The Effects of Nature Images on Pain in a Simulated Hospital Patient Room

Abstract

Background:

Views of nature have been reported to relieve stress and pain, making nature an ideal medium for use in healthcare settings. In hospitals whose design does not allow for a view of nature, virtual and surrogate views of nature may be viable therapeutic options.

Objective:

This study tests the effects of specific nature images, as defined by Appleton's prospect refuge theory of landscape preference, on participants experiencing pain. The hypotheses were: (1) Nature views are variable in their impact on specific psychological and physiological health status indicators; and (2) Prospect and refuge nature scenes are more therapeutic than hazard nature scenes. The research question was (1) Which nature image categories are most therapeutic as evidenced by reduced pain and positive mood?

Methods:

An experiment using mixed methods assessed the effects of four different nature scenes on physiological (blood pressure, heart rate) and psychological (mood) responses when a person was subjected to a pain stressor. Four groups were subjected to a specific nature image category of prospect, refuge, hazard, or mixed prospect and refuge; the fifth group viewed no image. The Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire and the Profile of Mood States survey instruments were used to assess pain and mood, respectively. Continuous physiological readings of heart rate and blood pressure were collected. Pain was induced through a cold pressor task, which required participants to immerse their nondominant hand in ice water for up to 120 seconds.

Results:

The mixed prospect and refuge image treatment showed significantly lower sensory pain responses, and the no-image treatment indicated significantly higher affective pain perception responses. The hazard image treatment had significantly lower diastolic blood pressure readings during the pain treatment, but it also had significantly high total mood disturbance.

Conclusions:

Although there was no clear “most” therapeutic image, the mixed prospect and refuge image showed significant potential to reduce sensory pain. The hazard image was the most effective at distracting participants from pain, but it should not be considered a positive distraction because it also received the highest mood disturbance scores of all groups.

Keywords

Clinical outcomes therapeutic photography hospital patient room interdisciplinary

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Appleton

(1996). The experience of landscape. Chichester, United Kingdom: Wiley.

Bell

P. A.

Greene

T. C.

Fisher

J. D.

, & Baum

(2001). Environmental psychology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Blakemore

, & Jennett

(2001). The Oxford companion to the body. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Cooper Marcus

, & Barnes

(1999). Healing gardens: Therapeutic benefits and design recommendations. New York, NY: Wiley.

Coss

R. G.

(1996). Biomedical aspects of picture perception. Progress report—Protocol No. 96-521R. Unpublished paper. University of California, Davis.

Diette

G. B.

Lechtzin

Haponik

Devrotes

, & Rubin

H. R.

(2003). Distraction therapy with nature sights and sounds reduces pain during flexible bronchoscopy. Chest, 123, 941–948.

Dilani

(2001). Psychosocially supportive design. In Dilani

(Ed.), Design and health—The therapeutic benefits of design (pp. 31–38). Stockholm, Sweden: International Academy for Design and Health.

Dilani

(2005). Psychosocially supportive design: As a theory and model to promote health. In Dilani

(Ed.), Design & health IV: Future trends in healthcare design (pp. 13–22). Stockholm, Sweden: Design & Health.

Edelman

G. M.

(1987). Neural Darwinism. New York, NY: Basic Books.

10.

Gatchel

R. J.

, & Turk

D. C.

(1999). Psychosocial factors in pain. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

11.

Heerwagen

J. H.

(1990). Windows, windowlessness and simulated view. In Environmental DesignResearch Association Symposium (EDRA 21) (pp. 269–280). Polytechnic Institute of New York, Brooklyn, New York.

12.

Johnston

(1988). Impending surgery. In Fisher

& Reason

(Eds.), Handbook of life stress, cognition and health (pp. 79–100). New York, NY: Wiley.

13.

Kaplan

(1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 169–182.

14.

Kaplan

, & Kaplan

(1989). The experience of nature. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

15.

Kaplan

, & Peterson

(1993). Health and environment. Landscape and Urban Planning, 26,17–23.

16.

Kincey

, & Saltmore

(1990). Surgical treatments. In Johnston

& Wallace

(Eds.), Stress and medical procedures (pp. 120–137). Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

17.

Lopez

S. J.

, & Snyder

C. R.

(2004). Positive psychological assessment. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

18.

Malenbaum

Keefe

F. J. de C.

Williams

A. C.

Ulrich

, & Somers

T. J.

(2008). Pain in its environmental context: Implications for designing environments to enhance pain control. Pain, 134, 241–244.

19.

McClelland

L. E.

, & McCubbin

J. A.

(2008). Social influence and pain response in women and men. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 31, 413–420.

20.

McNair

Lorr

Droppelman

, & Heuchert

(2003). Profile of mood states technical update 2003. North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems (MHS).

21.

