Demystifying the Peer-Review Process for HERD

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Association of University Presses. (2016). AAUP handbook: Best practices for peer review. New York, NY: Author.

American Psychological Association [APA]. (2009). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, 6th Edition. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Committee on Publication Ethics. (2013). COPE ethical guidelines for peer reviewers. London, UK: Author.

Dipboye

(2006). Peer reviews in the production of knowledge: Why I stopped worrying and learned to appreciate the flaws in the review process. In Baruch

Sullivan

Schepmyer

(Eds.), Winning reviews: A guide for evaluating scholarly writing (pp. 3–26). Bashstoke, England: Palgrave MacMillan.

Lovejoy

T. I.

Revenson

T. A.

France

C. R.

(2011). Reviewing manuscripts for peer-review journals: A primer for novice and seasoned reviewers. Annuals of Behavioral Medicine, 42, 1–13.

Shirey

M. R.

(2012). Giving and receiving feedback. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 43, 243–244.

Stichler

J. F.

(2011). Peer review and the development of a science. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 4, 44–49. doi:10.1177/193758671100400304

Yoder-Wise

P. S.

(2013). On reviewing well. Nurse Author & Editor, 23, 1–3.