Silver hydrogel dressings are antimicrobial, nonadherent, and have an absorptive capacity many times their weight. Fifty-nine (49.44 ± 16.85 years) foot and ankle patients with incisions >1 cm were prospectively enrolled to compare infection, scarring, and complication rates between the postoperative use of a silver hydrogel sheet (SHS) dressing and a standard petroleum-based (P) dressing. Overall, there were 5 (8.47%) infections; 4 (6.78%) superficial and 1 (1.69%) deep. The SHS group had 1 (3.45%) superficial infection, whereas the P group had 3 (10.00%) superficial infections and 1 (3.33%) deep infection. Infection incidence was similar for both groups (P = .37). However, in the P group, 3 (10.00%) patients developed wound dehiscence and 1 (1.69%) patient developed a fibrinous scab. Compared with SHS patients, the P patients had a greater incidence of incisional complications (1 [3.45%] vs 8 [26.67%], respectively; P = .03). The percent change in scar length was greater in the SHS group (18.04 ± 41.10%) when compared with the P group (2.00 ± 9.93%; P < .001) while the percent change in scar width was similar in the 2 groups (P = .19). The lower incidence of incisional complications and the greater reduction in scar length suggest that the inherent properties of the silver hydrogel dressing aid in postsurgical healing.
Levels of Evidence: Therapeutic, Level II: Prospective comparative trial, pilot study
EmoriTGGaynesRP. An overview of nosocomial infections, including the role of the microbiology laboratory. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1993;6:428-442.
2.
WukichDKMcMillenRLLoweryNJFrykbergRG. Surgical site infections after foot and ankle surgery: a comparison of patients with and without diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2011;34:2211-2213.
3.
ButterworthPGilheanyMFTinleyP. Postoperative infection rates in foot and ankle surgery: a clinical audit of Australian podiatric surgeons, January to December 2007. Aust Health Rev. 2010;34:180-185.
4.
HugarDWNewmanPSHugarRWSpencerRBSalvinoK. Incidence of postoperative infection in a free-standing ambulatory surgery center. J Foot Surg. 1990;29:265-267.
5.
MartinWJMandracchiaVJBeckettDE. The incidence of postoperative infection in outpatient podiatric surgery. J Am Podiatry Assoc. 1984;74:89-90.
6.
MillerWA. Postoperative wound infection in foot and ankle surgery. Foot Ankle. 1983;4:102-104.
7.
StevensDB. Postoperative orthopedic infections. A study of etiological mechanisms. J Bone Joint Surg. 1964;46:96-102.
8.
KirklandKBBriggsJPTrivetteSLWilkinsonWESextonDJ. The impact of surgical-site infections in the 1990s: attributable mortality, excess length of hospitalization, and extra costs. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1999;20:725-730.
9.
HaleyRWSchabergDRVon AllmenSDMcGowanJEJr. Estimating the extra charges and prolongation of hospitalization due to nosocomial infections: a comparison of methods. J Infect Dis. 1980;141:248-257.
10.
GreenJWWenzelRP. Postoperative wound infection: a controlled study of the increased duration of hospital stay and direct cost of hospitalization. Ann Surg. 1977;185:264-268.
11.
HutchinsonJJMcGuckinM. Occlusive dressings: a microbiologic and clinical review. Am J Infect Control. 1990;18:257-268.
12.
WinterGD. Formation of the scab and the rate of epithelialization of superficial wounds in the skin of the young domestic pig. Nature. 1962;193:293-294.
13.
FieldFKKersteinMD. Overview of wound healing in a moist environment. Am J Surg. 1994;167:2S-6S.
WalterCJDumvilleJCSharpCAPageT. Systematic review and meta-analysis of wound dressings in the prevention of surgical-site infections in surgical wounds healing by primary intention. Br J Surg. 2012;99:1185-1194.
16.
LeaperDJ. Silver dressings: their role in wound management. Int Wound J. 2006;3:282-294.
17.
BiffiRFattoriLBertaniE. Surgical site infections following colorectal cancer surgery: a randomized prospective trial comparing common and advanced antimicrobial dressing containing ionic silver. World J Surg Oncol. 2012;10:94.
18.
HiroMEPierpontYNKoFWrightTERobsonMCPayneWG. Comparative evaluation of silver-containing antimicrobial dressings on in vitro and in vivo processes of wound healing. Eplasty. 2012;12:e48.
19.
AramwitPMuangmanPNamviriyachoteNSrichanaT. In vitro evaluation of the antimicrobial effectiveness and moisture binding properties of wound dressings. Int J Mol Sci. 2010;11:2864-2874.
20.
