Revision of Failed Osteochondral Autologous Transplantation Procedure for Chronic Talus Osteochondral Lesion With Iliac Crest Graft and Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online April, 2012
Revision of Failed Osteochondral Autologous Transplantation Procedure for Chronic Talus Osteochondral Lesion With Iliac Crest Graft and Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis
This article describes a novel technique for treatment of recurrent large osteochondral lesions of the talus using autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis with a collagen I/III matrix.
ValderrabanoVLeumannARaschHEgelhofTHintermannBPagenstertG. Knee-to-ankle mosaicplasty for the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the ankle joint. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(suppl 1): 105S-111S.
2.
RaikinSM. Fresh osteochondral allografts for large-volume cystic osteochondral defects of the talus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:2818-2826.
3.
TohyamaHYasudaKOhkoshiYBeynnonBDRenstromPA. Anterior drawer test for acute anterior talofibular ligament injuries of the ankle. How much load should be applied during the test?Am J Sports Med. 2003;31:226-232.
PriceDDMcGrathPARafiiABuckinghamB. The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain. Pain. 1983;17:45-56.
6.
KitaokaHBAlexanderIJAdelaarRSNunleyJAMyersonMSSandersM. Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int. 1994;15:349-353.
7.
KretzschmarMWiewiorskiMRaschH. 99mTc-DPD-SPECT/CT predicts the outcome of imaging-guided diagnostic anaesthetic injections: a prospective cohort study. Eur J Radiol. 2011;80: e410-e415.
8.
PagenstertGIHintermannBBargALeumannAValderrabanoV. Realignment surgery as alternative treatment of varus and valgus ankle osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;462:156-168.
9.
PagenstertGLeumannAHintermannBValderrabanoV. Sports and recreation activity of varus and valgus ankle osteoarthritis before and after realignment surgery. Foot Ankle Int. 2008;29:985-993.
10.
KarlssonJBergstenTLansingerOPetersonL. Reconstruction of the lateral ligaments of the ankle for chronic lateral instability. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988;70:581-588.
11.
BrostromL. Sprained ankles. VI Surgical treatment of “chronic” ligament ruptures. Acta Chir Scand. 1966;132:551-565.
12.
HintermannBValderrabanoVKundertHP. Lengthening of the lateral column and reconstruction of the medial soft tissue for treatment of acquired flatfoot deformity associated with insufficiency of the posterior tibial tendon. Foot Ankle Int. 1999;20:622-629.
13.
WiewiorskiMLeumannABuettnerOPagenstertGValderrabano HorisbergerM. Autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis aided reconstruction of a large focal osteochondral lesion of the talus. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011;131:293-296.
SteinwachsMKreuzPC. Autologous chondrocyte implantation in chondral defects of the knee with a type I/III collagen membrane: a prospective study with a 3-year follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2007;23:381-387.
16.
NiemeyerPPestkaJMKreuzPC. Characteristic complications after autologous chondrocyte implantation for cartilage defects of the knee joint. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36:2091-2099.
17.
GoodingCRBartlettWBentleyGSkinnerJACarringtonRFlanaganA. A prospective, randomised study comparing two techniques of autologous chondrocyte implantation for osteochondral defects in the knee: periosteum covered versus type I/III collagen covered. Knee. 2006;13:203-210.
18.
GudasRKalesinskasRJKimtysV. A prospective randomized clinical study of mosaic osteochondral autologous transplantation versus microfracture for the treatment of osteochondral defects in the knee joint in young athletes. Arthroscopy. 2005;21:1066-1075.
19.
GianniniSVanniniF. Operative treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talar dome: current concepts review. Foot Ankle Int. 2004;25:168-175.
20.
GianniniSBudaRFaldiniC. Surgical treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus in young active patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(suppl 2):28-41.
21.
KnutsenGDrogsetJOEngebretsenL. A randomized trial comparing autologous chondrocyte implantation with microfracture. Findings at five years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:2105-2112.
DickhutADexheimerVMartinKLauingerRHeiselCRichterW. Chondrogenesis of human mesenchymal stem cells by local transforming growth factor-beta delivery in a biphasic resorbable carrier. Tissue Eng Part A. 2010;16:453-464.
24.
FussMEhlersEMRussliesMRohwedelJBehrensP. Characteristics of human chondrocytes, osteoblasts and fibroblasts seeded onto a type I/III collagen sponge under different culture conditions. A light, scanning and transmission electron microscopy study. Ann Anat. 2000;182:303-310.
25.
LahmAErggeletCSteinwachsMReicheltA. Arthroscopic management of osteochondral lesions of the talus: results of drilling and usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging before and after treatment. Arthroscopy. 2000;16:299-304.
26.
TaranowWSBisignaniGATowersJDContiSF. Retrograde drilling of osteochondral lesions of the medial talar dome. Foot Ankle Int. 1999;20:474-480.
27.
HahnDBAanstoosMEWilkinsRM. Osteochondral lesions of the talus treated with fresh talar allografts. Foot Ankle Int. 2010;31:277-282.
28.
ClarCCumminsEMcIntyreL. Clinical and cost-effectiveness of autologous chondrocyte implantation for cartilage defects in knee joints: systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2005;9(47):iii-iv, ix-x, 1-82.
29.
BrageMEReeseKA. Techniques for large osteochondral defects of the talus. Tech Foot Ankle Surg. 2009;8:43-49. doi:10.1097/BTF.0b013e31819999bb10.1097/BTF.0b013e31819999bb.
30.
TakakuraYTakaokaTTanakaYYajimaHTamaiS. Results of opening-wedge osteotomy for the treatment of a post-traumatic varus deformity of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80:213-218.
31.
TakakuraYTanakaYKumaiTTamaiS. Low tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis of the ankle. Results of a new operation in 18 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995;77:50-54.
32.
TanakaYTakakuraYHayashiKTaniguchiAKumaiTSugimotoK. Low tibial osteotomy for varus-type osteoarthritis of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:909-913.
