Aim: The objective of this study was to develop a comprehensive multidimensional framework by identifying the key drivers and components associated with the health of older people in healing environments, and to apply this framework in high-density city block spaces, creating opportunities for aging in place. Background: Effective theoretical and practical research frameworks are necessary to determine how to best support older adults in high-density city areas as they face aging-related challenges. Methods: The methodological approach involved bibliometric analysis (SciMAT) and systematic literature review of approximately 4446 articles related to rehabilitation settings and older adults. The review focused on literature that developed concepts and research frameworks and provided an empirical foundation. Results: The review identified four types of drivers for a healing environment for older individuals in high-density city blocks (HEOI-HCBs): self-environment, interpersonal, physical, and informational environments. These drivers were linked to eight desirable outcomes: initiative acquisition, shared vision, trust, empathy, integrity, systematicity, networking, and perceived usefulness. Conclusion: The drivers and outcomes formed the HEOI-HCBs framework, each representing a distinct dimension of the HEOI-HCBs concept. This study and the resulting framework facilitate the application and understanding of healing environments.
ArslanM.KalayliogluZ.EkrenE. (2018). Use of medicinal and aromatic plants in therapeutic gardens. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, 52(4s), 151–154. https://doi.org/10.5530/ijper.52.4s.92
2.
BarkerV.GilesH. (2003). Integrating the communicative predicament and enhancement of aging models: The case of older Native Americans. Health Communication, 15(3), 255–275. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327027HC1503_1
3.
ChadwickG. (2013). A systems view of planning: Towards a theory of the urban and regional planning process. Elsevier.
4.
ChangZ.ChenJ.LiW.LiX. (2019). Public transportation and the spatial inequality of urban park accessibility: New evidence from Hong Kong. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 76, 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.09.012
5.
ChenS.BaoZ.ChenJ.YangL.LouV. (2022). Sustainable built environment for facilitating public health of older adults: Evidence from Hong Kong. Sustainable Development, 30(5), 1086–1098. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2303
Chi JackieK. Y. (2013). Projecting sustainable living environment for an ageing society: The case of Hong Kong. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 17, 675–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2013.02.084
8.
ClarkeS. P.ClarkeJ. M.BrownR.MiddletonH. (2016). Hurting and healing in therapeutic environments: How can we understand the role of the relational context?European Journal of Psychotherapy & Counselling, 18(4), 384–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642537.2016.1260620
9.
CoboM. J.López-HerreraA. G.Herrera-ViedmaE.HerreraF. (2012). SciMAT: A new science mapping analysis software tool. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(8), 1609–1630. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22688
10.
CrammJ. M.BornscheuerL.SelivanovaA.LeeJ. (2015). The health of India’s elderly population: A comparative assessment using subjective and objective health outcomes. Journal of Population Ageing, 8(4), 245–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12062-015-9122-2
11.
D’AntonioP. (2004). Relationships, reality, and reciprocity with therapeutic environments: A historical case study. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 18(1), 11–16. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.apnu.2003.11.003
DuBoseJ.MacAllisterL.HadiK.SakallarisB. (2018). Exploring the concept of healing spaces. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 11(1), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/1937586716680567
14.
DuffyJ. R.HoskinsL.SeifertR. F. (2007). Dimensions of caring psychometric evaluation of the caring assessment tool. Advances in Nursing Science, 30, 235–245. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ANS.0000286622.84763.a9
15.
EdvardssonD. (2008). Therapeutic environments for older adults: Constituents and meanings. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 34, 32–40. https://doi.org/10.3928/00989134-20080601-05
16.
EngineerA.IdaA.SternbergE. M. (2020). Healing spaces: Designing physical environments to optimize health, wellbeing, and performance. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(4), 1155. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041155
FinlayJ.FrankeT.McKayH.Sims-GouldJ. (2015). Therapeutic landscapes and wellbeing in later life: Impacts of blue and green spaces for older adults. Health & Place, 34, 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2015.05.001
21.
GaoC.ZhangS. (2020). The restorative quality of patient ward environment: Tests of six dominant design characteristics. Building and Environment, 180, 107039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107039
GeigerP. J.BoggeroI. A.BrakeC. A.CalderaC. A.CombsH. L.PetersJ. R.BaerR. A. (2016). Mindfulness-based interventions for older adults: A review of the effects on physical and emotional well-being. Mindfulness, 7(2), 296–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-015-0444-1
24.
