Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background

The aim of the study is to investigate the differences between the extensile lateral (EL) and sinus tarsi (ST) approaches for the treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneus fractures as treated by a single surgeon.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study performed at a Level 1 trauma center. One hundred twenty-nine consecutive intra-articular calcaneus fractures from 2011 to 2018 that were surgically treated by a single surgeon. Primary outcomes were time to surgery, operative time, postoperative restoration of the critical angle of Gissane, postoperative wound complications, and need for unplanned re-operation.

Results

Patient characteristics, including demographics, mechanism of injury, and fracture patterns were similar between the EL and ST approach groups. There was a significant decrease in unplanned secondary procedures (P = .008), shorter time to definitive fixation (P = .00001), and shorter average operative time in the ST group (P = .00001). Postoperative measurement of the critical angle of Gissane between the two groups was significantly different, but minute with an average difference of approximately 3 degrees (P = .025). Measurements in both groups were within the expected range of normal.

Conclusions

For displaced intra-articular calcaneus fractures, a limited open ST approach is associated with a significant reduction in the time to definitive fixation and decreased operative time. The EL approach was associated with a small, but significant improvement in the restoration of the critical angle of Gissane compared with the ST approach. Therefore, an ST approach may allow for earlier surgical intervention and result in equivalent quality of reduction compared with an EL approach.

Level of Evidence:

Level III

Keywords

calcaneus fracture extensile lateral sinus tarsi

“Displaced, intra-articular calcaneus fractures can be treated via a limited ST approach with satisfactory restoration of calcaneal morphology with a shorter operative time and a decrease in woundrelated complications”

Introduction

The surgical treatment for displaced, intra-articular calcaneal fractures may often be challenging and rife with complications.^1-12 The extensile lateral (EL) approach is the most common approach used for open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of intra-articular calcaneus fractures, offering the surgeon excellent visualization of the posterior facet and lateral wall. However, studies have described a complication rate as high as 37%, which is largely attributed to the tenuous blood supply to the lateral hindfoot during this approach.^2,4,5,8,13 With the EL approach, there is the risk of devitalizing the soft tissue flap in addition to the lateral wall. Performing a tension free closure and meticulous soft tissue handling are paramount when using the EL approach.

The past few decades have seen an introduction of less invasive techniques, such as percutaneous fixation that have been popularized for their reduction in soft tissue complications particularly in patients with multiple comorbidities, including diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, and a history of tobacco use.^14
-20 Chief of these techniques is the sinus tarsi (ST) approach that is performed through a limited incision from the tip of the lateral malleolus, in line with the fourth ray, and ends at the level of the calcaneocuboid joint (Figure 1). The primary benefit to this approach is minimal soft dissection particularly of the lateral skin of the hindfoot and several studies have demonstrated lower wound complication rates and decreased surgical time with the ST approach.^14
-23 However, few studies have compared the EL and ST approaches for comminuted, displaced, intra-articular fractures, including AO-OTA 82-C3 (Sanders type IV) fractures. These severely comminuted fracture patterns have been associated with poor outcomes even with open treatment and acute arthrodesis should be highly considered.^11,24

Figure 1.

The location of the sinus tarsi incision (between arrow heads). Fibula (solid line) and approximate location of sural nerve (dotted line) are outlined.

The purpose of this study was to review a single surgeon’s experience with the EL and ST approaches in treating displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures over a 7-year period, including AO-OTA 82-C3 (Sanders type IV) calcaneus fractures. We hypothesized that the ST approach would result in similar postoperative radiographic outcomes, while resulting in a reduction of operative time and wound-related complications.

