To explore factors affecting the quality of child–nature interaction (CNI) based on the views and desires of children themselves and to offer solutions and strategies to provide this kind of spaces.
Background:
CNI is one of the most important needs of children which causes very profound effects on the psyche of children from different aspects. Space and context that have the ability and characteristics to provide opportunities to establish this interaction have an important role in the cognitive and social development of children.
Methods:
The qualitative data were collected by draw-and-write technique from a study of 119 children aged 2–6 years from five nursery schools located in the city of Hamedan, Iran. Then, the qualitative data were coded based on the grounded theory using three main steps of open, axial, and selective coding and a conceptual model of CNI is provided by the MAXQDA software.
Results:
The conceptual model developed from CNI consisted of seven core categories: “intertwining with nature,” “objective natural elements,” “nature conservation,” “colors,” “exaggerated plant perceptions,” “path perceptions,” and “nature-home similarity.”
Conclusions:
To reach an optimal CNI within architectural spaces, thus children should have a sense of belonging to nature, be engaged in it, and protect surrounding natural elements. It is of utmost importance to reflect on some points, such as colors, familiar signs, scales, natural elements, the boundary between natural environments and interior spaces, and natural element circulation and placement in designing and planning spaces made specifically for children.
BarnettE.FrancisV.de KonigK.ShaverT. (1994). Drawing and dialogue. The Learning Resources Group, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine.
2.
BartoshO.Mayer-SmithJ.PeteratL. (2006). Informal science learning on the farm: Teachers’ and students’ experiences in a long-term environmental education project. National Association for Research in Science Teaching.
3.
BellA. C.DymentJ. E. (2008). Grounds for health: The intersection of green school grounds and health-promoting schools. Environmental Education Research, 14(1), 77–90.
4.
BraddingA.HorstmanM. (1999). Using the write and draw technique with children. European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 3(3), 170–175.
5.
BrowningM. H.MarionJ. L.GregoireT. G. (2013). Sustainably connecting children with nature—An exploratory study of nature play area visitor impacts and their management. Landscape and Urban Planning, 119(2), 104–112.
6.
BurdetteH. L.WhitakerR. C. (2005). Resurrecting free play in young children: Looking beyond fitness and fatness to attention, affiliation and affect. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 159(1), 46–50.
7.
ChawlaL.KeenaK.PevecI.StanleyE. (2014). Green schoolyards as havens from stress and resources for resilience in childhood and adolescence. Health & Place, 28(1), 1–13.
8.
ChristensenP.O’BrienM. (Eds.). (2003). Children in the city: Home neighborhood and community. Routledge.
9.
ClementsR. (2004). An investigation of the status of outdoor play. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 5(1), 68–80.
10.
CorbinJ. M.StraussA. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3–21.
11.
CreswellJ. W.PothC. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage.
12.
DopkoR. L.CapaldiC. A.ZelenskiJ. M. (2019). The psychological and social benefits of a nature experience for children: A preliminary investigation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 63, 134–138.
13.
EiserC. (2012). The psychology of childhood illness. Springer Science & Business Media.
14.
Faber TaylorA.KuoF. E. (2011). Could exposure to everyday green spaces help treat ADHD? Evidence from children’s play settings. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 3(3), 281–303.
15.
FahyF.CinnéideM. Ó. (2008). Developing and testing an operational framework for assessing quality of life. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 28(6), 366–379.
16.
FernandezW. D. (2004). The grounded theory method and case study data in is research: Issues and design. In HartD. N.GregorS. D. (Eds.), Information systems foundations: Constructing and criticising (pp. 43–59). ANU EPress.
17.
FlouriE.MidouhasE.JoshiH. (2014). The role of urban neighbourhood green space in children’s emotional and behavioural resilience. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 179–186.
18.
GapinJ.EtnierJ. L. (2010). The relationship between physical activity and executive function performance in children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 32(6), 753–763.
19.
GibsonJ. J. (2014). The ecological approach to visual perception: Classic edition. Psychology Press.
20.
GiffordR. (2007). Environmental psychology: Principles and practice (p. 372). Optimal Books.
21.
GiffordR. (2016). Research methods for environmental psychology. John Wiley.
22.
HarveyC.HallamJ.RichardsonM.WellsR. (2020). The good things children notice in nature: An extended framework for reconnecting children with nature. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 49, 126573.
23.
HorstmanM.AldissS.RichardsonA.GibsonF. (2008). Methodological issues when using the draw and write technique with children aged 6 to 12 years. Qualitative Health Research, 18(7), 1001–1011.
24.
KeelerR. (2008). Natural playscapes: Creating outdoor play environments for the soul. Exchange Press.
25.
KellertS. R. (1995). The biophilia hypothesis. Island Press.
26.
KellertS. R. (2006). Building for life: Designing and understanding the human-nature connection. Renewable Resources Journal, 24(2), 8.
27.
KobusD. (2005). Development and testing of a conceptual framework for assessment of progress towards achieving sustainable development in countries in transition. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 7(3), 457–491.
28.
KopecD. A. (2018). Environmental psychology for design. Bloomsbury.
29.
KorpelaK. (2002). Children’s environment. In BechtelR. B.ChurchmanA. (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 363–373). John Wiley.
30.
KuoF. E.Faber TaylorA. (2004). A potential natural treatment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: evidence from a national study. American journal of public health, 94(9), 1580–1586.