GoldenbergA. J.HartmannC. D.MorelloL.BrooksS.Colon-ZimmermannK.MarshallP. A. (2013). Gene-environment interactions and health inequalities: Views of underserved communities. Journal of Community Genetics, 4(4), 425–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-013-0143-3
25.
GotoS.Jin ParkB.TsunetsuguY.HerrupK.MiyazakiY. (2013). The effect of garden designs on mood and heart output in older adults residing in an assisted living facility. Health Environments Research and Design Journal, 6, 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/193758671300600204
HamzahA. I. N.LeeC. K.KamaruzzamanZ. A.WahabN. A. (2020). The development of healing environment concept: A review. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 498, 012085. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/498/1/012085
28.
Hazlett-StevensH.SingerJ.ChongA. (2019). Mindfulness-based stress reduction and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy with older adults: A qualitative review of randomized controlled outcome research. Clinical Gerontologist, 42(4), 347–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/07317115.2018.1518282
29.
HeH.LiT.YuY.LinX. (2020). Associations between built environment characteristics and walking in older adults in a high-density city: A study from a Chinese Megacity. Frontiers in Public Health, 8, 577140. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.577140
30.
HeS. Y.ThøgersenJ.CheungY. H. Y.YuA. H. Y. (2020). Ageing in a transit-oriented city: Satisfaction with transport, social inclusion and wellbeing. Transport Policy, 97, 85–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.06.016
31.
HelpAge International. (2015). The Global AgeWatch Index ranks countries by how well their older populations are faring. https://www.helpage.org/global-agewatch/
32.
HuismanE. R. C. M.MoralesE.van HoofJ.KortH. S. M. (2012). Healing environment: A review of the impact of physical environmental factors on users. Building and Environment, 58, 70–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.06.016
33.
IyendoT. O.UwajehP. C.IkennaE. S. (2016). The therapeutic impacts of environmental design interventions on wellness in clinical settings: A narrative review. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice, 24, 174–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctcp.2016.06.008
34.
JabareenY. (2008). A new conceptual framework for sustainable development. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 10(2), 179–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-006-9058-z
Largo-WightE. (2011). Cultivating healthy places and communities: Evidenced-based nature contact recommendations. International Journal of Environmental Health Research, 21(1), 41–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/09603123.2010.499452
38.
LauK. K.-L.YungC.CY.TanZ. (2021). Usage and perception of urban green space of older adults in the high-density city of Hong Kong. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 64, 127251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127251
39.
LencaM.SchnebleC.KressigR. W.WangmoT. (2021). Digital health interventions for healthy ageing: A qualitative user evaluation and ethical assessment. BMC Geriatrics, 21(1), 412. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02338-z
40.
LiM.LuY.XuX. (2022). Mapping the scientific structure and evolution of renewable energy for sustainable development. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 29(43), 64832–64845. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20361-4
41.
LiM.XuL. (2020). Research and practice of healing environment from public health perspective. Journal of Human Settlements in West China, 35(5), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.13791/j.cnki.hsfwest.20200506
42.
LimJ.LimJ. (2017). A study on public design applicability through extraction of healing environment elements. Journal of the Korea Institute of Spatial Design, 12(5), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.35216/kisd.2017.12.5.11
LiuZ.YangZ.LiangM.LiuY.OsmaniM.DemianP. (2022). A conceptual framework for blockchain enhanced information modeling for healing and therapeutic design. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(13), 8218. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19138218
45.
LuptonD. (2017). How does health feel? Towards research on the affective atmospheres of digital health. Digital Health, 3, 2055207617701276. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207617701276
46.
MaceR. A.MattosM. K.VranceanuA.-M. (2022). Older adults can use technology: Why healthcare professionals must overcome ageism in digital health. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 12(12), 1102–1105. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibac070
47.
MalinowskiP.MooreA. W.MeadB. R.GruberT. (2017). Mindful aging: The effects of regular brief mindfulness practice on electrophysiological markers of cognitive and affective processing in older adults. Mindfulness, 8(1), 78–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-015-0482-8
48.
MalkinJ. (2007). Reflections on healing environments and evidence-based design. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 1, 26–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/193758670700100111
49.
MarstonH. R.van HoofJ. (2019). Who doesn’t think about technology when designing urban environments for older people? A case study approach to a proposed extension of the WHO’s age-friendly cities model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(19), 3525. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16193525
50.
MartiP.GiustiL. (2007). Coupling the digital and the physical in therapeutic environments. Human-Computer Interaction pt.2: Interaction Platforms and Techniques; Lecture Notes in Computer Science.
51.
