This research aims to propose a novel methodology for analyzing and optimizing wayfinding in complex environments by examining their spatial configurations.
Background:
Wayfinding difficulties often lead to disorientation and hinder users’ ability to locate destinations. Although architectural design can aid in simplifying user access, existing approaches lack a specific focus on wayfinding optimization despite its significant impact on users’ navigational abilities.
Methods:
In this study, an agent-based model was employed to assess the efficacy of wayfinding in a multistory hospital. Subsequently, the layouts were optimized, leading to the creation of a new space distribution diagram. The simulation was then repeated to examine the potential improvement in wayfinding. Data collection encompassed user types, workflow scenarios, population distribution, and user speed.
Results:
Comparative analysis of the agent-based simulation findings before and after layout optimization revealed a decrease in total distance and time spent on the modified floor plans for all users when compared to the existing layout. This suggests that the optimized layout holds significant potential for enhancing wayfinding performance. Given the positive outcomes observed for users, this approach is particularly well suited for preliminary design stages of complex environments, where designations among user groups are less crucial or flexibility is desired. Additional advantages include the ability to generate a comprehensive simulation of users’ daily workflow, which is integrated into the optimization process and considers specific requirements regarding spatial adjacency.
AksoyE.AydınD.İskifoğluG. (2022). An experimental research on the impact of spatial configurations of complex hospitals on human wayfinding performances. IDA: International Design and Art Journal, 4(2), 235–251.
2.
AtyabiA.MahmoudZadehS.Nefti-MezianiS. (2018). Current advancements on autonomous mission planning and management systems: An AUV and UAV perspective. Annual Reviews in Control, 46, 196–215.
3.
BaskayaA.WilsonC.ÖzcanY. Z. (2004). Wayfinding in an unfamiliar environment: Different spatial settings of two polyclinics. Environment and Behavior, 36(6), 839–867.
4.
BrachmanM. L.ChurchR.AdamsB.BassettD. (2020). Wayfinding during a wildfire evacuation. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 29(3), 249–265.
5.
BubricK.HarveyG.PitamberT. (2021). A user-centered approach to evaluating wayfinding systems in healthcare. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 14(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1937586720959074
6.
ChenM.-S.KoY.-T.HsiehW.-C. (2021). Exploring the planning and configuration of the hospital wayfinding system by space syntax: A case study of Cheng Ching Hospital, Chung Kang Branch in Taiwan. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 10(8), 570.
7.
DevlinA. S. (2014). Wayfinding in healthcare facilities: Contributions from environmental psychology. Behavioral Sciences, 4(4), 423–436.
8.
DorigoM.StützleT. (2019). Ant Colony Optimization: Overview and Recent Advances. Springer.
9.
DubeyR. K.KhooW. P.MoradM. G.HölscherC.KapadiaM. (2020). AUTOSIGN: A multi-criteria optimization approach to computer aided design of signage layouts in complex buildings. Computers & Graphics, 88, 13–23.
10.
DubeyR. K.ThrashT.KapadiaM.HoelscherC.SchinaziV. R. (2021). Information theoretic model to simulate agent-signage interaction for wayfinding. Cognitive Computation, 13, 189–206.
11.
EnsmengerN. (2016). The multiple meanings of a flowchart. Information & Culture, 51(3), 321–351.
12.
FanW.ChenP.ShiD.GuoX.KouL. (2021). Multi-agent modeling and simulation in the AI age. Tsinghua Science and Technology, 26(5), 608–624.
13.
FarrA. C.KleinschmidtT.YarlagaddaP.MengersenK. (2012). Wayfinding: A simple concept, a complex process. Transport Reviews, 32(6), 715–743.
14.
FriesenM. R.McLeodR. D. (2014). A survey of agent-based modeling of hospital environments. IEEE Access, 2, 227–233.
15.
GargA.DewanA. (2022). Manual of hospital planning and designing for medical administrators, architects and planners (1st ed.). Springer.
16.
GreenroydF. L.HaywardR.PriceA.DemianP.SharmaS. (2016). Using evidence-based design to improve pharmacy department efficiency. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 10(1), 130–143.
17.
GuoW.HeY. (2022). Optimized wayfinding signage positioning in hospital built environment through medical data and flows simulations. Buildings, 12(9), 1426.
18.
HuangC. Y.ZhangG. J.YaoJ. W.WangX. X.CalautitJ. K.ZhaoC. R.AnN.PengX. (2022). Accelerated environmental performance-driven urban design with generative adversarial network. Building and Environment, 224, 109575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109575
19.
IftikharH.LuximonY. (2023). Wayfinding information syntheses: A study of wayfinding efficiency and behavior in complex outdoor institutional environment. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 16(2), 250–267.
20.
IftikharH.ShahP.LuximonY. (2021). Human wayfinding behaviour and metrics in complex environments: A systematic literature review. Architectural Science Review, 64(5), 452–463.
21.
