The literature largely addresses questions of diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic accuracy. However, the magnitude of the clinical impact of syndesmosis injury is commonly described in intuitive yet qualitative terms. This systematic review aimed to quantify the impact of syndesmosis injury.
Methods:
Published clinical outcomes data were used to compute an effect size reflecting the impact of syndesmosis injury. This was done within the clinical contexts of isolated syndesmosis injury and syndesmosis injury with concomitant ankle fracture. Clinical outcomes data included Olerud-Molander (OM) and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores, visual analog scale for pain, and days missed from sport competition. Parametric data were compared with Student t tests. Effect size was computed using Cohen’s d.
Results:
In ankle fracture patients, syndesmosis injury demonstrated a large effect size for OM (d = 0.96) and AOFAS (d = 0.83) scores. In athletic populations without concomitant ankle fracture, syndesmosis injury demonstrated a large effect size on days missed from competition (d = 2.32).
Discussion:
These findings confirm the magnitude of the negative impact of syndesmosis injury in athletic populations with isolated injury and in ankle fracture patients. In ankle fracture patients, this large negative effect remains despite surgery. Thus, syndesmosis repair may not fully mitigate the impact of the injury.
OsbahrDCDrakosMCO’LoughlinPF, et al. Syndesmosis and lateral ankle sprains in the National Football League. Orthopedics. 2013;36(11):e1378-e1384.
2.
HuntKJPhisitkulPPiroloJAmendolaA. High ankle sprains and syndesmotic injuries in athletes. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015;23(11):661-673.
3.
NielsonJHSallisJGPotterHGHelfetDLLorichDG. Correlation of interosseous membrane tears to the level of the fibular fracture. J Orthop Trauma. 2004;18(2):68-74.
4.
StarkETornettaPIIICreevyWR. Syndesmotic instability in Weber B ankle fractures: a clinical evaluation. J Orthop Trauma. 2007;21(9):643-646.
5.
FitesBKunesJMadalenoJ. Latent syndesmosis injuries in athletes. Orthopedics. 2006;29(2):124-127.
6.
McCollumGAvan den BekeromMPKerkhoffsGMCalderJDvan DijkCN. Syndesmosis and deltoid ligament injuries in the athlete. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(6):1328-1337.
7.
ZalavrasCThordarsonDB. Ankle syndesmotic injury. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007;15:330-339.
8.
KelletJ. The clinical features of ankle syndesmosis injuries: a general review. Clin J Sport Med. 2011;21(6):524-529.
LiuGChenLGongMXingFXiangZ. Clinical evidence for treatment of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury: a systematic review of clinical studies. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2019;58(6):1245-1250.
11.
YuGSLinYBXiongGSXuHBLiuYY. Diagnosis and treatment of ankle syndesmosis injuries with associated interosseous membrane injury: a current concept review. Int Orthop. 2019;43(11):2539-2547.
12.
KrähenbühlNWeinbergMWHintermannBHallerJMSaltzmanCLBargA. Surgical outcome in chronic syndesmotic injury: a systematic literature review. Foot Ankle Surg. 2019;25(5):691-697.
13.
McKenzieACHesselholtKE. A systematic review and meta-analysis on treatment of ankle fractures with syndesmotic rupture: suture-button fixation versus cortical screw fixation. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2019;58(5):946-953.
14.
StieneARennerCEChenT. Distal tibiofibular syndesmosis dysfunction: a systematic literature review of dynamic versus static fixation over the last 10 years. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2019;58(2):320-327.
15.
MontMASedlinEDWeinerLS. Postoperative radiographs as predictors of clinical outcome in unstable ankle fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 1992;6(3):352-357.
16.
ChissellHRJonesJ. The influence of a diastasis screw on the outcome of Weber type-C ankle fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995;77(3):435-438.
17.
EbraheimNALuJYangHMekhailAO. Radiographic and CT evaluation of tibiofibular syndesmotic diastasis: a cadaver study. Foot Ankle Int. 1997;18(11):693-698.
18.
WikeroyAKBHoinessPRAndreassenGS. No difference in functional and radiographic results 8.4 years after quadricortical compared with tricortical syndesmosis fixation in ankle fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2010;24(1):17-23.
19.
DikosGDHeislerJChoplinRH. Normal tibiofibular relationships at the syndesmosis on axial CT imaging. J Orthop Trauma. 2012;26(7):433-438.
20.
NaqviGACunninghamPLynchB. Fixation of ankle syndesmotic injuries. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(12):2828-2835.
21.
SagiHCShahARSandersRW. The functional consequence of syndesmotic joint malreduction at a minimum 2-year follow-up. J Orthop Trauma. 2012;26(7):439-443.
22.
