BoothA.SuttonA.PapaioannouD. (2016). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
2.
Campbell Collaboration. (2017). Methodological Expectations of Cochrane Collaboration Intervention Reviews (MEC2IR)[updated on September 2014]. Author. Retrieved fromhttps://www.campbellcollaboration.org/MEC2IR.html
3.
FosterM. J. (2013). Introduction to systematic reviews for healthcare design. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 7(1), 143–154.
4.
FosterM. J.JewellS. T. (2017). Assembling the pieces of a systematic review: Guide for librarians. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
5.
GoughD.ThomasJ.OliverS. (2012). Clarifying differences between review designs and methods. Systematic Reviews, 1(28), 1.
6.
HigginsJ. P. TGreenS. (Eds.). (2011). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration. Retrieved fromwww.handbook.cochrane.org
7.
HigginsJ. P. T.LassersonT.ChandlerJ.ToveyD.ChurchillR. (2017). Methodological Expectations of Cochrane Intervention Reviews (MECIR): Standards for the conduct and reporting of new Cochrane Intervention Reviews, reporting of protocols and the planning, conduct and reporting of updates [updated July 2017]. The Cochrane Collaboration. Retrieved fromhttp://methods.cochrane.org/mecir
8.
SheaB. J.ReevesB. C.WellsG.ThukuM.HamelC.MoranJ.…HenryD. A (2017). AMSTAR 2: A critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. British Medical Journal, 358, 1–8.
9.
WhitingP.SavovićJ.HigginsJ. P. T.CaldwellD. M.ReevesB. C.SheaB., … ChurchillR. (2016). ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 69, 225–234.