JamshidiS.EnsafiM.PatiD. (2020). Wayfinding in interior environments: An integrative review. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 549628.
22.
JamshidiS.PatiD. (2023). Identifying environmental elements and attributes that contribute to indoor wayfinding: An exploratory study utilizing think-aloud protocol. Journal of Interior Design. https://doi.org/10.1177/10717641231207031
23.
KhasraghiG. S. (2020). Developing a multi-agent based simulation model of users’ wayfinding as a representation and PostOccupancy Evaluation (POE) tool in a hospital. Prometheus, 4, 102–105.
24.
LehmannJ.LoberA.HäußermannT.RacheA.OllingerL.BaumgärtelH.ReichwaldJ. (2023). The anatomy of the internet of digital twins: A symbiosis of agent and digital twin paradigms enhancing resilience (not only) in manufacturing environments. Machines, 11(5), 504.
25.
MaS.LiX.CaiY. (2017). Delimiting the urban growth boundaries with a modified ant colony optimization model. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 62, 146–155.
26.
MadsonM.GoodwinK. (2021). Color coding the “labyrinth”: How staff perceived a two-part intervention to improve wayfinding in an adult emergency department. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 14(4), 429–441.
27.
MaruyamaT.KanaiS.DateH.TadaM. (2017). Simulation-based evaluation of ease of wayfinding using digital human and as-is environment models. ISPRS: International Journal of Geo-Information, 6(9), 267.
28.
MarzbanF.AjdariA.Zohari AnboohiS.PakzadY. (2021). Investigating the role of expansive design and service design in improving healthy food consumption, case study; consuming vegetables. Journal of Design Thinking, 2(2), 277–292.
29.
MoragI.HeylighenA.PintelonL. (2016). Evaluating the inclusivity of hospital wayfinding systems for people with diverse needs and abilities. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 21(4), 243–248.
30.
NejatA.DamnjanovicI. (2012). Agent-based modeling of behavioral housing recovery following disasters. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 27(10), 748–763.
31.
NeufertE.NeufertP. (2012). Architects’ data. John Wiley & Sons.
32.
OnggoB. S.KaratasM. (2016). Test-driven simulation modelling: A case study using agent-based maritime search-operation simulation. European Journal of Operational Research, 254(2), 517–531.
33.
PatiD.HarveyT. E.JrWillisD. A.PatiS. (2015). Identifying elements of the health care environment that contribute to wayfinding. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 8(3), 44–67.
34.
RaubalM. (2001). Ontology and epistemology for agent-based wayfinding simulation. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 15(7), 653–665.
35.
RouxT. (2020). Users’ experience of digital wayfinding screens: A uses and gratification perspective from South Africa. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, 2020, 7636150.
36.
RussellS.NorvigP. (2003). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (2nd ed.). Prentice Hall.
37.
SchaumannD.BreslavS.GoldsteinR.KhanA.KalayY. E. (2017). Simulating use scenarios in hospitals using multi-agent narratives. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 10(5-6), 636–652.
38.
Schrom-FeiertagH.StubenschrottM.RegalG.SchrammelJ.SettgastV. (2016). Using cognitive agent-based simulation for the evaluation of indoor wayfinding systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.02459. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1611.02459
39.
SilvermanE.GostoliU.PicasciaS.AlmagorJ.McCannM.ShawR.AngioneC. (2021). Situating agent-based modelling in population health research. Emerging Themes in Epidemiology, 18, 1–15.
40.
SjoukemaJ.-W.SamiaJ.BregtA. K.CrompvoetsJ. (2021). Governance interactions of spatial data infrastructures: An agent-based modelling approach. International Journal of Digital Earth, 14(6), 696–713.
41.
SloneE.BurlesF.RobinsonK.LevyR. M.IariaG. (2015). Floor plan connectivity influences wayfinding performance in virtual environments. Environment and Behavior, 47(9), 1024–1053.
42.
SokhansefatG.DelavarM.Banedj-SchafiiM. (2012). Multi-agent simulation of wayfinding for rescue operation during building fire. International Journal of Computer and Information Engineering, 6(12), 1727–1735.
43.
TorrensP. M. (2012). Moving agent pedestrians through space and time. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 102(1), 35–66.
VeeraswamyA. (2011). Computational modelling of agent based path planning and the representation of human wayfinding behaviour within Egress models. University of Greenwich.
46.
VizzariG.CrocianiL.BandiniS. (2020). An agent-based model for plausible wayfinding in pedestrian simulation. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 87, 103241.
47.
WangY.GeJ.ComberA. (2022). An agent-based simulation model of pedestrian evacuation based on Bayesian Nash Equilibrium. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.14260. https://doi.org/10.18564/jasss.5037
48.
ZamaniZ. (2019). Effects of emergency department physical design elements on security, wayfinding, visibility, privacy, and efficiency and its implications on staff satisfaction and performance. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 12(3), 72–88.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
