Space Planners' Perception of an Assessment Instrument for Briefs in the Pre-Design Phase of New Healthcare Environments

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

The main purpose of the study was to investigate the usability of a newly developed instrument designed to assess the content and quality briefs (CQB-I) in programs for new healthcare environments. We studied the perception of using the instrument on a group of space planners.

BACKGROUND:

The study is part of a larger project designed to ensure the quality of the planning of new healthcare environments with a focus on documents (programs or briefs) created in the early phases of the planning process. In this study, we used an instrument that measures the clarity of the mission statement for the project based on user needs and care activities that will take place in the new healthcare environment. The instrument further evaluates whether there are clear patient-related outcome measures specified and whether the information in the documents is person-oriented and evidence-based.

METHODS:

The study used a mixed-method design where the relevance and usability of the instrument was estimated and a focus group interview was conducted.

RESULTS:

The study showed that a CQB-I is perceived to be a relevant instrument primarily as a guide for programming, but also for monitoring the produced programs.

CONCLUSIONS:

Instruments like CQB-I can help to bring research results into planning and contribute to dialogue and collaboration in the early phases of a planning process by orienting planning participants to user needs and facilitating the discussion and articulation of clear performance indicators.

Keywords

Design process evidence-based design outcomes planning project management

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baird

(2001). Post-occupancy evaluation and probe: A New Zealand perspective. Building Research & Information, 29(6), 469–472.

Barrett

, & Baldery

(2003). Facilities management: Towards best practice. Oxford, England: Blackwell Science.

Barrett

, & Stanley

(1999). Better construction briefing. Oxford, England: Blackwell Science.

Barrett

P. S.

Hudson

, & Stanley

(1999). Good practice in briefing: The limits of rationality. Automation in Construction, 8(6), 633–642.

Becker

, & Parson

S. K.

(2007). Hospital facilities and the role of evidence-based design. Journal of Facility Management, 5(4), 263–274.

Blyth

, & Worthington

(2001). Managing the brief for better design. London, England: Spoon Press.

Creswell

J. W.

, & Tashakkori

(2007). Developing publishable mixed methods manuscripts. Journal of Mixed Methods, 1, 107–111.

Curtis

Gesler

Priebe

, & Francis

(2009). New spaces of inpatient care for people with mental illness: A complex ‘rebirth’ of the clinic? Health & Place, 15(1), 340–348.

Elf

, & Malmqvist

(2009). An audit of content and quality in briefs in Sweden. Journal of Facility Management, 7(3), 198–211.

10.

Elf

Svedbo Engström

, & Wijk

(2011). Development of the content and quality in briefs instrument (CQB-I). Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 5(3), 74–88.

11.

Elf

Svedbo Engström

, & Wijk

(2012). An assessment of briefs used for designing healthcare environments: A survey in Sweden. Construction Management and Economics, 30(10), 835–844.

12.

Gesler

Bell

Curtis

Hubbard

, & Francis

(2004). Therapy by design: Evaluating the UK hospital building program. Health & Place, 10(2), 117–128.

13.

Graneheim

, & Lundman

(2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24(2), 105–112.

14.

Henriksen

Isaacson

Sadler

B. L.

, & Zimring

C. M.

(2007). The role of the physical environment in crossing the quality chasm. The Joint Commission Journai on Quality and Patient Safety, 33(11 Suppl), 68–80.

15.

Huisman

E. R. C. M.

Morales

van Hoof

, & Kort

H. S. M.

(2012, December). Healing environment: A review of the impact of physical environmental factors on users. Building and Environment, 58, 70–80.

16.

Kelly

, and Hunter

(2005). Briefing from facilities management perspective. Facilities, 23(7/8), 356–367.

17.

Morse

, & Niehaus

(2007). Combining qualitative and quantitative methods for mixed method designs. In Munhall

(Ed.), Nursing research: A qualitative perspective (4th ed.)(pp. 541–554). Boston, MA: Jones & Bartlett.

18.

Polit

D. F.

, & Beck

C. T.

(2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing and Health, 29(5), 489–497.

19.

Preiser

(1995). Post-occupancy evaluation: How to make buildings work better. Facilities, 13(11), 19–28.

20.

Preiser

, & Vischer

(2005). Assessing building performance. London, England: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann.

21.

Rybkowski

Z. K.

(2009). The application of root cause analysis and target value design to evidence-based design in the capital planning of healthcare facilities. (Dissertation). University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA. ProQuest, UMI Dissertation Publishing.

22.

Ryd

(2001). Byggnadsbrief som informationsbärare i byggprocessen. En studie av byggnadsbriefmering. [The architectural brief as carrier of client-information during the building process.] Göteborg, Sweden: Chalmers University of Technology.

23.

Ryd

, & Fristedt

(2007). Transforming strategic briefing into project briefs. A case study about client and contractor collaboration. Facilities, 25(5/6), 185–202.

24.

Steinke

Webster

, & Fontaine

(2010). Evaluating building performance in healthcare facilities: An organizational perspective. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 3(2), 63–83.

25.

Szigeti

, & Davis

(2002). Forum: The turning point for linking briefing and POE? Building Research & Information, 30(1), 47–53.

26.

Ulrich

R. S.

Berry

L. L.

Quan

, & Parish

J. T.

(2010). A conceptual framework for the domain of evidence-based design. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 4(1), 95–114.

27.

Ulrich

R. S.

Zimring

Zhu

DuBose

Seo

H.-B.

Choi

Y.-S.

Joseph

(2008). A review of the research literature on evidence-based healthcare design. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 1(3), 61–125.

28.

Vischer

(2009). Applying knowledge on building performance: From evidence to intelligence. Intelligent Building International, 1(4), 239–248.

29.

Vischer

, & Zeisel

(2008, July). Process management: Bridging the gap between research and design. Design & Health Scientific Review, 57–61.

30.

T. W. A.

Shen

Kelly

, & Hunter

(2007). An empirical study of the variables affecting construction project briefing/architectural briefing. International Journal of Project Management, 25(2), 198–212.

31.

Elf

& Wijk

(2014). Space planners' perception of an assessment instrument for briefs in the pre-design phase of new healthcare environments. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 8(1), 67–80.