MengL. (2021). Space and Health: Study on the Design of Elderly Healing Spaces in High-density city Blocks—A Case Study of the Peninsula of Macao. Macau University of Science and Technology].
52.
MengL.ZhuC.WenK. H. (2020). Research on constructing a healing environment for the street spaces of a high-density city: Using street spaces in Macao’s old city area. International Journal of Environmental Research Public Health, 17(13), 4767. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17134767
53.
MiaoJ.WuX.ZengD. (2024). Promoting ageing in place in Hong Kong: Neighbourhood social environment and depression among older adults. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 17(1), 142–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2022.2040087
54.
MillerW. L.CrabtreeB. F. (2005). Healing landscapes: Patients, relationships, and creating optimal healing places. The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 11, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2005.11.s-4
55.
MoherD.LiberatiA.TetzlaffJ.AltmanD. G.GroupP. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. BMJ, 339, b2535. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535
56.
MossA. S.ReibelD. K.GreesonJ. M.ThaparA.BubbR.SalmonJ.NewbergA. B. (2015). An adapted mindfulness-based stress reduction program for elders in a continuing care retirement community: Quantitative and qualitative results from a pilot randomized controlled trial. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 34(4), 518–538. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464814559411
57.
MuellmannS.ForbergerS.MollersT.BroringE.ZeebH.PischkeC. R. (2018). Effectiveness of eHealth interventions for the promotion of physical activity in older adults: A systematic review. Preventive Medicine, 108, 93–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.12.026
58.
NewmanP.HoganT. (1981). A review of urban density models: Toward a resolution of the conflict between populace and planner. Human Ecology, 9, 269–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00890739
59.
NgE. (2009). Designing high-density cities: For social and environmental sustainability. Routledge.
60.
NilssonC.WijkH.HoglundL.SjoblomH.HessmanE.BergM. (2020). Effects of birthing room design on maternal and neonate outcomes: A systematic review. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 13(3), 198–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/1937586720903689
61.
NormanV.RossilloK.SkeltonK. (2016). Creating healing environments through the theory of caring. Aorn Journal, 104(5), 401–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aorn.2016.09.006
62.
OhK. H.ShinW. S.KhilT. G.KimD. J. (2020). Six-step model of nature-based therapy process. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(3), 685. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17030685
63.
Olszewska-GuizzoA.SiaA.FogelA.HoR. (2022). Features of urban green spaces associated with positive emotions, mindfulness and relaxation. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 20695. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-24637-0
64.
PallesenK. J.DahlgaardJ.FjorbackL. (2016). Mindfulness for the treatment of stress disorders. In E. Shonin, W. Gordon, & M. Griffiths (Eds.), Mindfulness and Buddhist-derived approaches in mental health and addiction(pp.165–189). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22255-4_8
65.
PhangJ. K. Y.KwanY. H.YoonS.GohH.YeeW.TanC.LowL. (2023). Digital intergenerational program to reduce loneliness and social isolation among older adults: Realist review. JMIR Aging, 6, e39848. https://doi.org/10.2196/39848
66.
PortegijsE.KeskinenK. E.EronenJ.SaajanahoM.RantakokkoM.RantanenT. (2020). Older adults’ physical activity and the relevance of distances to neighborhood destinations and barriers to outdoor mobility. Frontiers in Public Health, 8, 335. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00335
RuengtamP. (2019). Factors affecting design and management of residential community for enhancing well-being of Thai early stage elderly. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 650, 012018. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/650/1/012018
70.
SakallarisB. R.MacAllisterL.VossM.SmithK.JonasW. B. (2015). Optimal healing environments. Global Advances in Health and Medicine, 4(3), 40–45. https://doi.org/10.7453/gahmj.2015.043
71.
SchirmerW.GeertsN.VercruyssenA.GlorieuxI.Digital AgeingC. (2022). Digital skills training for older people: The importance of the “lifeworld”. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 101, 104695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2022.104695
72.
SchmidtS. (2004). Mindfulness and healing intention: Concepts, practice, and research evaluation. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 10(Suppl 1.), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.1089/1075553042245917
73.
SchreuderE.LebesqueL.BottenheftC. (2016). Healing environments: What design factors really matter according to patients? An exploratory analysis. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 10(1), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/1937586716643951
74.
SchweitzerM.GilpinL.FramptonS. (2004). Healing spaces: Elements of environmental design that make an impact on health. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 10, 71–83. https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2004.10.S-71
75.
SeifertA. (2021). Older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic—Forgotten and stigmatized?International Social Work, 64(2), 275–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872820969779
76.