Patients and Methods

After institutional review board approval, all intra-articular calcaneal fractures treated by the senior author were reviewed over a 7-year period (2011-2018). Inclusion criteria included displaced, intra-articular calcaneal fractures treated with an EL or ST approach with a minimum of 3-month follow-up with complete clinical and radiographic records. A total of 129 fractures were included in the study. Patient demographics and injury characteristics obtained included age, gender, body mass index (BMI), medical, and social history (such as diabetes, vascular disease, tobacco, and drug use), mechanism of injury, presence of ipsilateral extremity injury, and presence of an open or closed fracture. Use of staged treatment, such as external fixation or acute subtalar arthrodesis, was also recorded.

Preoperative imaging included plain radiographs and computed tomography (CT). Fractures were classified by the senior author according to the AO-OTA classification. Intra-articular fracture patterns were selected, namely, AO-OTA 82-B3, C1, C2, and C3. Postoperative radiographic measurement of the critical angle of Gissane was performed by the lead and senior authors.

Outcome variables included time to definitive fixation, total surgical time, return to the operating room for unplanned procedure(s), such as hardware removal or irrigation and debridement (I&D), and measurement of the critical angle.

Data analysis was performed using Excel (Microsoft, Seattle, WA). Student’s t-test and chi-square analysis were used to evaluate for statistical significance with significance set at a P-value of less than .05. Separate data analysis was performed for unmatched and matched patient cohorts based on patient age, gender, and BMI.

Results

Unmatched Cohorts EL Versus ST

One hundred twenty-nine intra-articular calcaneal fractures were included for the unmatched cohort analysis. Fifty-six of the 129 (43%) fractures were AO-OTA 82-C3 (Sanders type IV) patterns. The EL approach was used in 55 patients and ST approach in 74 patients (Table 1). There were no significant differences between the cohorts with regards to age, BMI, and medical or social history. No significant differences were noted with regards to fracture pattern, status of open or closed fracture, ipsilateral extremity/foot injury, or use of staged treatment with provisional fixation or acute subtalar fusions.

Table 1.

Data for Unmatched Cohorts.

	Extensile lateral		Sinus tarsi		P value
	n = 55		n = 74		P value
Demographics
Average age (years)	41.8		42.9		.217
Average BMI	26.8		26.3		.782
DM	2	4%	2	3%	.762
Smoking	12	22%	20	27%	.498
Vascular disease	1	2%	5	7%	.187
Drug use	4	7%	9	12%	.414
Mechanism
Motor vehicle	16	29%	13	18%	.121
Motorcycle	3	5%	3	4%	.708
Total fall from height	31	56%	29	39%	.053
Fall 0 to 9 feet	14	25%	17	23%	.744
Fall ≥ 10 feet	15	27%	6	8%	.003
Fall (unspecified height)	2	4%	6	8%	.297
Fracture patterns
C1	0	0%	5	7%	.072
C2	17	31%	14	19%	.114
C3	23	42%	33	45%	.753
B3	15	27%	22	30%	.760
Injury characteristics
Open	5	9%	8	11%	.748
Closed	50	91%	66	89%	.748
Ipsilateral foot injury	17	31%	30	41%	.260
Ipsilateral lower extremity injury	13	24%	27	36%	.118
Provisional fixation
Total	8	15%	9	12%	.692
External fixation	5	9%	3	4%	.232
Pinning	3	5%	6	8%	.544
Re-operations
Total	17	31%	9	12%	.008
Hardware removal	12	22%	8	11%	.087
I&D	5	9%	1	1%	.038
Timing
Time to definitive (days)	23.1		14.1		.00001
Surgical time (minutes)	167.1		122		.00001
Postoperative critical angle of Gissane (degrees, range)	124.4 (109.2-140.1)		121.2 (107.7-136.6)		.025
Acute subtalar fusions	1	2%	3	4%	.468

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; DM, diabetes mellitus; I&D, irrigation and debridement.

Overall, there was no significant difference between the two groups with regards to the mechanism of injury. However, further subgroup analysis of falls from height demonstrated significantly more fractures from a fall from 10 feet or higher in the EL group (15 vs 6, EL vs ST, respectively, P = .003) (Table 1).