Melzack

(1999). Pain and stress: A new perspective. In Gatchel

R. J.

& Turk

D. C.

(Eds.), Psychosocial factors in pain: Critical perspectives (pp. 89–106). New York, NY, & London, United Kingdom: Guilford Press.

22.

Melzack

(1987). The short-form McGill pain questionnaire. Pain, 30, 191–197.

23.

Miller

A. C.

Hickman

L. C.

, & Lemasters

G. K.

(1992). A distraction technique for control of burn pain. Journal of Burn Care & Rehabilitation, 13, 576–580.

24.

Park

S. H.

Matson

R. H.

, & Kim

(2004). Pain tolerance effects of ornamental plants in a simulated hospital patient room. Acta Horticulturae 639, pp. 241–247.

25.

RMNO, Health Council of the Netherlands & Dutch Advisory Council for Research on Spatial Planning, Nature, and the Environment. (2004). Nature and health: The influence of nature on social, psychological, and physical well-being. [Publication no. 2004/09E]. The Hague, Netherlands: Health Council of the Netherlands and RMNO.

26.

Ruso

Renninger

, & Atzwanger

(2003). Human habitat preferences: A generative territory for evolutionary aesthetics research. In Voland

& Grammer

(Eds.), Evolutionary aesthetics (pp. 279–294). Berlin, Germany: Springer.

27.

Saab

P. G.

Llabre

M. M.

Hurwitz

B. E.

Schneiderman

Wohlgemuth

Durel

L. A.

, & Nagel

(1993). The cold pressor test: Vascular and myocardial response Patterns and their stability. Psychophysiology, 30, 366–373.

28.

Sutton

K. R. C.

(2005). A study of the Mater Children's Hospital tile project. (Unpublished master's thesis.) Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia: Australian Catholic University.

29.

Syrjala

K. L.

, & Abrams

J. R.

(2002). Hypnosis and imagery in the treatment of pain. In Turk

D. C.

& Gatchel

R. J.

(Eds.), Psychological approaches to pain management: A practitioner's handbook (pp. 187–209). New York, NY, & London, United Kingdom: Guilford Press.

30.

Tse

Chung

, & Wong

(2002). The effect of visual stimuli on pain threshold and tolerance. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 11, 462–469.

31.

Turk

D. C.

(2002). A cognitive-behavioral perspective on treatment of chronic pain patients. In Turk

D. C.

& Gatchel

R. J.

(Eds.), Psychological approaches to pain management: A practitioner's handbook (pp. 138–158). New York, NY, & London, United Kingdom: Guilford Press.

32.

Turk

D. C.

, & Gatchel

R. J.

(2002). Psychological approaches to pain management: A practitioner's handbook. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

33.

Turk

D. C.

, & Winter

(2008). The pain survival guide. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

34.

Ulrich

R. S.

(1984). View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science, 224, 420–421.

35.

Ulrich

R. S.

(1991). Wellness by design: Psychologically supportive patient surroundings. Group Practice Journal. July/August, 10–19.

36.

Ulrich

R. S.

(1999). Effects of gardens on health outcomes: Theory and research. In Cooper-Marcus

& Barnes

(Eds.), Healing gardens' therapeutic benefits and design recommendations (pp. 27–86). New York, NY: Wiley.

37.

Ulrich

R. S.

, & Gilpin

(2003). Healing arts: Nutrition for the soul. In Frampton

S. B.

Gilpin

, & Charmel

P. A.

(Eds.), Putting patients first (pp. 117–146). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

38.

Ulrich

R. S.

Lunden

, & Eltinge

J. L.

(1993). Effects of exposure to nature and abstract pictures on patients recovering from open heart surgery. Society for Psychophysiological Research (U.S.) Meeting 33, S7.

39.

Ulrich

R. S.

Simons

R. F.

, & Miles

M. A.

(2003). Effects of environmental simulations and television on blood donor stress. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 20(1), 38–47.

40.

Ulrich

R. S.

Zimring

Quan

, & Joseph

(2006). The environment's impact on stress. In Marberry

(Ed.), Improving healthcare with better building design (pp. 37–61). Chicago, IL: Health Administration Press.

41.

Ulrich

R. S.

Zimring

Quan

Joseph

, & Choudhary

(2004). The role of the physical environment in the hospital of the 21st century: A once-in-a-lifetime opportunity. Concord, CA: Center for Health Design.

42.

Ulrich

R. S.

Zimring

Zhu

DuBose

Seo

H. B.

Choi

Y. S.

, & Joseph

(2008). A review of the research literature on evidence-based healthcare design. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 1(3), 61–125.

43.

Vincent

Battisto

, & Grimes

(in preparation). A methodology for selecting nature images for Appleton's prospect refuge theory.

44.

Vincent

Battisto

, & Grimes

(2010). The effects of presence and influence in nature images in a simulated hospital patient room. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 3(3), 56–69.