IpMLuiSLPoonVKLungIBurdA. Antimicrobial activities of silver dressings: an in vitro comparison. J Med Microbiol. 2006;55:59-63.
21.
EpsteinNE. Do silver-impregnated dressings limit infections after lumbar laminectomy with instrumented fusion?Surg Neurol. 2007;68:483-485.
22.
HuckfeldtRRedmondCMikkelsonDFinleyPJLoweCRobertsonJ. A clinical trial to investigate the effect of silver nylon dressings on mediastinitis rates in postoperative cardiac sternotomy incisions. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2008;54:36-41.
23.
HoranTCGaynesRPMartoneWJJarvisWREmoriTG. CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1992;13:606-608.
24.
LohanaPPotokarTS. Aquacel AG® in paediatric burns—a prospective audit. Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2006;19:144-147.
25.
ConnerySADownesKLYoungC. A retrospective study evaluating silver-impregnated dressings on cesarean wound healing. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2012;25:414-419.
26.
DunnRM. Cross-linking in biomaterials: a primer for clinicians. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130:18S-26S.
27.
SibbaldRGContreras-RuizJCouttsPFierhellerMRothmanAWooK. Bacteriology, inflammation, and healing: a study of nanocrystalline silver dressings in chronic venous leg ulcers. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2007;20:549-558.
28.
RigoCFerroniLToccoI. Active silver nanoparticles for wound healing. Int J Mol Sci. 2013;14:4817-4840.
29.
DemlingRHDeSantiL. Scar management strategies in wound care. Rehab Manag. 2001;14:26-30.
30.
FongJWoodFFowlerB. A silver coated dressing reduces the incidence of early burn wound cellulitis and associated costs of inpatient treatment: comparative patient care audits. Burns. 2005;31:562-567.
31.
StrandOSan MiguelLRowanSSahlqvistA. Retrospective comparison of two years in a paediatric burn unit, with and without acticoat as a standard dressing. Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2010;23:182-185.
32.
ShinoharaTYamashitaYSatohK. Prospective evaluation of occlusive hydrocolloid dressing versus conventional gauze dressing regarding the healing effect after abdominal operations: randomized controlled trial. Asian J Surg. 2008;31:1-5.
33.
HolmCPetersenJSGrønboekFGottrupF. Effects of occlusive and conventional gauze dressings on incisional healing after abdominal operations. Eur J Surg. 1998;164:179-183.
34.
MichieDDHugillJV. Influence of occlusive and impregnated gauze dressings on incisional healing: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Ann Plast Surg. 1994;32:57-64.
35.
LawNWEllisH. Exposure of the wound—a safe economy in the NHS. Postgrad Med J. 1987;63:27-28.
36.
FearmontiRBondJErdmannDLevinsonH. A review of scar scales and scar measuring devices. Eplasty. 2010;10:e43.
37.
MabilleauGEdmondsME. Role of neuropathy on fracture healing in Charcot neuro-osteoarthropathy. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2010;10:84-91.
38.
MøllerAMVillebroNPedersenTTønnesenH. Effect of preoperative smoking intervention on postoperative complications: a randomised clinical trial. Lancet. 2002;359:114-117.
39.
JorgensenLNKallehaveFChristensenESianaJEGottrupF. Less collagen production in smokers. Surgery. 1998;123:450-455.
40.
FrickWGSealsRRJr. Smoking and wound healing: a review. Tex Dent J. 1994;111:21-23.
41.
YousufMHussainM. Need and duration of antibiotic therapy in clean and clean contaminated operations. J Pak Med Assoc. 2002;52:284-287.
42.
LewisRTWeigandFMMamazzaJLloyd-SmithWTatarynD. Should antibiotic prophylaxis be used routinely in clean surgical procedures: a tentative yes. Surgery. 1995;118:742-747.
43.
ZgonisTJollyGPGarbalosaJC. The efficacy of prophylactic intravenous antibiotics in elective foot and ankle surgery. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2004;43:97-103.
44.
OkunSMehlSDellaCorteMShechterDEspositoF. The use of prophylactic antibiotics in clean podiatric surgery. J Foot Surg. 1984;23:402-406.
45.
DonleyBGPhilbinTTomfordJWSferraJJ. Foot and ankle infections after surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;391:162-170.
46.
BariePS. Antibiotic-resistant gram-positive cocci: implication for surgical practice. World J Surg. 1998;22:118-126.
47.
MarananMCMoreiraBBoyle-VavraSDaumRS. Antimicrobial resistance in staphylococci. Epidemiology, molecular mechanisms, and clinical relevance. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 1997;11:813-849.
