BerryL.ParkerD.CoileR.HamiltonD. K.O’NeillD. D.SadlerB. L., (2004). The business case for better buildings. Frontiers of Health Services Management, 21, 3–24.
3.
BrowningW. D.KallianpurkarN.RyanC. O.LabrutoL.WatsonS.KnopT. (2012). The economics of biophilia. New York, NY: Terrapin Bright Green.
4.
CooperMarcus C.SachsN. A. (2014). Therapeutic landscapes: An evidence-based approach to designing healing gardens and restorative outdoor spaces. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
DannenbergA.BurpeeH. (2018). Architecture for health is not just for healthcare architects. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 11, 8–12.
7.
FrumkinH.BratmanG. N.BreslowS. J.CochranB.KahnP. H.JrLawlerJ. J.…WoodS. A. (2017). Nature contact and human health: A research agenda. Environmental Health Perspectives, 125, 075001. http://doi.org/10.1289/EHP1663
KnezevicI.MountP.ClementC. (2016). Shared opportunities on institutional lands: On-site food production, its benefits, barriers, and opportunities. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 10, 144–154.
RazaniN.MorshedS.KohnM. A.WellsN. M.ThompsonD.AlqassariM.…RutherfordG. W. (2018). Effect of park prescriptions with and without group visits to parks on stress reduction in low-income parents: SHINE randomized trial. PLoS one, 13, e0192921.
WattsA.WolfK.GradoS. C.MeasellsM. (2018). Nearby nature—A cost-effective prescription for better community health? In Science findings 203 (p. 5). Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research StationRetrieved fromhttps://www.fs.fed.us/pnw/sciencef/scifi203.pdf.