Emergency Department Environmental Responses to COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to document and empirically evaluate the physical environment strategies used by emergency departments (EDs) to address the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic; and to develop recommendations for managing future crises. Background: Emergency departments made significant environmental modifications in responding to the COVID-19 pandemic but these modifications and the decision-making processes were seldomly studied. Methods: In this in-depth qualitative case study, a multidisciplinary research team conducted semistructured interviews with 11 professionals of various roles in environmental responses to the pandemic at a large urban ED in the U.S. Qualitative content analysis generated codes and code categories from the data as well as a conceptual framework. Design documents and photographic documentation were used to cross-check the interview data. Results: The ED faced challenges in making rapid changes with limited information and resources. Physical barriers separating patients, air filtration, airflow control, and alternative care spaces were key physical environmental strategies implemented. Among them, the physical separation of patients was perceived to be most effective, followed by air quality control measures. Interviewees recommended flexibility in building design (self-contained zones, negative pressure and air filtration in all patient rooms, pandemic mode of air ventilation system), and an all-inclusive bottom-up decision-making process. Concerns included ventilation, security, communication strategies, and workplace ergonomics. Conclusion: The physical environment constitutes an important part of ED pandemic response and the proactive preparation for future crises. Hospitals should consider the ED environment's role in pandemic response, including ventilation capability, security visibility, and functionality for staff.