Havid I., Rasmussen O., Jensen NC, Nielsen S.Trabecular bone strength profiles at the ankle joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985;199:306-312.
2.
Bolton-Maggs BG, Sudlow RA, Freeman MAR.Total ankle arthroplasty: a long-term review of the London hospital experience. J Bone Joint Surg. 1985;67(5):785-790.
3.
Saltzman CL, Alvine F., Sanders RW, Gall RJChallenges with initial use of a total ankle replacement. Paper presented at: Scientific Program, 67th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; March 15, 2000 ; Orlando, FL.
4.
Conti SF, Bisignani G., Martin R.Update on total ankle replacement. Semin Arthroplast . 1999;10(2):62-71.
5.
Alvine FGThe Agility ankle replacement: the good and the bad. Foot Ankle Clin. 2002;7(4):737-753.
6.
Hanna RS, Haddad SL, Lazarus MLEvaluation of periprosthetic lucency after total ankle arthroplasty: helical CT versus conventional radiography. Foot Ankle Int . 2007;28(8):921-926.
7.
Conti SF, Dazen D., Stewart G., et al. Proprioception after total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int. 2008;29(11):1069-1073.
8.
Conti S., Lalonde KA, Martin R.Kinematic analysis of the agility total ankle during gait. Foot Ankle Int. 2006;27(11):980-984.
9.
Raikin SM, Heim CS, Plaxton NA, Greenwald ASMobility characteristics of total ankle replacements. Orthopaedic Research Laboratories, Lutheran Hospital, Cleveland Clinic Health System , 2000. http://www.orl-inc.com/ankle_publications/2000/ankle2000.pdf. Accessed October 4, 2005.
10.
Knecht SI, Estin M., Callaghan JJ, et al. The Agility total ankle arthroplasty: seven to sixteen-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86-A(6):1161-1171.