To examine the impact of spatial enclosures on social interaction between older adults with early stage dementia and young children.
Background:
Intergenerational interaction through meaningful activities can promote positive affects and behaviors of children and older adults. The development of social interaction is closely related to the physical environment in association with personal competence of older adults with dementia and young children. However, minimal attention has been given to the role of physical environment in influencing intergenerational interaction.
Methods:
A quasi-experiment examined the functional relationship between the amount of spatial enclosure and the types of social behaviors of older adults with dementia and young children. Semi-structured interviews, aided by a photographic simulation, were developed to explore the participants’ perceptions of and experiences with the different degrees of spatial enclosure.
Results:
Findings showed that the semienclosed spatial plan impacted both prosocial and antisocial behaviors of older adults with dementia in their interactions with young children. This apparent discrepancy was associated with two conflicting perceptions: a sense of openness and the lack of control due to distraction created by the loose visual boundary. There was no correlation between the elder-child neutral behaviors and the degrees of spatial enclosure.
Conclusion:
This study suggests that spaces with moderate openness without visual and acoustic distraction are the most desirable to promote prosocial behaviors of older adults with dementia and young children. Additionally, elder-child prosocial behaviors were likely facilitated by specific design features such as adequate personal space, the perception of openness, and possible spaces that provide both prospect and refuge in relation to spatial enclosure.
CampC. J.LeeM. M. (2011). Montessori-based activities as a transgenerational interface for persons with dementia and preschool children. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 9, 366–373.
2.
Clarke-StewartA.GruberC. (1984). Day care forms and features. In AinslieR. C. (Ed.), Quality variations in day care (pp. 35–62). New York, NY: Praeger.
3.
CohenU.WeismanG. D. (1991). Holding on to home: Designing environments for people with dementia. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
DavisA. (2003). Educational implications. In SlaterA.BremnerG. (Eds.), An introduction to developmental psychology (pp. 415–433). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
6.
DayK.CarreonD.StumpC. (2000). The therapeutic design of environments for people with dementia: A review of the empirical research. The Gerontologist, 40, 397–416.
7.
EvansG. W. (2006). Child development and the physical environment. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 423–451.
8.
EvansG. W.RicciutiH. N.HopeS.SchoonI.BradleyR. H.CorwynR. F.HazanC. (2010). Crowding and cognitive development: The mediating role of maternal responsiveness among 36-month-old children. Environment and Behavior, 42, 135–148.
FieldT. M. (1980). Preschool play: Effect of teacher/child ratios and organization of classroom space. Child Study Journal, 10, 191–205.
11.
FosterK. (1997). Creating a child care center in a nursing home and implementing an intergenerational program. Retrieved from ERIC database (ED411053).
12.
GalbraithB.LarkinH.MoorhouseA.OomenT. (2015). Intergenerational programs for persons with dementia: A scoping review. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 58, 357–378. doi:10.1080/01634372.2015.1008166
13.
GumpP. V. (1987). School and classroom environments. In StokolsD.AltmanI. (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology: Vol. 1 (pp. 691–732). New York, NY: John Wiley.
14.
HayesC. L. (2003). An observational study in developing an intergenerational shared site program: Challenges and insights. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 1, 113–131.
15.
HowesC. (1983). Caregiver behavior in center and family day care. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 4, 99–107.
16.
JarrottS. E.BrunoK. (2003). Intergenerational activities involving persons with dementia: An observational assessment. American Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease and Other Dementias, 18, 31–37.
17.
KaplanM.HaiderJ.CohenU.TurnerD. (2007). Environmental design perspectives on intergenerational programs and practices: An emergent conceptual framework. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 5, 81–110.
18.
KrishefC. H. (1991). Fundamental approaches to single subject design and analysis. Malabar, FL: Krieger Publishing Company.
19.
KuehneV. S. (Ed.). (1999). Intergenerational programs: Understanding what we have created. New York, NY: The Haworth Press.
20.
LaikeT. (1997). The impact of daycare environments on children’s mood and behavior. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 38, 209–218.
21.
