Daylight is usually mentioned immediately after reduced energy use in conversations about sustainable building design, yet in North America, daylight remains the most-asked-for/least-delivered aspect of the caregiver work environment. In Europe, essentially the same care practices continue to be accommodated in daylit building configurations. Recognizing that the daylighting credits in Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) for new construction (NC) are more difficult for large healthcare projects to achieve during the design process, and that two daylighting credits are probably not enough of an incentive to change North American healthcare design practice, the Green Guide for Health Care (GGHC) has both simplified the process of calculating daylight achievement levels and increased the number of daylighting credits available from two to five.
de BottonA. (2006). The architecture of happiness. New York: Pantheon Books.
2.
BarryL.ParkerD.CoileR.HamiltonD. K.O'NeilD., & SadlerB. (2004). Can better buildings improve care and increase your financial returns?Frontiers of Health Services Management, 21(1).
3.
BenedettiF.ColomboC.BarbiniB.CamporiE., & SmeraldiE. (2001). Morning sunlight reduces length of hospitalization in bipolar depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 62(3), 221–223.
4.
BergslandK. (January 10, 2006). Building green and integrating nature: Rikshospitalet University Hospital in Oslo, Norway. Presentation at Green Healthcare Institutions: Health, Environment, and Economics, Institute of Medicine of the National Academies, Washington, DC.
5.
BoubekriM. (2004). An overview of the current state of daylight legislation. Journal of the Human-Environment System, 7(2), 57–63.
The Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment. (2004). The role of hospital design in the recruitment, retention and performance of NHS nurses in England. London: CABE. Copies available at www.cabe.org.uk
8.
Green Guide for Health Care, Best Practices for Creating High Performance Healing Environments. (2007). Version 2.2, January 2007. Available at www.gghc.org
9.
HillierW. (1996). Space is the machine. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10.
KatsG.AlevantisL.BermanA.MillsE., & PerlmanJ. (2003). The costs and financial benefits of green buildings: A report to California's Sustainable Building Task Force.
11.
KronerW., & Stark-MartinJ. (2002). Environmentally responsive workstations and office worker productivity. In LevinH. (Ed.), Proceedings of indoor environment and productivity. Atlanta, GA: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers.
12.
LoweG.ShellenbergG., & ShannonH. (2003). Correlates of employees' perceptions of a healthy work environment. American Journal of Health Promotion, 17(6), 390–399.
13.
MetzT. (2000). Behnisch, Behnisch & Partner let the environmentalists at the IBN-DLO Institute in Holland practice what they preach.
14.
PatiD.HarveyT. E.Jr., & BarachP. (2008). Relationships between exterior views and nurse stress: An exploratory examination. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 1(2), 27–38.
15.
SchultzE. (2006). A new future for old hospitals. In WagenaarC. (Ed.), The architecture of hospitals (pp. 494–499). Rotterdam, Netherlands. NAi Publishers.
16.
Stantec Architecture. (2008). Kaiser Permanente template study. Unpublished.
17.
UlrichR. (1984). View from a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science, 224(647), 420–421.
VerderberS., & FineD. (2000). Healthcare architecture in an era of radical transformation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
20.
WalchJ.M.RabinB.S.DayR.WilliamsJ. N.ChoiK., & KangJ. D. (2005). The effect of sunlight on postoperative analgesic medication use: A prospective study of patients undergoing spinal surgery. Psychosomatic Medicine, 67, 156–163.
21.
WilsonE. O. (1984). Biophilia: The human bond with other species. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