31.
KyttäM. (2003). Children in outdoor contexts: Affordances and independent mobility in the assessment of environmental child friendliness. Helsinki University of Technology.
32.
LawrenceR. J. (1982). A psychological—Spatial approach for architectural design and research. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2(1), 37–51.
33.
LouvR. (2005). Last child in the woods: Saving our children from nature-deficit disorder. Algonquin.
34.
MachoverK. (1949). Personality projection in the drawing of the human figure: A method of personality investigation. In MachoverK. (Ed.), Personality projection in the drawing of the human figure: A method of personality investigation (pp. 3–32). Charles C. Thomas.
35.
McAndrewF. T. (1993). Environmental psychology. Thomson Brooks/Cole.
36.
McDevittT. M.OrmrodJ. E.CupitG.ChandlerM.AloaV. (2010). Child development and education. Merrill.
37.
McLachlanF. (2013). Architectural colour in the professional palette. Routledge.
38.
McWhirterJ. (2014). The draw and write technique as a versatile tool for researching children’s understanding of health and well-being. International Journal of Health Promotion and Education, 52(5), 250–259.
39.
MillardN. M. (2015). Cultural entropy: A grounded theory study of early childhood experiences in nature in the Arroyo Grande Creek watershed. Utah State University.
40.
MooreR. C.WongH. H. (1997). Natural learning: The life history of an environmental schoolyard. MIG Communications.
41.
MuellerM. A.FlouriE. (2020). Neighbourhood greenspace and children’s trajectories of self-regulation: Findings from the UK Millennium Cohort Study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 71, 101472.
42.
Natural Learning Initiative. (2012). Benefits of connecting children with nature: Why naturalize outdoor learning environments. College of Design, North Carolina State University.
43.
ParrishD.PhillipsG.LevineR.HikawaH.GaertnerM.AgostaN.DoyalD. ( 2005). Effects of outdoor education programs for children in California. American Institute for Research.
44.
PyleR. (2002). Eden in a vacant lot: Special places, species and kids in community of life. In KahnP. H. (Ed.), Children and nature: Psychological, sociocultural and evolutionary investigations (pp. 305–327). MIT Press.
45.
RogersM. R.WitzelC.RhodesP.FranklinA. (2020). Color constancy and color term knowledge are positively related during early childhood. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 196, 104825.
46.
RustinM. (2016). Grounded theory methods in child psychotherapy research. Journal of Child Psychotherapy, 42(2), 179–197.
47.
SebastianK. (2019). Distinguishing between the strains grounded theory: Classical, interpretive and constructivist. Journal for Social Thought, 3(1), 1–9.
48.
ServiceR. W. (2009). Book Review: Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Organizational Research Methods, 12(3), 614–617.
49.
SharpeD. T. (1974). The psychology of color and design. Nelson-Hall.
50.
SogaM.GastonK. J. (2016). Extinction of experience: The loss of human–nature interactions. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 14(2), 94–101.
51.
StoughL. M.LeeS. (2021). Grounded theory approaches used in educational research journals. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211052203
52.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1994). Grounded theory methodology: An overview. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 273–285). Sage.
53.
TamoutseliN.PolyzouE. (2010). Using drawings to assess children’s perceptions of schoolyard environment: A case study of a primary school in drama, Greece. Flora, 22(1), 5–8.
54.
TaylorA. F.Butts-WilmsmeyerC. (2020). Self-regulation gains in kindergarten related to frequency of green schoolyard use. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 70, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101440.
55.
TaylorA. F.KuoF. E.SullivanW. C. (2001). Coping with ADD: The surprising connection to green play settings. Environment and Behavior, 33(1), 54–77.
56.
ThygesenM.EngemannK.HolstG. J.HansenB.GeelsC.BrandtJ.PedersenC. B.DalsgaardS. (2020). The association between residential green space in childhood and development of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: A population-based cohort study. Environmental Health Perspectives, 128(12), 127011.
57.
UlsetV.VitaroF.BrendgenM.BekkhusM.BorgeA. I. (2017). Time spent outdoors during preschool: Links with children’s cognitive and behavioral development. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 52, 69–80.
58.
Van LiempdI. H.Oudgenoeg-PazO.LesemanP. P. (2020). Do spatial characteristics influence behavior and development in early childhood education and care?Journal of Environmental Psychology, 67, 101385.
59.
WellsN. M. (2000). At home with nature: Effects of “greenness” on children’s cognitive functioning. Environment and Behavior, 32(6), 775–795.
60.
WellsN. M.EvansG. W. (2003). Nearby nature: A buffer of life stress among rural children. Environment and Behavior, 35(3), 311–330.
61.
WettonN. M.McWhirterJ. (1998). Images and curriculum development in health education. In ProsserJ. (Ed.), Image-based research: A sourcebook for qualitative researchers (pp. 263–283). Routledge.
62.
WhiteM. P.PahlS.WheelerB. W.DepledgeM. H.FlemingL. E. (2017). Natural environments and subjective wellbeing: Different types of exposure are associated with different aspects of wellbeing. Health & Place, 45, 77–84.
63.
WilsonE. O. (1984). Biophilia. Harvard University Press.
64.
YilmazF.KahramanA. D. (2015). Science and nature perception in the images and pictures of the children. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, 650–658.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
