Stiehl JB, Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Keblish PAIn vivo kinematic analysis of a mobile bearing total knee prosthesis. Clin Orthop. 1997;345:60-66.
2.
Stiehl JB, Komistek RD, Dennis DAIn vivo kinematics comparison of posterior cruciate retention or sacrifice with a mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty. Trans Orthop Res Soc.1997;22:658.
3.
DesJardins JD , Walker PS, Haider H., Perry J.The use of a force-controlled dynamic knee stimulator to quantify the mechanical performance of total knee replacement designs. J Biomechanics. 2000;32:290-247.
4.
Bell CJ, Walker PS, Sathasivam S., Campbell PA, Blunn GWDifferences in wear between fixed bearing and mobile bearing knees. Trans Orthop Res Soc. 1999;24:962.
5.
Sathasivam S. , Walker PSA computer model with surface friction or the prediction of total knee kinematics. J Biomech. 1997;30:107-117.
6.
Raikin SM, Heim CS, Plaxton NA, Greenwald ASMobility Characteristics of Total Ankle Replacements. Cleveland, OH: Orthopaedic Research Laboratories;2000.
7.
Wright TM, Goodman SBImplant Wear in Total Joint Replacement. Rosemont, IL : AAOS;2000.
Huber H., Kellenberger R., Huber M.Scandinavian total ankle replacement (LINK S.T.A.R.) technical problems and solutions. In: Kofoed H, ed. Current Status of Ankle Arthroplasty. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 1998:106-110.
Kimizuka M., Kurosawa H., Fukubayashi T.Load bearing pattern of the ankle joint, contact area and pressure distribution . Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1980;20:45-49.
12.
Brown TD, Shaw DTIn vitro contact stress distributions in the natural human hip. J Biomech.1983;16:373-384.
13.
Ihn JC, Kim SJ, Park IHIn vitro study of contact area and pressure distribution in the human knee after partial and total meniscectomy. Int Orthop.1993;17: 214-218.
14.
Insall JNTotal knee replacement. In: Insall JN , ed. Surgery of the Knee. New York: Churchill Livingstone;1993.
15.
Goodman S., Wright T.Clinical, biological, design and material considerations of implant wear in total joint replace ment. AAOS Bull. February 2002: 43-44.