This study explored the perspectives of healthcare designers to identify key design strategies that are adopted to optimize wayfinding in complex healthcare environments, addressing a notable gap in academic literature.
Background
Wayfinding in healthcare facilities is often challenging for patients, visitors, and staff due to complex layouts and stressful conditions. While academic research has examined specific environmental features, little is known about key strategies formulated and adopted by design practitioners to enhance wayfinding in complex healthcare environments, and how general wayfinding considerations are incorporated in the design process.
Methods
We conducted semi-structured focus group sessions (n = 34 participants) with experienced healthcare design practitioners. Participants met stringent inclusion criteria, including a minimum of five years of experience and involvement in at least three relevant healthcare projects. Transcripts were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis.
Results
We put forward a novel framework linking four key design considerations to seven design variables which were mapped to embedded and applied approaches across chronological and spatial dimensions of the design process. Six core wayfinding strategies were identified: simplicity, consistency, spatial hierarchy, orienting cues, ambient cues, and landmarks. We also elucidate divergences between industry perspectives and existing literature, particularly regarding the role of signage and the potential of biophilic design.
Conclusion
The importance of prioritizing embedded wayfinding strategies early in the design process is highlighted, integrating cultural and contextual relevance, and fostering collaboration between industry and academia to steer research efforts toward more pressing issues.
Alizadeh AsliA.MoshfeghifarS.MousighichiP.SamimiP. M. (2023). Adults’ visual cue preferences and wayfinding abilities in healthcare centers. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 16(3), 104–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/19375867231153122
2.
BaumgartnerT. A.StrongC. H.HensleyL. D. (2002). Conducting and Reading Research in Health and Human Performance (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
3.
BernardH. R. (1995). Research Methods in Anthropology: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. AltaMira.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2013). Successful Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide for Beginners. Sage Publications.
6.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
7.
BrielmannA. A.BurasN. H.SalingarosN. A.TaylorR. P. (2022). What happens in your brain when you walk down the street? Implications of architectural proportions, biophilia, and fractal geometry for urban science. Urban Science, 6(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci6010003
8.
BrösamleM.HölscherC. (2018). Approaching the architectural native: A graphical transcription method to capture sketching and gesture activity. Design Studies, 56, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2018.01.002
9.
BubricK.HarveyG.PitamberT. (2021). A user-centered approach to evaluating wayfinding systems in healthcare. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 14(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1937586720959074
10.
ByrneD. (2022). A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Quality & Quantity, 56(3), 1391–1412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y
11.
CarpmanJ. R.GrantM. A. (2016). Design That Cares: Planning Health Facilities for Patients and Visitors. John Wiley & Sons.
12.
ChoM. (2023). Evaluating therapeutic healthcare environmental criteria: Architectural designers’ perspectives. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(2), 1540. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20021540
13.
CooperR. (2010). Wayfinding for health care: Best practices for today’s facilities. AHA Press.
14.
CreswellJ. W.CreswellJ. D. (2022). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (Sixth). Sage Publications.
15.
DevlinA. (2014). Wayfinding in healthcare facilities: Contributions from environmental psychology. Behavioral Sciences, 4(4), 423–436. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs4040423
16.
DongW.QinT.LiaoH.LiuY.LiuJ. (2020). Comparing the roles of landmark visual salience and semantic salience in visual guidance during indoor wayfinding. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 47(3), 229–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2019.1697965
17.
GhamariH.PatiD. (2018). Examining eye-fixations during wayfinding in unfamiliar indoor environments. The International Journal of Designed Objects, 12(2), 15–33. https://doi.org/10.18848/2325-1379/CGP/v12i02/15-33
18.
GhamariH.SharifiA. (2021). Mapping the evolutions and trends of literature on wayfinding in indoor environments. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 11(2), 585–606. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe11020042
19.
HamburgerK.RöserF. (2014). The role of landmark modality and familiarity in human wayfinding. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 73(4), 205–213. https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/a000139
20.
HeikkiläM.VermaI.NenonenS. (2024). Toward restorative hospital environment: Nature and art in Finnish hospitals. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 17(3), 239–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/19375867241239320
JamshidiS.HashemiS.TranD.-M. T. (2025). Costs and effects of ineffective wayfinding in US hospitals: A survey of hospital staff. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 18(2), 259–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/19375867251317240
23.
JamshidiS.PatiD. (2024). Identifying environmental elements and attributes that contribute to indoor wayfinding: An exploratory study utilizing think-aloud protocol. Journal of Interior Design, 49(2), 117–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/10717641231207031
24.
JiangS. (2022). The effects of windows and transparency on people’s wayfinding behaviors and navigational experience in hospitals. In Nature through a hospital window (pp. 115–140). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003122180-7
25.
JiangS.AllisonD.DuchowskiA. T. (2022). Hospital greenspaces and the impacts on wayfinding and spatial experience: An explorative experiment through immersive virtual environment (IVE) techniques. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 15(3), 206–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/19375867211067539
26.
JiangS.VerderberS. (2017). On the planning and design of hospital circulation zones. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 10(2), 124–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/1937586716672041
27.
JohnsonR. B.ChristensenL. B. (2004). Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches. Allyn and Bacon.
28.
KalantariS.TripathiV.KanJ.RoundsJ. D.MostafaviA.SnellR.Cruz-GarzaJ. G. (2022). Evaluating the impacts of color, graphics, and architectural features on wayfinding in healthcare settings using EEG data and virtual response testing. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 79, 101744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101744
29.
KaplanS. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(3), 169–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2
30.
KhasraghiG. S.NejatA. (2024). Utilizing agent-based modeling for optimization of wayfinding in hospital: A case study. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 17(3), 251–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/19375867241248593
31.
