This literature review is conducted to identify knowledge gaps and shape a framework for the development of guidelines and future research on programming and design of rehabilitation environments.
Background:
Patients suffering from trauma, stroke, neurological or cardiopulmonary conditions, or recovering from surgery or cancer treatment require rehabilitation services. A comprehensive rehabilitation program can support continuum of care for inpatient and outpatient groups. However, within most facilities, rehabilitation environments are found to be outdated and undersized compared to other programs or lack the correct adjacencies within the facility. Unfortunately, this deficiency is echoed by limited guidelines on programming, planning, and design of these environments. General guidelines derived from healthcare environments research is not adaptable to rehabilitation environments, because the paradigm used in most healthcare environment research does not address specific needs of rehabilitation patients in regaining confidence or relearning daily life skills.
Method:
We conducted a structured literature review, using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses as a basis for reporting the available body of work on evidence-based research in rehabilitation environments.
Result and Conclusion:
Through analysis of the limited literature, specific mediators such as patient confidence and motivation were identified. An environment that creates a balance between privacy and social interaction can promote these mediators. Creating enriched environments through elements that engage the senses and encourage more social and physical interaction is essential for recovery. Finally, accessibility and wayfinding are of great importance in these environments due to potential limited mobility or cognitive impairments of patients.
AnåkerA.von KochL.SjöstrandC.HeylighenA.ElfM. (2018). The physical environment and patients’ activities and care: A comparative case study at three newly built stroke units. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 74(8), 1919–1931. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13690
2.
ArbelI.YeB.MihailidisA. (2020). Stroke patients’ experiences in an adaptive healing room in a stroke rehabilitation unit. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 13(2), 170–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/1937586719879
3.
AtwaA.MoneyA. G.SpiliotopoulouG.McintyreA. (2013). Occupational therapists’ perceptions about the clinical utility of the 3D interior design software. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 8(4), 348–355. https://doi.org/10.3109/17483107.2012.713437
4.
BernhardtJ.Lipson-SmithR.DavisA.WhiteM.ZeemanH.PittN.ShannonM.CrottyM.ChurilovL.ElfM. (2022). Why hospital design matters: A narrative review of built environments research relevant to stroke care. International Journal of Stroke, 17(4), 370–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/17474930211042485
5.
BlennerhassettJ. M.BorschmannK. N.Lipson-SmithR. A.BernhardtJ. (2018). Behavioral mapping of patient activity to explore the built environment during rehabilitation. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 11(3), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/1937586718758444
6.
CampagnolG.ShepleyM. M. (2014). Positive distraction and the rehabilitation hospitals of João Filgueiras Lima. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 8(1), 199–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/193758671400800113
7.
ColleyJ.ZeemanH. (2020). Safe and supportive neurorehabilitation environments: Results of a structured observation of physical features across two rehabilitation facilities. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 13(4), 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/1937586720912546
8.
ColleyJ.ZeemanH.KendallE. (2018). “Everything happens in the hallways”: Exploring user activity in the corridors at two rehabilitation units. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 11(2), 163–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/1937586717733149
9.
DalalH. M.ZawadaA.JollyK.MoxhamT.TaylorR. S. (2010). Home based versus centre based cardiac rehabilitation: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ, 340: b5631. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b5631
10.
DavisB. E. (2011). Rooftop hospital gardens for physical therapy: A post-occupancy evaluation. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 4(3), 14–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/193758671100400303
FariasS.MasculoF. S.da SilvaL. B. (2010). Ergonomics study of a Brazilian physiotherapy clinic. SHO2010: International Symposium on Occupational Safety and Hygiene, 52(12), 1262–1268.
13.
FleuryA. M.SalihS. A.PeelN. M. (2013). Rehabilitation of the older vascular amputee: A review of the literature. Geriatrics & Gerontology International, 13(2), 264–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.12016
14.
GawlakA.StankiewiczM. (2022). Specific needs of patients and staff reflected in the design of an orthopaedic and rehabilitation hospital—design recommendations based on a case study (Poland). International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(22), 15388. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192215388
15.
JanssenH.AdaL.MiddletonS.PollackM.NilssonM.ChurilovL.BlennerhassettJ.FauxS.NewP.McCluskeyA.SprattN. J.BernhardtJ., & On Behalf of the AREISSA Trial Group. (2022). Altering the rehabilitation environment to improve stroke survivor activity: A phase II trial. International Journal of Stroke, 17(3), 299–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/17474930211006999
KevdzijaM. (2022). Everything looks the same: Wayfinding behaviour and experiences of stroke inpatients in rehabilitation clinics. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 17(1), 2087273. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2022.2087273
18.
KevdzijaM.MarquardtG. (2018). Physical barriers to mobility of stroke patients in rehabilitation clinics. In LangdonP.LazarJ.HeylighenA.DongH. (Eds.), Breaking Down barriers: Usability, accessibility and inclusive design (pp. 147–157). Springer International.
19.
KevdzijaM.MarquardtG. (2022a). Stroke patients’ nonscheduled activity during inpatient rehabilitation and its relationship with the architectural layout: A multicenter shadowing study. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 29(1), 9–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2020.1871281
20.
