Electromyographic Analysis of Large Muscle Activity in Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity

Abstract

Background

There are various deformities described in the spectrum of Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity (PCFD) which not only have adverse effects on the foot but also on the entire lower limb. Early lower limb muscular fatigue and pain during exertion is the most common complaint of patients with PCFD. Surface electromyography (sEMG) provides an accurate assessment of muscle activity. In this study, we aim to compare the activities of quadriceps, hamstrings, and gastrosoleus muscle groups of adult patients with PCFD with normal lower limbs and correlate the radiological parameters and functional effects of PCFD with the activities.

Methods

Thirty patients with bilateral PCFD and 30 controls underwent weight-bearing anteroposterior (AP), lateral, and hindfoot alignment radiographs of the foot. Radiographic parameters of PCFD were assessed. Surface electromyography was used to assess the quadriceps, hamstrings, and gastrosoleus activities, and this was compared between the 2 groups and correlated with radiological measurements of PCFD. Tegner activity questionnaire was used to assess the functional effects of collapsed arch.

Results

Electrical activities of all muscle groups were significantly higher in cases than controls. Meary’s angle and hindfoot moment arm had significant correlations with hamstring activity (P = .013) and gastrosoleus activity (P = .027), respectively. Tegner scores of cases were significantly lower than those of controls (P = .041).

Conclusions

The PCFD causes an increase in activity of large muscles of the affected lower limb which act on joints other than those in the foot. This finding may be due to several compensatory mechanisms that counteract the deforming forces. This may be a cause for the frequent complaint, early fatigue, and hence functional impairment. However, most radiological parameters did not correlate with muscle activities and larger study size may be required for further association.

Levels of Evidence:

Diagnostic: Level 3.