A major challenge in the evidence-based design (EBD) practice model has been in determining the degree of credibility of specific (or a body of) evidence. This challenge has remained one of the key impediments to the broader adoption of EBD. Borrowing from evidence-based medicine and evidence-based practice literatures, this paper proposes a framework for evaluating evidence in EBD. Key to the proposed framework is the separation of the evaluation of strength and quality of evidence from the evaluation of appropriateness and feasibility in a specific application context.
AlmquistJ.KellyC.BrombergJ.BryantS.ChristiansonT., & MontoriV. (2009). Consultation room design and the clinical encounter: The space and interaction randomized trial. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 3(1), 41–54.
BeaucheminK., & HaysP. (1998). Dying in the dark: Sunshine, gender and outcomes in myocardial infarction. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 91(7), 352–354.
4.
Center for Health Design, The. (2009). Integrating evidence-based design: Practicing the healthcare design process. Concord, CA: Author.
5.
Center for Health Design, The. (2010). Definition of evidence-based design. Retrieved from http://edac.healthdesign.org/
6.
EvansD. (2003). Hierarchy of evidence: A framework for ranking evidence evaluating healthcare interventions. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 12, 77–84.
FitzgeraldC., & TramposchB. (1998). Soft opening post occupancy evaluation at Te Papa, the Museum of New Zealand. Visitor Studies Today, 1(2), 5–6.
9.
GuyattG.OxmanA.KunzR.VistG.YtterY., & SchunemannH. (2008a). Rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations: What is “quality of evidence” and why is it important to clinicians?British Medical Journal, 336, 995–998.
10.
GuyattG.OxmanA.VistG.KunzR.Falck-YtterY.Alonso-CoelloP.SchunemannH. (2008b). GRADE: An emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. British Medical Journal, 336, 924–926.
11.
HarbourR., & MillerJ. (2001). A new system for grading recommendations in evidence based guidelines. British Medical Journal, 323, 334–336.
12.
HaynesR. (2006). Of studies, syntheses, synopses, summaries, and systems: The “5S” evolution of information services for evidence-based health care decisions. ACP Journal Club, 145(3), A8.
13.
HendrichA.FayJ., & SorrelsA. (2004). Effects of acuity-adaptable rooms on flow of patients and delivery of care. American Journal of Critical Care, 13(1), 35–45.
14.
JosephA. (2006). The impact of light on outcomes in healthcare settings. Concord, CA: Center for Health Design.
15.
LatimerH.GutknechtH., & HardestyK. (2008). Analysis of hospital facility growth: Are we super-sizing healthcare. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 1(4), 70–88.
MillerP., & Jones-HarrisA. (2005). The evidence-based hierarchy: Is it time for change? A suggested alternative. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 28, 454–458.
18.
Nelson-PetersonD., & LeppaC. (2007). Creating an environment for caring using Lean principles of the Virginia Mason Production System. Journal of Nursing Administration, 37(6), 287–294.
19.
PatiD., & BarachP. (2010). Application of environmental psychology theories and frameworks to evidence-based healthcare design. In ValentínJ. & GamezL. (Eds.), Environmental psychology: New developments (pp. 1–36). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.
20.
PatiD.CasonC.HarveyT., & EvansJ. (2010). An empirical examination of patient room handedness in acute medical-surgical settings. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 4(1), 11–33.
21.
PatiD.HarveyT., & CasonC. (2008). Inpatient unit flexibility: Design characteristics of a successful flexible unit. Environment & Behavior, 40(2), 205–232.
PatiD.PietrzakM.DuthuD.George LeiT.VincentD.FranklinT.RansdellT. (2010). Airborne contamination control through directed airflow in the exam room: A pilot study using a membrane diffuser. Journal of Healthcare Engineering, 1(4), 655–674.
24.
PhillipsB.BallC.SackettD.BadenochD.StrausS.HaynesB., & DawesM. (2009). Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine—Levels of evidence. Retrieved from http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=1025
25.
PreiserW.RabinowitzH., & WhiteE. (1988). Post-occupancy evaluation. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
26.
ShepleyM.HarrisD., & WhiteR. (2008). Open-bay and single-family room neonatal intensive care units: Caregiver satisfaction and stress. Environment & Behavior, 40(2), 249–268.
27.
StankosM., & SchwarzB. (2007). Evidence-based design in healthcare: A theoretical dilemma. Interdisciplinary Design and Research e-Journal, 1(1). Retrieved from http://www.idrp.wsu.edu/Vo_1/stankos.pdf
28.
StetlerC. (2002). Evidence-based practice and the use of research: A synopsis of basic concepts & strategies to improve care. Washington, DC: NOVA Foundation.
29.
StetlerC., & CaramanicaL. (2007). Evaluation of an evidence-based practice initiative: Outcomes, strengths and limitations of a retrospective, conceptually-based approach. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 4(4), 187–199.
30.
StetlerC.MorsiD.RuckiS.BroughtonS.CorriganB.FitzgeraldJ.SheridanE. (1998). Utilization-focused integrative review in a nursing service. Applied Nursing Research, 11(4), 195–206.
31.
The AGREE Collaboration. (2001). Appraisal of guidelines for research & evaluation (AGREE) instrument. Retrieved from http://www.agreecollaboration.org
32.
UlrichR. (1984). View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science, 224(4647), 420–421.
33.
UlrichR.ZimringC.QuanX., & JosephA. (2004). The role of the physical environment in the hospital of the 21st century: A once-in-a-lifetime opportunity. Concord, CA: Center for Health Design.
34.
UlrichR.ZimringC.ZhuX.DuBoseJ.SeoH.ChoiY.JosephA. (2008). A review of the research literature on evidence-based healthcare design. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 1(3), 61–125.
35.
WatsonC. (2003). Review of building quality using post occupancy evaluation. Journal of the Programme on Educational Building, 2003/1(48), 15–18.
