Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2002). Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment, Number 47. Gaithersburg, MD: Author.
2.
ArmolaR. R.BourgaultA. M.HalmM. A.BoardR. M.BucherL.HarringtonL.MedinaJ. (2009). AACN levels of evidence: What's new?Critical Care Nurse, 29(4), 70–73.
3.
BeroL., & RennieD. (1995). The Cochrane collaboration: Preparing, maintaining, and disseminating systematic reviews of the effects of health care. Journal of the American Medical Association, 274(24), 1935–1938.
4.
GuyattG.GuttermanD.BaumannM. H.Addrizzo-HarrisD.HylekE. M.PhillipsB.RaskobG.SchünemannH. (2006). Grading strength of recommendations and quality of evidence in clinical guidelines. Chest, 129, 174–181.
5.
GuyattG. H.OxmanA. D.VistG. E.KunzR.Falck-YtterY., & SchünemannH. J. (2008). GRADE: What is “quality of evidence” and why is it important to physicians?British Medical Journal, 336, 995–998.
6.
KennyC. (2008). The best practice: How the new quality movement is transforming medicine. Philadelphia, PA: Perseus Books.
7.
MundenJ., & LockhartA. (Eds.). (2007). Best practices: Evidence-based nursing procedures (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
8.
StichlerJ. F. (2010). Weighing the evidence. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 3(4), 3–7.