LarsonC. S.GreenfieldP. M.LandD. (1990). Physical environment and child behavior in Vienna kindergartens. Children’s Environments Quarterly, 7, 37–43.
22.
LawtonM. P. (1990). Methods in environmental research with older people. In BechtelR. B.MaransR. W.MichelsonW. (Eds.), Methods in environmental and behavioral research (pp. 337–360). Malabar, FL: Robert E. Krieger Publishing Company.
23.
LawtonM. P. (1999). Environmental design features and the well-being of older persons. In DuffyM. (Ed.), Handbook of counseling and psychotherapy with older adults (pp. 350–365). New York, NY: John Wiley.
24.
LegendreA. (1999). Interindividual relationships in groups of young children and susceptibility to an environmental constraint. Environment and Behavior, 31, 463–486.
25.
LegendreA. (2003). Environmental features influencing toddlers’ bioemotional reactions in day care centers. Environment and Behavior, 35, 523–549.
26.
LegendreA.FontaineA. M. (1991). The effects of visual boundaries in two year old’s playroom. Children Environments Quarterly, 8, 2–16.
27.
MarquardtG.BueterK.MotzekT. (2014). Impact of the design of the built environment on people with dementia: An evidence-based review. Health Environments Research & Design, 8, 127–157.
28.
MaxwellL. E. (2007). Competency in child care settings: The role of the physical environment. Environment and Behavior, 39, 229–245.
29.
MooreG. T. (1986). Effects of the spatial definition of behavior settings on children’s behavior: A quasi-experimental field study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 6, 205–231.
30.
MooreG. T. (1994). Early childhood physical environment observation schedules and rating scales(Tech. Rep. No. 94-2). Milwaukee, WI: University of Wisconsin, School of Architecture and Urban Planning.
31.
MooreK. D.VerhoefR. (1999). Special care units as places for social interaction: Evaluating an SCU’s social affordance. American Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 14, 217–229.
32.
NeillS. R. (1982). Experimental alterations in playroom layout and their effect on staff and child behaviour. Educational Psychology, 2, 103–119.
33.
NeillS. R.DenhamE. J. (1982). The effects of preschool building design. Educational Research, 24, 107–111.
34.
NewmanS.WardC. R.SmithT. B.WilsonJ. O.McCreaJ. M. (1997). (Eds.), Intergenerational programs: Past, present, and future. Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis.
35.
PrescottE. (1987). The environment as organizer of intent in child-care settings. In WeinsteinC.DavidT. (Eds.), Spaces for children (pp. 73–87). New York, NY: Plenum.
36.
ReadM. A.SugawaraA. L.BrandtJ. A. (1999). Impact of space and color in the physical environment on preschool children’s cooperative behavior. Environment and Behavior, 31, 413–428.
37.
ReisbergB.FerrisS.de LeonM.CrookT. (1982). The global deterioration scale fro assessment for primary degenerative dementia. American Journal of Psychiatry, 139, 1136–1139.
38.
RichardsJ. E. (2003). The development of visual attention and the brain. In De HaanM.JohnsonM. H. (Eds.), The cognitive neuroscience of development (pp. 73–98). East Sussex, England: Psychology Press.
39.
RodiekS. D.FriedJ. T. (2005). Access to the outdoors: Using photographic comparison to assess preferences of assisted living residents. Landscape and Urban Planning, 73, 184–199.
40.
RosenbergM. (1993). The design and implementation of an intergenerational program at a private long-term healthcare facility with on-site childcare. Retrieved from ERIC database (ED364351).
41.
SeoM. (2006). Therapeutic and developmental design: The relationship between spatial enclosure and impaired elder-child social interaction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
42.
SheppardS. R. (1989). Visual simulation: A user’s guide for architects, engineers, and planners. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
43.
SiegelS.CastellanN. J. (1988). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
44.
ZieglerS.AndrewsH. F. (1990). Children and built environments: A review of methods for environmental research and design. In BechtelR. B.MaransR. W.MichelsonW. (Eds.), Methods in environmental and behavioral research (pp. 301–336). Malabar, FL: Robert E. Krieger Publishing Company.