With regards to surgical intervention, no difference was found with the use of provisional fixation or acute subtalar arthrodesis. However, there was a significant difference in the time from injury to definitive fixation with EL taking approximately 23 days versus 14 days for ST (P = .0001). In addition, procedures utilizing EL had significantly longer operative times (167 minutes) than ST (122 minutes, P = .0001).

There were a total of 26 cases (20%, 26/129) with unplanned secondary procedures regardless of surgical approach used. A significantly higher percentage of patients in the EL group (31%, 17/55) had secondary procedures compared with ST (12%, 9/74; P = .008). More patients in the EL group (9%, 5/55) had an I&D performed than the ST group (1%, 1/74, P = .038). There was no difference in the percentage of hardware removals (Table 1).

Postoperative radiographic measurement of the critical angle of Gissane demonstrated a significant difference between the two approaches (EL average 124.4 degrees vs ST average 121.2 degrees, P = .025).

Matched Cohorts EL Versus ST

In addition, matched cohort analysis was performed matching patients based on age, gender, and BMI between the EL and ST groups. A total of 102 calcaneal fractures were included for analysis with 51 cases each for EL and ST groups. Forty-three percent of these fractures were classified as AO-OTA 82-C3 (44 of 102). There were no statistical differences between the cohorts with regards to medical/social history, fracture patterns, open or closed fractures, ipsilateral extremity/foot injury, or use of staged treatment with provisional fixation or acute subtalar fusions (Table 2).

Table 2.

Data for Matched Cohorts (Patients Matched for Age, BMI, and Diabetes).

	Extensile lateral		Sinus tarsi		P value
	n = 51		n = 51		P value
Demographics
Average age (years)	42.4		42.9		.751
Average BMI	26.2		26.3		.370
Diabetes	2	4%	0		.495
Smoking	11	22%	15	29%	.363
Vascular disease	1	2%	3	6%	.307
Drug use	4	8%	7	14%	.338
Mechanism
Motor vehicle	15	29%	6	12%	.027
Motorcycle	2	4%	2	4%	1.0
Total fall from height	30	59%	28	55%	.689
Fall 0 to 9 feet	13	25%	11	22%	.640
Fall ≥10 feet	15	29%	13	25%	.657
Fall (unspecified height)	2	4%	4	8%	.399
Fracture patterns
C1	0	0%	5	10%	.056
C2	15	29%	10	20%	.249
C3	21	41%	23	45%	.689
B3	15	29%	11	22%	.363
Injury characteristics
Open	5	10%	8	16%	.748
Closed	46	90%	42	82%	.748
Ipsilateral foot injury	14	27%	18	35%	.260
Ipsilateral lower extremity injury	11	22%	16	31%	.118
Provisional fixation
Total	8	16%	7	14%	.692
External fixation	5	10%	3	6%	.232
Pinning	3	6%	4	8%	.544
Re-operation
Total	14	27%	8	16%	.148
Hardware removal	9	18%	7	14%	.586
I&D	5	10%	1	2%	.092
Timing
Time to definitive (days)	23.2		15.2		.000062
Surgical time (minutes)	169.4		120.8		.00001
Postoperative critical angle of Gissane (degrees, range)	124.5(109.2 to 140.1)		121.7(107.7 to 136.6)		.044
Acute subtalar fusions	1	2%	3	4%	.468

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; I&D, irrigation and debridement.

With regard to mechanism of injury, the EL group had more patients involved in motor vehicle collisions (29%, 15/51) compared with ST (12%, 6/51, P = .027). There was no significant difference the total number patients who fell from a height independent of the height (Table 2).

The time from injury to definitive surgical fixation was increased in the EL group at approximately 23 versus 15 days for the ST group (P = .0001). In addition, procedures utilizing EL had significantly longer operative times (169 minutes) than ST (121 minutes, P = .0001).

