October 30, 2023. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12724608/

37.

Usually

Indino

Di Silvestri

Manzi

Maffulli

Clinical outcomes and return to sport after minimally invasive reconstruction of the lateral ligament complex with semitendinosus tendon autograft in chronic ankle instability. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2021;111(2):2.

38.

De Vries

Struijs

Raaymakers

Marti

RK.

Long-term results of the Weber operation for chronic ankle instability: 37 patients followed for 20-30 years. Acta Orthop. 2005;76(6):891-898.

39.

Caals

Mertens

Spaepen

Buedts

Outcome after arthroscopically assisted percutaneous reconstruction of lateral ankle ligaments using a gracilis tendon autograft. Acta Orthop Belg. 2020;86(1):95-101.

40.

Paterson

Cohen

Taylor

Bourne

Black

Reconstruction of the lateral ligaments of the ankle using semi-tendinosis graft. Foot Ankle Int. 2000;21(5):413-419.

Autograft Choice for Anatomic Reconstruction of Lateral Ankle Ligaments in Chronic Ankle Instability: A Systematic Review

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Methodology

Electronic Literature Search

Study Selection

Inclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria

Critical Appraisal and Quality Assessment

Data Extraction, Synthesis, and Analysis

Results

Study Selection

Critical Appraisal and Quality Assessment

Data Extraction, Synthesis, and Analysis

Complications Associated With Autografts

Discussion

Conclusion

Footnotes

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

Funding

Ethical Approval

Informed Consent

Trial Registration

ORCID iD

References