HarperMCKellerTS. A radiographic evaluation of the tibiofibular syndesmosis. Foot Ankle. 1989;10(3):156-160.
23.
FrankeJWendlKSudaAJ. Intraoperative three-dimensional imaging in the treatment of acute unstable syndesmotic injuries. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(15):1386-1390.
24.
MuratliHHBicximogluACelebiL. Magnetic resonance arthrographic evaluation of syndesmotic diastasis in ankle fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2005;125(4):222-227.
25.
GuytonGP. Theoretical limitations of the AOFAS scoring systems: an analysis using Monte Carlo modeling. Foot Ankle Int. 2001;22(10):779-787.
26.
PinskerEDanielsTR. AOFAS position statement regarding the future of the AOFAS Clinical Rating Systems. Foot Ankle Int. 2011;32(9):841-842.
27.
ButtonGPinneyS. A meta-analysis of outcome rating scales in foot and anklesurgery: is there a valid, reliable, and responsive system?Foot Ankle Int. 2004;25(8):521-525.
28.
AndersenMRFrihagenFHellundJCMadsenJEFigvedW. Randomized trial comparing suture button with single syndesmotic screw for syndesmosis injury. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018;100(1):2-12.
29.
CarrozzoMVicentiGPesceV, et al. Beyond the pillars of the ankle: a prospective randomized CT analysis of syndesmosis’ injuries in Weber B and C type fractures. Injury. 2018;49:S54-S60.
30.
RaederBWFigvedWMadsenJEFrihagenFJacobsenSBAndersenMR. Better outcome for suture button compared with single syndesmotic screw for syndesmosis injury: five-year results of a randomized controlled trial. Bone Joint J. 2020;102(2):212-219.
31.
BoytimMJFischerDANeumannL. Syndesmotic ankle sprains. Am J Sports Med. 1991;19(3):294-298.
32.
GerberJPWilliamsGNScovilleCRArcieroRATaylorDC. Persistent disability associated with ankle sprains: a prospective examination of an athletic population. Foot Ankle Int. 1998;19(10):653-660.
33.
WrightRWBarileRJSurprenantDAMatavaMJ. Ankle syndesmosis sprains in national hockey league players. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32(8):1941-1945.
34.
SmanADHillerCERaeKLinklaterJBlackDARefshaugeKM. Prognosis of ankle syndesmosis injury. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014;46(4):671-677.
35.
TaylorDCEnglehardtDLBassettFHIII. Syndesmosis sprains of the ankle: the influence of heterotopic ossification. Am J Sports Med. 1992;20(2):146-150.
36.
NussbaumEDHoseaTMSielerSDIncremonaBRKesslerDE. Prospective evaluation of syndesmotic ankle sprains without diastasis. Am J Sports Med. 2001;29(1):31-35.
37.
HanSHLeeJWKimSSuhJSChoiYR. Chronic tibiofibular syndesmosis injury: the diagnostic efficiency of magnetic resonance imaging and comparative analysis of operative treatment. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28(3):336-342.
HowardDRRubinDAHillenTJ, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging as a predictor of return to play following syndesmosis (high) ankle sprains in professional football players. Sports Health. 2012;4(6):535-543.
40.
MillerBSDownieBKJohnsonPD, et al. Time to return to play after high ankle sprains in collegiate football players: a prediction model. Sports Health. 2012;4(6):504-509.
41.
SikkaRSFetzerGBSugarmanE, et al. Correlating MRI findings with disability in syndesmotic sprains of NFL players. Foot Ankle Int. 2012;33(5):371-378.
42.
LaverLCarmontMRMcConkeyMO, et al. Plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF) as a treatment for high ankle sprain in elite athletes: a randomized control trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;23(11):3383-3392.
43.
RyanPMRodriguezRM. Outcomes and return to activity after operative repair of chronic latent syndesmotic instability. Foot Ankle Int. 2015;37(2):192-197.
44.
CalderJDBamfordRPetrieAMcCollumGA. Stable versus unstable grade II high ankle sprains: a prospective study predicting the need for surgical stabilization and time to return to sports. Arthroscopy. 2016;32(4):634-642.
45.
FörschnerPFBeitzelKImhoffAB, et al. Five-year outcomes after treatment for acute instability of the tibiofibular syndesmosis using a suture-button fixation system. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017;5(4):1-7.
46.
MollonBWassersteinDMurphyGMWhiteLMTheodoropoulosJ. High ankle sprains in professional ice hockey players: prognosis and correlation between magnetic resonance imaging patterns of injury and return to play. Orthop J Sports Med. 2019;7(9):1-5.
47.
D’HooghePGrassiAAlkhelaifiK, et al. Return to play after surgery for isolated unstable syndesmotic ankle injuries (West Point grade IIB and III) in 110 male professional football players: a retrospective cohort study. Br J Sports Med. 2020;54(19):1168-1173.