A total of 22 of 102 (22%) cases underwent re-operations in the matched group for either hardware removal or I&D. Although not statistically significant, there was a trend toward more secondary procedures in the EL group with 27% (14/51) needing an unplanned secondary procedure versus 16% (8/51) of the ST group (P = .148). Hardware removal rate was 18% (9/51) versus 14% (7/51) and I&D rate was 10% (5/51) versus 2% (1/51) for EL versus ST, respectively (Table 2).

Postoperative radiographic measurement of the critical angle of Gissane demonstrated a significant difference between the two approaches (EL average 124.5 degrees vs ST average 121.7 degrees, P = .044).

Discussion

We have demonstrated that displaced, intra-articular calcaneus fractures can be treated via a limited ST approach with satisfactory restoration of calcaneal morphology with a shorter operative time and a decrease in wound-related complications (Figure 2). We hypothesized a similar postoperative radiographic outcome, however, our results showed that the EL approach had a small, but significant improvement in the restoration of the angle of Gissane (approximately 3 degrees, P = .025). In review of the current orthopaedic literature, a normal critical angle range is reported between 120 and 140 degrees, and both approaches had postoperative measurements within this range.^25
-27 Therefore, the small difference seen in our study may not be clinically significant. Regarding wound related complications, our results showed a significantly higher re-operation rate for wound complications after the EL approach (9%, 5 of 55) compared with the ST approach (1%, 1 of 74, P = .038).

Figure 2.

Preoperative and postoperative images of a comminuted, depressed intra-articular calcaneus fracture treated with a sinus tarsi approach.

Several studies have demonstrated the utility and efficacy of minimally invasive approach for the treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures.^15,16,21
-23 One of the earliest comparative studies by Weber et al²³ described 50 patients with Sanders type II and type III calcaneus fractures. Twenty-four were treated with an ST approach, while 26 were treated with an EL approach. There were no significant differences in clinical outcome. However, they found significantly shorter operative times and increased rate of hardware removal in the limited open group. The authors reported that the less invasive technique became their standard technique for all operative calcaneus fractures.

Xia et al²⁴ compared the two approaches for 117 calcaneal fractures in a randomized control trial and found decreased surgical times and equivalent postoperative radiographic measurements. More recently, a study of 125 calcaneus fractures by Schepers et al²¹ utilized postoperative CT scans to evaluate the quality of reduction. They found comparable restoration of anatomy in both groups with two cases of minimal step off in the EL group and none in the ST group. Other anatomical characteristics, such as varus/valgus, calcaneal width, and restoration of Bohler’s angle were similar between the two groups. A subsequent retrospective comparative study by Kline et al¹⁶ reviewed 112 Sanders type II and type III calcaneal fractures, 79 of which were treated with EL approach and 33 via ST approach. They reported a 29% versus 6% wound complication rate in the EL versus ST approach, respectively. In addition, no significant differences were noted in their postoperative measurements of Bohler’s angle and critical angle of Gissane. A recent meta-analysis by Yao et al²⁸ in 2017 identified a significant difference in wound complication rates with 15% incidence after the EL approach versus 0% for ST (P = .01).

To our knowledge, there has been a paucity of a large case series comparing EL and ST approaches particularly those that include AO-OTA type C3 fractures. Many of the comparative studies in the literature exclude type C3 or Sanders type IV fractures often citing a high level of intra-articular comminution that may portend a poor functional outcome and the need for acute primary arthrodesis.^10,11 However, in our study, type C3 fractures accounted for more than 40% of the total number of fractures (43%, 56 of 129). In addition, for Sanders type IV or other severely comminuted patterns, an acute primary arthrodesis can also be performed through an ST approach (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Preoperative and postoperative radiographs of a severely comminuted intra-articular calcaneus fracture treated with an acute subtalar arthrodesis through a sinus tarsi approach.