KimH.SefcikJ. S.BradwayC. (2017). Characteristics of qualitative descriptive studies: A systematic review. Research in Nursing & Health, 40(1), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.21768
32.
KruegerR. A. (1994). Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research (2nd ed.). Sage publications.
LeeE.DaughertyJ.SelgaJ.SchmidtU. (2020). Enhancing patients’ wayfinding and visitation experience improves quality of care. Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing, 35(3), 250–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2019.11.003
35.
MadsonM.GoodwinK. (2021). Color coding the “Labyrinth”: How staff perceived a two-part intervention to improve wayfinding in an adult emergency department. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 14(4), 429–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/1937586721994593
36.
MarquardtG. (2011). Wayfinding for people with dementia: A review of the role of architectural design. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 4(2), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/193758671100400207
37.
MinY. H.HaM. (2021). Contribution of colour-zoning differentiation to multidimensional spatial knowledge acquisition in symmetrical hospital wards. Indoor and Built Environment, 30(6), 787–800. https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X20909490
38.
MoragI.PintelonL. (2021). Digital wayfinding systems in hospitals: A qualitative evaluation based on managerial perceptions and considerations before and after implementation. Applied Ergonomics, 90, 103260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103260
39.
MorganD. L. (1997). Focus Groups As Qualitative Research (2nd ed.). Sage publications.
40.
NatapovA.KuligaS.DaltonR. C.HölscherC. (2020). Linking building-circulation typology and wayfinding: Design, spatial analysis, and anticipated wayfinding difficulty of circulation types. Architectural Science Review, 63(1), 34–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2019.1675041
41.
OnwuegbuzieA. J.DickinsonW. B.LeechN. L.ZoranA. G. (2009). A qualitative framework for collecting and analyzing data in focus group research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(3), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690900800301
42.
PatiD.HarveyT. E.WillisD. A.PatiS. (2015). Identifying elements of the health care environment that contribute to wayfinding. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 8(3), 44–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/1937586714568864
43.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (Third). Sage Publications.
44.
PouyanA. E.GhanbaranA.ShakibamaneshA. (2021). Impact of circulation complexity on hospital wayfinding behavior (case study: Milad 1000-bed hospital, Tehran, Iran). Journal of Building Engineering, 44, 102931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102931
45.
QiF.LuZ.ChenY. (2022). Investigating the influences of healthcare facility features on wayfinding performance and associated stress using virtual reality. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 15(4), 131–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/19375867221108505
46.
QiuZ.AshourM.ZhouX.KalantariS. (2024). NavMarkAR: A landmark-based augmented reality (AR) wayfinding system for enhancing older Adults’ spatial learning. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 62, 102635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2024.102635
RodriguesR.CoelhoR.TavaresJ. M. R. S. (2019). Healthcare signage design: A review on recommendations for effective signing systems. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 12(3), 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/1937586718814822
49.
RookeC. N.TzortzopoulosP.KoskelaL.RookeJ. (2009). Wayfinding: Embedding Knowledge in Hospital Environments.
RubinH. J.RubinI. S. (1995). Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data (1st ed.). Sage Publications.
52.
SamahZ. A.IbrahimN.AmirJ. S. (2013). Translating quality care factors to quality space: Design criteria for outpatient facility. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 105, 265–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.11.028
SharmaG.KaushalY.ChandraS.SinghV.MittalA. P.DuttV. (2017). Influence of Landmarks on Wayfinding and Brain Connectivity in Immersive Virtual Reality Environment. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01220
55.
ShortE. J.ReayS. D.DouglasR. A. (2019). Designing wayfinding systems in healthcare: From exploratory prototyping to scalable solutions. Design for Health, 3(1), 180–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/24735132.2019.1575659
UlrichR. S.SimonsR. F.LositoB. D.FioritoE.MilesM. A.ZelsonM. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11(3), 201–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80184-7
58.
VollmerT. C.KoppenG.IovițaC.SchießlL. (2024). Therapeutic architecture and temporality: Evidence-based design for long-stay facilities for individuals with severe intellectual disabilities and challenging behaviour. Architecture, 4(3), 541–570. https://doi.org/10.3390/architecture4030029
59.
WillisK. S.HölscherC.WilbertzG.LiC. (2009). A comparison of spatial knowledge acquisition with maps and mobile maps. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 33(2), 100–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2009.01.004
60.
XuT. B.GovaniV. N.KalantariS. (2025). Age differences in pedestrian navigational skills and performance: A systemic review and meta-analysis. Ageing Research Reviews, 104, 102591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2024.102591
61.
YangQ.DubeyR. K.KalantariS. (2025). PATH-U: A data-driven agent-based wayfinding model incorporating perceived path uncertainty and cognitive strategies in unfamiliar indoor environments. Building Simulation, 18(2), 449–471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-024-1217-3
62.
YesiltepeD.Conroy DaltonR.Ozbil TorunA. (2021). Landmarks in wayfinding: A review of the existing literature. Cognitive Processing, 22(3), 369–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-021-01012-x
63.
YinJ.YuanJ.ArfaeiN.CatalanoP. J.AllenJ. G.SpenglerJ. D. (2020). Effects of biophilic indoor environment on stress and anxiety recovery: A between-subjects experiment in virtual reality. Environment International, 136, 105427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.105427
64.
YoungA. A. (2004). Experiences in ethnographic interviewing about race: The inside and outside of it. In Researching race and racism (pp. 187–202). Routledge.
65.
ZamaniZ. (2019). Effects of emergency department physical design elements on security, wayfinding, visibility, privacy, and efficiency and its implications on staff satisfaction and performance. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 12(3), 72–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1937586718800482
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