SeifertA.CottenS. R.XieB. (2021). A double burden of exclusion? Digital and social exclusion of older adults in times of COVID-19. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 76(3), e99–e103. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaa098
77.
ShikderS.MourshedM.PriceA. (2011). Therapeutic lighting design for the elderly: A review. Perspectives in Public Health, 132(6), 282–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/1757913911422288
78.
SubramanianD.JanaA. (2018). Assessing urban recreational open spaces for the elderly: A case of three Indian cities. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 35, 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.08.015
79.
TanY.LiuG.ZhangY.ShuaiC.ShenG. Q. (2018). Green retrofit of aged residential buildings in Hong Kong: A preliminary study. Building and Environment, 143, 89–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.06.058
80.
Tenngart IvarssonC.GrahnP. (2012). Differently designed parts of a garden support different types of recreational walks: Evaluating a healing garden by participatory observation. Landscape Research, 37(5), 519–537. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2011.641948
VolicerL.HurleyA. C. (2003). Review article: Management of behavioral symptoms in progressive degenerative dementias. The Journals of Gerontology: Series A, 58(9), M837–M845. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/58.9.M837
83.
WeismanG. D. (2001). The place of people in architectural design. In PressmanA. (Ed.), Architectural design portable handbook: A guide to excellent practices (pp. 158–170). McGraw-Hill.
84.
WilesJ. L.LeibingA.GubermanN.ReeveJ.AllenR. E. (2012). The meaning of “aging in place” to older people. Gerontologist, 52(3), 357–366. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnr098
85.
XieH.ZhangY.DuanK. (2020). Evolutionary overview of urban expansion based on bibliometric analysis in Web of Science from 1990 to 2019. Habitat International, 95, 102100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2019.102100
86.
XuL.MengR.HuangS.ChenZ. (2019). Healing oriented street design: Experimental explorations via virtual reality. Urban Planning International, 34(1), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.22217/upi.2018.496
87.
XueF.LauS. (2016). Legacy of lifestyle driver: A London study of healing space in contemporary urban environments. Landscape Architecture Frontiers, 4, 20–41.
88.
YaoM.YaoB.CenciJ.LiaoC.ZhangJ. (2023). Visualisation of high-density city research evolution, trends, and outlook in the 21st century. Land, 12(2), 485. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12020485
89.
YigitcanlaraT.KamruzzamanfM.BuysbL.IoppolocG.Sabatini-MarquesdJ.Moreira da CostadE. (2018). Understanding “smart cities”: Intertwining development drivers with desired outcomes in a multidimensional framework. Cities, 81, 145–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.04.003
90.
YooI.-Y. (2015). A study on healing environmental factors in the elderly patients with long-term care. International Journal of Bio-Science and Bio-Technology, 7(5), 267–276. https://doi.org/10.14257/ijbsbt.2015.7.5.25
91.
YuC.WongE.GignacJ.WalkerM.RossT. (2023). A scoping review of pediatric healthcare built environment experiences and preferences among children with disabilities and their families. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 17(2), 19375867231218035. https://doi.org/10.1177/19375867231218035
92.
YungE. H. K.HoW. K. O.ChanE. H. W. (2017). Elderly satisfaction with planning and design of public parks in high density old districts: An ordered logit model. Landscape and Urban Planning, 165, 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.05.006
93.
ZeebH.RothgangH.Darmann-FinckI. (2018). Ageing, health and equity-broad perspectives are needed to understand and tackle health challenges of ageing societies. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(3), 457. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15030457
94.
ZhangR.LiuS.LiM.HeX.ZhouC. (2021). The effect of high-density built environments on elderly individuals’ physical health: A cross-sectional study in Guangzhou, China. International Journal of Environmental Research Public Health, 18(19), 10250. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph181910250
95.
ZhangY.LuoH.XieJ.MengX.YeC. (2023). The influence and prediction of built environment on the subjective well-being of the elderly based on random forest: Evidence from Guangzhou, China. Land, 12(10), 1940. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12101940
96.
ZhangY.TzortzopoulosP.KagioglouM. (2018). Healing built-environment effects on health outcomes: Environment–occupant–health framework. Building Research & Information, 47(6), 747–766. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2017.1411130
97.
ZhouP. (2021). Affordable and enjoyable health shopping: Commodified therapeutic landscapes for older people in China’s urban open spaces. Health & Place, 70, 102621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2021.102621
98.
ZhouP.GradyS. C.RosenbergM. W. (2021). Creating therapeutic spaces for the public: Elderly exercisers as leaders in urban China. Urban Geography, 44(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2021.1979284
