Barriers to Healthcare Participation in Persons With Disabilities in Appalachia: A Qualitative Pilot Study

Abstract

Objectives:

A study exploring facility-related barriers to healthcare participation (the level to which an individual is engaged or involved in their own healthcare activities from simply keeping appointments to following treatment regimens) in persons with disabilities in Appalachia from the perspectives of four stakeholder groups, (1) adults with disabilities, (2) caregivers of persons with disabilities, (3) advocates for persons with disabilities, and (4) providers who treat persons with disabilities.

Background:

Persons with disabilities potentially face additional barriers to healthcare participation than those without disabilities. Understanding and addressing the barriers to participation could assist in improving healthcare outcomes among the disabled population.

Methods:

A qualitative study was conducted involving scripted focus groups with four stakeholder groups with expertise/experience in disabilities. The objective was to assess perceptions of impacts of clinical design elements on healthcare participation.

Results:

Participants identified and characterized six major categories of facility- and nonfacility-related barriers they felt impacted healthcare participation, with priority differences reported between each group.

Conclusions:

The healthcare facility is perhaps the most visible tool the provider has at his or her disposal to deliver effective healthcare. Understanding the interactions persons with different disabilities have with the physical facility and the messages, both intentional and unintentional, the state of the facility sends can provide useful insights into delivering more effective healthcare to this population.

Keywords

rural health facility design focus groups Appalachia patient participation in healthcare provider awareness flexibility of space

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Birks

Chapman

Francis

(2008). Memoing in qualitative research: Probing data and processes. Journal of Research in Nursing, 13, 68–75. doi:10.1177/1744987107081254

Brems

Johnson

M. E.

Warner

T. D.

Weiss Roberts

(2006). Barriers to healthcare as reported by rural and urban interprofessional providers. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 20, 105–118. doi:10.1080/13561820600622208

Drum

C. E.

Horner-Johnson

Walsh

E. S.

(2012). Construction and validation of the Outpatient Health Care Usability Profile (OHCUP). Disability and Health Journal, 5, 292–297. doi:10.1016/j.dhjo.2012.08.001

Haddox

J. C.

(2017). Impact of design on patient participation in healthcare in a rural health clinic in Appalachia. Health Environments Research and Design, 11, 31–39. doi:10.1177/19375867176996701

Healthcare Access in Rural Communities (2016). Retrieved from: https://www.ruralhealthinfo.org/topics/healthcare-access

Krahn

G. L.

Klein Walker

Correa-De-Araujo

(2015). Persons with disabilities as an unrecognized health disparity population. American Journal of Public Health, 105, S198–S206. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2014.302182

Kroll

Jones

G. C.

Kehn

Neri

M. T.

(2006). Barriers and strategies affecting the utilisation of primary preventative services for people with physical disabilities: A qualitative inquiry. Health and Social Care in the Community, 14, 284–293. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2524.2006.00613.x

Kvale

Brinkmann

(2009). Interviews. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Long

J. M.

Sowell

Bairan

Holtz

Curtis

A. B.

Fogarty

K. J.

(2012). Exploration of commonalities and variations in health-related beliefs across four Latino subgroups using focus group methodology: Implications in care for Latinos with type 2 diabetes. Journal of Cultural Diversity, 19, 133–142.

10.

Mayring

(2000). Qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Social Research Forum, 1, article 20. Retrieved from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1089/2385%3E

11.

Millman

(Ed.). (1993). Access to health care in America. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

12.

Morgan

D. L.

(1997). Focus groups as qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

13.

Mudrick

N. R.

Schwartz

M. A.

(2010). Healthcare under the ADA: A vision or a mirage? Disability and Health Journal, 3, 233–239. doi:10.1016/j.dhjo.2010.07.002

14.

Oelke

N. D.

Thurston

W. E.

Arthur

(2013). Intersections between interprofessional practice, cultural competency and primary healthcare. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 27, 367–372. doi:10.3109/13561820.2013.785502

15.

Pharr

J. R.

Bungum

(2012). Health disparities experienced by people with disabilities in the United States: A behavioral risk factor surveillance system study. Global Journal of Health Science, 4, 99–108. doi:10.5539/gjhs.v4n6p99

16.

Raymaker

D. M.

Mcdonald

K. E.

Ashkenazy

Gerrity

Baggs

A. M.

Kripke

Nicolaidis

(2016). Barriers to healthcare: Instrument development and comparison between autistic adults and adults with and without other disabilities. Autism, 21, 972–984. doi:10.1177/1362361316661261

17.

Reiling

Hughes

R. G.

Murphy

M. R.

(2008). The impact of facility design on patient safety. In Hughes

R. G.

(Ed.), Patient safety and quality: An evidence-based handbook for nurses. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK2633

18.

U.S. Census Bureau, Public Information Office. (2016). Nearly 1 in 5 people have a disability in the U.S, Census bureau reports. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/miscellaneous/cb12-134.html

19.

U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division. (2009). A guide to disability rights laws. Retrieved from https://www.ada.gov/cguide.htm

20.

Vickery

C. G.

Nyberg

Whiteaker

(Eds.). (2015). Front matter, in modern clinic design: Strategies for an era of change. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley. doi:10.1002/9781119149675.fmatter