KevdzijaM.MarquardtG. (2022b). Impact of distance on stroke inpatients’ mobility in rehabilitation clinics: A shadowing study. Building Research & Information, 50(1-2), 74–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2021.2001302
21.
KevdzijaM.Bozovic-StamenovicR.MarquardtG. (2022). Stroke patients’ free-time activities and spatial preferences during inpatient recovery in rehabilitation centers. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 15(4), 96–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/19375867221113054
22.
KillingtonM.FyfeD.PatchingA.HabibP.McNamaraA.KayR.KochiyilK.CrottyM. (2019). Rehabilitation environments: Service users’ perspective. Health Expectations, 22(3), 396–404. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12859
23.
KurichiJ. E.SmallD. S.BatesB. E.Prvu-BettgerJ. A.KwongP. L.VogelW. B.BidelspachD. E.StinemanM. G. (2009). Possible incremental benefits of specialized rehabilitation bed units among veterans after lower extremity amputation. Medical Care, 47(4), 457–465. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0b013e31818b08c6
24.
LahtinenM.NenonenS.RasilaH.LehteläJ.RuohomäkiV.ReijulaK. (2014). Rehabilitation centers in change: Participatory methods for managing redesign and renovation. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 7(2), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/193758671400700204
25.
LakhaniA.WatersD.DemaS. (2022). Evaluating an inpatient created art installation on perceptions of the physical environment, health status, and rehabilitation motivation. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 15(3), 96–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/19375867211069297
26.
Lipson-SmithR.ChurilovL.NewtonC.ZeemanH.BernhardtJ. (2019). A framework for designing inpatient stroke rehabilitation facilities: A new approach using interdisciplinary value-focused thinking. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 12(4), 142–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/1937586719831450
27.
Medina-MirapeixF.Del Baño-AledoM. E.Oliveira-SousaS. L.Escolar-ReinaP.CollinsS. M. (2013). How the rehabilitation environment influences patient perception of service quality: A qualitative study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 94(6), 1112–1117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2012.11.007
28.
McCluskyJ. F. (2008) Creating engaging experiences for rehabilitation, Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 15(2), 80–86. https://doi.org/10.1310/tsr1502-80
29.
McCunnL. J.GiffordR. (2013). Environmental design in acute care settings: A case study of a neurological rehabilitation unit. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 7(1), 102–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/193758671300700109
30.
NasK.YazmalarL.ŞahV.AydınA.ÖneşK. (2015). Rehabilitation of spinal cord injuries. World Journal of Orthopedics, 6(1), 8–16. https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v6.i1.8
31.
NordinS.SwallA.AnåkerA.von KochL.ElfM. (2021). Does the physical environment matter? A qualitative study of healthcare professionals’ experiences of newly built stroke units. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 16(1), 1917880. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2021.1917880
32.
OrrB.MattsonR.ChambersN.WichrowskiM. (2004). Factors affecting choice of horticultural therapy at the Rusk Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine. Journal of Therapeutic Horticulture, 15, 6–14.
33.
RehnJ.SchusterK. (2017). Clinic design as placebo—Using design to promote healing and support treatments. Behavioral Sciences, 7(4), 77. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs7040077
34.
Ribbe KelsoL.StocktonK.MahendranN.BrauerS. G.RosbergenI. (2024). The influence of communal spaces on patient activity in rehabilitation: A mixed methods study. Disability and Rehabilitation, 46(2), 309–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2022.2160834
35.
RosbergenI. C.GrimleyR. S.HaywardK. S.BrauerS. G. (2019). The impact of environmental enrichment in an acute stroke unit on how and when patients undertake activities. Clinical Rehabilitation, 33(4), 784–795. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215518820087
36.
RosbergenI. C.TonelloI.ClarkR. A.GrimleyR. S. (2022). Does hospital design impact on patient activity levels and time spend alone?Disability and Rehabilitation, 44(13), 3173–3180. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2020.1861117
37.
Skubik-PeplaskiC. L.HowellD.HunterE. (2016). The environmental impact on occupational therapy interventions. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 30(2), 139–151. https://doi.org/10.3109/07380577.2015.1063180
38.
SmithD.MacdonaldJ. (2015). Design as a rehabilitative tool for people with acquired brain injury: Mapping the field. Journal of Interior Design, 40(3), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/joid.12048
39.
Stroke Unit Trialists’ Collaboration. (2013). Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke. Cochrane Database System Review, 9(9), CD000197. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000197.pub3
WestA.JennumP.SimonsenS. ASanderB.PavlovaM.IversenH. K. (2017). Impact of naturalistic lighting on hospitalized stroke patients in a rehabilitation unit: Design and measurement. Chronobiology International, 34(6), 687–697. https://doi.org/10.1080/07420528.2017.1314300
ZaniboniL.Sarey KhanieM.PernigottoG.ToftumJ.GasparellaA.OlesenB. W. (2022). Lighting conditions in physiotherapy centres: A comparative field study. Lighting Research & Technology, 54(4), 377–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/14771535211046521
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
