Evaluating Building Performance in Healthcare Facilities: An Organizational Perspective

Abstract

Purpose:

Using the environment as a strategic tool is one of the most cost-effective and enduring approaches for improving public health; however, it is one that requires multiple perspectives. The purpose of this article is to highlight an innovative methodology that has been developed for conducting comprehensive performance evaluations in public sector health facilities in Canada.

Background:

The building performance evaluation methodology described in this paper is a government initiative. The project team developed a comprehensive building evaluation process for all new capital health projects that would respond to the aforementioned need for stakeholders to be more accountable and to better integrate the larger organizational strategy of facilities.

Theoretical Framework:

The Balanced Scorecard, which is a multiparadigmatic, performance-based business framework, serves as the underlying theoretical framework for this initiative. It was applied in the development of the conceptual model entitled the Building Performance Evaluation Scorecard, which provides the following benefits: (1) It illustrates a process to link facilities more effectively to the overall mission and goals of an organization; (2) It is both a measurement and a management system that has the ability to link regional facilities to measures of success and larger business goals; (3) It provides a standardized methodology that ensures consistency in assessing building performance; and (4) It is more comprehensive than traditional building evaluations.

Conclusion:

The methodology presented in this paper is both a measurement and management system that integrates the principles of evidence-based design with the practices of pre- and post-occupancy evaluation. It promotes accountability and continues throughout the life cycle of a project. The advantage of applying this framework is that it engages health organizations in clarifying a vision and strategy for their facilities and helps translate those strategies into action and measurable performance outcomes.

Keywords

Building performance balanced scorecard management measurement public sector

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ashforth

(1985). Climate formation: Issues and extensions. Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 837–847.

Becker

(1981). Workspace. New York, NY: Praeger Publishers.

Becker

, & Steele

(1995). Workplace by design: Mapping the high performance workscape. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Berry

Parker

Coile

Hamilton

O'Neill

, & Sadler

(2004). The business case for better buildings. Frontiers of Health Services Management, 21(1), 3–24.

Bitner

(1992). Servicescapes: The impact of physical surroundings on customers and employees. Journal of Marketing, 56, 57–71.

BREEAM. (2007). BRE Environmental Assessment Method. Retrieved July 17, 2007, from http://www.breeam.org

CASBEE. (2006). Assessment Tool of CASBEE: Structure of CASBEE-NC Tool. Retrieved July 17, 2007, from http://www.ibec.or.jp/CASBEE

Chan

Beckman

, & Lawrence

(2007). Workplace design: A new managerial perspective imperative. California Management Review, 49(2), 6–22.

Grantham

(2000). The future of work: The promise of the new digital work society. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, Commerce Net Press.

10.

Green Guide for Health Care (GGHC). (2007). Green Guide for Health Care (Version 2.2). Retrieved July 5, 2007, from www.gghc.org

11.

Hamilton

D. K.

, & Sherman

(2005, August). Architecture as an organization development intervention. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Annual Meeting, Honolulu, HI.

12.

Hatch

(1997). Organization theory: Modern, symbolic and postmodern perspectives. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

13.

Healthcare Financial Management Association. (HFMA). (2003, November). Design for success: Efficiency and effectiveness through facility design. HFMA Real Estate, Design and Construction Review, 1–13.

14.

Heerwagen

(2002). A balanced scorecard approach to post-occupancy evaluation: Using the tools of business to evaluate facilities. In Federal Facilities Council, Board on Infrastructure and the Constructed Environment, & National Research Council (Eds.), Learning from our buildings: A state-of-the-practice summary of post-occupancy evaluation (pp. 79–87). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

15.

Homans

(1950). The human group. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace, & World.

16.

Horgen

Joroff

Porter

Schon

(1999). Excellence by design. New York, NY: Wiley.

17.

International Initiative for a Sustainable Built Environment. (2005). GBTool overview: Volume 107. Retrieved July 17, 2007, from http://www.greenbuilding.ca

18.

Kaplan

, & Norton

(1996). Translating strategy into action: The balanced scorecard. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

19.

Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED). (2007). LEED for healthcare rating system. U.S. Green Building Council. Retrieved November 20, 2007, from http://www.usgbc.org/LEED

20.

National Health Service. (2007). AEDET evolution: Design evaluation toolkit. Retrieved November 1, 2007, from http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_082089

21.

National Health Service. (2007). ASPECT: Staff and patient environment calibration toolkit. Retrieved November 1, 2007, from http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_082087

22.

Ouye

, & Bellas

(1999). The competitive workplace. Tokyo, Japan: Kokuyo.

23.

Pfeffer

(1982). Organization and organization theory. Marshfield, MA: Pitman Publishing.

24.

Preiser

, & Vischer

(2005). Assessing building performance. Burlington, MA: Elsevier.

25.

Radnor

, & Lovell

(2003). Success factors for implementation of The Balanced Scorecard in a NHS multi-agency setting. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 176(2), 99–108.

26.

Schneider

(1994). HRM—A service perspective: Towards a customer-focused HRM. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 5(1), 64–76.

27.

Schneider

, & Bowen

(1993). The service organization: Human resource management is crucial. Organizational Dynamics, 21(4), 39–52.

28.

Schneider

Ehrhart

Mayer

Saltz

, & Niles-Jolly

(2005). Understanding organization-customer links in service settings. Academy of Management Journal, 48(6), 1017–1032.

29.

Shiem-Shin Then

(2005, September). Assessing building performance: An integrated model. APEC Network Conference Presentation. Australia.

30.

Steele

(1973). Physical settings and organization development. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

31.

Sundstrom

(1986). Work places: The psychology of the physical environment in offices and factories. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

32.

Ulrich

R. S.

, & Zimring

(2004). The role of the physical environment in the hospital of the 21st century: A once in a lifetime opportunity. Concord, CA: The Center for Health Design.

33.

Ulrich

R. S.

(1984). View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science, 224(4647), 420–421.