The strengths of this study are multiple. We report on the largest single surgeon cohort of patients with intra-articular calcaneus fractures who underwent ORIF with either EL or ST approaches. All patients were treated by the senior author, using the same preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative protocols, so that, variability in treatment and decision-making were minimized. Given that this is a single surgeon study, the external validity of these results may be limited or difficult to replicate. Other weaknesses of the study include retrospective study design and potential selection bias for the approach performed by the single surgeon. Furthermore, independent evaluation of radiographs by a musculoskeletal trained radiologist would have limited bias in the measurement of postoperative radiographic parameters as this was done by the lead and senior authors. Another significant limitation is that no functional outcome scores were obtained at follow-up visits. However, none of the patients in this study underwent secondary procedures for subtalar arthrodesis at the conclusion of the data collection period for this study. A minimum follow-up period of 3 months may likely underrepresent the number of patients which may have subsequently required hardware removal at a later time point.

Overall, our results support the use of the ST approach for the acute definitive treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneus fractures. Utilizing a minimally invasive approach may allow for earlier definitive fixation, decreased overall procedure times, and decreased wound complication rates. With careful preoperative planning, a more limited approach may result in nearly equivalent intra-articular fracture reduction, including that of AO-OTA type C3 fractures.

Footnotes

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Ethical Approval

Not applicable, because this article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects.

Informed Consent

Consent was not applicable to this study as this study utilized an HIPAA compliant deidentified patient database

Trial Registration

Not applicable, because this article does not contain any clinical trials.

ORCID iD

Justin Haghverdian

References

Hsu

Anderson

Cohen

. Advances in surgical management of intra-articular calcaneus fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015;23(7):399-407. doi:10.5435/JAAOS-D-14-00287

Gardner

Nork

Barei

Kramer

Sangeorzan

Benirschke

. Secondary soft tissue compromise in tongue-type calcaneus fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2008;22(7):439-445. doi:10.1097/BOT.0b013e31817ace7e

Agren

P-H

Wretenberg

Sayed-Noor

. Operative versus nonoperative treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95(15):1351-1357. doi:10.2106/JBJS.L.00759

Abidi

Dhawan

Gruen

Vogt

Conti

. Wound-healing risk factors after open reduction and internal fixation of calcaneal fractures. Foot Ankle Int. 1998;19(12):856-861. doi:10.1177/107110079801901211

Gougoulias

Khanna

McBride

Maffulli

. Management of calcaneal fractures: systematic review of randomized trials. Br Med Bull. 2009;92:153-167. doi:10.1093/bmb/ldp030

Randle

Kreder

Stephen

Williams

Jaglal

. Should calcaneal fractures be treated surgically? A meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000(377):217-227. doi:10.1097/00003086-200008000-00029

Sanders

Fortin

DiPasquale

Walling

. Operative treatment in 120 displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures. Results using a prognostic computed tomography scan classification. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;290:87-95.

Swanson

Clare

Sanders

. Management of intra-articular fractures of the calcaneus. Foot Ankle Clin. 2008;13(4):659-678. doi:10.1016/j.fcl.2008.09.006

Thordarson

Krieger

LE.

Operative

. nonoperative treatment of intra-articular fractures of the calcaneus: a prospective randomized trial. Foot Ankle Int. 1996;17(1):2-9. doi:10.1177/107110079601700102

10.

Sanders

Vaupel

Erdogan

Downes

. Operative treatment of displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures: long-term (10-20 Years) results in 108 fractures using a prognostic CT classification. J Orthop Trauma. 2014;28(10):551-563. doi:10.1097/BOT.0000000000000169

11.

Buckley

Leighton

Sanders

, et al. Open reduction and internal fixation compared with ORIF and primary subtalar arthrodesis for treatment of Sanders type IV calcaneal fractures: a randomized multicenter trial. J Orthop Trauma. 2014;28(10):577-583. doi:10.1097/BOT.0000000000000191

12.

Bruce

Sutherland

. Surgical versus conservative interventions for displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013(1):CD008628. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD008628.pub2

13.