48.
ColvinACWalshMKovalKJMcLaurinTTejwaniNEgolK. Return to sports following operatively treated ankle fractures. Foot Ankle Int. 2009;30(4):292-296.
49.
EgolKAPahkBWalshMTejwaniNCDavidovitchRIKovalKJ. Outcome after unstable ankle fracture: effect of syndesmotic stabilization. J Orthop Trauma. 2010;24(1):7-11.
50.
KortekangasTFlinkkilaTNiinimakiJ, et al. Effect of syndesmosis injury in SER IV (Weber B)-type ankle fractures on function and incidence of osteoarthritis. Foot Ankle Int. 2015;36(2):180-187.
51.
LitrentaJSaperDTornettaPIII, et al. Does syndesmotic injury have a negative effect on functional outcome? a multicenter prospective evaluation. J Orthop Trauma. 2015;29(9):410-413.
52.
VeenEJDZuurmondRG. Mid-term results of ankle fractures with and without syndesmotic rupture. Foot Ankle Surg. 2015;21(1):30-36.
53.
KohakeMBJWiebkingUO’LoughlinPFKrettekCGaulkeR. Mid- to long-term outcomes after Weber B-type ankle fractures with and without syndesmotic rupture. In Vivo. 2018;33(1):255-261.
54.
WuYHeQ-FLaiL-PLiXZhouJ-L. Functional outcome of pronation-external rotation-Weber C ankle fractures with supracollicular medial malleolar fracture treated with or without syndesmotic screws. Chin Med J. 2018;131(21):2551-2557.
KortekangasTSavolaOFlinkkiläT, et al. A prospective randomised study comparing TightRope and syndesmotic screw fixation for accuracy and maintenance of syndesmotic reduction assessed with bilateral computed tomography. Injury. 2015;46(6):1119-1126.
57.
KotwalRRathNParingeVHemmadiSThomasRLyonsK. Targeted computerised tomography scanning of the ankle syndesmosis with low dose radiation exposure. Skeletal Radiol. 2015;45(3):333-338.
58.
WarnerSJFabricantPDGarnerMRSchottelPCHelfetDLLorichDG. The measurement and clinical importance of syndesmotic reduction after operative fixation of rotational ankle fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97(23):1935-1944.
59.
KocadalOYucelMPepeMAksahinEAktekinCN. Evaluation of reduction accuracy of suture-button and screw fixation techniques for syndesmotic injuries. Foot Ankle Int. 2016;37(12):1317-1325.
60.
CherneySMCosgroveCTSpraggs-HughesAGMcAndrewCMRicciWMGardnerMJ. Functional outcomes of syndesmotic injuries based on objective reduction accuracy at a minimum 1-year follow-up. J Orthop Trauma. 2018;32(1):43-51.
61.
XianHMiaoJZhouQLianKZhaiWLiuQ. Novel elastic syndesmosis hook plate fixation versus routine screw fixation for syndesmosis injury. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2018;57(1):65-68.
62.
AndersenMRDiepLMFrihagenFCastberg HellundJMadsenJEFigvedW. Importance of syndesmotic reduction on clinical outcome after syndesmosis injuries. J Orthop Trauma. 2019;33(8):397-403.
63.
SandersDSchneiderPTaylorMTieszerCLawendyA-R. Improved reduction of the tibiofibular syndesmosis with tightrope compared with screw fixation. J Orthop Trauma. 2019;33(11):531-537.
64.
CohenJ. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1988.
NakagawaSCuthillIC. Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2007;82(4):591-605.
67.
LeeDK. Alternatives to P value: confidence interval and effect size. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2016;69(6):555-562.
68.
VastaSPapaliaRAlboEMaffulliNDenaroV. Top orthopedic sports medicine procedures. J Orthop Surg Res. 2018;13(1):1-8.
69.
MinhasSVKesterBSLarkinKEHsuWK. The effect of an orthopaedic surgical procedure in the national basketball association. Am J Sports Med. 2015;44(4):1056-1061.
70.
AminNHMcCulloughKCMillsGL, et al. The impact and functional outcomes of achilles tendon pathology in National Basketball Association players. Clin Res Foot Ankle. 2016;4(3):205.
71.
NiedererDEngeroffTWilkeJVogtLBanzerW. Return to play, performance and career duration after anterior cruciate ligament rupture: a case-control study in the five biggest football nations in Europe. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2018;28(10):2226-2233.
72.
SooHooNFShulerMFlemingLL; for American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society. Evaluation of the validity of the AOFAS clinical rating systems by correlation to the SF-36. Foot Ankle Int. 2003;24(1):50-55.
