The healthcare construction boom requires evidence for effective design of nurse stations, including evidence supporting workflow processes, computerization, integration of technology, communication of caregivers, and optimal patient outcomes. This article describes the examination of a traditional centralized nursing station using a total patient care delivery model and minimal computerization and a highly computerized, decentralized nursing station using a team nursing model. Results specific to communication activities, time with patients, number of patient visits per registered nurse, and patient satisfaction with response time are reported.
BurgioL.EngelB.HawkinsA.McCorickK., & ScheveA. (1990). A descriptive analysis of nursing staff behaviors in a teaching nursing home: Differences among NAs, LPNs and RNs. The Gerontologist, 30, 107–112.
3.
FletcherG.FlinR.McGeorgeP.GlavinR.MaranN., & PateyR. (2004). Rating non-technical skills: Developing a behavioral marker system for use in anesthesia. Cognition, Technology, and Work, 6, 165–171.
4.
HendrichA. (2003). Optimizing physical space for improved outcomes: Satisfaction and the bottom line. Paper presented at “Optimizing the Physical Space for Improved Outcomes, Satisfaction, and the Bottom Line,” mini-course sponsored by the Institute for Healthcare Improvement and the Center for Health Design, Atlanta, GA.
5.
HendrichA., & LeeN.Evidence-based design on nursing workspace in hospitals. In Keeping patients safe: Transforming the work environment of nurses.Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Retrieved June 5, 2007, from http://site.ebrary.com/lib/asulib/Doc?id=10051642&ppg=248
6.
Illuminating Engineering Society of North America. (2000). Lighting handbook.New York: IESNA.
KorstL.Eusebio-AngejaA.ChamorroT.AydinC., & GregoryK. (2003). Nursing documentation time during implementation of an electronic medical record. Journal of Nursing Administration, 33(1), 24–30.
10.
KruegerR.A., & CassonM. A. (2000). A practical guide for applied research.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
11.
MossJ., & XiaoY. (2004). Improving operating room coordination: Communication pattern assessment. Journal of Nursing Administration, 34(2), 93–100.
12.
PabstM.ScherubelJ., & MinnickA. (1996). The impact of computerized documentation on nurses' use of time. Computers in Nursing, 14(1), 25–30.
SmeltzerC.HinesP.BeebeH., & KellerB. (1996). Streamlining documentation: An opportunity to reduce costs and increase nurse clinicians' time with patients. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 10(4), 66–77.
16.
UlrichR.QuanX.ZimringC.JosephA., & ChoudharyZ. (2004). The role of the physical environment in the hospital of the 21st century: A once-in-a-lifetime opportunity report to the Center for Health Design for the Designing the 21st Century Hospital project.Concord, CA: Center for Health Design.
UrdenL., & RoodeJ. (1997). Work sampling: A decision-making tool for determining resources and work redesign. Journal of Nursing Administration, 27(9), 34–41.
19.
World Health Organization. (1999). Guidelines for community noise.Stockholm: Stockholm University and Karolinska Institute.
20.
XiaoY.SeagulF. J.MackenzieC.ZiegertJ., & KleinK. J. (2003). Team communication patterns as measures of team processes: Exploring the effects of task urgency and shared team experience. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 46th Annual Meeting.
21.
AgostiniJ. V., & BakerD. I. (2001). Chapter 26. Prevention of falls in hospitalized and institutionalized older people. In Making health care safer: A critical analysis of patient safety practices. (AHRQ Publication No. 01-E058). Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/ptsafety/
22.
BarrereC., & EllisP. (2002). Changing attitudes among nurses and physicians: A step toward collaboration. Journal for Healthcare Quality, 3, 24.
23.
BognerM. S. (1994). Human error in medicine.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24.
ChangJ. T.MortonS. C.RubensteinL. Z.MojicaW. A.MaglioneM.SuttorpM. J. (2004). Interventions for the prevention of falls in older adults: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials. British Medical Journal, 328(7441), 680–680.
25.
DonchinY., & SeagullF. J. (2002). The hostile environment of the intensive care unit. Current Opinion in Critical Care, 8(4), 316–320.
26.
First Consulting Group. (2004). Vocera communications: Vocera benefits study at St. Agnes Hospital. Cupertino, CA: First Consulting Group.
27.
HaysM. (2002). An exploratory study of supportive communication during shift report. Southern Online Journal of Nursing Research, 3, 3. 248
28.
HendrichA.FayJ., & SorrellsA. (2002, September). Courage to heal: Comprehensive cardiac critical care. Concord, CA: The Center for Health Design.
29.
HendrichA. L.BenderP. S., & NyhuisA. (2003). Validation of the Hendrich II Fall Risk Model: A large concurrent case/control study of hospitalized patients. Applied Nursing Research, 16(1), 9–21.
30.
HickamD. H.SeveranceS.FeldsteinA. (2003, April). The effect of health care working conditions on patient safety. Evidence report/technology assessment number 74. (AHRQ Publication No. 03-E.) Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
31.
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. (2000). Sentinel event alert. Issue 14. Retrieved January 15, 2007, from www.jcaho.org
32.
KruegerR. A. (1994). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications..
33.
KullerR., & LaikeT. (1998). The impact of flicker from fluorescent lighting on well-being, performance, and physiological arousal. Ergonomics, 41(4), 433–447.
34.
LiedermanE. M.LeeJ. C., & BaqueroV. H. (2005). Patient-physician web messaging: The impact on message volume and satisfaction. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 20(1), 52–57.
MackenzieC. F., & XiaoY. (2004). Stopping bad things from happening to good people in shock trauma center. In BognerM. S. (Ed.), Misadventures in health care: Inside stories (pp. 27–40). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
37.
ShepleyM. McCuskeyMarchM. A., & DaviesK. (2007). Nursing unit configuration and its relationship to noise and nurse walking behavior: An AIDS/HIV unit case study. (Electronic Version) Architecture: the AIA journal. Retrieved June 1, 2007, from http://www.ala.org/aah_a_jrnl_0401
38.
MillerE. T.DeetsC., & MillerR. V. (2001). Nurse call and the work environment: Lessons learned. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 15(3), 7–15.
39.
NyssenA. (2004). Integrating cognitive and collective aspects of work in evaluating technology. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, And Cybernetics—Part A: Systems And Humans, 34(6), 743.
40.
PattersonE.CookR.WoodsD., & RenderM. (2004). Examining the complexity behind a medication error: Generic patterns in communication. Systems and Humans.34(6), 749–756.
41.
PinelleD.GutwinC., & GreenbergS. (2003). Task analysis for groupware usability evaluation: Modeling shared-workspace tasks with the mechanics of collaboration. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 10(4), 281–311.
42.
ReilingJ. G. (2005, February). Creating a culture of patient safety through hospital design. In Advances in patient safety: From research to implementation.Volume 2, (AHRQ Publication Nos. 050021 1–4). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Retrieved May 15, 2007 from http://www.ahrq.gov/qual/advances/
43.
SpiveyM. A. (2002). Thesis: Web-based collaboration technology and requirements for peace operations. Monterey, California: Naval Postgraduate School.
44.
XiaoY. (2005). Artifacts and collaborative work in healthcare: Methodological, theoretical, and technological implications of the tangible. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 38, 26–33.
45.
XiaoY.LasomeC.MossJ.MackenzieC. F., & FarajS. (2001). Cognitive properties of a whiteboard: A case study in a trauma centre. In: PrinzW.JarkeM.RogersY.SchmidtK., & WulfV. (Eds.) Proceedings of the Seventh European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, 259–278. Bonn, Germany: Kluwer Academic.