Buckley

Tough

. Displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures. JAAOS—J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2004;12(3). https://journals.lww.com/jaaos/Fulltext/2004/05000/Displaced_Intra_articular_Calcaneal_Fractures.5.aspx

14.

DeWall

Henderson

McKinley

Phelps

Dolan

Marsh

. Percutaneous reduction and fixation of displaced intra-articular calcaneus fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2010;24(8):466-472. doi:10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181defd74

15.

Kikuchi

Charlton

Thordarson

. Limited sinus tarsi approach for intra-articular calcaneus fractures. Foot Ankle Int. 2013;34(12):1689-1694. doi:10.1177/1071100713510267

16.

Kline

Anderson

Davis

Jones

Cohen

. Minimally invasive technique versus an extensile lateral approach for intra-articular calcaneal fractures. Foot Ankle Int. 2013;34(6):773-780. doi:10.1177/1071100713477607

17.

Rammelt

Amlang

Barthel

Gavlik

J-M

Zwipp

. Percutaneous treatment of less severe intraarticular calcaneal fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(4):983-990. doi:10.1007/s11999-009-0964-x

18.

Tomesen

Biert

Frölke

JPM

. Treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures with closed reduction and percutaneous screw fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(10):920-928. doi:10.2106/JBJS.H.01834

19.

Wang

Chen

, et al. Minimally invasive treatment of calcaneal fracture by percutaneous leverage, anatomical plate, and compression bolts–the clinical evaluation of cohort of 156 patients. J Trauma. 2010;69(6):1515-1522. doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e3181e16150

20.

Chen

, et al. Functional outcome of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures: a comparison between open reduction/internal fixation and a minimally invasive approach featured an anatomical plate and compression bolts. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(3):743-751. doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e318253b5f1

21.

Schepers

Backes

Dingemans

de Jong

Luitse

JSK

. Similar anatomical reduction and lower complication rates with the sinus tarsi approach compared with the extended lateral approach in displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2017;31(6):293-298. doi:10.1097/BOT.0000000000000819

22.

Schepers

. The sinus tarsi approach in displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures: a systematic review. Int Orthop. 2011;35(5):697-703. doi:10.1007/s00264-011-1223-9

23.

Weber

Lehmann

Sägesser

Krause

. Limited open reduction and internal fixation of displaced intra-articular fractures of the calcaneum. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90(12):1608-1616. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.90B12.20638

24.

Xia

Wang

. Open reduction and internal fixation with conventional plate via L—shaped lateral approach versus internal fixation with percutaneous plate via a sinus tarsi approach for calcaneal fractures—a randomized controlled trial. Int J Surg. 2014;12(5):475-480. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.03.001

25.

Schepers

Ginai

Mulder

PGH

Patka

. Radiographic evaluation of calcaneal fractures: to measure or not to measure. Skeletal Radiol. 2007;36(9):847-852. doi:10.1007/s00256-007-0330-6

26.

Badillo

Pacheco

Padua

Gomez

Colon

Vidal

. Multidetector CT evaluation of calcaneal fractures. Radiographics. 2011;31(1):81-92. doi:10.1148/rg.311105036

27.

Fitzgibbons

McMullen

Mormino

. Fractures and Dislocations of the Calcaneus (5th ed.). Lippincott: Williams and Wikins; 2001.

28.

Yao

Liang

Hou

Zhang

. Sinus tarsi approach versus extensile lateral approach for displaced intra-articular calcaneal fracture: a meta-analysis of current evidence base. J Orthop Surg Res. 2017;12(1):43. doi:10.1186/s13018-017-0545-8

Sinus Tarsi Versus Extended Lateral Approach for Displaced Intra-Articular Calcaneal Fractures: A Single Surgeon’s Experience

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Level of Evidence:

Keywords

Introduction

Patients and Methods

Results

Unmatched Cohorts EL Versus ST

Matched Cohorts EL Versus ST

Discussion

Footnotes

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

Funding

Ethical Approval

Informed Consent

Trial Registration

ORCID iD

References